Initial experience with laparoscopic gastrectomy in a low-volume center

Öz

Objective: Today, minimal invasive surgery has gained wide acceptance by general surgeons, even in complex oncological procedures. Despite the increased experience on laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, limited number of surgeons prefer laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal or middle-third gastric cancer, due to the concern of technical difficulties which can alter the quality of oncological outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed gastric cancer patients who underwent curative intent laparoscopic gastrectomy by single surgeon from October 2013 to April 2014. Five total gastrectomy + D2 (-No 10 and 11d) and 1 distal gastrectomy + D2 lymphadenectomy were analyzed for patient demographics, pathological characteristics, morbidity and in-hospital mortality. Results: The mean operating time was 255,8±37.2 minutes. The mean blood loss was 121.6±20.4 ml. In all patients, R0 resection were performed. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes were 22.6±7.3. The median number of metastatic lymph nodes was 16 (0-23). In one patient, less than 15 lymph nodes were retrieved. Complication rate was 33.3% (n=2). In one patient, who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, afferent loop syndrome developed. In another patient, who underwent total gastrectomy plus splenectomy a massive pulmoner embolism developed. The median hospital stay was 10 (6-18) days. Conclusion: With increased experience in advanced laparoscopic procedures, laparoscopic total gastrectomy may be considered as the first line treatment approach for gastric cancer patient even in a low-volume center. Key words: Gastric cancer, Laparoscopic gastrectomy, distal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gastric cancer, Laparoscopic gastrectomy, distal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy

Düşük yoğunluklu bir merkezde ilk laparoskopik gastrektomi deneyimlerimiz

Öz

Amaç: Günümüzde minimal invazif cerrahi genel cerrahlar tarafından kompleks onkolojik prosedürler için bile kullanılır hale gelmiştir. Ancak, laparoskopik distal gastrektomi deneyiminin artmasına rağmen, teknik zorlukların onkolojik sonuçları etkileyebileceği endişesi ile az sayıda cerrah total gastrektomi için laparoskopik yöntemi tercih etmektedir.Yöntemler: Eylül 2013 ile Nisan 2014 arasında tek cerrah tarafından küratif amaçlı laparoskopik gastrektomi uygulanmış mide kanseri hastalarını retrospektif olarak değerlendirdik. 5 total gastrektomi + D2 (-No 10 ve 11d) ve 1 distal gastrektomi + D2 lenfadenektomi hastası, demografik özellikler, patolojik karakteristikler, morbidite ve hastane mortalitesi açısından değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Ortalama ameliyat süresi 255,8±37,2 dakika, ortalama kan kaybı 121.6±20.4 mL idi. Tüm hastalara R0 rezeksiyon uygulandı. Çıkartılan lenf nodu ortalaması 22,6±7,3, metastatik lenf nodu ortancası 16 idi. 1 hastada 15’ten az lenf nodu çıkartıldı. Komplikasyon oranı %33,3 (n=2) idi; laparoskopik distal gastrektomi uygulanan bir hastada aferent loop sendromu gelişti; laparoskopik total gastrektomi ve splenektomi uygulanan diğer bir hastada masif pulmoner emboli gelişti. Ortanca hastanede kalım süresi 10 gündü.Sonuç: Laparoskopik cerrahi prosedürlerin uygulanmasında gelişen deneyim düzeyi ile birlikte, ileri gastrik kanser hastaları için, ileri laparoskopik işlemlerin az sayıda ve düşük yoğunlukta yapıldığı merkezlerde dahi laparoskopik total gastrektomi ilk düşünülecek tedavi seçeneği olabilir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mide kanseri, laparoskopik gastrektomi, distal gastrektomi, total gastrektomi

Kaynakça

1. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted
2. Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994; 4:146-
3. -
4. Hur H, Jeon HM, Kim W. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy
5. with D2 lymphadenectomy for T2b advanced
6. gastric cancers: three years’ experience. J Surg Oncol
7. ;98:515-519.
8. Hamabe A, Omori T, Tanaka K, et al. Comparison of longterm

9. results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and
10. open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced
11. gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2012; 26:1702-1709.
12. Viñuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, et al. Laparoscopic
13. versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a metaanalysis
14. of randomized controlled trials and high-quality
15. nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg 2012; 255:446-456.
16. Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, et al. Improved quality of life
17. outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for
18. early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized
19. clinical trial. Ann Surg 2008; 248:721-727.
20. Lee JH, Han HS, Lee JH. A prospective randomized study
21. comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy
22. in early gastric cancer: early results. Surg Endosc 2005;
23. :168-173.
24. Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, et al. Changes in clinicopathological
25. features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric
26. cancer over a 20-year period. Br J Surg 2011;98:255-260.
27. Suzuki H, Gotoda T, Sasako M, et al. Detection of early gastric
28. cancer: misunderstanding the role of mass screening.
29. Gastric Cancer 2006;9:315-319.
30. Yalcin S, Gumus M, Kilickap S, et al. End-of-study results
31. of Turkish gastric cancer patients from the global REGATE
32. study. J BUON 2014; 19:377-387.
33. Association JGC. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines
34. (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 2011;14:113-123.
35. Jeong O, Ryu SY, Zhao X-F, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes
36. and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy
37. (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume
38. center. Surg Endosc 2012;26:3418-3425.
39. Xiong J-J, Nunes QM, Huang W, et al. Laparoscopic vs
40. open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
41. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:8114-8132.
42. Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, et al. Extended
43. lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med
44. ;340:908-914.
45. Danielson H, Kokkola A, Kiviluoto T, et al. Clinical outcome
46. after D1 vs D2-3 gastrectomy for treatment of gastric
47. cancer. Scand J Surg 2007;96:35-40.
48. Maruyama K, Gunvén P, Okabayashi K, et al. Lymph node
49. metastases of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1931 patients.
50. Ann Surg 1989;210:596-602.
51. Noguchi Y, Imada T, Matsumoto A, et al. Radical surgery
52. for gastric cancer. A review of the Japanese experience.
53. Cancer 1989;64:2053-2062.
54. Cuschieri A, Weeden S, Fielding J, et al. Patient survival
55. after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term
56. R. Aktimur et al. Initial experience with laparoscopic gastrectomy 17
57. Dicle Tıp Derg / Dicle Med J www.diclemedj.org Cilt / Vol 42, No 1, 12-17
58. results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Cooperative
59. Group. Br J Cancer 1999;79:1522-1530.
60. Wang J, Dang P, Raut CP, et al. Comparison of a lymph
61. node ratio-based staging system with the 7th AJCC system
62. for gastric cancer: analysis of 18,043 patients from the
63. SEER database. Ann Surg 2012;255:478-485.
64. Wang W, Zhang X, Shen C, et al. Laparoscopic versus open
65. total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.
66. PLoS One 2014; 9:e88753.
67. Poller DN. Method of specimen fixation and pathological
68. dissection of colorectal cancer influences retrieval of
69. lymph nodes and tumour nodal stage. Eur J Surg Oncol
70. ;26:758-762.
71. Dulucq J-L, Wintringer P, Stabilini C, et al. Laparoscopic
72. and open gastric resections for malignant lesions: a prospective
73. comparative study. Surg Endosc 2005;19:933-938.
74. Du J, Zheng J, Li Y, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy
75. with extended lymph node resection for advanced
76. gastric cancer--reports of 82 cases. Hepatogastroenterology
77. ;57:1589-1594.
78. Kim HS, Kim BS, Lee IS, et al. Comparison of totally
79. laparoscopic total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy
80. for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
81. ;23:323-331.
82. Hallet J, Labidi S, Bouchard-Fortier A, et al. Oncologic
83. specimen from laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy for gastric
84. adenocarcinoma is comparable to D1-open surgery: the
85. experience of a Canadian centre. Can J Surg 2013;56:249-
86. -
87. Huang K-H, Lan Y-T, Fang W-L, et al. Initial experience of
88. robotic gastrectomy and comparison with open and laparoscopic
89. gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg
90. ;16:1303-1310.
91. Ye L-y, Liu D-r, Li C, et al. Systematic review of laparoscopy-assisted
92. versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric
93. cancer. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2013;14:468-478.