Worldly asceticism as the ethic of vocation in the interpretation of max weber

Öz

The explosive power of Max Weber's thesis derived from the correlation of two concepts, Protestantism and capitalism. The words capitalism or spirits of capitalism are used in a very particular sense. They mean no less than the entire inner structure governing Western society's attitudes. Not only its economy but also its legal system, its political structure, its institutionalized sciences and technology, its mathematically based music and architecture. Its economic modes of operation, works discipline and accountancy methods are all regarded as a whole life is rationality by Max Weber.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Max weber'in yorumunda meslek ahlakı olarak dünyevi asketikizm

Öz

Max Weber'in hararetle tartışılan tezi, Protestanlık ve kapitalizm olmak üzere iki kavramdan kaynaklanmıştır. Kapitalizm veya kapitalizmin ruhu kelimeleri, çok özel anlamları içinde kullanılmaktadır. Bu kavramlar, Batı toplumunun içyapısını bütünüyle hükmü altına alan tutumlarından başka bir anlamı taşımamaktaydı. Yalnızca ekonomiyle değil, yasal sistemiyle, siyasal yapısıyla, kurumsallaşmış bilim ve teknoloji dokusuyla, matematiksel bir temele oturmuş müziğiyle ve mimarisiyle bütünlük göstermekteydi. İşlerin ekonomik yürütülüşü, Max Weber tarafından bir bütün olarak ekonomik hayatın rasyonelleşmesi olarak dikkate alınan, çalışma disiplini ve muhasebe esaslarına göre işlemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kapitalizm, Protestanlık, Meslek Ahlakı, Dünyevi Asketikizm

Kaynakça

1. Blayney, I. W. (1957). The age of Luther: the spirit of Renaissance- Humanism and the reformation, New York: Vantage Press.
2. Bottner, L. (1932). The reformed doctrine of Predestination, Philadelphia: The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing.
3. Brubaker, R. (1984). The Limits of rationality: an essay on the social and moral thought of Max Weber. London: Allan&Unwin.
4. Cohen, C. L. (1986). God’s Caress: The psychology of Puritan religious experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Forell, G. W. (1964). Faith active in love: an investigation of principles under lying Luther’s social ethics. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publisher.
6. Freytag, G. (1910). Martin Luther. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing.
7. Kooman, W. J. (1954). By Faith alone: the life of Martin Luther, London: Lutterworth Press.
8. KMŞ (2004). Kutsal kitap eski ve yeni antlaşma (Tevrat, Zebur, İncil). İstanbul: Kitab-ı Mukaddes Şirketi.

9. Lecky, W. E. H. (1955). History of the rise and influence of the Rationalism in Europe. New York: G. Braziller.
10. McGrath, A. E. (1910). A life of John Calvin: a study of the shaping of Western culture. Cambridge: Mass Brassil Blackwell.
11. Oberman, H. A. (1985). Luther: man between God and the Devil. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
12. Poggi, G. (1983) Calvinism and Capitalist spirit: Max Weber’s Protestant ethic. Amberst: University of Massachusetts Press.
13. Schmidt, A. M. (1960). John Calvin and Calvinist tradition. New York: Harper.
14. Schneider, H. (1958). Puritan mind. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15. Watson, P. S. (1947). Let god be god. an interpretation of the theology of Martin Luther. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
16. Weber, M. (1984). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of Capitalism. London: George Allen and Unwin.
17. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. California: University of California Press.
18. Weber, M. (1964). The sociology of religion. London: Methuen Press.
19. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
20. Weber, M. (1950). General economic history. New York: Free Press Glencoe.
21. Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
22. Weber, M. (1966). The city. New York: Free Press.
23. Weber, M. (1968). Basic concepts in sociology. New York: Citadel.
24. Weber, M. (1967). Ancient Judaism. London: Collier MacMillan.
25. Weber, M. (1969). On charisma and institution building. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Weber, M. (1948). Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.