Pediatric Gunshot Wounds: A Decade-Long Emergency Department Experience in a High-Risk Region

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 52 Sayı: 3, 443 - 452, 16.09.2025

Abdullah Şen , Mahmut Yaman , Hasan Mansur Durgun , Şilan Göger Ülgüt , Sema Belek , Berçem Tugay Günel , Cahfer Güloğlu

https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1784789

Öz

Background: Pediatric gunshot wounds (GSWs) remain a significant cause of preventable mortality worldwide, particularly in regions with high violence and low socioeconomic conditions. The Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) is widely used for trauma severity assessment, yet its prognostic value in firearm-related pediatric injuries remains underexplored.
Methods: This retrospective study included patients under 18 years who presented with GSWs to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in southeastern Türkiye between 2015 and 2025. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected. The predictive value of PTS for in-hospital mortality was analyzed using ROC curve analysis. Logistic regression was used to identify independent mortality predictors.
Results: A total of 200 pediatric GSW cases were evaluated; the median age was 11 years, and 73% were male. The overall mortality rate was 6.5%. All deaths occurred in patients triaged as red zone and requiring emergency interventions. Mortality was significantly associated with low PTS (median: 1 vs. 9, p<0.001), low GCS, head/neck injuries, abdominal-pelvic trauma, intubation, and blood transfusion needs. ROC analysis showed that PTS had high predictive performance (AUC: 0.969) with an optimal cut-off of 5.5. In multivariate analysis, head/neck injuries (OR: 5.327) and abdominal trauma (OR: 3.173) remained significant predictors, while higher PTS was protective (OR: 0.014).
Conclusion: Pediatric firearm injuries are associated with substantial mortality. PTS is a strong, practical predictor of outcome and can aid in triage and early intervention strategies. Comprehensive trauma care systems and public health policies are essential to reduce mortality in high-risk pediatric populations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pediatric Trauma , Gunshot Wounds , Mortality , Pediatric Trauma Score , Emergency Medicine

Etik Beyan

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Dicle University Faculty of Medicine (approval date: March 19, 2025; approval number: 140). All patient data used in the study were anonymized to protect patient privacy and were analyzed solely for scientific purposes.

Pediatrik Ateşli Silah Yaralanmaları: Yüksek Riskli Bir Bölgede On Yıllık Acil Servis Deneyimi

Öz

Amaç: Pediatrik ateşli silah yaralanmaları (ASY), dünya genelinde önlenebilir ölümlerin önemli bir nedeni olmaya devam etmektedir. Bu durum özellikle şiddetin yoğun olduğu ve sosyoekonomik düzeyin düşük olduğu bölgelerde daha belirgin hale gelmektedir. Pediatrik Travma Skoru (PTS), travma şiddetini değerlendirmede yaygın olarak kullanılmakla birlikte, ateşli silah kaynaklı pediatrik yaralanmalarda prognostik değeri yeterince araştırılmamıştır.
Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya, 2015–2025 yılları arasında Türkiye'nin güneydoğusunda bir üçüncü basamak hastanenin acil servisine ateşli silah yaralanması nedeniyle başvuran 18 yaş altı hastalar dâhil edilmiştir. Hastalara ait demografik, klinik ve sonuç verileri toplanmıştır. Hastane içi mortaliteyi öngörmede PTS'nin prediktif değeri ROC eğrisi analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Mortalitenin bağımsız belirleyicilerini saptamak amacıyla lojistik regresyon analizi yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: Toplam 200 pediatrik ASY vakası değerlendirildi; medyan yaş 11, hastaların %73’ü erkekti. Genel mortalite oranı %6,5 olarak saptandı. Tüm mortal vakalar, kırmızı alan triyajı almış ve acil müdahale gerektirmişti. Mortalite ile düşük PTS (medyan: 1 vs. 9, p<0.001), düşük GKS, baş-boyun yaralanmaları, abdominal-pelvik travma, entübasyon ve kan transfüzyonu ihtiyacı arasında anlamlı ilişkiler bulundu. ROC analizi, PTS’nin yüksek prediktif performansa sahip olduğunu gösterdi (AUC: 0.969) ve optimal eşik değeri 5,5 olarak belirlendi. Çok değişkenli analizde, baş-boyun yaralanmaları (OR: 5.327) ve abdominal travma (OR: 3.173) bağımsız mortalite belirleyicisi olarak kalırken, yüksek PTS koruyucu bir faktör olarak öne çıktı (OR: 0.014).
Sonuç: Pediatrik ateşli silah yaralanmaları önemli mortalite ile ilişkilidir. PTS, klinik sonuçları öngörmede güçlü ve pratik bir skorlama aracı olup, triyaj ve erken müdahale stratejilerinde kullanılabilir. Yüksek riskli pediatrik popülasyonlarda mortaliteyi azaltmak için kapsamlı travma bakım sistemleri ve etkili halk sağlığı politikaları gereklidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pediatrik Travma , Ateşli Silah Yaralanmaları , Mortalite , Pediatrik Travma Skoru , Acil Tıp.

Kaynakça

• 1.Cunningham RM, Walton MA, Carter PM. The MajorCauses of Death in Children and Adolescents in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(25):2468-75.doi:10.1056/NEJMsr1804754.
• 2.Fowler KA, Dahlberg LL, Haileyesus T, Gutierrez C,Bacon S. Childhood Firearm Injuries in the United States[published correction appears in Pediatrics. 2017Oct;140(4):e20172298. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2298.].Pediatrics. 2017;140(1):e20163486.doi:10.1542/peds.2016-3486.
• 3.Kalesan B, Lagast K, Villarreal M, et al. School shootingsduring 2013-2015 in the USA. Inj Prev. 2017;23(5):321-7.doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042162.
• 4.Smart R, Schell TL, Cefalu M, Morral AR. Impact onNonfirearm Deaths of Firearm Laws Affecting FirearmDeaths: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am JPublic Health. 2020;110(10):e1-e9.doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305808.
• 5.Kaufman EJ, Delgado MK. The Epidemiology of FirearmInjuries in the US: The Need for Comprehensive, Real-time, Actionable Data. JAMA. 2022;328(12):11778.doi:10.1001/jama.2022.16894.
• 6.Yazar A, Akın F, Türe E, Odabaş D. Çocuk Acil KliniğineBaşvuran Adli Vakaların Değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Med J.2017;44(4):345-53. doi:10.5798/dicletip.362395.
• 7.Flaherty MR, Klig JE. Firearm-related injuries inchildren and adolescents: an emergency and critical careperspective. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020;32(3):349-53.doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000905.
• 8.Lieu V, Carrillo LA, Pandya NK, Swarup I. Pediatricfirearm-associated fractures: Analysis of managementand outcomes. World J Clin Pediatr. 2021;10(6):151-8.Published 2021 Nov 9. doi:10.5409/wjcp.v10.i6.151.
• 9.Pear VA, Wintemute GJ, Jewell NP, Ahern J. FirearmViolence Following the Implementation of California'sGun Violence Restraining Order Law. JAMA Netw Open.2022;5(4):e224216. Published 2022 Apr 1.doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4216.
• 10.Çelegen M., & Çelegen K. (2021). Comparison ofScoring Systems for Mortality Prediction in PediatricMultitrauma Patients. Journal of pediatric intensive care,13(2), 162-7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740361.
• 11.Misirlioglu M, Alakaya M, Arslankoylu AE, et al.Evaluation of pediatric trauma score and pediatric age-adjusted shock index in pediatric patients admitted to thehospital after an earthquake. Ulus Travma Acil CerrahiDerg. 2024;30(4):254-62.doi:10.14744/tjtes.2024.47835.
• 12. Wendling-Keim DS, Hefele A, Muensterer O, Lehner M.Trauma Scores and Their Prognostic Value for theOutcome Following Pediatric Polytrauma. Front Pediatr.2021;9:721585. Published 2021 Sep 3.doi:10.3389/fped.2021.721585.
• 13.Schuster A, Klute L, Kerschbaum M, et al. InjuryPattern and Current Early Clinical Care of PediatricPolytrauma Comparing Different Age Groups in a Level ITrauma Center. J Clin Med. 2024;13(2):639. Published2024 Jan 22. doi:10.3390/jcm13020639.
• 14.Hemenway D, Shawah C, Lites E. Defensive gun use:What can we learn from news reports?. Inj Epidemiol.2022;9(1):19. Published 2022 Jul 1. doi:10.1186/s40621-022-00384-8.
• 15.De Los Ríos-Pérez A, García A, Cuello L, Rebolledo S,Fandiño-Losada A. Performance of the Paediatric TraumaScore on survival prediction of injured children at a majortrauma centre: A retrospective Colombian cohort, 2011-2019. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022;13:100312. Published2022 Jun 29. doi:10.1016/j.lana.2022.100312.
• 16.Tıraşçı Y, Gören S. Diyarbakır’da çocuk ve adolesancinayetleri. Dicle Tıp Dergisi. 2007;34(2):120-2.
• 17.Global Burden of Disease 2016 Injury Collaborators,Naghavi M, Marczak LB, et al. Global Mortality fromFirearms, 1990-2016 [published correction appears inJAMA. 2018 Sep 25;320(12):1288. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.13590.]. JAMA. 2018;320(8):792-814.doi:10.1001/jama.2018.10060.
• 18.Goldstick JE, Cunningham RM, Carter PM. CurrentCauses of Death in Children and Adolescents in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(20):1955-6.doi:10.1056/NEJMc2201761.
• 19.Schecter SC, Betts J, Schecter WP, Victorino GP.Pediatric penetrating trauma: the epidemic continues. JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):721-5.doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318265cdce.
• 20. Cochran ED, Machchhar A, Qiao J, Chung DH. Caught in the Crossfire: 10-Year Experience with Pediatric FirearmInjury at a Single Institution. J Am Coll Surg.2025;240(4):588-95. doi:10.1097/XCS.0000000000001298.
• 21.Roberts BK, Nofi CP, Cornell E, et al. Trends andDisparities in Firearm Deaths Among Children. Pediatrics. 2023;152(3):e2023061296. doi:10.1542/peds.2023-061296.
• 22.Yang YH, Zhang TN, Yang N, et al. Functional status ofpediatric patients with trauma and risk factors formortality from a single center in China. Front Pediatr.2023;11:1051759. Published 2023 May 3.doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1051759.
• 23.Veenstra M, Patel V, Donoghue L, Langenburg S.Trends in pediatric firearm-related injuries over the past10 years at an urban pediatric hospital. J Pediatr Surg.2015;50(7):1184-7. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.042.
• 24.Davis JS, Castilla DM, Schulman CI, et al. Twenty yearsof pediatric gunshot wounds: an urban trauma center'sexperience. J Surg Res. 2013;184(1):556-60.doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.047.
• 25.Khavandegar A, Salamati P, Zafarghandi M, et al.Comparison of nine trauma scoring systems in prediction of inhospital outcomes of pediatric trauma patients: amulticenter study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):7646.doi:10.1038/s41598-024-58373-4.
• 26.Choi D, Park JW, Kwak YH, et al. Comparison of age-adjusted shock indices as predictors of injury severity inpaediatric trauma patients immediately after emergencydepartment triage: A report from the Korean multicentreregistry. Injury. 2024;55(1):111108.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2023.111108
• 27.Feldman KA, Tashiro J, Allen CJ, et al. Predictors ofmortality in pediatric urban firearm injuries. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33(1):53-8. doi:10.1007/s00383-016-3984-0.
• 28.Duda T, Sharma A, Ellenbogen Y, et al. Outcomes ofcivilian pediatric craniocerebral gunshot wounds: Asystematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.2020;89(6):1239-47.doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000002900.
• 29.Freeman LM, Bothwell S, Pazniokas J, et al. Thepediatric Brain Injury Guidelines: a retrospective clinicalvalidation study. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2025;35(3):214-21. Published 2025Jan3.doi:10.3171/2024.7.PEDS24229
• 30. Stevens J, Leonard J, Reppucci ML, et al. Individual and neighborhood level characteristics of pediatric firearminjuries presenting at trauma centers in Colorado. JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;93(3):385-93.doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000003520.