ON INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AFFECTING FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Yıl 2014, Sayı: 163, 5 - 18, 01.03.2014

Sıla Ay

https://doi.org/10.1501/Dilder_0000000203

Cited By: 4

Öz

There are plenty of factors affecting the foreign language process. Amongthe factors like choosing the right method and environment, learners’ firstlanguage, teachers’ dedication individual learner differences have a vitalimportance in deciding success or failure in foreign language learning.Although there is a consensus about the role of individual differences, thereis a quagmire in identifying, describing and classifying these factors. Thepresent paper provides an overview of the most significant differences likeage, intelligence, aptitude, learning styles and strategies, motivation andanxiety among others. It also describes the various classifications done byresearchers of the field

Anahtar Kelimeler

Foreign language teaching, individual differences, affectivefactors, cognitive factors

Yabancı dil öğretiminde bireysel farklılıklar kavramına genel bir bakış

Öz

Yabancı dil öğretimi süreci boyunca, öğrenciyi başarıya götüren birçoketmen vardır. Uygun yöntemin seçilmesinden ders ortamına, anadili ilehedef dil arasındaki ilişkiden öğretmen yetkinliğine kadar çeşitlendirilebilecek bu etmenler her ne kadar iyileştirilmeye de çalışılsa, ideal koşullarbelirlenip uygulanılsa da süreç, öğrenciden öğrenciye farklılık gösterecektir. Bu durumun temelinde şüphesiz, bireysel farklılıklar yatmaktadır.Araştırmacılar tarafından da kabul görmüş olan bu düşünce doğrultusundayabancı dil öğretiminde rol oynayan yaş, zekâ, eğilim, öğrenme biçemleri vestratejileri, güdülenme ve kaygı gibi bireysel farklılıkların tanımlanması veulamlandırılması üzerine birçok çalışma yapılmıştır. Bu derleme çalışmasında, yıllar içinde ortaya çıkan farklı görüşler ve bunlara bağlı olarakyapılan tanımların açıklanması amaçlanmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yabancı dil öğretimi, bireysel farklılıklar, duyuşsaletmenler, bilişsel etmenler

Kaynakça

• Anderson, N.J. (2005). L2 learning strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.757-771). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Benson, P. (Ed.) (2007). Learner autonomy 8: Teacher and learner perspectives. Dublin: Authentik.
• Berninger, V. W.,Nielsen, K.H., Abbott, R.D., Wijsman, E.&Raskind, W. (2008).Genderdifferences in severity of writingandreadingdisabilities. Journal of School Psychology46, 151–172.
• Bista, B. (2009). Age as an affectivefactor in secondlanguageacquisition, http://www. scribd.com/doc/7753203/Age-as-an-AffectiveFactor-in-Second-Language- Acquisition adresinden 10 Ekim 2012 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
• Brown, H. D. (2001). Principles of language learning and teaching (fourth edition). White Plains: Pearson Education.
• Byrne, B. (2000).Relationshipbetweenanxiety, fear, self-esteemandcopingstrategies in ado- lescence. Adolescence35, 201–215.
• Cohen, A.D. &Dörnyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the language learner: Motivation, styles and strategies. In N. Schmitt (Ed.) An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 170-190). London: Edward Arnold.
• Cook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
• Dörnyei, Z. &Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in L2 learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.) The handbook of second language acquisition (pp: 589-630). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ehrman, M. E. & Leaver, B. L. (2003). Cognitive styles in the service of language learning. System 31: 391-415.
• Ehrman, M. E.; Leaver, B. L. & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual dif- ferences in second language learning. System 31: 313-330.
• Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.) The handbook of applied linguistics (pp: 525-551). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• Ellis, R. (2008).The study of second language acquisition (second edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of Learning andsecond-languagespeech. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second languageacquisitionandthecriticalperiodhypothesis (pp.101–132). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
• Gardner, R. C. &MacIntyre, P. D. (1992). A student’s contributions to second language learning. Part I: Cognitive variables. Language Teaching 25, 211-220.
• Gass, S. M. &Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. New York and London: Routledge.
• Gregersen, T. &Horwitz, E. K. (2002). Language Learning andPerfectionism: AnxiousandNon Anxious Language Learners’ ReactionstoTheirOwn Oral Performance. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 562-570.
• Griffiths, C. (2008). LessonsfromGood Language Learners, Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
• Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21: 112-126.
• Ioup, G. (2005). Age in second language development. In. E. Hinkel (Ed.) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Johnson, K. (2001). An introduction to foreign language learning and teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education.
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (2008). TechniquesandPrinciples in Teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford UniversityPress.
• Leaver, B. L., Ehrman, M. E. &Shekhtman, B. (2005). Achieving successin second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). TheBiologicalFoundations of Language. New York: Wiley.
• MacIntyre, P. D. &Gardner, R. C. (1991). Language Anxiety: Its Relationshipto Other Anxietiesandto Processing in Nativeand Second Languages. Language lear- ning, 41(4), 513-534.
• MacIntyre, P. D. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of there search for language teac- hers. Affect in foreignlanguageandsecondlanguagelearning: A practicalguidetocrea- ting a low-anxietyclassroomatmosphere, 24, 41. MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., &Conrod, S. (2001). Willingnesstocommunicate, socialsupport, andlanguage-learningorientations of immersionstudents. Studies in secondlanguageacquisition, 23(03), 369-388.
• Mayberry, R. &Lock, E. (2003). Age constraints on firstversussecondlanguageacquisition: Evidenceforlinguisticplasticityandepigenesist. Brain and Language, 87(1), 369-384.
• Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: Thecriticalfactors of age, moti- vation, andinstruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81–108.
• Muñoz, C. & Singleton, D. (2011). A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching 44: 1-35.
• Oxford, R. L. (1999). Anxietyandthelanguagelearner: New insights. Affect in languagelear- ning, 58-67.
• Oxford, R. L. (2001). Language learning styles and strategies. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language (third edition), (pp.359-366). Boston: Heinle&Heinle.
• Pawlak, M. (2012). Individual differences in language learning and teaching: Achievements, Prospects and challenges. In M. Pawlak (Ed.) New perspectives on individual differ- ences in language learning and teaching (pp. xix-xlvi). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
• Piechurska-Kuciel, E. (2008). Input, processingandoutputanxiety in studentswithsymptoms of developmentaldyslexia. Language Learnerswith Special Needs, an international- perspective, 86-109.
• Piske, T.,MacKay, I., &Flege, J. E. (2001). Factorsaffectingdegree of foreignaccent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.
• Scovel, T. (1978). Theeffect of affect on foreignlanguagelearning: A review of theanxiety- research. Language learning, 28(1), 129-142.
• Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking Press.
• Sternberg, R. J. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence and its implications for lan- guage aptitude testing. In P. Robinson (Ed.) Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp:13-43). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Wen, X. (2011). Learning styles and their implications in learning and teaching, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol.1, 4, pp. 413-416.
• Zhang, Q. (2009). Affectingfactors of native-likepronunciation: A literaturereview. A ComprehensivePerspective, 33-52.