Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 49 Sayı: 1, 29 - 35, 11.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1086113

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, et al. Multiplesclerosis. The Lancet. 2018;391:1622-36.
  • 2.Filippi M, Preziosa P, Langdon D, et al. IdentifyingProgression in Multiple Sclerosis: New Perspectives.Ann Neurol. 2020;88:438-52.
  • 3.Kavaliunas A, Manouchehrinia A, Stawiarz L, et al.Importance of early treatment initiation in theclinical course of multiple sclerosis. MultipleSclerosis. 2017;23:1233-40.

Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 49 Sayı: 1, 29 - 35, 11.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1086113

Öz

Objective: Mitoxantrone (Mtx) and cyclophosphamide (Cyc) have successfully been used in highly aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. This study aims to compare the efficacy of these drugs in patients with secondary progressive MS (pwSPMS).
Method: Clinical data of pwSPMS treated with either Mtx or Cyc were collected retrospectively. The EDSS scores before, during, and after the drug was determined. The efficacy of the drug was evaluated according to the EDSS change after the completion of therapy. The variations in clinical benefit between the two groups were investigated, as well as the factors that influenced them.
Results: Fifty-nine SPMS patients (29 Mtx, 30 Cyc) were included in our study. Mean treatment periods were 19.5±9.9 months for Mtx and 9.1±4.1 months for the Cyc group. Mean EDSS in Mtx and Cyc groups at the first dose were 6.2±0.7 and 6.3±0.8, respectively (p=0.42). The percentage of patients who benefited from treatment was 41.6% in the Mtx group and 43.0% in the Cyc group (p=0.54). However, Mtx was more effective in patients with younger age of disease onset (p=0.01).
Conclusion: Immunosuppression with intravenous Mtx and Cyc may equally prevent progression in patients with SPMS. Additionally, Mtx may be more beneficial in MS patients with earlier disease onset.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, et al. Multiplesclerosis. The Lancet. 2018;391:1622-36.
  • 2.Filippi M, Preziosa P, Langdon D, et al. IdentifyingProgression in Multiple Sclerosis: New Perspectives.Ann Neurol. 2020;88:438-52.
  • 3.Kavaliunas A, Manouchehrinia A, Stawiarz L, et al.Importance of early treatment initiation in theclinical course of multiple sclerosis. MultipleSclerosis. 2017;23:1233-40.
Toplam 3 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Articles
Yazarlar

Tuncay Gündüz Bu kişi benim

Gonca Özcan Bu kişi benim

Arman Çakar Bu kişi benim

Halil İbrahim Akçay Bu kişi benim

Ayşe Nur Özdağ Acarlı Bu kişi benim

Mefküre Eraksoy Bu kişi benim

Murat Kürtüncü Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 11 Mart 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 9 Ekim 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 49 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Gündüz, T., Özcan, G., Çakar, A., Akçay, H. İ., vd. (2022). Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, 49(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1086113
AMA Gündüz T, Özcan G, Çakar A, Akçay Hİ, Özdağ Acarlı AN, Eraksoy M, Kürtüncü M. Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. diclemedj. Mart 2022;49(1):29-35. doi:10.5798/dicletip.1086113
Chicago Gündüz, Tuncay, Gonca Özcan, Arman Çakar, Halil İbrahim Akçay, Ayşe Nur Özdağ Acarlı, Mefküre Eraksoy, ve Murat Kürtüncü. “Comparison of Mitoxantrone Versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 49, sy. 1 (Mart 2022): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1086113.
EndNote Gündüz T, Özcan G, Çakar A, Akçay Hİ, Özdağ Acarlı AN, Eraksoy M, Kürtüncü M (01 Mart 2022) Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 49 1 29–35.
IEEE T. Gündüz, G. Özcan, A. Çakar, H. İ. Akçay, A. N. Özdağ Acarlı, M. Eraksoy, ve M. Kürtüncü, “Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis”, diclemedj, c. 49, sy. 1, ss. 29–35, 2022, doi: 10.5798/dicletip.1086113.
ISNAD Gündüz, Tuncay vd. “Comparison of Mitoxantrone Versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 49/1 (Mart 2022), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1086113.
JAMA Gündüz T, Özcan G, Çakar A, Akçay Hİ, Özdağ Acarlı AN, Eraksoy M, Kürtüncü M. Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. diclemedj. 2022;49:29–35.
MLA Gündüz, Tuncay vd. “Comparison of Mitoxantrone Versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, c. 49, sy. 1, 2022, ss. 29-35, doi:10.5798/dicletip.1086113.
Vancouver Gündüz T, Özcan G, Çakar A, Akçay Hİ, Özdağ Acarlı AN, Eraksoy M, Kürtüncü M. Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. diclemedj. 2022;49(1):29-35.