Using of Cone Beam Computed Tomografy in Dentistry: A Review of the Literature

Yıl 2017, Sayı: 1, 1 - 7, 01.01.2017

Duygu Göller Bulut , Emre Köse

https://doi.org/10.21306/jids.2017.1.26

Öz

Cone Beam Computed Tomography CBCT imaging system was used for the first time for angiography, radiotherapy and mammography in 1982. In 1990s, with its development, we had a chance to get 3 dimensional imaging system in addition to 2 dimensional in dentistry and it was first used for maxillofacial region in 1997. Although conventional radiography technique is commonly used nowadays, converting the morphology of 3 dimensional bone and teeth to 2 dimensional radiographs may cause insufficient examination and inaccurate diagnose. These insufficiencies made researchers study on 3 dimensional imaging systems to improve them. The usage of CBCT in dentistry has increased exceedingly, especially for last five years and includes diagnose and therapy of anatomic and pathologic structures in oral and maxillofacial region, assessment of temporomandibular joint, implant planning and many other issues. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography systems in dental practice and its facilities for dentists

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Dentistry, Diagnostic Imaging

Diş Hekimliğinde Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Kullanımı: Literatür Taraması

Öz

Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi KIBT 1982 yılında ilk kez anjiyografi, radyoterapi ve mamografi uygulamalarında kullanılmıştır. 1990’lı yıllarda geliştirilmesi ile diş hekimliğinde iki boyuttan üçüncü boyuta geçme şansı elde edilmiş ve ilk kez 1997 yılında maksillofasiyal bölgenin görüntülenmesi amacıyla kullanılmıştır. Günümüzde geleneksel radyografi tekniği daha yaygın kullanılsa da üç boyutlu kemik ve diş morfolojilerinin görüntüsel olarak iki boyuta indirgenmesi yetersiz inceleme, değerlendirme ve yanlış teşhislerin yapılmasına neden olur. Bu yetersizlikler, araştırmacıların üç boyutlu görüntüleme sistemleri üzerinde çalışmalar yapmalarını sağlamıştır. KIBT’ nin özellikle son 5 yılda diş hekimliğinde kullanım alanları son derece artmıştır; oral maksillofasiyal bölge anatomik ve patolojik yapıların tanı ve tedavi planlamasında, temporomandibular eklemin değerlendirilmesinde, implant planlamasında ve daha birçok alanda kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, KIBT ’nin diş hekimliğinde kullanım alanları ve hekime sağladığı kolaylıklar hakkında literatür bilgilerinden faydalanarak bilgi sunmaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi, Diş Hekimliği, Tanısal Görüntüleme.

Kaynakça

• 1. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. Journal-Canadian Dental Association. 2006; 72.1: 75.
• 2. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-newtom). Analysis. 2014; 33.5:291-4.
• 3. Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2009; 136.1: 17.
• 4. Georg E, Mühling J, Hofele C. Clinical use of navigation based on cone-beam computer tomography in maxillofacial surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009; 47.9: 450-4.
• 5. Sisman Y, Sahman H, Sekerci A, Tokmak TT, Aksu Y, Mavili E. Detection and characterization of the mandibular accessory buccal foramen using CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2012; 41.7: 558–63.
• 6. Sahman H, Sekerci AE, Ertas ET, Etoz M, Sisman Y. Prevalence of bifid mandibular condyle in a Turkish population. Journal of oral science. 2011; 53.4: 433-7.
• 7. Etoz M, Sisman Y. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal and variations with cone-beam computed tomography. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2014; 36.8: 805-12.
• 8. Sekerci AE, Sisman Y. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the shape, height, and location of the mandibular lingula. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2014;36.2: 155- 62.
• 9. Sekerci AE, et al. Morphometric analysis of the mental foramen in a Turkish population based on multi-slice computed tomography. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2013; 1: 2.
• 10. Aksoy S. Konik ışınlı komputerize tomografi kullanılarak üç boyutlu olarak paranasal sinüs ve varyasyonlarının üst havayolu anatomisi ile birlikte incelenmesi. Doktora tezi. Yakındoğu Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü 2013.
• 11. Coşkuner HG, Kocadereli İ. Farklı malokluzyonlarda temporomandibular eklem pozisyonlarının değerlendirilmesi. Acta Odontologica Turcica 2013; 30: 157.
• 12. Tatlı U, et al. Unilateral Kondiler Hiperplazinin Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi İle Değerlendirilmesi: iki olgu sunumu ve literatür derlemesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2010; ss: 3.
• 13. Wessely MA, Young MF. Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Clinical Chiropractic 2008; 11.1: 37-44.
• 14. Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L. Ultrasonography of the temporomandibular joint: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38.12: 1229-36.
• 15. Singh B, Narang RS, Arora PC, Manchanda AS, Kaur A. Cone Beam Computerısed Tomography A New Ray For Dıagnosıs In Dental Radıology. Indian Journal of Comprehensive Dental Care 2014:4.2.
• 16. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128.6: 803-11.
• 17. Büyük SK, Ramoğlu Sİ. Ortodontik Teşhiste Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Erciyes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2011; 20.3:227.
• 18. Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R, Hans MG. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2010; 137.4: 109-19.
• 19. De Vos W. Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature.” International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2009; 38.6: 609-625.
• 20. Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2013; 29: 55-77.
• 21. Samur S. Diş hekimliğinde Cone Beam Bilgisayarlı Tomografi. Cone Beam Computed Tomography In Dentistry. ADO. 2009; 2: 346-51.
• 22. Ertaş ET, Arslan H, Çapar İD, Gök T, Ertaş H. Endodontide Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2014: 24.1.
• 23. de Menezes, RF, et al. Detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth in the absence and in the presence of metal post by cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health 2016; 16.1: 1.
• 24. Raiput A, Talwar S, Chaudhary S, Khetatpal A. Successful management of pulpo-periodontal lesion in maxillary lateral incisor with palatogingival groove using CBCT scan. Indian J Dent Res. 2012; 23.3: 415-8.
• 25. Soğur E, Baksı BG. Peridontontal Patolojilerin Tanısında Kullanılan Görüntüleme Teknikleri Bölüm 2: Alternatif Görüntüleme Sistemleri Ve Görüntü Analiz Yöntemleri EÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014; 35: 10-8.
• 26. Tugnait A, Carmichael F. Use of radiographs in the diagnosis of periodontal disease. Dent Update. 2005; 32: 536-8: 541-2.
• 27. Grimard BA, Hoidal MJ, Mills MP, Mellonig JT, Nummikoski PV, Mealey BL. Comparison of clinical, periapical radiograph, and cone-beam volume tomography measurement techniques for assessing bone level changes following regenerative periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 2009; 80.1: 48-55.
• 28. De Faria Vasconcelos K, Evangelista K, Rodrigues C, Estrela C, de Sousa T, Silva M. Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 64-9.
• 29. Corbet EF, Ho DKL, Lai SML. Radiographs in periodontal disease diagnosis and management. Aust Dent J. 2009 ;54.1:27-43.
• 30. Mol A. Imaging methods in periodontology. Periodontol 2000 2004;34:34-48.
• 31. Naitoh M, Yamada S, Noguchi T, Ariji E, Nagao J, Mori K, et al. Three-dimensional display with quantitative analysis in alveolar bone resorption using cone-beam computerized tomography for dental use: a preliminary study. International Journal of Periodontics Restorative Dentistry 2006; 26.6: 607-12.
• 32. Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol. 2006; 77.7: 1261-6.
• 33. Goodarzi PD, Romoozi E, Shayesteh YS. Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Bone Loss. Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012; 12.7: 513-523.
• 34. Nikolic-Jakoba N, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A. Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Intrabony and Furcation Defects: A Systematic Review Based on a Hierarchical Model for Diagnostic Efficacy. Journal of periodontology 2016: 0; 1-19.
• 35. Mengel R, Candir M, Shiratori K, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of periodontal defects: an in vitro study on native pig and human mandibles. J Periodontol 2005;76.5:665-73.
• 36. Golubovic V, Mihatovic I, Becker J, Schwarz F. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography to assess the configuration and extent of ligature-induced periimplantitis defects. A pilot study 2012; 16.4: 349-54.
• 37. Wingrove S. Peri-implant therapy for the dental hygienist: clinical guide to maintenance and disease complications. Wiley-Blackwell. 2013.
• 38. Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE Jr. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 24-34.
• 39. Becker A, Chaushu G, Chaushu S. Analysis of failure in the treatment of impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137.6: 743-54.
• 40. Xia WQ, Gu YJ, Gao MQ. Morphological characteristics of upper alveolar bone around central incisor in Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion on cone-beam CT. Shanghai kou qiang yi xue= Shanghai journal of stomatology 2016; 25.1: 68.
• 41. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52.4: 707-30.
• 42. Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Threedimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod 2005; 32.4: 282-93.
• 43. Cevidanes SHL, Styner AM, Proffit RW. Image analysis and superimposition of 3- dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129.5: 611-8.
• 44. Dong HW, et al. Root shape changes of impacted upper central incisor before and after orthodontic traction. Shanghai kou qiang yi xue= Shanghai journal of stomatology 2016; 25.1: 72.
• 45. Aboudara CA, Hatcher D, Nielsen IL, Miller A. A three dimensional evaluation of the upper airway in adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6.1: 173-5.
• 46. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96.4: 508-13.
• 47. Domeshek LF, Mukundan S Jr, Yoshizumi T, et al. Increasing concern regarding computed tomography irradiation in craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123.4: 1313-20.
• 48. James K. Mah, Liu Yi, Reyes C. Huang, and Hye Ran Choo. Advanced Applications of Cone Beamb Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2011; 17.1: 57- 71.
• 49. van der Stelt PF. Cone beam computed tomography: is more also better?. Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde 2016; 123.4: 189.