Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma

Cilt: 43 Sayı: 1 1 Mart 2016
  • Zülfü Bayhan
  • Sezgin Zeren
  • Mehmet Ekici
  • Cüneyt Kahraman
  • Turgay Şimşek
PDF İndir

Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma

Öz

Objective: Nonoperative management is the preferred treatment option of blunt splenic injury in appropriate conditions. İncreasing success is achieved with the help of advanced imaging techniques and angioembolization procedure. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Intervention in patients with blunt splenic injury.
Methods: Records of 56 patients who were treated by nonoperative management or surgical intervention in our clinic were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, grade of injury, mortality, length of hospital stay, complications, presence of additional injuries and concomitant disease in both groups.
Results: There were 29 patients (51.78%) in the surgery group and 27 patients (48.2%) in the nonoperative management group. Grade of injury was determined significantly higher in surgical treatment group (p<0.001). Additional injury was observed more in the group treated with surgery (p: 0.033). Infectious complication rate was found higher in surgically treated group (<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, mortality, length of hospital stay, presence of concomitant disease.
Conclusion: Nonoperative management is the appropriate method in treatment of blunt splenic injury in patients who were hemodinamically stable and have no signs of peritoneal irritation. Nonoperative management is increasingly being implemented in conjunction with improvements in imaging methods. Angioembolization is a treatment that increases the success rate of nonoperative management and implementation of this method in trauma centers is an important target. Surgical intervention is inevitable in cases when the nonoperative management is inappropriate.
Key words: Blunt splenic injury, Nonoperative Management, Splenectomy, Splenoraphy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Schroeppel TJ, Croce MA. Diagnosis and management of blunt abdominal solid organ injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007;13:399–404.
  2. Millikan JS, Moore EE, Moore GE, Stevens RE. Alternatives to splenectomy in adults after trauma. Repair, partial resection, and reimplantation of splenic tissue. Am J Surg 1982;144:711-716.
  3. Krause KR, Howells GA, Bair HA, et al. Nonoperative management
  4. of blunt splenic injury in adults 55 years and older: a twenty-year experience. Am Surg 2000;66:636-640.
  5. Bain IM, Kirby RM. 10 year experience of splenic injury. An
  6. increasing place for conservative management after blunt trauma. Injury 1998;29:177-182.
  7. Watanabe S, Ishi T, Kamachi M, Takahashi T. Computed tomography and nonoperative treatment for blunt abdominal
  8. trauma. Jpn J Surg 1990;20:56-63.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Sezgin Zeren Bu kişi benim

Mehmet Ekici Bu kişi benim

Cüneyt Kahraman Bu kişi benim

Turgay Şimşek Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Mart 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

29 Mart 2016

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2016 Cilt: 43 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bayhan, Z., Zeren, S., Ekici, M., Kahraman, C., & Şimşek, T. (2016). Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma. Dicle Medical Journal, 43(1), 117-121. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2016.01.0649
AMA
1.Bayhan Z, Zeren S, Ekici M, Kahraman C, Şimşek T. Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma. diclemedj. 2016;43(1):117-121. doi:10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2016.01.0649
Chicago
Bayhan, Zülfü, Sezgin Zeren, Mehmet Ekici, Cüneyt Kahraman, ve Turgay Şimşek. 2016. “Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma”. Dicle Medical Journal 43 (1): 117-21. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2016.01.0649.
EndNote
Bayhan Z, Zeren S, Ekici M, Kahraman C, Şimşek T (01 Mart 2016) Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma. Dicle Medical Journal 43 1 117–121.
IEEE
[1]Z. Bayhan, S. Zeren, M. Ekici, C. Kahraman, ve T. Şimşek, “Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma”, diclemedj, c. 43, sy 1, ss. 117–121, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2016.01.0649.
ISNAD
Bayhan, Zülfü - Zeren, Sezgin - Ekici, Mehmet - Kahraman, Cüneyt - Şimşek, Turgay. “Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma”. Dicle Medical Journal 43/1 (01 Mart 2016): 117-121. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2016.01.0649.
JAMA
1.Bayhan Z, Zeren S, Ekici M, Kahraman C, Şimşek T. Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma. diclemedj. 2016;43:117–121.
MLA
Bayhan, Zülfü, vd. “Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma”. Dicle Medical Journal, c. 43, sy 1, Mart 2016, ss. 117-21, doi:10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2016.01.0649.
Vancouver
1.Zülfü Bayhan, Sezgin Zeren, Mehmet Ekici, Cüneyt Kahraman, Turgay Şimşek. Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Management and Surgical Treatment of Blunt Splenic Trauma. diclemedj. 01 Mart 2016;43(1):117-21. doi:10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2016.01.0649