A Research on Barriers to Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Sustainable Supplier Selection Criteria

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 259 - 279, 30.09.2014

Funda Özçelik , Burcu Avcı Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.16953/deusbed.89025

Cited By: 3

Öz

Abstract

Firms have started to become aware of the fact that their suppliers’ responsibility for sustainability has a great impact on their own development and reputation and that any organization’s environmental sustainability is impossible without incorporating sustainable supply chain management applications into their activities. In this study, a survey was conducted on the firms that issue sustainability reports in Turkey. The purpose of the study is to examine issues that businesses see as obstacles to sustainable supply chain management and to search rankings of the criteria that can be used in sustainable supplier selection. According to the results of the study, supplier firm culture and financial costs are seen as obstacles to sustainable supply chain management, and amongst the criteria given for sustainable supplier selection, three criteria identified to have the highest importance value are, respectively, abolition of child labor and working conditions, quality, and reliability. According to the overall rankings of the criteria, economic criteria rank first, followed by environmental and social criteria.

Keywords: Sustainability, Triple Bottom Line, Supply Chain Management, Sustainable Supply Chain Management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainability, Triple Bottom Line, Supply Chain Management

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ İÇİN ENGELLER VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİM KRİTERLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

İşletmeler tedarikçilerinin sürdürülebilirlik konularındaki sorumluluklarının kendi
gelişim ve itibarları üzerindeki etkisinin ve herhangi bir örgütün çevresel
sürdürülebilirliğinin, sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetimi uygulamalarını içermeden
imkânsız olduğunun farkına varmaya başlamışlardır. Yapılan çalışmada, Türkiye’de
sürdürülebilirlik raporu yayınlayan işletmeler üzerine anket yoluyla bir araştırma
yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı, işletmelerin sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri için engel olarak
gördükleri konuları ve sürdürülebilir tedarikçi seçimi için kullanılacak kriterlerin önem derecelerini araştırmaktır. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre, tedarikçi firma kültürü ve
finansal maliyetler sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetimi için engel olarak görülmektedir,
sürdürülebilir tedarikçi seçimi için verilen kriterlerden en yüksek önem derecelerine sahip
olan üç kriter ise sırasıyla, çocuk işgücü çalıştırmama ve çalışma koşulları, kalite ve
güvenirlilik olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sürdürülebilir tedarikçi seçiminde kullanılabilecek
kriterler genel ortalamalarına göre sıralandığında, ekonomik kriterlerin ilk sırayı aldığı ve
bunu çevresel kriterler ve sosyal kriterlerin takip ettiği görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilirlik, Üç Boyutlu Sorumluluk, Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi, Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi

Kaynakça

• Ageron, B., Gunasekaran, A. and Spalanzan, A. (2012). Sustainable supply management: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1): 168–182.
• Altuntaş, C. and Türker, D. (2012). Sürdürülebilir tedarik zincirleri: sürdürülebilirlik raporlarının içerik analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14 (3): 39–64.
• Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A. and Bahreininejad, A. (2012). Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 12 (6): 1668–1677.
• Ashby, A., Leat, M. and Hudson-Smith, M. (2012). Making connections: A review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17 (5): 497–516.
• Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42 (4): 372–387.
• Büyüközkan, G. and Vardaloğlu, Z. (2008). Yeşil tedarik zinciri yönetimi. Lojistik Dergisi, 8: 66–73.
• Büyüközkan, G. and Çiftçi, G. (2011). A novel fuzzy multi-criteria Decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Computers In Industry, 62 (2): 164-174.
• Carter, C. R. and Easton, P. L. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 41 (1): 46–62.
• Dickson, G.W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection system and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2 (1): 5–17.
• Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of the 21st century. Stoney Creek CT: New Society Publishers.
• Erol, İ., Nurtanış Velioğlu, M. and Sivrikaya Şerifoğlu, F. (2006). AB uyum yasaları ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma bağlamında tersine tedarik zinciri yönetimi: Türkiye’ye yönelik araştırma fırsatları ve önerileri. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 21 (44): 86–106.
• Erol, İ., Sencer, S. and Sari, R. (2011). A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecological Economics, 70 (6): 1088–1100.
• Ghodsypour, S. H. and O’Brien, C. (1998). A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics, 56–57 (20): 199–212.
• Gimenez, C., Sierra, V. and Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottomline. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1): 149–159.
• Gimenez, C. and Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17 (5): 531–543.
• Goebel, P., Reuter, C., Pibernik, R. and Sichtmann, C. (2012). The influence of ethical culture on supplier selection in the context of sustainable sourcing. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1): 7–17.
• Gold, S., Seuring, S. and Beske, P. (2010). Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17 (4): 230–245.
• Gopalakrishnan, K., Yusuf, Y. Y., Musa, A., Abubakar, T. and Ambursa, H. M. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management: A case study of British Aerospace (BAe) systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1): 193–203.
• Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R. and Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47: 345–354.
• GRI, “What is sustainability reporting?", https://www.globalreporting.org/ information/sustainabilityreporting /Pages/default.aspx (04.03.2013).
• Hassini, E., Surti, C. and Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1): 69–82.
• Herren, A. and Hadley, J. (2010). Barriers to environmental sustainability facing small businesses in Durham, NC. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Nickolas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham.
• Ho, W., Xu, X. and Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202 (1): 16–24.
• Hu, A. H., Chen, L-T., Hsu, C-W. and Ao, J-G. (2011). An evaluation framework for scoring corporate sustainability reports in Taiwan. Environmental Engineering Science, 8 (12): 843–858.
• Hutchins, M. J. and Sutherland, J. W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (15): 1688–1698.
• İMKB, “Sürdürülebilirlikle ilgili özet bilgiler”, http://www.imkb.gov.tr/datum/surdurulebilirlik/SURDURULEBILIRLIK_OZET_BILGILER.pdf (08.01.2013).
• Keating, B., Quazi, A., Kriz, A. and Coltman, T. (2008). In pursuit of a sustainable supply chain: Insights from Westpac Banking Corporation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13 (3): 175–179.
• Krause, D. R., Vachon, S. and Klassen, R. D. (2009). Special topic forum on sustainable supply chain management: introductıon and reflections on the role of purchasing management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (4): 18–25.
• Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H. Y., Hsu, C. F. and Hung, H. C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (4): 7917–7927.
• Liao, C. N. and Kao, H. P. (2011). An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (9): 10803–10811.
• Linton, J. D., Klassen, R. and Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25 (6): 1075–1082.
• Luthra, S., Kumar, V., Kumar, S. and Haleem A. (2011). Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique – an Indian perspective. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4 (2): 231–257.
• Markley, M. J. and Davis L. (2007). Exploring future competitive advantage through sustainable supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 37 (9): 763–774.
• Mittal, V. K. and Sangwan, K. S. (2013). Assessment of hierarchy and inter-relationships of barriers to environmentally conscious manufacturing adoption. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 10 (4): 297–307.
• McKinsey, “How companies manage sustainability: Mckinsey global survey results”, http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/How_companies_ manage_sustainability_McKinsey_Global_Survey_results__2558 (15.03.2013).
• McKinsey, “The business of sustainability survey: Mckinsey global survey results”, http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/The_business_of_sustainability_ McKinsey_Global_Survey_results_2867 (15.03.2013).
• Özsüzgün Çalışkan, A. (2012). Sürdürülebilirlik raporlaması. Muhasebe ve Vergi Uygulamaları Dergisi, 5 (1): 41–68.
• Pagell, M. and Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (2): 37–56.
• Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (1): 19–37.
• Pullman, M. E., Maloni, M. J. and Carter, C. R. (2009). Food for thought: Social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (4): 38–54.
• Reuter, C., Foerstl, K., Hartmann, E. and Blome, C. (2010). Sustainable global supplier management: The role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46 (2): 45–63.
• Seuring, S. and Müller, M. (2008a). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (15): 1699–1710.
• Seuring, S. and Müller, M. (2008b). Core issues in sustainable supply chain management–a Delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17 (8): 455-466.
• Seuring, S. (2011). Supply chain management for sustainable products–insights from research applying mixed methodologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20 (7): 471–484.
• Svensson, G. (2007). Aspects of sustainable supply chain management (SSCM): Conceptual framework and empirical example. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12 (4): 262–266.
• Vachon, S. and Mao, Z. (2008). Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: A country-level analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (15): 1552–1560.
• Walker, H. and Jones, N. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management across the UK private sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17 (1): 15–28.
• WCED Report, “Our common future”, http://conspect.nl/pdf/Our_ Common_Future-Brundtland_Report_1987.pdf (06.02.2013).
• Weber, C. A., Current, J. R. and Benton,W. C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50 (1): 2–18.
• Weber, C. A. and Current, J. R. (1993). A multi objective approach to vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 68 (2): 173–184.
• Zaabi, S. A., Dhaheri, N. A. and Diabat, A. (2013). Analysis of interaction between the barriers for the implementation of sustainable supply chain management. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68 (1–4): 895–905.
• Zamantılı Nayır, D. and Demiralay, S. (2007). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramının gıda sanayii tedarik zincirindeki yeri: Sorumlular, işlevler ve unsurlar. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, XXIII (2): 249–262.
• Zhu, Q and Geng, Y. (2013). Drivers and barriers of extended supply chain practices for energy saving and emission reduction among Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40: 6–12.