Ray Hammond’ın Extinction Romanında İklim Yönetimi ve Yapısal Bilmezlik

Öz

Extinction (2005) adlı distopik romanında, Ray Hammond, dünyanın daha zengin bölgelerinden olan çok uluslu şirketlerin ve hükümetlerin iklimi kontrol etmesine ve dünyanın geri kalanına iklim hizmetleri satarak kazanç sağlamasına olanak veren iklim yönetiminin aşırı bir formunun başına bela olduğu dünyanın yakın gelecekteki bir tasvirini yapar. Şirketlerin ve hükümetlerin temsil ettiği kapitalist sistemin istilacı iklim yönetim uygulamaları, yerküre sistemlerinin doğal ritimlerini, bunların çöküşüne varan ölçüde, sekteye uğratır ve bozar. Üstelik, romanda, ERGIA Şirketi ve Amerikan hükümeti gibi kendini önceleyen kapitalist sistemin temsilcileri, sonu gelmeyen iklim yönetimlerinin zararlı etkilerini kanıtlayan bilimsel bulguları ve kanıtları ortadan kaldırarak ve/ya karartarak, uygulamalarının gerçek yüzü ile ilgili bilmezlik yayarlar. Dolayısıyla, bu çalışma, ileri düzey iklim yönetim sistemlerinin uzayda kurulu olduğu ve hava olaylarının sıkı bir şekilde kontrol edildiği bir dünya sunan Ray Hammond’ın Extinction isimli eserinde, kapitalist şirketlerin ve hükümetlerin sürdürülen uygulamaları ile çevresel bozulma ve çöküş arasındaki bağlantıların izini sürmeyi hedeflemektedir. Ayrıca, romanda, aşırı iklim yönetimi sebebiyle dünyanın manyetik alanına yoğun bir darbe inmesi sonucu meydana gelen çevresel felaketlerin, dünyayı yok oluşa sürükleyen büyük ölçekli iklim yönetiminin zararlı ve geri dönüşü olmayan etkilerini ve sonuçlarını, çıkarcı ve amansız kapitalist sistemin görememesini ya da bundan ziyade kasıtlı görmezden gelişini nasıl açığa çıkardığını tartışmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ray Hammond
• Extinction
• İklim Değişikliği
• İklim Yönetimi
• Küresel Isınma
• Agnotoloji
• Kapitalizm

Climate Management and Structural Ignorance in Ray Hammond’s Extinction

Abstract

In his dystopian novel, Extinction (2005), Ray Hammond envisions an image of the world in the near future where it is troubled by an extreme form of climate management that enables multi-national corporations and governments from the wealthier regions of the world to control the climate and make profits by selling climate services to the rest of the world. The invasive climate management practices of the capitalist system represented by corporations and governments interfere with and disrupt the natural rhythms of the Earth systems to the extent of the latter’s collapse. Moreover, the representatives of the capitalist self-prioritizing system such as the ERGIA Corporation and the US Government in the novel spread ignorance regarding the true nature of their practices by suppressing and/or obscuring scientific findings and evidence that prove the harmful effects of their relentless climate management. Accordingly, this paper aims at tracing the links between the perpetuated practices of the capitalist corporations and governments, and environmental degradation and collapse in Ray Hammond’s Extinction which presents a world where advanced climate management systems have been implemented in space and weather events are tightly controlled and scheduled. It further discusses how the environmental cataclysms brought about by deep interference with the Earth’s magnetic field via extreme climate management in the novel expose the self-interested and ruthless capitalist system’s failure to see or rather deliberate ignorance of the detrimental and irreversible effects and consequences of large-scale climate management which drives the world to extinction.

Keywords

• Ray Hammond
• Extinction
• Climate Change
• Climate Management
• Global Warming
• Agnotology
• Capitalism

Kaynakça

1. Adhikari, Surendra, and Ivins, Erik R. (2016), “Climate-Driven Polar Motion: 2003–2015,” Science Advances, vol.2, no. 4, pp. 1–10.
2. Altvater, Elmar (2016), “The Capitalocene, or, Geoengineering against Capitalism’s Planetary Boundaries,” Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism, ed. Jason W. Moore, Oakland, PM Press, pp. 138–152.
3. Berchin, Issa Ibrahim, Valduga, Isabela Blasi, Garcia, Jéssica, and Guerra, José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osorio de Andrade (2017), “Climate Change and Forced Migrations: An Effort Towards Recognizing Climate Refugees,” Geoforum, vol. 84, pp. 147–150.
4. Garrard, Greg (2004), Ecocriticism, New York, Routledge.
5. Heise, Ursula K. (2006), “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Ecocriticism,” PMLA, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 503–516.
6. Iovino, Serenella (2010), “Ecocriticism, Ecology of Mind, and Narrative Ethics: A Theoretical Ground for Ecocriticism as Educational Practice,” ISLE, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 759–762.
7. IPCC (2014), Climate Change 2014, Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf (Last accessed: March 15, 2021).
8. Johnson-Groh, Mara, and Merzdorf, Jessica (2020, August 19), “NASA Researchers Track Slowly Splitting ‘Dent’ in Earth’s Magnetic Field,” https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-researchers-track-slowly-splitting-dent-in-earth-s-magnetic-field (Last accessed: March 19, 2021).

9. Kilifarska Natalya A., Bakmutov, Volodymyr G., and Melnyk, Galyna V. (2020), The Hidden Link between Earth’s Magnetic Field and Climate, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
10. Lazarus, Michael, and Asselt, Harro van (2018), “Fossil Fuel Supply and Climate Policy: Exploring the Road Less Taken,” Climatic Change, vol. 150, pp. 1–13.
11. Love, Glen A. (1996), “Revaluing Nature: Toward an Ecological Criticism,” The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, eds. Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm, Athens, University of Georgia Press, pp. 225–240.
12. Moore, Jason W. (2017), “The Capitalocene, Part I: On the Nature and Origins of Our Ecological Crisis,” The Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 594–630.
13. Oreskes, Naomi, and Conway, Erik M. (2008), “Challenging Knowledge: How Climate Science Became a Victim of the Cold War,” Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, ed. Robert N. Proctor and Londa Schiebinger, Stanford, Stanford University Press, pp. 55–89.
14. Plumwood, Val (2002), Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason, New York, Routledge.
15. Proctor, Robert N. (2008), “Agnotology: A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural Production of Ignorance (and Its Study),” Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, eds. Robert N. Proctor and Londa Schiebinger, Stanford, Stanford University Press, pp. 1–33.
16. Proctor, Robert N., and Schiebinger, Londa (2008), Preface, Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, eds. Robert N. Proctor and Londa Schiebinger. Stanford, Stanford University Press, pp. vii–viii.
17. Roszak, Theodore (2003), Person/Planet: The Creative Disintegration of Industrial Society, Lincoln, iUniverse.
18. Sen, Malcolm (2009), “Spatial Justice: The Ecological Imperative and Postcolonial Development,” Journal of Postcolonial Writing, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 365–377.
19. Shepherd, John (2009), Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty, London, The Royal Society.
20. Thoreau, Henry David (2008), Walking, Auckland, The Floating Press.
21. Thornes, John E., and Pope, Francis D. (2014), “Why Do We Need Solutions to Global Warming?,” Geoengineering of the Climate System, eds. Ronald E. Hester and Roy M. Harrison, Cambridge, The Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 1–21.