The role of organizational health in determining organizational effectiveness with competing values approach: A research on the four and five star hotels in the city centre of Izmir

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3 , 477 - 510 , 01.04.2013

Avşar Kurgun Demet Bağıran

https://izlik.org/JA27PJ86JJ

Öz

The purpose of this study is to determine the dimensions of organizational health and organizational effectiveness in four and five star hotels in the city of İzmir and the relationship between organizational health dimensions and organizational effectiveness. To measure organizational health, dimensions developed by Lyden and Klingele (2000) and to measure organizational effectiveness, dimensions developed by Quin and Rohrbaugh (1981, 1983) were employed. In order to achieve the validity of measurement models and the consistency of the proposed model showing the relationship between organizational health dimensions and organizational effectiveness, a confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were performed. In an overall measurement models, the adequacy and the reliability of indicators were proved by measuring the composite reliability, the estimated percentage of variance extracted by each construct, discriminant and convergent validity. The results of DFA confirmed the seven dimensional nature of the organizational health and the nine dimensional nature of the organizational effectiveness. “Loyalty and morale, institutional reputation and ethics, development and resource utilization" dimensions were found to be effective in predicting organizational effectiveness in consequence of testing the structural equation model 1. As a result of the findings obtained from the proposed models in order to test the relationship between organizational health dimensions and organizational effectiveness dimensions, “development and resource utilization” dimension was determined as the reference dimension to predict organizational effectiveness. In addition, the findings indicated that “communication” dimension does not explain any dimension of organizational effectiveness.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational health , Organizational Effectiveness , Competing Values Approach , Hotels , Structural Equation Model.

Rekabetçi değerler yaklaşımı ile örgütsel etkinliğin belirlenmesinde örgütsel sağlığın rolü: İzmir ili merkezindeki dört ve beş yıldızlı otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma

https://izlik.org/JA27PJ86JJ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, İzmir ili merkezindeki dört ve beş yıldızlı otellerde örgütsel sağlık ve örgütsel etkinlik boyutlarının belirlenmesi ve örgütsel sağlık boyutları ile örgütsel etkinlik arasındaki ilişkinin tespit edilmesidir. Örgütsel sağlık ölçümünde Lyden ve Klingele'nin (2000), örgütsel etkinlik ölçümünde, Quin ve Rohrbaugh'un (1981, 1983) geliştirdiği boyutlardan yararlanılmıştır. Ölçüm modellerinin geçerliliğini ve örgütsel sağlık boyutları ve örgütsel etkinlik arasındaki ilişkiyi gösteren yapısal modelin uygunluğunu sağlamak için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ve yapısal eşitlik modeli yürütülmüştür. Ölçüm modellerindeki göstergelerin yeterliği ve güvenilirliği; bileşik güvenilirlik, örtük değişkenlerin açıklanan varyans değerleri, ayırıcı ve yakınsak geçerliliğin ölçülmesi ile sağlanmıştır. DFA sonucunda, araştırmadaki otel işletmelerinde örgütsel sağlığın yedi, örgütsel etkinliğin ise dokuz boyuttan oluştuğu doğrulanmıştır. Yapısal eşitlik modeli 1'in test edilmesi sonucunda örgütsel etkinliğin tahminlenmesinde “sadakat ve moral, kurumsal itibar ve etik, gelişme ve kaynak kullanımı” boyutlarının etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Örgütsel sağlık boyutları ile örgütsel etkinlik boyutları arasındaki ilişkiyi test etmek amacıyla önerilen yapısal modellerden elde edilen bulgular sonucunda "gelişme ve kaynak kullanımı" boyutu örgütsel etkinliğin tahminlenmesinde referans boyut olarak belirlenmiştir. Ek olarak, bulgular örgütsel sağlığın "iletişim" boyutunun örgütsel etkinliğin hiçbir boyutunu açıklamadığını ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Sağlık , Örgütsel Etkinlik , Rekabetçi Değerler Yaklaşımı , Otel İşletmeleri , Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli.

Kaynakça

• Anantharaman, R. N. ve Chacko, A. (1997). Organizational climate: a predictor of organizational effectiveness. Malaysian Management Review, 32 (3)
• http://portal.mim.org.my/resources/MMR/9709/970907.Htm, (17.04.2011)
• Anderson, J. C. ve Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 411–423
• Ashforth, B. E. (1985). Climate formation: issues and extensions. Academy of Management Review, 10 (4): 837–847
• Aytaç, S. (2003). Çalışma psikolojisi alanında yeni bir yaklaşım: örgütsel sağlık. İş, Güç, Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 5 (2)
• http://www.isguc.org/?p=article&id=163&cilt=5&sayi=2&yil=2003 (15.03.2013)
• Baumgartner, H. ve Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (2), 139-161
• Bennett, P. D. (1995). Dictionary of marketing terms. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books
• Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models
• Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2): 238-246
• Bentler, P. ve Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88: 591-606
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
• New York: The Guilford Press
• Browne, J. (2002). Validation of the healthy work organizations model
• Journal of American Academy of Business, 1 (2): 206-214
• Browne, M. W. ve Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. İçinde K. A. Bollen ve S. Long (Der.) Testing structural equation models: 131- 161. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications
• Byrne, N. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer
• Çakar, N. D., Yıldız, S. ve Dur, S. (2010). Bilgi yönetimi ve örgütsel etkinlik ilişkisi: örgüt kültürü ve örgüt yapısının temel etkileri. Ege Akademik Bakış/Ege Academic Review, 10 (1): 71-93
• Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32 (5): 539-553
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. ve Rhodes, E. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science, 27 (6): 668-697
• Chester, I. B. (1938). The function of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
• Conolly, T., Colon, E. M. ve Deutch, S. J. (1980). Organizational effectiveness: a multiple constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5 (2): 211-219
• Cox, T. ve Howarth, I. (1990). Organizational health, culture and helping
• Work&Stress, 4 (2): 107- 110
• Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21 (3): 619-654
• Denison, D. R., Haaland, S. ve Goelzer, P. (2004). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness: is Asia different from the rest of the world?
• Organizational Dynamics, 33 (1): 98-109
• Denison, D. R. ve Mishra, A. K. (1989). Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: a theory and some preliminary empirical evidence
• www.denisonconsulting.com/Libraries/Resources/Denison-1989-Preliminary- Evidence.sflb.ashx (17.04.2011)
• Denison, D. R. ve Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6 (2): 204-223
• Diamantopoulos, A. ve Siguaw, J. (2000). Introducing LISREL. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
• Dive, B. (2004). The healthy organization: a revolutionary approach to people and management, (2. Baskı). United States: Kogan Page
• Etzioni, A. (1960). Two approaches to organizational analysis: a critique and suggestion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5 (2): 257-278
• Fey, C. F. ve Denison, D. R. (2003). Organizational culture and effectiveness: can American theory be applied in Russia?. Organization Science, 14 (6): 686-706
• Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39–50
• Friedlander, F., ve Pickle, H. (1968). Components of effectiveness in small organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13 (2): 289-304
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P. ve Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: an introduction, 8th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
• Georgopoulos, B. S. ve Tannenbaum, A. S. (1957). A study of organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 22 (5): 534-540
• Gregory, B. T., Harris, S. G., Armenakis, A. A. ve Shook, C. L. (2009)
• Organizational culture and effectiveness: a study of values, attitudes, and organizational outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 62 (7): 673-679
• Hannan, M. T. ve Freeman, J. (1977). Obstacles to comparative studies
• İçinde P. S. Goodman ve J. H. Pennings (Der.) New perspectives on organizational effectiveness: 106-131. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
• Henri, J. F. (2004). Performance measurement and organizational effectiveness: bridging the gap. Managerial Finance, 30 (6): 93-123
• Herzberg, F. (1974). The wise old Turk. Harward Business Review, 52 (5): 70- 80
• Hitt, M. A. ve Middlemist, R. D. (1979). A methodology to develop the criteria and criteria weightings for assessing subunit effectiveness in organizations
• Academy of Management Journal, 22 (2): 356-374
• Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J. ve Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open schools /healthy schools. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
• Hu, L. ve Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. İçinde R. Hoyle (Der.) Structural equation modelling: concepts, issues and applications: 76-99
• Thousand Oak, CA: Sage
• Hubert, J. A. (1984). The relationship of school organizational health and teacher need satisfaction to teacher stress. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45(5)-A: 1343
• Jaffe, D. T. (1995). The healthy company: research paradigms for personal and organizational health. İçinde S.L. Sauter ve L.R. Murphy (Der) Organizational risk factors for job stress: 13-40. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. İçinde A. S. Golderger ve O. D. Duncan (Der.) Structural equation models in the social sciences: 85-112. New York: Academic Press
• Jöreskog, K. G. ve Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL VIII manual. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software
• Kalliath, T.J., Bluedorn, A.C. ve Strube, M. J. (1999). A test of value congruence effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 (7): 1175-1198
• Karasar N. (1998). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım
• Keeley, M. (1978). A social-justice approach to organizational evaluation
• Administrative Science Quarterly, 23 (2): 272-292
• Kentucky State University Organizational Health Survey, (2005)
• http://www.kysu.edu/about/divisions/officeofthepresident/institutionalresearch/Sur veys.htm, (17.04.2011)
• Kimpston, R. D., ve Sonnabend, L. C. (1975). Public secondary schools: the interrelationship between organizational health and innovativeness and between organizational health and staff characteristics. Urban Education, 10 (1): 27-45
• Köseoğlu, M. A. ve Karayormuk, K. (2009). Örgüt sağlığı nedir? Yöneticiler arasında görüş farklılığı var mıdır?. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23 (2): 175-193
• Lim, S., ve Murphy, L. (1999). The relationship of organizational factors to employee health and overall effectiveness. American Journal of Industrial Medicine Supplement, 36 (1): 64-65
• Lopez-Cabrales, A., Vale, R. ve Herrero, I. (2006). The contribution of core employees to organizational capabilities and efficiency. Human Resource Management, 45 (1): 81-109
• Lyden, J. A. ve Klingele, W. E. (2000). Supervising organizational health
• Supervision, 61 (12): 3-6
• Mahoney, T. A. ve Weitzel, W. (1969). Managerial models of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14 (3): 357-365
• Marcoulides, G. ve Heck R. (1993). Organizational culture and performance: proposing and testing a model. Organization Science, 4 (2): 209-225
• McHugh, M., Humphreys, P. ve Mclvor, R. (2003). Buyer-supplier relationships and organizational health. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39 (2): 15-25
• Miles, M. B. (1969). Planned change and organizational health: figure and ground. İçinde F. D. Carver ve T. J. Sergiovanni (Der.) Organizations and human behavior: 375-391. New York: Mcgraw- Hill
• Miles, M. B. (1971). Planned change and organizational health: change process in the public schools. Oregon: University of Oregon Press
• Miller, R. L., Griffin, M. A. ve Hart, P. M. (1999). Personality and organizational health: the role of conscientiousness. Work & Stres, 13 (1): 7-19
• Mott, P. E. (1972). The characteristics of effective organizations. New York: Harper and Row
• Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Alstine, J. V., Bennett, N., Lind, S. ve Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6 (1): 1-55
• Neugebauer, R. (1990). Do you have a healthy organization? Exchange, 1990 (72): 38-41
• Nunnally, J. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
• Ostroff, C. ve Schmitt, N. (1993). Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6): 1345-1361
• Özdamar, K. (2002). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi
• Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi
• Özdemir, A. (2010). Yönetim biliminde ileri araştırma yöntemleri ve uygulamalar. İstanbul: Beta Basım A.Ş
• Pfeffer, J. (1977). Usefulness of the concept. İçinde P. S. Goodman ve J
• M. Pennings (Der.) New perspectives on organizational effectiveness: 132-143. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
• Podgurski, T. P. (1990). School effectiveness as it relates to group consensus and organizational health of elementary schools. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
• Poulin, L. ve Leclerc, S. (2004). Organizational health evaluation and implementation process. Final Report Presented To The Canada Council For The Arts: 1-53. http://www.canadacouncil.ca/NR/rdonlyres/85171F2C-853C-439B- A9D310F7F78C7B58/0/OrganizationalHealthLPoulinNov252004.pdf, (17.04.2011)
• Pounder, J. S. (1997). Organizational effectiveness in higher education: towards an operational definition. Hong Kong Institute of Business Studies: 1-33, http://www.library.ln.edu.hk/eresources/etext/hkibs/hkws_0008.pdf, (17.04.2011)
• Price, J. L. (1972). Handbook of organizational management. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath
• Quick, J. C., Quick, J. D., Nelson, D. L. ve Hurrell, J. J. (1997). Preventive stress management in organizations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
• Quinn, R. E. ve Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 5 (2): 122-140
• Quinn, R. E. ve Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis
• Management Science, 29 (3): 363-377
• Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). Operationalizing the competing values approach: measuring performance in the employment service. Public Productivity Review, 5 (2): 141-159
• Rosen, R. (1991). The healthy company. Los Angeles: Tarcher
• Schneider, B., Gunnarson, S. K. ve Niles, J. K. (1994). Creating the climate and culture of success. Organizational Dynamics, 23 (1): 17-29
• Seashore, S. E. ve Yuchtman, E. (1967). Factorial analysis of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12 (3): 377-395
• Shoaf, C., Genaidy, A., Karwowski, W. ve Huang, S. H. (2004). Improving performance and quality of working life: a model for organizational health assessment in emerging enterprises. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 14 (1): 81-95
• Siehl, C. ve Martin J. (1990). Organizational culture: a key to financial performance? İçinde B. Schneider (Der.) Organizational climate and culture: 241- 81. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
• Steers, R. M. (1977). Organizational effectiveness: a behavioral view
• Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear
• Steiger, J. H. ve Lind, J. M. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA. May 30, 1980
• Stevens, J. M., Beyer, J. M. ve Trice, H. M. (1978). Assessing personal, role and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 21 (3): 380-396
• Tsui, K. T. ve Cheng, Y. C. (1999). School organizational health and teacher commitment: a contingency study with multi-level analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5 (3): 249–268
• Webb, R. J. (1974). Organizational effectiveness and the voluntary organization. Academy of Management Journal, 17 (4): 663-677
• Williams, B.W. (2010). Organizational health and mindfulness as predictors of school effectiveness: using the balanced scorecard. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Graduate School of The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
• Wilson, B. R.A. ve Wagner, D. I. (1997). Developing organizational health at the worksite. American Journal of Health Studies, 13 (2): 105-108
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y.ve Erdoğan, S. (2007). SPSS uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık
• Yılmaz, C. ve Ergun, E. (2008). Organizational culture and firm effectiveness: an examination of relative effects of culture traits and the balanced culture hypothesis in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 43 (3): 290-306
• Yuchtman, E. ve Seashore, S. E. (1967). A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 32 (6): 891-903
• Zwetsloot, G. ve Pot, F. (2004). The business value of health management
• Journal of Business Ethics, 55 (2): 115-124