Sosyal güvenlik sistemi açısından güvenceli esneklik

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 73 - 110, 01.02.2012

Demirsat Duygu Köleoğlu

Öz

Güvenceli esneklik olgusu, işçi ve işveren taraflarını eş zamanlı olarak ilgilendiren ve etkileyen bir niteliğe sahiptir. Kavram, özgün bir takım koşullar ile somutlaşmaktadır. Söz konusu koşullar; uygun yasal temel, aktif işgücü piyasası politikaları, yaşam boyu eğitim ve sosyal güvenlik sistemidir. Çalışmada, güvenceli esneklik olgusunun sosyal güvenlik sistemleri açısından incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, güvenceli esnekliğin içerdiği gelir ve bağdaştırma güvenceleri sosyal güvenlik sistemleri bağlamında ele alınmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Güvenlik Sistemi, Güvenceli Esneklik, Gelir

Flexicurity in terms of social security system

Öz

Flexicurity is a fact that synchronically interests and impresses employee and employer. Flexicurity fact becomes concrete with some genuine provisions. This provision is appropriate law framework, active labour market policies, lifelong learning and social security system. In this study, it is aimed to analyze flexicurity fact in the context of social security systems. In this reasons, income security and combination security are explicated through social security systems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

• Andaç, F. (2010). İşsizlik sigortası. Ankara: TÜHİS Yayınları. Andersen, S. K. ve Mailand, M. (2005). The Danish flexicurity model: the role of the collective bargaining system. Employment Relations Research Centre Department of Sociology (FAOS), Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
• Antoniades, A. (2008). Social Europe and/ or global Europe? globalization and flexicurity as debates on the future of Europe. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21 (3): 327-346.
• Arıcı, K. (1999). Sosyal güvenlik dersleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. Balcı, İ. B. (2008). Türk sosyal güvenlik sisteminde son gelişmeler. Çalışma ve Toplum, 16 (1): 85–107.
• Bekker, S. ve Wilthagen, T. (2008). Europe’s pathways to flexicurity: lessons presented from and to the Netherlands. Intereconomics–Review of European Economic Policy, 43 (2): 68-73.
• Blanpain, R. (2006). European labour law. 10th Publishing, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International Publishing.
• Boeri, T. (2002). “Does Europe Need a Harmonised Social Policy?” Competition of Regions and Integration in EMU 30th Economics Conference: 55- 64. Vienna: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.
• Bovenberg, A. L. (2007). The life-course perspective and social policies: an overview of the issues. Modernising social policy for the new life course İçinde: 23-76. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Chung, H. (2005). Different paths towards flexibility: deregulated employment protection or temporary employment. Munich Personel RePEc Archive (MPRA) Working Paper, No. 2396.
• Demirbilek, S. (2005). Sosyal güvenlik sosyolojisi. İzmir: Legal Yayıncılık.
• Demirsat, D. (2009). Avrupa Birliği’ne üye ülkelerde güvenceli esnekliğin işgücü piyasasına etkisi ve Türkiye. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
• Erdut, T. (1998). Yeni teknolojilerin iş ilişkileri üzerindeki etkisi. Ankara: TÜHİS Yayınları.
• Esping–Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Esping–Andersen, G. ve Regini, M. (2000). Why deregulate labour markets? New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
• EUROFOUND, (2010). Extending flexicurity: the potential of short-time working schemes. European Restructuring Monitor (ERM) Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• EUROFOUND. (2007). Foundation findings: flexicurity–issues and challenges. Denmark: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2007). Gender equality law in the European Union. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2009). Industrial relations in Europe 2008. Luxembourg: Directorate–General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2007). Towards common principles of flexicurity: more and better jobs through flexibility and security. Belgium: Directorate–General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
• Fagan, C. ve Walthery, P. (2007). The role and effectiveness of time policies for reconciliation of care responsibilities. Modernising social policy for the new life course İçinde: 75-116. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Gehrmann, T. (2007). The development of Danish flexicurity and possible lessons for America. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen.
• Ghai, D. (2002). Social security priorities and patterns: a global perspective. International Labour Organization Discussion Paper, No: 141/ 2002, Geneva: Internaional Labour Office.
• Ginneken, W. V. (2003). Extending social security: policies for developing countries. Extension of Social Security (ESS) Paper, No: 13, Geneva: International Labour Office.
• Gümüş, E. (2010). Türkiye’de sosyal güvenlik sistemi: mevcut durum, sorunlar ve öneriler. SETA Analiz (Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları Vakfı), 24.
• Hutsebaut, M. (2003). Social protection in Europe: a European trade union perspective. International Social Security Review, 56 (1): 53-74.
• ILO. (1984). Introduction to social security. Geneva: International Labour Office.
• ILO. (2001). Social security: a new consensus. Geneva: International Labour Office.
• ILO. (2010). World social security report 2010/ 11: providing coverage in times of crisis and beyond. Geneva: International Labour Office.
• Kapar, R. (2005). Aktif işgücü piyasası politikaları. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası Prof. Dr. Toker Dereli’ye Armağan Özel Sayısı, 55 (1): 341-371.
• Kapar, R. (2005). Sosyal korumanın işgücü piyasasına etkisi. İstanbul: Birleşik Metal-İş Yayınları.
• Keller, B. ve Seifert, H. (2004). Flexicurity: the German trajectory. Transfer-European Review of Labour and Research, 10 (2): 226-247.
• Larsen, T. P. (2010). Flexicurity from the individual’s work-life balance perspective: coping with the flaws in European child- and eldercare provision. Journal of Industrial Relations, 52 (5): 575-593.
• Leschke, J. (2006). Are unemployment insurance systems in Europe adapting to news risks arising from non-standard employment. DULBEA Working Papers, No. 07-05, Brussels: Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
• Madsen, P. K. (2006). Flexicurity: a new perspective on labour markets and welfare states in Europe. CARMA Research Paper, No. 3, Centre for Labour Market Research.
• MISSOC. (2008). Missoc analysis 2008–social protection: aspects of flexicurity and active inclusion. Mutual Information System on Social Protection in the EU Member States and the EEA.
• Pacelli, L., Devicienti, F., Miada, A., Morini, M., Poggi, A. ve Vesan, P. (2008). Employment security and employability: a contribution to the flexicurity debate. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Peeters, H., Debels, A., Verschraegen, G. ve Berghman, J. (2007). Flexicurity in Bismarckian countries? old age protection for non–standard workers in Belgium. Journal of Social Policy, 37 (1): 125-143.
• Räisänen, H. (2006). The changes in the structure of labour markets. İçinde Reconciling labour flexibility with social cohesion–ideas for political action: 47- 68. Belgium: Council of Europe Publishing.
• Ray, R., Gornick, J. C. ve Schmitt, J. (2009). Parental leave policies in 21 countries: assessing generosity and gender equality. CEPR (Center for Economic and Policy Research) Reports and Issue Briefs, No. 23.
• Sapir, A. (2006). Globalisation and the reform of European social models. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44 (2): 369-390.
• Spattini, S. (2008). Social protection systems reforms and flexicurity from an European perspective. www.csmb.unimore.it/online/Home/Prova/documento 36007568.html (17.02.2011).
• Temiz, H. E. (2004). Eğreti istihdam: işgücü piyasasında güvencesizliğin ve istikrarsızlığın yeni yapılanması. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2 (2): 55-80.
• Tros, F. (2010). Flexibility and security for older workers: HRMArrangements in Four European Countries. Working and ageing: emerging theories and empirical perspectives İçinde: 132-165. Luxembourg: CEDEFOP Publications Office of the European Union.
• Tuncay, C ve Ekmekçi, Ömer. (2009). Yeni mevzuat açısından sosyal güvenlik hukukunun esasları. 2. Baskı. İstanbul: Legal Yayıncılık.
• Turan, E. (2003). Sosyal güvenlik hakkı. Kamu–İş İş Hukuku ve İktisat Dergisi, 7 (3): 319-332.
• Turan, S. (2005). Öğrenen toplumlara doğru Avrupa Birliği eğitim politikalarında yaşam boyu öğrenme. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, 5 (1): 87-98.
• Uşen, Ş. (2007). Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ve Türkiye’de aktif emek piyasası politikaları. Çalışma ve Toplum, 13 (2): 65-95.
• Wilthagen, T. ve Tros, F. (2003). Dealing with the ‘flexibility–security– nexus’: institutions, strategies, opportunities and barriers. University of Amsterdam Working Paper, No. 9, Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
• Wilthagen, T. ve Tros, F. (2004). The concept of ‘flexicurity’: a new approach to regulating employment and labour markets. Transfer– European Review of Labour and Research, 10 (2): 166-186.
• Valverde, M., Tregaskis, O. ve Brewster, C. (2000). Labor flexibility and firm performance. International Advances in Economic Research, 6 (4): 649-661.
• Zhou, J. (2007). Danish for all? balancing flexibility with security: the flexicurity model. IMF Working Paper, Paper No: 07/ 36.