High school students usage behavior and views about mobile phones

Yıl 2014, , 542 - 547, 01.09.2014

Ahmet Ergin Süleyman Utku Uzun , Ali İhsan Bozkurt

https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.03.0471

Cited By: 2

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine high school students\' usage behavior and views about mobile phones. Methods: Totally 253 (85.5%) students educated at Honaz High School within the academic year 2010-2011, participated to this cross-sectional study and a questionnaire consisting of 42 questions which aimed to determine usage behavior and views about mobile phones was administered to the students. Results: The mean age of the students was 16.1 ± 1.1 years, and 56.9% of them were girl. 79.8% of students have mobile phone and 53.9% of them make daily average of over 30 minutes mobile phone calls. 76.1% of participants stated that they did not use headphones, 78.1% did not turn off their mobile phones when they are sleeping and 67.3% put it right next to them or under the pillow. 83.1% of students think mobile phones are harmful for human health, 56.7% think the base stations are harmful to human health and the environment, 91.3% think mobile phones are harmful for children, pregnant women and elderly people. Conclusion: It is found that students\' mobile phone ownership is widespread, the age of starting to use mobile phone and headphones usage is low, knowledge about the base stations is not adequate.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mobile phone, electromagnetic radiation, student, dependency

Lise öğrencilerinin cep telefonu kullanma davranışları ve cep telefonları hakkındaki görüşleri

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı lise öğrencilerinin cep telefonu kullanma davranışları ve cep telefonu hakkındaki görüşlerini belirlemektir. Yöntemler: Kesitsel tipteki bu çalışmaya 2010-2011 öğretim yılı içerisindeki Honaz Lisesi\'nde eğitim gören 253 öğrenci (%85,5) katılmış olup, çalışmaya katılan öğrencilere cep telefonu kullanma davranışlarını ve cep telefonu hakkındaki görüşlerini ortaya koymayı amaçlayan 42 sorudan oluşan bir anket formu uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan öğrencilerin yaş ortalaması 16,1±1,1 yıl olup, %56,9\'u kız idi. Öğrencilerin %79,8\'inin cep telefonu vardı ve %53,9\'u günlük ortalama 30 dakikanın üzerinde cep telefonuyla görüşme yapmaktaydı. Katılımcıların % 76,1\'i kulaklık kullanmadığını, %78,1\'i yatarken cep telefonunu kapatmadığını ve %67,3\'ü yatarken cep telefonunu hemen yanına veya yastığın altına koyduğunu belirtmiştir. Katılımcıların %83,1\'i cep telefonunun insan sağlığına zararlı olduğunu, %56,7\'si baz istasyonlarının insan sağlığına ve çevreye zararlı olduğunu, %91,3\'ü çocuklara, hamilelere ve yaşlılara zararlı olduğunu düşünmekte idi. Sonuç: Öğrencilerin cep telefonu sahipliğinin yaygın olduğu ve cep telefonu kullanmaya başlama yaşının ve kulaklık kullanımının düşük olduğu, baz istasyonları hakkında yeterli bilgiye sahip olmadığı görüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cep telefonu, elektromanyetik radyasyon, öğrenci, bağımlılık

Kaynakça

• Karaaslan İA, Budak L. Üniversite öğrencilerinin cep telefo- nu özelliklerini kullanımlarının ve gündelik iletişimlerine etkisinin araştırılması. J Yaşar University 2012;26:4548- 4571.
• Mitchell KJ, Bull S, Kiwanuka J, Ybarra ML. Cell phone us- age among adolescents in Uganda: acceptability for relay- ing health information. Health Educ Res 2011;26:770-781.
• Davidson HC, Lutman ME. Survey of mobile phone use and their chronic effects on the hearing of a student population. Int J Audiol 2007;46:113-118.
• Ameli SR. New individualism and mobil phone: technology of individualism and identity. Global Media J 2006;1:3.
• Redmayne M. New Zealand adolescents’ cellphone and cord- less phone user-habits: are they at increased risk of brain tumours already? A cross-sectional study. Environ Health 2013;12:5.
• Rubin GJ, Das MJ, Wessely S. Electromagnetic hypersensi- tivity: a systematic review of provocation studies. Psycho- som Med 2005;67:224-232.
• Ammari M, Brillaud E, Gamez C, Lecomte A, Sakly M, Ab- delmelek H. Effect of a chronic GSM 90MhHz exposure on glia in the rat brain. Biomed Pharmacother 2008;62:273- 281.
• Riddervold IS, Pedersen GF, Andersen NT et al. Cognitive function and symptoms in adults and adolescents in relation to f radiation from UMTS base stations Bioelectromagnet- ics 2008;29:257-267.
• Eltiti S, Wallace D, Ridgewell A, et al. Does short term ex- posure to mobile phone base station signals increase symp- toms in individuals who report sensitivity to electromag- netic fields? A double-blind randomized provocation study. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115:1603-1608.
• Franke H, Streckert J, Bitz A, et al. Effects of universal mobile telecommunications systems(UMTS) electromag- netic fields on the blood-brain barrier in vitro. Radiat Res 2005;164:258-269.
• Curcio G, Ferrara M, Moroni F, D’Inzeo G, De Bertini LM. Is the brain influenced by a phone call? An EEG study of resting wakefulness. Neurosci Res 2005;53:265-270.
• Karger CP. Mobile phones and health: A literature overview. Z Med Phys 2005;15:73-85.
• Johansen C. Electromagnetic fields and health effects-ep- idemiologic studies of cancer, diseases of the central ner- vous system and arrhythmia-related heart disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 2004;1:1-30.
• Westerman R, Hocking B. Diseases of modern living: neu- rological changes associated with mobile phones and radio frequency radiation in humans. Neurosci Lett 2004;361:13- 16.
• French PW, Penny R, Laurance JA, McKenzie DR. Mo- bile phones heat shock proteins and cancer. Differentiation 2001;67:93-97.
• Repacholi MH. Health risks from the use of mobile phones. Toxicol Lett 2001;120:323-331.
• Regel SJ, Negovetic S, Roosli M, et al. UMTS base station- like exposure well-being and cognitive performance, Envi- ron Health Perspect 2006;114:1270-1275.
• World Health Organization, International Agency for Re- search on Cancer. IARC classifies radiofrequency elec- tromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Ulaşılabileceği adres: http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/ pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf
• International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Pro- tection (ICNIRP). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time- varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 1998;74:494-522.
• Council of European Union. Implementation report on the council recommendation limiting the public exposure to electromagnetic fields. Ulaşılabileceği adres: http:// ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_determinants/environment/ emf/implement_rep_en.pdf
• Federal Communications Commissions. Specific absorp- tion rate (Sar) for cellular telephones. Ulaşılabileceği adres: http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/specific-absorption-rate- sar-cellular-telephones
• Lenhart A. Teens, smartphones & texting. Ulaşılabileceği adres:http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/03/19/communica- tion-choices/
• Mezei G, Benyi M, Muller A. Mobile phone ownership and use among school children in three Hungarian cities. Bio- electromagnetics 2007;28:309-315.
• Thomas S, Heinrich S, Kühnlein A, Radon K. The associa- tion between socioeconomic status and exposure to mobile telecommunication networks in children and adolescents. Bioelectromagnetics 2010;31:20-27.
• Schüz J. Mobile phone use and exposures in children. Bio- electromagnetics 2005;7:45-50.
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojile- ri kullanım araştırması. Ulaşılabileceği adres: http://www. tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=13569
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. 06-15 yaş grubu çocuklarda bilişim teknolojileri kullanımı ve medya, 2013. Ulaşılabi- leceği adres: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri. do?id=15866
• Bilgi teknolojileri ve iletişim kurumu piyasa gözetim la- boratuvarı müdürlüğü sar değerleri Ulaşılabileceği adres: http://pgm.btk.gov.tr/?q=SARvalues
• Hassoy H, Durusoy R, Karababa AO. Adolescents’ risk perceptions on mobile phones and their base stations, their trust to authorities and incivility in using mobile phones: a cross-sectional survey on 2240 high school students in Izmir, Turkey. Environ Health 2013;12:1-10.
• Lonn S, Forssen U, Vecchia P, et al. Output power levels from mobile phones in different geographical areas; im- plications for exposure assessment. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:769-772.