KAE TEMPEST’IN BRAND NEW ANCIENTS ADLI ESERİNDE CİNSİYET EDİMLİLİĞİNİN YENİDEN İFADE EDİLMESİ

Öz

Bu makale, Kae Tempest’in Brand New Ancients adlı eserini Judith Butler’ın toplumsal cinsiyet edimliliği kuramı çerçevesinde incelemekte ve metni eril epik türün bir altüst edimi olarak değerlendirmektedir. Çalışma, şiirin erkeklik ve kadınlığın toplumsal olarak nasıl kurulduğunu, tekrar eden pratikler aracılığıyla nasıl pekiştirildiğini ve belirli edimler yoluyla nasıl dönüştürülebileceğini ortaya koyduğunu savunmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda toplumsal cinsiyetin sabit bir özden ziyade süreçsel ve performatif bir yapı olduğu vurgulanmaktadır. Aynı zamanda metin, epik geleneğin tarihsel olarak erkek-merkezli anlatı yapısını yeniden işleyerek, kahramanlık, güç ve otorite gibi kavramları gündelik yaşamın sıradan özneleri üzerinden yeniden tanımlar. Clive ve Gloria gibi karakterler üzerinden yürütülen analiz, heteronormatif ataerkil düzenin bireyler üzerindeki etkilerini görünür kılmakta; kadınlık ve erkeklik rollerinin nasıl içselleştirildiğini ve yeniden üretildiğini göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte metin, bu normlara karşı gelişen kırılma ve direniş anlarını da açığa çıkararak toplumsal cinsiyetin değiştirilebilir doğasına işaret etmektedir. Sonuç olarak makale, Brand New Ancients’ın hem toplumsal cinsiyet normlarını hem de maskülinist epik türün sınırlarını sorgulayan, onları istikrarsızlaştıran ve alternatif eylemlilik biçimlerine alan açan bir metin olduğunu ileri sürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kae Tempest
• Judith Butler
• Brand New Ancients
• cinsiyet edimliliği
• epik

A REARTICULATION OF GENDER PERFORMATIVITY IN KAE TEMPEST’S BRAND NEW ANCIENTS

Öz

This article examines Kae Tempest’s Brand New Ancients through Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity and conceptualizes the text as a subversion of the masculinist epic genre. It argues that the poem reveals how masculinity and femininity are socially constructed, reinforced through repetitive practices, and potentially transformed through performative acts. In this respect, gender is emphasized as a processual and performative structure rather than a fixed essence. At the same time, the text reworks the historically male-centered conventions of epic narrative, redefining notions such as heroism, power, and authority through the lives of ordinary individuals. Through an analysis of characters such as Clive and Gloria, the study exposes the impact of heteronormative patriarchy on individuals and demonstrates how gender roles are internalized and reproduced. At the same time, the text highlights moments of fraction and resistance that expose the possibility of reconfiguring gender norms, suggesting that gender is neither stable nor predetermined but open to rearticulation. Ultimately, the article argues that Brand New Ancients challenges the constructed nature of gender, destabilizes normative understandings of masculinity and femininity, and opens up alternative forms of agency beyond patriarchal constraints.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kae Tempest
• Judith Butler
• gender performativity
• epic
• Brand New Ancients

Kaynakça

1. Bailey, L., Griffin, C., & Shankar, A. (2015). “Not a good look”: Impossible dilemmas for young women negotiating the culture of intoxication in the United Kingdom. Substance Use & Misuse, 50(6), 747–758.
2. Beauvoir, S. de. (1973). The second sex (E. M. Parshley, Trans.). Vintage.
3. Bhana, D. (2009). “Boys will be boys”: What do early childhood teachers have to do with it? Educational Review, 61(3), 327–339.
4. Blundell, S. (1995). Women in ancient Greece. Harvard University Press.
5. Butler, J. (2002). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
6. Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893
7. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.
8. Dempster, S. (2007). Degrees of laddishness: Masculinities within the student experience of higher education [Doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University].

9. Dodd, E. S. (2023). The lyric voice in English theology. Bloomsbury Publishing.
10. Dowden, K. (2004). The epic tradition in Greece. In R. Fowler (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Homer (pp. 188–205). Cambridge University Press.
11. Engel, K. (2021). “Poverty porn” in spoken word poetry? Kate Tempest’s Brand New Ancients. In Representing poverty in the Anglophone postcolonial world (pp. 43–70). Bonn University Press.
12. Eves, R. (2010). Engendering gesture: Gender performativity and bodily regimes from New Ireland. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 11(1), 1–16.
13. Francis, B. (1999). Lads, lasses and (new) labour: 14–16 year old students’ responses to “laddish behaviour and boys’ underachievement” debate. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 353–371.
14. Galasiński, D. (2004). Men and the language of emotions. Palgrave Macmillan.
15. Hamilton, A. C. (Ed.). (1997). The Spenser encyclopedia. University of Toronto Press.
16. Homer. (1990). The Iliad (R. Fagles, Trans.). Penguin Books.
17. Jackson, C., & Sundaram, V. (2020). Lad culture in higher education: Sexism, sexual harassment and violence. Routledge.
18. Jewkes, R., Flood, M., & Lang, J. (2015). Hegemonic masculinity: Combining theory and practice in gender inter‐ ventions. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(Suppl. 2), 112–127.
19. Lawson, R. (2023). Language and mediated masculinities: Cultures, contexts, and constraints. Oxford University Press.
20. Lewis, C. T., & Short, C. (1879). A Latin dictionary. Oxford University Press.
21. Martin, B. (2011). Children at play: Learning gender in the early years. Trentham Books.
22. McGlashan, M., & Mercer, J. (2023). Toxic masculinity: Men, meaning, and digital media. Routledge.
23. Nichols, K. (2018). Moving beyond ideas of laddism: Conceptualising “mischievous masculinities” as a new way of understanding everyday sexism and gender relations. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 73–85.
24. Ostriker, A. (1982). The thieves of language: Women poets and revisionist mythmaking. Signs, 8(1), 68–90.
25. Phipps, A. (2018). “Lad culture” and sexual violence against students. In S. Anitha & R. Lewis (Eds.), Gender-based violence in university communities: Policy, prevention and educational initiatives (pp. 41–59). Bristol University Press.
26. Roberts, T.-A., & Waters, P. L. (2019). The gendered body project: Sexual and self-objectification as motivated and motivating processes. In The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 321–336). Oxford University Press.
27. Rotelle, J. H. (Ed.). (1988). Little office of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Catholic Book Publishing.
28. Salih, S. (2007). On Judith Butler and performativity. In Sexualities and communication in everyday life (pp. 55–68). Sage Publications.
29. Shelley, P. B. (2025). A defence of poetry. https://resources.saylor.org
30. Short, C. (1991). Dear Clare: This is what women feel about Page 3. In K. Tunks & D. Hutchinson (Eds.), Dear Clare: This is what women feel about Page 3. Hutchinson Radius.
31. Stehle, E. (1997). Performance and gender in ancient Greece: Nondramatic poetry in its setting. Princeton University Press.
32. Tempest, K. (2015). Brand New Ancients. Picador.
33. Waling, A. (2019). Problematising “toxic” and “healthy” masculinity for addressing gender inequalities. Australian Feminist Studies, 34(101), 1–14.
34. Whitehead, S. M. (2021). Toxic masculinity, curing the virus: Making men smarter, healthier, safer. Andrews UK Limited.
35. Zeitlin, F. (1986). Configurations of rape in Greek myths. In S. Tomaselli & R. Porter (Eds.), Rape (pp. 122–151). Basil Blackwell.