STRATEJİK HALKLA İLİŞKİLER YÖNETİMİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN EYLEMCİLİK

Öz

Son yıllarda hedef örgütlere karşı gerçekleştirilen kolektif hareketlerde büyük bir artış meydana gelmiştir. Bu durumun birçok sebebi olabilir. Fakat eylemci örgütler tarafından bakıldığında, hedef örgütler etik olmayan ve sadece kendini düşünen uygulamalarıyla kamu refahına zarar vermektedir. Hedef örgütlerin bu tip davranışları, onların dışardan kontrol edilmeleri için dağınık durumda bulunan kamu kesiminin eylemcilik hareketleriyle bir araya gelmelerine yol açar. Hedef örgütün eylemleri ile paydaşların beklentileri arasındaki uçurum ne kadar büyükse, sorun o kadar büyür ve eylemci örgütler hedef örgüte aynı oranda baskı uygulamaya çalışırlar. Fakat buradaki ilişki, kompleks ve sürekli değişen bir ilişkidir. Stratejik halkla ilişkiler, eylemcilik hareketlerine sorun veya konu yönetimi, ilişki yönetimi gibi stratejik yaklaşımlarla karşılık vermektedir. Eylemci örgütler ise hedef örgütleri sivil itaatsizlik, gösteri, boykot, miting, dijital aktivizm gibi araçlarla baskı altına almaya çalışırlar. Bu anlamda hem hedef örgüt, hem de eylemci örgüt açısından halkla ilişkilerin önemi büyüktür. Bu çalışmanın amacı, eylemciliği inceleyerek stratejik halkla ilişkilerin her iki taraf için de önemli olduğunu vurgulamaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eylemcilik, Halkla İlişkiler, Stratejik Halkla İlişkiler Yönetimi.

ACTIVISM FROM THE STRATEGIC PUBLIC RELATIONS MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE

Öz

In recent years there has been a great increase in the collective movements against target organizations. There may be many reasons of this situation. However, from the point of view of activist organizations, target organizations harm public welfare with their unethical and self-reflective practices. The larger the gap between the actions of the target organization and the expectations of the stakeholders, the larger the problem and activist organizations try to exert pressure on the target organization at the same rate. But the relationship here is a complex and constantly changing relationship. Strategic public relations responds to activism movements through strategic approaches such as problem or subject management and relationship management. On the other hand, activist organizations try to suppress the target organizations by means of civil disobedience, demonstration, boycott, rally and digital activism. Public relations are of great importance for both the target organization and the activist organization. The purpose of this study is to examine activism and emphasize that strategic public relations are important for both parties

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Activism,Public Relations,Strategic Public Relations Management

Kaynakça

1. Akar, Hüsamettin (2010), “Halkla İlişkilere Farklı Bir Yaklaşım: İlişki Yönetimi”, Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi, 6,3, 206-215, Konya.
2. Akatay, Ayten ve Yelkikalan, Nazan. (2007). Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarında Gönüllülük ve İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım, İstanbul.
3. Aldoory, L, Sha B.L. (2007). “The Stuational Theory of Publics: Practical Applications, Methodological Challenges and Theoretical Horizons” In The Future of Excellence In Public Relations and Communications Management: Challenges For The Next Generation, Toth EL (ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ. pp.339-355.
4. Anderson, Deborah (1992), “Identifying and Responding to Activist Publics: A Case Study”, Journal of Public Relations Research, 4:3, s.151-165.
5. Carter, Stacy (2002), “Mongoven, Bicoe & Dunchin: Destroying Tobacco Control Activism From The Inside” Tobacco Control, Vol.11, No.2 (June 2002), s.112-118
6. Castells, Manuel (2008), “The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance”, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 78-93.
7. CognitiveSomputingResearchGroup,(2019),http://ccrg.cs.memphis.edu/tutorial/introductio n.html (Erişim Tarihi:14.09.2019)
8. Cawson, Alan (1986), “Corporatism and Political Theory”, Basil Blackwell, New York, pp. 27-30.

9. Çaha, Ömer. (2003), Aşkın Devletten Sivil Topluma, Gendaş A.Ş., İstanbul.
10. Çakır, Hilal, Özdemir (2010), “Tüketici Boykotlarının Kriz İletişimi Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2 121-136
11. Çalı, Hasan Hüseyin (2010), “Protesto ve Miting Kavramı Üzerine Bir Yazı”, (Çevrimiçi) http://www.caginpolisi.com.tr/45/47-48.html.(Erişim Tarihi 13.09.2015).
12. Demir Gök, Zuhal (2011). “Stratejik Halkla İlişkilerin İtici Gücü: Eylemcilik”, Halkla İlişkilerden Stratejik Halkla İlişkilere, (Ed. Çiğdem Karakaya Şatır), Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
13. Deniz, Çağlar (2015), Toplumsal Hareket Teorileri ve Ortadoğu İsyanları, Orion Kitabevi, Ankara.
14. Derville, Tiffany (2005), “Radical Activist Tactics: Overturning Public Relations Conceptualizations”, Public Relations Review, 31: 527-533.
15. Doğan, İlyas (2002), Özgürlükçü ve Totaliter Düşünce Geleneğinde Sivil Toplum, Alfa Yayınları, İstanbul.
16. Dozier, David ve Lauzen Martha (2000,. “Liberating the Intellectual Domain From the Practice: Public Relations, Activism, and the Role of the Scholar”, Journal of Public Relations Research, 12: 1, 3-22.
17. Friedman, Thomas (2000), The Lexus and The Olive Tree, Anchor Books, New York.
18. Geçikli, Fatma (2013). Halkla İlişkiler ve İletişim, 3. b., Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
19. Goodwin, Jeff ve Jasper, James (2015), The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Conceps, WILEY Blackwell, Third Edition. UK.
20. Grunig, James, E, (1989), “Sierra Club Study Shows Who Become Activists”, Public Relations Review, Vol. XV, No.3.
21. Grunig, James E. ve Grunig, Larissa A. (1997), “Review of A Program of Research On Activism: Incidence In Four Countries, Activist Publics, Strategies of Activist Groups, And Organizational Responses To Activism”, Paper Presented To The Fourth Public Relations Research Symposium, Managing Environmental Issues, Lake Bled, Slovenia.
22. Grunig, James E. ve Jaatinen, Miia (1998), “Strategic, Symmetrical Public Relations in Government: From Pluralism To Societal Corporatism”, Journal of Communication Management, Vol.3 Iss: 3 s. 218-234.
23. Grunig, James E. ve Repper, Fred C. (2005), “Stratejik Yönetim, Kamular ve Gündemler”, Halkla İlişkilerde ve İletişim Yönetiminde Mükemmellik, (Editör: Grunig James E.), Çev. Elif Özsayar. İstanbul Rota Yayınları, s.131-172.
24. Grunig, Larissa (2005), “Eylemcilik: Örgütlerin Etkinliğini Nasıl Sınırlıyor ve Mükemmel Halkla İlişkiler Departmanları Nasıl Karşılık Vermeli”, Halkla İlişkilerde ve İletişim Yönetiminde Mükemmellik. (der) içinde. Grunig James E., Çev. Elif Özsayar. İstanbul Rota Yayınları, s. 527- 557.
25. Grunig, Larissa (1986), “Activism And Organizational Response: Contemporary Cases Of Collective Behaviour.”, Paper Presented To The Association For Education In Journalism And Mass Communication, Norman, Oklahoma.
26. Guattari, Felix (1986), “The Postmodern dead end.”, Flash Art, 128, 40-41.
27. Guiniven, John E. (2002), “Dealing With Activism In Canada: An Ideal Cultural Fit For The To-Way Symmetrical Public Relations Model”, Public Relations Review, 28: 393-402.
28. Heath, Robert (1997), Strategic Issues Management: Organizations and Public Policy Challenges. Sage: Thousand Oaks, C.A.
29. Holtzhausen, Derina (2000)., “Postmodern Values in Public Relations”, Journal of Public Relations Research, 12: 1, 93-114.
30. Holtzhausen, Derina ve Voto, Rosina (2002), “Resistance From the Margins: The Postmodern Public Relations Practitioner as Organizational Activist”, Journal of Public Relations Research, 14: 1, 57-84.
31. Hung, Flora Chun-ju (2003), “Relationship building, activism, and conflict resolution — A case study on the termination of licensed prostitution in Taipei City”, Asian Journal of Communication ,18 may 2009, s. 21-49.
32. Jahng, Mi Rosie-Hong, Seoyeon-Park, Eun Hae (2014), “How Radical Is Radical?: Understanding The Role Of Acrivist’s Communication Strategies On The Formation Of Public Attitude And Evaluation”, Public Relations Review, 40: s.119-121.
33. Jones, Barrie ve Chase, W.Howard (1979), “Managing Public Policy Issues”, Public Relations Review, 5 (2), s. 3-23.
34. Karagianni, S. Katharine ve Cornelissen Joep (2006), “Anti-Corporate Movements and Public Relations” Leeds University Business School, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. S.168-170
35. Karagöz, Kezban (2013), “Yeni Medya Çağında Dönüşen Toplumsal Hareketler ve Dijital Aktivizm Hareketleri” İletişim ve Diplamasi Dergisi, 1 (1), s.131-156.
36. Kavada, Anastasia (2010), “Activism Transforms Digital: The Social Movement Perspective”, Digital Activism Decoded The New Mechanics of Change, İçinde (der). Mary Joyce, International Debate Education Association, New York, 101-118.
37. Locke, Richard (2002), “The Promises And Perils of Globalization: The Case of Nike”, Case Study Presented at The MIT Sloan School of Management 50th Anniversary Conference, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved September 30
38. Mayhew, Leon (1997).,The New Public: Professional Communication and The Means of Social İnfluence, Cambridge University Press, England.
39. McCown Nance (2007), “The Role of Public Relations With Internal Activists”, Journal of Public Relations Research, s.47-68
40. Mintzberg, Henry (1983), “Power In and Around Organizations”, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. s.48-49.
41. Moe, Terry (1988), The Organization Of Interests, The University Of Chicago Press. Chicago, IL, United States
42. Mozorov, E. (2009). “The Brave New World of Slacktivis, In Foreign Policy”, http://www.npr.org. /templates/story/story.php?storyId=104302141 (Erişim Tarihi: 02.10.2015).
43. Okay Ayla ve Okay Aydemir (2011). Halkla İlişkiler. Kavram, Strateji ve Uygulamaları, Genişletilmiş Dördüncü Basım, Der Yayınları, İstanbul.
44. Olson, Mancur (1982), The Logic Of Collective Action: Public Goods And The Theory Of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Ökçesiz, Hayrettin (1996), Sivil İtaatsizlik, 2.b., Alfa Yayınları, İstanbul.
45. Özer, Mehmet Akif (2012), Halkla İlişkiler Dersleri, 2.b., Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara.
46. Pal, Mahuya ve Dutta, Mohan (2012), “Organizing Resistance On The Internet: The Case Of The International Campaign For Justice In Bhopal”, International Communication Assocation, Communication, Culture & Critique 5: s. 230-251.
47. Postmes, Tom ve Brunsting, Suzanne (2002), “Collective Action In The Age Of Internet”, Social Science Computer Review, 20, s. 290-301.
48. Reber, Bryan ve Kim, Jun Kyo (2006), “How Activist Groups Use Websites in Media Relations: Evaluating Online Press Rooms”, Journal of Public Relations Research, 18:4, s.313- 333.
49. Seo, Hyunjin- Kim Ji Young- Yang Sung- Un, (2009), “Global Activism and New Media: A Study of Transnational NGO’s Online Public Relations”, Public Relations Review, 35 (2009), s. 123-126.
50. Sert, Nuray Yılmaz (2012), Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Aktivizm İlişkisinin Araştırılması: Türkiye’de Özel Sektör, Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Aktivizm İlintisi, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Halkla İlişkiler ve Tanıtım Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.
51. Smith, M. F., (2005). “Activism”, , Encyclopedia of Public Relations, (Editör: Roberth Heath), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.s. 5-9.
52. Stokes Ashli Q. ve Rubin Donald (2010), “Activism and the Limits of Symmetry: The Public Relations Battle Between Colorado GASP and Philip Morris”, Journal of Public Relations Research, 22: 1, s. 26-48.
53. Tesh, Sylvia (1984), “In Support Of ‘Single Issue’ Politics”, Political Science Quartely, 99, s.27-44.
54. Taylor, Maureen (2009), “Civil Society As A Rhetorical Public Relations Process”. İçinde: Rhetorical And Critical Approaches To Public Relations II (Ed. Robert L. Heath, Elizabeth L. Toth ve Damion Waymer). New York: Routledge. S. 76-91.
55. Trujillo, Nick ve Toth, Elizabeth Lance (1987), “Organizational Perspectives for Public Relations Research and Practice”, Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 199-231.
56. Uçkan, Özgür (2012), “Dijital Aktivizm mi? Aktivizm mi?” İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi, Alternatif Bilişim Derneği 30 Mayıs. S. 53-80.
57. Ünsal, Engin (2011), “Grev Hakkının Geleceği”, TBB Dergisi, 2011 (92), Ankara. S. 419- 430.
58. Wakefield, Robert (2007), “Theory of International Public Relations, The Internet, and Activism: A Personal Reflection.”, Journal of Public Relations Research, 20:1, s. 138-157.
59. Van Laer, Jeroen, ve Van Aelst, Peter (2010), “Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires. Information”, Communication & Society, s. 1146-1171.
60. Veil, Shari- Reno, Jenna-Freihaut, Rebecca- Oldham, Jordan (2015), “Online Activists vs. Kraft Foods: A Case of Social Media Hijacking”, Public Relations Review 41: s.103-108.
61. Zoch, Lyn- Collins Erik L.- Sisco, Hilary Fessell-Supa, Dustin, (2008), “Empowering The Activist: Using Framing Devices On Activist Organizations’ Web Sites”, Public Relations Review, 34: s.351-358.