Aeroallergen Sensitization by Skin Prick Testing in Children from Erzurum, Eastern Türkiye

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 52 Sayı: 4, 713 - 719, 12.12.2025

Yahya Gül , Serap Kılıç Kaya Mehmet Tunahan Çelik Tuğba Güler

https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1840659

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and distribution of aeroallergen sensitization in children who presented with allergic complaints to the Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Clinic in Erzurum and surrounding provinces and underwent skin prick testing.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1,251 patients aged 2–18 years who underwent skin prick testing (SPT) at the Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Clinic between February 1, 2022, and November 1, 2024. Demographic data, SPT results, serum total IgE, and eosinophil counts of patients with at least one aeroallergen sensitization were analyzed.
Results: Sensitization to at least one aeroallergen was detected in 55.4% (n=693) of the patients, with 75.3% being polysensitized. The most common allergen group was pollens (79.2%), with grass pollen mix (55.1%) being the leading sensitizer. Pollens were followed by house dust mites (35.9%), cat epithelium (24.6%), dog epithelium (19.1%), and Alternaria alternata (16.5%). The most frequent diagnoses in sensitized patients were allergic rhinitis (43.7%) and asthma (26.3%). Significant differences in IgE and eosinophil levels were found between atopic dermatitis and respiratory allergic disease groups (p<0.05).
Conclusion: In children living in Erzurum and surrounding provinces, the most common sensitizations are to pollens and house dust mites. House dust mite sensitization remains a significant concern even in low-humidity regions due to indoor environmental factors. Determining the regional allergen profile can guide both diagnostic evaluation and the development of effective environmental control measures and immunotherapy strategies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Atopy , Aeroallergen , Skin prick test , House dust mites

Etik Beyan

The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of (Date: July 9, 2025; Decision No: 2025/197).

Erzurum ve Türkiye’nin Doğusundaki Çocuklarda Aeroalerjen Duyarlılığının Deri Prick Testi ile Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, Erzurum ve çevre illerinde bulunan Çocuk Alerji ve İmmünoloji Polikliniğine alerjik şikayetlerle başvuran ve deri prick testi yapılan çocuklarda aeroalerjen duyarlılığının sıklığını ve dağılımını değerlendirmeyi amaçlamıştır.
Yöntemler: 1 Şubat 2022 – 1 Kasım 2024 tarihleri arasında Çocuk Alerji ve İmmünoloji Polikliniğine başvuran, 2–18 yaş arası ve deri prick testi (DPT) yapılan 1251 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. En az bir aeroalerjene duyarlılığı olan olguların demografik verileri, DPT sonuçları, serum total IgE ve eozinofil düzeyleri değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Hastaların %55,4’ünde (n=693) en az bir aeroalerjene karşı duyarlılık saptandı. Duyarlılığı olan olguların %75,3’ü polisensitizeydi. En sık saptanan alerjen grubu polenlerdi (%79,2); bunlar arasında çimen polen karışımı (%55,1) ilk sırada yer aldı. Polenleri ev tozu akarları (%35,9), kedi epiteli (%24,6), köpek epiteli (%19,1) ve Alternaria alternata (%16,5) izledi. Aeroalerjen duyarlılığı olan olgularda en yaygın tanılar alerjik rinit (%43,7) ve astım (%26,3) idi. IgE ve eozinofil düzeyleri, atopik dermatit ile solunum yolu alerjik hastalıkları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark gösterdi (p<0,05).
Sonuç: Erzurum ve çevre illerindeki çocuklarda en sık polenler ve ev tozu akarlarına karşı aeroalerjen duyarlılığı gelişmektedir. Ev tozu akarlarının, nem oranı düşük bölgelerde dahi iç ortam koşullarına bağlı olarak önemli bir duyarlılık nedeni olduğu görülmektedir. Bu nedenle bölgesel alerjen profilinin belirlenmesi, hem tanısal süreçte hem de çevresel kontrol önlemleri ve immünoterapi planlamasında yol gösterici olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Atopi , Aeroalerjen , Deri prick testi , Ev tozu akarları.

Kaynakça

• 1.Shin YH, Hwang J, Kwon R, et al. Global, regional,and national burden of allergic disorders and theirrisk factors in 204 countries and territories, from1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the GlobalBurden of Disease Study 2019. Allergy2023;78:2232-54. doi:10.1111/all.15807.
• 2.Arshad H, Lack G, Durham SR, et al. Prevention isbetter than cure: Impact of allergen immunotherapy on the progression of airway disease. J Allergy ClinImmunol Pract 2024;12(1):45-56.doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2023.10.013.
• 3.Eigenmann PA, Atanaskovic-Markovic M,O’Bhourihane J, et al. Testing children for allergies:why, how, who and when: an updated statement ofthe European Academy of Allergy and ClinicalImmunology (EAACI) Section on Pediatrics and theEAACI-Clemens von Pirquet Foundation. PediatrAllergy Immunol 2013;24:195-209.
• 4.Asher MI, Montefort S, Björkstén B, et al.Worldwide time trends in the prevalence ofsymptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitisand eczema in childhood: ISAAC Phases One andThree repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys.Lancet 2006;368:733-43.
• 5.Singh AB, Kumar P. Aeroallergens in clinicalpractice of allergy in India. An overview. Ann AgricEnviron Med 2003;10:131-6.
• 6.Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, et al. Revisednomenclature for allergy for global use: Report ofthe Nomenclature Review Committee of the WorldAllergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy ClinImmunol 2004;113(5):832-6.
• 7.Başaran AE, Torun NK, Kocacık Uygun DF, BıngölA.Distribution of aeroallergens on skin prick tests ofatopic children living in the Akdeniz region, Turkey.Asthma Allergy Immunol 2018;16:132-7.
• 8.Wahn U. Preventing new sensitization and asthma onset by allergen immunotherapy: the currentevidence. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol2017;17(6):443-6.doi:10.1097/ACI.0000000000000399.
• 9.Huang X, Tsilochristou O, Perna S, et al. Evolutionof the IgE and IgG repertoire to a comprehensivearray of allergen molecules in the first decade of life.Allergy 2018;73(2):421-30. doi:10.1111/all.13269.
• 10.Rasool R, Shera IA, Nissar S, et al. Role of skinprick test in allergic disorders: a prospective studyin Kashmiri population in light of review. Indian JDermatol 2013;58(1):12-7. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.105276.
• 11.Bisoffi L, Sassudelli G, Agostinis F, et al. Pediatricasthma and altitude: a complex interplay betweendifferent environmental factors. Ital J Pediatr2024;50(1):42. doi:10.1186/s13052-023-01492-x.
• 12.Heinzerling L, Frew AJ, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al.Standard skin prick testing and sensitization toinhalant allergens across Europe—a survey from the GA(2)LEN network. Allergy 2005;60:1287-300.
• 13.Ünal BÜ, Erçin AC, Çelik İK, Artaç H. Evaluation ofskin prick test results performed for the diagnosis of inhaled allergens in Konya. Gen Med J 2024;34(2).
• 14.Ansotegui IJ, Melioli G, Canonica GW, et al. IgEallergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy: a World Allergy Organization position paper. World Allergy Organ J 2020;13(2):100080. doi:10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100080.
• 15.Pawankar R, Canonica GW, Holgate ST, LockeyRF, Blaiss M. WAO white book on allergy: update2013. World Allergy Organization. Available from:https://www.worldallergy.org/education-and-programs/education/allergic-disease-resources/white-book-on-allergy.
• 16.Kim HY, Lee JH, Lee SY, et al. Polysensitizationpatterns and their clinical relevance. J Allergy ClinImmunol 2015;136(6):1535-41.
• 17.Wu AC, Tantisira K, Li L, et al. Multisensitizationand risk of asthma in children. J Allergy ClinImmunol 2011;127(4):965-72.
• 18.Tezcan D, Uzuner N, Civelek E, et al. Allergensensitization in children in Turkey. Asthma AllergyImmunol 2019;17(3):123-30.
• 19.Güneşer Kendirli S, Altıntaş DU, Yılmaz M, et al.Aeroallergen sensitization in Ankara. Turk ArchPediatr 2015;50(3):123-9.
• 20.Arıcı M, Yılmaz S, Demir A, et al. Pollen profileand sensitization in Eastern Anatolia. Turk J AllergyImmunol 2021;9(2):65-72.
• 21.Özdemir C, Kılıç M, Erkoçoğlu M, et al. Climaticfactors and allergy. Turkiye Klinikleri J Pediatr Sci2013;9(2):50-6.
• 22.Budak F, Özbilgin A. Mite sensitization andenvironmental factors. Mikrobiyol Bul2020;54(1):181-96.
• 23.Akaya A, Civelek E, Boz AB, et al. Prevalence ofhouse dust mite sensitization. Asthma AllergyImmunol 2018;16(3):142-8.
• 24.Arshad SH. Indoor allergens and atopy. CurrAllergy Asthma Rep 2010;10(1):49-56.
• 25.Knutsen AP, Bush RK, Demain JG, et al. Alternaria exposure and its relationship to asthma in theenvironment. J Allergy Clin Immunol2012;129(2):378-82.
• 26.Williams H, Flohr C, Howells L, et al. Atopicdermatitis and disease severity are associated withsystemic immune activation: a longitudinal study. Br J Dermatol 2007;157(1):110-7.
• 27.Bousquet J, Antoine N, Bachert C, et al. Pollen-related allergic rhinitis and asthma: seasonalvariation in pollen exposure and symptom severity.Allergy 2010;65(12):1524-32.