Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

GÖÇ, TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET VE AİLENİN YENİDEN YAPILANMASI: GÖÇMEN KADINLAR ÜZERİNE SOSYOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4, 1853 - 1869, 29.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1738371

Öz

Bu makale, kadın göçünü toplumsal cinsiyet, sınıf, etnisite ve aile rollerinin kesişiminde ele alan feminist ve kesişimsel bir perspektifle incelemektedir. Çalışma, bu alandaki uluslararası akademik çalışmaları eleştirel bir literatür incelemesi yöntemiyle değerlendirerek, göçün yalnızca ekonomik bir olgu olmadığını; aynı zamanda kadınların aile içindeki rollerini, emek biçimlerini ve bakım pratiklerini dönüştüren yapısal bir süreç olduğunu tartışmaktadır. Makale, göçmen kadınların deneyimlerine odaklanarak, ev içi emek, kayıt dışı istihdam, sınır ötesi annelik ve duygusal emek gibi temalar çerçevesinde kadınların karşılaştığı kırılganlıkları ve direniş stratejilerini incelemektedir. Bu çalışmada, mevcut akademik literatürde yer alan bulgular doğrultusunda, Suriyeli, Orta Asyalı ve Doğu Avrupalı göçmen kadınların Türkiye’deki konumlarına da kısaca değinilmektedir. Göçmen kadınların görünmeyen emeği, hem ekonomik hem de duygusal düzlemde ailelerin sürdürülebilirliğinde kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu makale, aileyi durağan ve çekirdek bir yapı olarak değil; kadınların hareketliliğiyle yeniden biçimlenen, esnek ve sınır ötesi bir kurum olarak kavramsallaştırmayı önermektedir. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma, hak temelli, kapsayıcı ve toplumsal cinsiyete duyarlı politikaların gerekliliğine dikkat çekmektedir.

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma için etik kurul onayı gerekmemektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Afsar, R. (2003). Internal migration and the development nexus: The case of Bangladesh. Regional Conference on Migration, Development and Pro-Poor Policy Choices in Asia, 22–24.
  • Afsar, R. (2011). Contextualizing gender and migration in South Asia: Critical insights. Gender, Technology and Development, 15(3), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/097185241101500304
  • Aksel, D., & Boşnak, B. (2022). Sivil toplum ve göç çalışmalarında köprüler kurmak: Türkiye örneği. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(Özel Sayı), 159–182.
  • Altıok, B., & Tosun, S. (2020). Understanding foreign policy strategies during migration movements: A comparative study of Iraqi and Syrian mass refugee inflows to Turkey. Turkish Studies, 21(5), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2019.1636115
  • Anderson, B. (2000). Doing the dirty work? The global politics of domestic labour. Zed Books.
  • Andrijasevic, R. (2003). The difference borders make: (Il)licit mobility and the politics of identification in post‐socialist Europe. Feminist Review, 73(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400081
  • Andrijasevic, R. (2007). Beautiful dead bodies: Gender, migration and representation in anti-trafficking campaigns. Feminist Review, 86(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400355
  • Bastia, T. (2005). Child trafficking or teenage migration? Bolivian migrants in Argentina. International Migration, 43(4), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2005.00342.x
  • Bastia, T. (2011). Migration as protest: Negotiating gender and class in Bolivia. Environment and Planning A, 43(7), 1514–1529. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43420
  • Collins, P. H. (1998). It's all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13(3), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01370.x
  • Crenshaw, K. (2013). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In Feminist legal theories (pp. 23-51). Routledge.
  • Day, S. (2010). Prostitution, trafficking and trafficking policy: Making migration work for women. Policy Press.
  • Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. R. (Eds.). (2002). Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. Metropolitan Books.
  • Erdoğan, M. M. (2019). Urban refugees in Turkey: Integration levels and future expectations. Turkish-German University Research Center on Migration and Integration.
  • Erman, T. (1998). Becoming "urban" or remaining "rural": The views of Turkish rural-to-urban migrants on the "integration" question. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 30(4), 541–561.
  • Federici, S. (2004). Women, land-struggles and globalization: an international perspective. Journal of Asian and African studies, 39(1-2), 47-62.
  • Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world (Vol. 31). Columbia University Press.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (2000). Global care chains and emotional surplus value. In W. Hutton & A. Giddens (Eds.), On the edge: Living with global capitalism (pp. 130–146). Jonathan Cape.
  • Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Pluto press.
  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2000). Feminism and migration. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 571(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620057100108
  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Avila, E. (1997). “I’m here, but I’m there”: The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. Gender & Society, 11(5), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124397011005003
  • International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2020). World migration report 2020. https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2020
  • İçduygu, A., & Yükseker, D. (2012). Rethinking transit migration in Turkey: Reality and re-presentation in the creation of a migratory phenomenon. Population, Space and Place, 18(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.679
  • Kalfa, E. (2010). Göçmen kadınların emeği, cinsiyeti ve bedeni: Ev içi hizmet sektöründe çalışan Gürcü kadınlar örneği. Kadın/Woman 2000, 11(1), 97–115.
  • Kofman, E., Phizacklea, A., Raghuram, P., & Sales, R. (2000). Gender and international migration in Europe: Employment, welfare, and politics. Routledge.
  • Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. Routledge.
  • Morokvasic, M. (1983). Women in migration: Beyond the reductionist outlook. UNESCO Reports and Papers in the Social Sciences, 46, 13–31.
  • Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford University Press.
  • Parreñas, R. S. (2005). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford University Press.
  • Pedraza, S. (1991). Women and migration: The social consequences of gender. Annual Review of Sociology, 17(1), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001511
  • Pettman, J. J. (1997). Body politics: International sex tourism. Third World Quarterly, 18(1), 93–108.
  • Raijman, R., Schammah-Gesser, S., & Kemp, A. (2003). International migration, domestic work, and care work: Undocumented Latina migrants in Israel. Gender & Society, 17(5), 727–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243203255559
  • Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nation. SAGE Publications.

MIGRATION, GENDER AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FAMILY: A SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE ON MIGRANT WOMEN

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4, 1853 - 1869, 29.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1738371

Öz

This article examines women’s migration from a feminist and intersectional perspective, focusing on the intersections of gender, class, ethnicity, and family roles. Drawing on a critical literature review of predominantly international scholarship, it argues that migration is not merely an economic phenomenon but also a structural process that reshapes women’s domestic roles, forms of labor, and care practices. The article focuses on the experiences of migrant women and analyzes the vulnerabilities they face and the strategies of resistance they develop, within the thematic framework of domestic labor, informal employment, transnational motherhood, and emotional labor. The positions of Syrian, Central Asian, and Eastern European migrant women in Türkiye are briefly discussed in light of examples and findings reported in the existing scholarly literature. The invisible labor of migrant women plays a crucial role in sustaining families not only economically but also emotionally. This article proposes conceptualizing the family not as a fixed and nuclear unit but as a flexible and transnational institution continually reshaped by women’s mobility. Ultimately, the study highlights the need for rights-based, inclusive, and gender-sensitive policies.

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee approval is not required for this study

Kaynakça

  • Afsar, R. (2003). Internal migration and the development nexus: The case of Bangladesh. Regional Conference on Migration, Development and Pro-Poor Policy Choices in Asia, 22–24.
  • Afsar, R. (2011). Contextualizing gender and migration in South Asia: Critical insights. Gender, Technology and Development, 15(3), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/097185241101500304
  • Aksel, D., & Boşnak, B. (2022). Sivil toplum ve göç çalışmalarında köprüler kurmak: Türkiye örneği. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(Özel Sayı), 159–182.
  • Altıok, B., & Tosun, S. (2020). Understanding foreign policy strategies during migration movements: A comparative study of Iraqi and Syrian mass refugee inflows to Turkey. Turkish Studies, 21(5), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2019.1636115
  • Anderson, B. (2000). Doing the dirty work? The global politics of domestic labour. Zed Books.
  • Andrijasevic, R. (2003). The difference borders make: (Il)licit mobility and the politics of identification in post‐socialist Europe. Feminist Review, 73(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400081
  • Andrijasevic, R. (2007). Beautiful dead bodies: Gender, migration and representation in anti-trafficking campaigns. Feminist Review, 86(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400355
  • Bastia, T. (2005). Child trafficking or teenage migration? Bolivian migrants in Argentina. International Migration, 43(4), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2005.00342.x
  • Bastia, T. (2011). Migration as protest: Negotiating gender and class in Bolivia. Environment and Planning A, 43(7), 1514–1529. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43420
  • Collins, P. H. (1998). It's all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13(3), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01370.x
  • Crenshaw, K. (2013). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In Feminist legal theories (pp. 23-51). Routledge.
  • Day, S. (2010). Prostitution, trafficking and trafficking policy: Making migration work for women. Policy Press.
  • Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. R. (Eds.). (2002). Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. Metropolitan Books.
  • Erdoğan, M. M. (2019). Urban refugees in Turkey: Integration levels and future expectations. Turkish-German University Research Center on Migration and Integration.
  • Erman, T. (1998). Becoming "urban" or remaining "rural": The views of Turkish rural-to-urban migrants on the "integration" question. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 30(4), 541–561.
  • Federici, S. (2004). Women, land-struggles and globalization: an international perspective. Journal of Asian and African studies, 39(1-2), 47-62.
  • Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world (Vol. 31). Columbia University Press.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (2000). Global care chains and emotional surplus value. In W. Hutton & A. Giddens (Eds.), On the edge: Living with global capitalism (pp. 130–146). Jonathan Cape.
  • Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Pluto press.
  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2000). Feminism and migration. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 571(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620057100108
  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Avila, E. (1997). “I’m here, but I’m there”: The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. Gender & Society, 11(5), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124397011005003
  • International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2020). World migration report 2020. https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2020
  • İçduygu, A., & Yükseker, D. (2012). Rethinking transit migration in Turkey: Reality and re-presentation in the creation of a migratory phenomenon. Population, Space and Place, 18(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.679
  • Kalfa, E. (2010). Göçmen kadınların emeği, cinsiyeti ve bedeni: Ev içi hizmet sektöründe çalışan Gürcü kadınlar örneği. Kadın/Woman 2000, 11(1), 97–115.
  • Kofman, E., Phizacklea, A., Raghuram, P., & Sales, R. (2000). Gender and international migration in Europe: Employment, welfare, and politics. Routledge.
  • Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. Routledge.
  • Morokvasic, M. (1983). Women in migration: Beyond the reductionist outlook. UNESCO Reports and Papers in the Social Sciences, 46, 13–31.
  • Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford University Press.
  • Parreñas, R. S. (2005). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford University Press.
  • Pedraza, S. (1991). Women and migration: The social consequences of gender. Annual Review of Sociology, 17(1), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001511
  • Pettman, J. J. (1997). Body politics: International sex tourism. Third World Quarterly, 18(1), 93–108.
  • Raijman, R., Schammah-Gesser, S., & Kemp, A. (2003). International migration, domestic work, and care work: Undocumented Latina migrants in Israel. Gender & Society, 17(5), 727–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243203255559
  • Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nation. SAGE Publications.
Toplam 34 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sosyal Politika (Diğer)
Bölüm Derleme
Yazarlar

Özge Kaytan 0000-0002-5456-6996

Gönderilme Tarihi 9 Temmuz 2025
Kabul Tarihi 7 Ekim 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Kaytan, Ö. (2025). GÖÇ, TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET VE AİLENİN YENİDEN YAPILANMASI: GÖÇMEN KADINLAR ÜZERİNE SOSYOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27(4), 1853-1869. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1738371