Operatif Diş Hekimliğinde Kavite Dezenfeksiyonu – Derleme

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 68 - 76, 29.08.2023

Özge Bektaş

https://doi.org/10.21306/dishekimligi.1128565

Öz

Kavite preparasyonu sonrası restoratif materyallerin yerleştirilmesinden önce rezidüel mikroorganizmaların eliminasyonu ve etkilerinin ortadan kaldırılması; restorasyonun ömrünü ve tedavidenin başarısını artırmaktadır. Kavite preparasyonu sırasında bakterilerin tamamen yok edilmesi mekanik olarak diş yapısını zayıflatmanın yanı sıra pulpanın vitalitesini de etkileyebilir. Bu nedenle, çürük temizlendikten sonra kavitenin dezenfeksiyonu; rezidüel bakterilerin eliminasyonu ile sekonder çürüklerin ve postoperatif hassasiyetin önlenmesine yardımcı olabilir. Bununla birlikte, dezenfektanların restoratif materyaller üzerindeki etkileri çalışmalarda araştırılmaktadır. Bu derleme; mevcut literatür incelemesi sonucu restoratif diş hekimliğinde kullanılan kavite dezenfektanlarının etkileri / etkinlikleri hakkında bilgi sağlamayı ve diş hekimlerine restoratif prosedürler sırasında kavite dezenfektanlarını kullanma konusunda klinik karar vermede yardımcı olmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bakteri, diş hekimliği, kavite dezenfeksiyonu

Cavity Disinfection In Operative Dentistry – Review

Öz

Elimination of residual microorganisms and their effects before placement of restorative materials after cavity preparation increase the longevity of the restoration and the success of the treatment. Complete destruction of bacteria during cavity preparation can mechanically weaken the tooth structure as well as affect the vitality of the pulp. Therefore, disinfection of the cavity after caries removal can help prevent secondary caries and postoperative sensitivity by eliminating residual bacteria. However, the effects of disinfectants on restorative materials are being investigated in studies.This review aims to provide information about the effects / efficacy of cavity disinfectants used in restorative dentistry through a review of the current literature review and to assist dentists in making clinical decisions about using cavity disinfectants during restorative procedures.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bacteria, dentistry, cavity disinfection

Kaynakça

• 1. Kidd E, Joyston-Bechal S BD. Microbiological validation of assessments of caries activity during cavity preparation. Caries Res. 1993; 27(5): 402-408.
• 2. Leung RL et al. Effect of dycal on bacteria in deep carious lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 100(2): 193-197.
• 3. Meiers JC KJ. Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding. Oper Dent. 1996; 21: 153-159.
• 4. Baum L., Phillips R.W LMR. Textbook of Operative Dentistry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1995; 132-133.
• 5. Arslan İ, Baygın Ö. Çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanılan kavite dezenfeksiyon yöntemleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2019; 29(1): 124-132.
• 6. Türkün M et al. Effect of cavity disinfectants on the sealing ability of non-rinsing dentin bonding resins. Quintessence International 2004; 35: 469-476.
• 7. L.P. S. Essential Microbiology for Dentistry. Second Edition, Elsevier, China 2002.
• 8. Varoni, E. et al. Chlorhexidine (CHX) in dentistry: state of the art. Minerva Stomatol, 2012; 61(9): 399-419.
• 9. Emilson CG et al. Effect of chlorhexidine on human oral streptococci. 1972; 7(2): 189-91.
• 10. Estrela C et al. Antimicrobial effect of 2% sodium hypochlorite and 2% chlorhexidine tested by different methods. Braz Dent J. 2003; 14(1): 58-62.
• 11. Fardal O, Turnbull RS. A review of the literature on use of chlorhexidine in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986; 112(6): 863-869.
• 12. Van Strijp AJP et al. Effects of chlorhexidine on the bacterial colonization and degradation of dentin and completely demineralized dentin in situ. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997; 105(1): 27-35.
• 13. Uygun G. Diş hekimliğinde el hijyeni ve lateks alerjisi. 5 Ulus Sterilizasyon Dezenfeksiyon Kongresi – 2007 Kitabı 2007: 648-661.
• 14. Kidd EA. Role of chlorhexidine in the management of dental caries. Int Dent J. 1991; 41(5): 279-286.
• 15. Arslan S et al. Comparison of the effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and different cavity disinfection agents onmicroleakage of current adhesives. Lasers in medical science 2012; 27(4): 805-811.
• 16. Elkassas DW et al. The effect of cavity disinfectants on the micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesives. European Journal of Dentistry 2014; 8(2): 184-190.
• 17. Bin-Shuwaish MS. Effects and effectiveness of cavity disinfectants in operative dentistry: A literature review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016; 17(10): 867-879.
• 18. Rosenberg, L. et al. Observational: Prospective study of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars using resin-modified glass ionomer and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate: A 12-month follow-up. Pediatric Dentistry 2013; 35(1): 13-17.
• 19. Fazlara A, Ekhtelat M. The disinfectant sffects of benzalkonium chloride on some important foodborne pathogens. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 2012; 12(1): 23-29.
• 20. Erganiş O, Öztürk A. Oral Mikrobiyoloji & İmmünoloji. Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri 2003: 91-110.
• 21. Türkün M. et al. Antibacterial activity of cavity disinfectants. Balk J Stom. 2004; 8(3): 214-19.
• 22. Gultz, J. et al. Antimicrobial activity of cavity disinfectants. General dentistry 1999; 47(2): 187-190.
• 23. Chan D. C. N., Lo WW. Residual antimicrobial action of benzalkonium chloride-containing etchant. Journal of Dental Research 1994; 73(12): 226-226.
• 24. Brannstrüm M. et al. The effect of EDTA-containing surface- active solutions on the morphology of prepared dentin: an in vivo study. Journal of Dental Research 1980; 59(7): 1127-1131.
• 25. Schmalz G. et al. Permeability characteristics of bovine and human dentin under different pretreatment conditions. Journal of Endodontics 2001; 27(1): 23-30.
• 26. Özel E ve ark. Fosforik asit ve dezenfektan solüsyonların streptococcus mutans ’ a karşı antibakteriyel etkisinin saptanması. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2005; 29(4): 8-14.
• 27. Perdigão J. et al. Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dental Materials 2000; 16(5): 311-323.
• 28. Peker DÖB. Sodyum hipokloritin fikse ve fikse olmayan insan pulpa dokularını çözücü etkisi. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 1993; 21: 21-3.
• 29. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation systems. Journal of Endodontics 1987; 13(4): 147-157.
• 30. Berber VB. et al. Efficacy of various concentrations of NaOCl and instrumentation techniques in reducing Enterococcus faecalis within root canals and dentinal tubules. International Endodontics Journal 2006; 39(1): 10-17.
• 31. Prati C. et al. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different endodontic procedures on dentin morphology of human teeth. Journal of Endodontics 1994; 20(4): 174-179.
• 32. Marais JT. Cleaning efficacy of a new root canal irrigation solution: a preliminary evaluation. International Endodontic Journal 2000; 33(4): 320-325.
• 33. Pioch T. et al. Interfacial micromorphology and tensile bond strength of dentin bonding systems after NaOCl treatment. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 1999; 1(2): 135-142.
• 34. Nikaido, T., Nakabayashi N. Relationship between polymerization and adhesion to teeth. Adhesive Dent 1988; 6(4): 229-234.
• 35. Alaçam T. Endodonti 2. baskı. Barış Yayınları, Şafak Matbaacılık, Ankara. 2000.
• 36. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1999; 12(1): 147-179.
• 37. Ohara, P. et al. Antibacterial effects of various endodontic irrigants on selected anaerobic bacteria. Dental Traumatology 1993; 9(3): 95-100.
• 38. Bağış Y.H., Ertaş E. Kompozit restorasyonların yapımından önce ve sonra uygulanan vital ağartma işlemlerinin mikrosızıntı üzerine etkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2000; 27(2): 137-142.
• 39. Hickel R. et al. Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials. International Dental Journal 1998; 48(1): 3-16.
• 40. Imazato S. et al. Antibacterial activity and bonding characteristics of an adhesive resin containing antibacterial monomer MDPB. Dental Materials 2003; 19(4): 313-319.
• 41. Imazato S, Mccabe JF. Influence of incorporation of antibacterial monomer on curing behavior of a dental composite. Journal of Dental Research 1994; 73(10): 1641-1645.
• 42. Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dental Materials 2003; 19(6): 449-457.
• 43. Ergücü Z. et al. Influence of dentin on the effectiveness of antibacterial agents. Journal of Endodontics 2005; 31(2): 124-129.
• 44. Albay A. El antiseptiklerinde cilt koruyucu maddeler: katkıları nelerdir? Antiseptik etkinliğinde değişiklik yapar mı? El antiseptiklerinde kombinasyonlar: farkları nelerdir? 4. Ulusal Sterilizasyon Dezenfeksiyon Kongresi, Antalya. 2005: 41-58.
• 45. Dale R. A. et al. The effect of ORA-5 on recurrent aphthous ulcers. General dentistry 1989; 37(6): 504-507.
• 46. Franchi M, Breschi L. Effects of acid-etching solutions on human enamel and dentin. Quintessence International 1995; 26(6): 431-435.
• 47. Featherstone J. D. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dentistry Oral Epidemiology 1999; 27(1): 31-40.
• 48. Thylstrup A. Clinical evidence of the role of pre-eruptive fluoride in caries prevention. Journal of Dentistry Research 1990; 69(2): 742-750.
• 49. Hamilton I. R. Biochemical effects of fluoride on oral bacteria. Journal of Dental Research 1990; 69(2): 660-667.
• 50. Tüzüner T. et al. Direct and transdentinal (indirect) antibacterial activity of commercially available dental gel formulations against streptococcus mutans. Medical Principles and Practice 2013; 22(4): 397-401.
• 51. Özan Ü ve ark. Sodyum hipoklorit, klorheksidin ve propolis içerikli solüsyonların potasyum titanyum fosfat lazer ile birlikte kullanımlarının candida albicans üzerine etkilerinin incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2009; 12: 33-38.
• 52. Hepşen İ. F. et al. Propolis : tıbbi özellikleri ve oftalmolojik kullanımı. Journal of Turgut Özal Medical Center 1996; 3(4): 386-391.
• 53. Kartal M. et al. Antimicrobial activity of propolis samples from two different regions of Anatolia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2003; 86(1): 69-73.
• 54. Azarpazhooh A, Limeback H. The application of ozone in dentistry: a systematic review of literature. Journal of Dentistry 2008; 36(2): 104-116.
• 55. Cardoso M. G. et al. Effectiveness of ozonated water on candida albicans, enterococcus faecalis, and endotoxins in root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology 2008; 105(3): 85-91.
• 56. Baysan A. et al. Antimicrobial effect of a novel ozone-generating device on micro-organisms associated with primary root carious lesions in vitro. Caries Research 2000; 34(6): 498-501.
• 57. Baysan A. et al. The use of ozone for the management of primary root carious lesions. Tissue preservation and caries treatment. Quintessence Book 2001; 49-67.
• 58. Brannstrbm M. The cause of postrestorative sensitivity and its prevention. Journal of Endodontics 1986; 12(10): 475-481.
• 59. Türkün M. et al. Bactericidal effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on streptococcus mutans. Dental Materials Journal 2006; 25(1): 81-86.
• 60. Wilson M. Bactericidal effect of laser light and its potential use in the treatment of plaque-related diseases. International Dental Journal 1994; 44(2), 181-189.
• 61. Dinç G. Kavite dezenfektanlarının antibakteriyel özellikleri, bağlanma dayanımı ve mikrosızıntı üzerine etkileri (derleme). Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2012; 6: 66-75.
• 62. Raghavendra M. et al. Photodynamic therapy: a targeted therapy in periodontics. Australian Dental Journal 2009; 54: 102-109.
• 63. Demidova T. N., Hamblin M. R. Photodynamic therapy targeted to pathogens. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology 2004; 17(3): 245-254.
• 64. Konopka K. et al. Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. Journal of Dental Research 2007; 86: 694-707.
• 65. Wainwright M. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT). The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1998; 42(1): 13-28.
• 66. Carvalho E. S. et al. Effect of chemical substances in removing methylene blue after photodynamic therapy in root canal treatment. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery 2011; 29(8): 559-563.
• 67. Costa L. M. et al. Tooth color change caused by photosensitizers after photodynamic therapy: an in vitro study. Journal of Photochemistry Photobiology 2016; 160: 225-228.
• 68. Karaarslan E. Ş. ve ark. Işıkla aktive edilen dezenfeksiyon (PAD) işlemi uygulanmış seramik inley restorasyonlarda mikrosızıntının değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2011; 2: 108-114.
• 69. Komerik N., MacRobert A. J. Photodynamic therapy as an alternative antimicrobial modality for oral infections. Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology 2006; 25(1-2): 487-504.
• 70. Hamblin M. R. , Hasan T. Photodynamic therapy: a new antimicrobial approach to infectious disease? Photochemical and Photobiology Sciences 2004; 3(5): 436-450.
• 71. Salva K. A. Photodynamic therapy : unapproved uses, dosage, or indications Clinics in Dermatology 2002; 20(5): 571-581.