ACCESS TO THE EU LABOUR MARKET FOR THE THIRD COUNTRY NATIONALS: THE CASE OF FREE MOVEMENT OF THE WORKERS BETWEEN TURKEY AND THE EU

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1 , 33 - 52 , 31.08.2015

Maciej Cesarz

https://doi.org/10.16953/deusbed.72942

Cited By: 1

https://izlik.org/JA96NX87MR

Öz

Abstract

The decreasing demography and visible deficit of labour force raise a question of the future steps taken by the EU and its Member States to solve these problems affecting the economy of the whole Europe. Although much attention is paid to recently established instruments of the EU immigration policy with the aim to attract workers from Third States, the attempts to facilitate an access to internal market by Turkish nationals should be particularly considered.  The constantly increasing role of the Republic of Turkey as a regional power stabilising the Balkans and Middle East puts the EU under political pressure, forcing the Member States to take a final decision on Turkey's place in the European economy and the legal status of Turkish labour within freedoms offered within the internal Market. This paper aims to examine the legal framework and main principles governing the free movement of Turkish workers in the EU. It identifies the EU-Turkish relations from the perspective of individuals searching an access to European labour market with particular emphasis on their rights arising from the so called association law and formal obstacles that Turkish workers encounter when exercising these rights.

Keywords: Association Law, Free Movement of the Workers in the EU, Turkish Workers, EU Visa Policy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Association Law , Free Movement of the Workers in the EU , Turkish

ÜÇÜNCÜ ÜLKE VATANDAŞLARININ AB İŞGÜCÜ PİYASASINA ERİŞİMİ: TÜRKİYE VE AB ARASINDA İŞÇİLERİN SERBEST DOLAŞIMI ÖRNEĞİ

https://izlik.org/JA96NX87MR

Öz

Azalan nüfus ve gözle görülür işgücü açığı gibi bütün Avrupa ekonomisini etkileyen sorunlar, AB ve üye ülkeler tarafından bu sorunları çözmeye yönelik yakın gelecekte atılacak adımlar konusundaki tartışmaları gündeme getirmiştir. AB göç politikasının üçüncü ülkelerden gelen çalışanları cezbeden yeni araçları dikkate değer olmakla birlikte, Türk vatandaşlarının tek pazara ulaşımını kolaylaştıran girişimlerin özel olarak değerlendirilmesi gerekmektedir. Balkanları ve Ortadoğu’yu dengeleyen bölgesel bir güç olarak Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin giderek artan önemi, AB’yi siyasi baskı altına almakta, Türkiye’nin Avrupa ekonomisindeki yeri ve Türk işgücünün iç pazar ile sağlanan özgürlükler dahilindeki yasal statüsü hakkında üye ülkeleri nihai bir karar almaya zorlamaktadır. Bu makale Türk çalışanların AB’deki serbest dolaşımını düzenleyen yasal çerçeveyi ve temel ilkeleri ortaya koymayı amaçlamakta ve AB-Türkiye ilişkilerini Avrupa işgücü piyasasına kişilerin erişiminde söz konusu ortaklık hukukundan doğan hakları ve Türk işçilerin bu haklar uygulanırken karşılaştığı yasal engeller bağlamında tanımlamaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ortaklık Hukuku , AB’de İşçilerin Serbest Dolaşımı , Türk

Kaynakça

• Additional Protocol and Financial Protocol annexed to the Agreement establishing the Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey and on measures to be taken for their entry into force, signed on 23 November 1970 (Brussels), entered into force on 1 January 1973, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:21970A1123(01):EN:NOT
• Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, signed on 12 September 1963 (Ankara), entered into force on 1 December 1964, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri =CELEX:21964A1229(01):EN:NOT
• Aktas, M. (2010). What are the politics of labour mobility between turkey and the EU and to what extent do IR theories explain this politics. Unpublished Master Thesis. University of Twente, School of Management and Governence, Enschede.
• Apap, J., Carrera, S. and Kirişci, K. (2004). Turkey in the EU Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. CEPS EU-Turkey Working Papers No. 3.
• Barrett, G. (2003). Family matters: European Community law and third-country family members. Common Market Law Review, 40 (2): 369-421.
• Baysan, A. (2013). Multiple arenas and diverse techniques of securitisation: The case of the EU’s Visa Regime towards Turkey. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 9 (5): 740-758.
• Bechev, D. (2013, 22nd October). A breath of fresh air in EU-Turkey accession talks. http://www.ecfr.eu/blog/entry/a_breath_of_fresh_air_in_eu_turkey _accession_talks, (10.10.2014).
• Castles, S. (2006). Back to the future? Can Europe meet its labour needs through temporary migration? International Migration Institute, Working Paper No. 1.
• Cesarz, M. (2013). The European Union’s Blue Card System - Legal foundations, principles and controversies. J. Dyduch, M. Michalewska-Pawlak, and R. Murphy (Eds.) European Union development. Challenges and strategies: In 239-257. Warszawa: Aspra.
• Council Regulation (EC) No. 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, [21.03.2001], OJ L81, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri= CONSLEG:2001R0539:20110111:EN:PDF
• Çiçekli, B. (2004). “Legal Integration of Turkish Immigrants under the Turkish-EU Association Law”. The Journal of Turkish Weekly, 2 November 2004. http://www.turkishweekly.net/2004/11/02/article/legal-integration-of-turkish-im migrants-under-the-turkish-eu-association-law/, (08.04.2014).
• Euractive (2014). “European Court of Justice bans German language requirement for Turkish spouse visas”. http://www.euractiv.com/sections/global-europe/european-court-justice-bans-german-language-requirement-turkish-spouse-visas, (11.10.2014).
• Göçmen, I. (2009). Started to shine, but how brightly? Standstill provisions in Association Law between Turkey and the Community. Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy, 5: 151-193.
• Groenendijk, C. A. and Guild, E. (2010). Visa policy of Member States and the EU towards Turkish nationals after Soysal. Economic Development Foundation Publications, No. 232.
• Holscher, L. C. (2012). Cross-border relations between Turkey and the European Union-An analysis of the freedom of services for Turkish Nationals. Unpublished Bachelor Thesis. University of Twente, School of Management and Governence, Enschede.
• İçduygu, A., Göker, G. Z., Tokuzlu, L. B. and Elitok S. P. (2013). MPC-Migration profile: Turkey. European University Institute, Migration Policy Centre Publication.
• İçduygu, A. and Karaçay, A. B. (2012). Demography and migration in transition: Reflections on EU-Turkey relations. S. P. Elitok, T. Straubhaar (Eds.) Turkey, Migration and the EU: Potentials, Challenges and Opportunities: In 19-38. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press.
• Kirişci, K. (2014, 4th February). Will the readmission agreement bring the EU and Turkey together or pull them apart? CEPS Commentary, http://www.ceps. eu/system/files/KK%20EU-Turkey%20readmission%20agreement.pdf, (03.11.2014).
• Oğuz, G. (2012). The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Turkish Labour Migration. International Journal of Economic & Administrative Studies, 4 (8): 151-157.
• Özsöz, M. (2013). Turkey’s Visa Policy towards nationals of EU Member States: A scenario of Visa-Free travel for all EU nationals to Turkey. Economic Development Foundation (İKV) Research Report.
• Peers, S. (1996). Towards equality. Actual and potential rights of third-country nationals in the European Union. Common Market Law Review, 33 (1): 7-50.
• Polat, C. (2013). Effects of Ankara Agreement within the Community Legal Order. Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 1 (1): 151-171.
• Regulation (EC) No. 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code), [15.09.2009] OJ L243, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri =OJ:L:2009:243:0001:0058:en:PDF
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs, www.mfa.gov.tr, (01.12.2014).
• Stiglmayer, A. (2012). Visa-Free Travel for Turkey: in Everybody’s Interest. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 11 (1): 99-109.
• Tezcan-Idriz, N. and Slot, P. J. (2010). Free Movement of Persons Between Turkey and the EU: the Hidden Potential of Article 41 (1) of the Additional Protocol. Centre for Law of EU External Relations Working Paper 2: 1-19.
• Yalincak, O. H. (2013). Freedom of Movement Rights of Turkish Nationals in the European Union. Columbia Journal of European Law, 19 (3): 391-422.
• Case law
• Case 53/81 Levin v Staatssecretaris van Justitie [1982] ECR 1035.
• Case C 12/86 Meryem Demirel v Stadt Schwäbisch Gmünd [1987] ECR 03719.
• Case C-192/89 Sevince v Staatssecretaris van Justitie [1990] ECR. I-3461.
• Case C 237/91 Kuş v Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden [1992] ECR I-06781.
• Case C-103/94 Krid [1995] ECR I-719.
• Case C 277/94 Taflan-Met v. Bestuur van de Sociale Verzekeringsbank [1996] ECR I-04085.
• Case C-58/93 Yousfi [1994] ECR I- 1353.
• Case C-351/95 Selma Kadıman v. Freistaat Bayern [1997] ECR I-2133.
• Case C-386/95 Eker v. Land Baden-Württenberg [1997] ECR I-2697.
• Case C-36/96 Faik Günaydın and Others v. Freistaat Bayern [1997] ECR I-5143.
• Case C-210/97 Akman [1998] ECR I-7519.
• Case 1/97 Mehmet Birden v. Stadtgemeinde Bremen [1998] ECR I-7747.
• Case 329/97 Sezgin Ergat v. Stadt Ulm. [2000] ECR I-1487.
• Case C-37/98 The Queen, ex parte: Abdul Nasir Savas v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2000] ECR I-2927.
• Case C-65/98 Safet Eyüp v. Landesgeschäftsstelle des Arbeitsmarktservice Vorarlberg [2000] ECR I-4747.
• Case C-37/98 The Queen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Abdulnasir Savas [2000] ECR I-2927.
• Case 188/00 Bülent Kurz, né Yüce v. Land Baden-Württemberg [2002] ECR I- 10691.
• Case 317/01 and Case 369/01 Eran Abatay and Others v. Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C 317/01) ECR I-12301.
• Case C-325/05 İsmail Derin v. Landkreis Darmstadt-Dieburg [2005] ECR I-6181.
• Case C-16/05 Veli Tüm ve Mehmet Darı v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] ECR I-7415.
• Case C 228/06 Mehmet Soysal and İbrahim Savatlı v Bundesrepublik Deutschland [2009] ECR I-01031.
• Case C‐256/11 Dereci and Others [2011] ECR I‐0000.
• Case C‐186/10 Oguz [2011] ECR I‐0000.
• Case C-221/11 Leyla Ecem Demirkan [2013] ECR I-00000.
• Case C-138/13 Naime Dogan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland [2014], (Unpublished).