Intraoral Scanners in Completely Edentulous Jaws: Review

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 117 - 125, 31.12.2024

Lale Gül Ağaçdan , Sema Murat , Furkan Ağaçdan

https://doi.org/10.21306/dishekimligi.1488878

Öz

Aim: In recent years, with the developments in intraoral scanners, studies on the precise recording of digital measurements of hard and soft tissues of completely edentulous patients have increased. The purpose of this review; The aim of this study is to compare the advantages and difficulties of using an intraoral scanner in completely edentulous mouths compared to the traditional method and to provide information about the studies on the subject.
Materials and Method: Detailed information is given about the current intraoral scanners used in recent years and their comparison with traditional impressions is made.
Results: Intraoral scanners generally report that they can be used to take digital measurements of teeth and implants and to digitalize edentulous jaws in the production of fixed dentures and, in recent studies, in the production of complete dentures. Although it has many advantages over the traditional method, such as reducing clinical time, patient and physician comfort, and ability to store data, it has disadvantages such as requiring user experience, being difficult to record soft tissues and sulcus, and being affected by oral fluids such as blood and saliva.
Conclusion: Correct scanning of edentulous jaws is a very important step during complete denture production; however, the sensitivity of the resulting digital scan is still controversial.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Intraoral scanner, Complete edentulism, Digital workflow

Ağız İçi Tarayıcıların Tamamen Dişsiz Çenelerde Kullanımı: Derleme

Öz

Amaç: Son yıllarda ağız içi tarayıcılardaki gelişmelerle birlikte tamamen dişsiz hastaların da sert ve yumuşak dokularının dijital ölçüsünün hassas şekilde kaydedilmesi için yapılan çalışmalar artmaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı; tamamen dişsiz ağızlarda ağız içi tarayıcı kullanımının geleneksel yönteme göre avantajlarını ve zorluklarını karşılaştırmak ve konu ile ilgili yapılan çalışmalar hakkında bilgi vermektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Son yıllarda kullanılan güncel ağız içi tarayıcılar hakkında detaylı bilgi verilmiş ve geleneksel ölçüyle karşılaştırmaları yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: Ağız içi tarayıcılar genel olarak dişlerin ve implantların dijital ölçülerinin alınmasında ve sabit protezlerin yapımında ve son yapılan çalışmalarda tam protezlerin üretilmesinde dişsiz çenelerin dijitalize edilmesi için de kullanılabileceğini rapor etmektedir. Geleneksel yönteme göre klinik sürenin azaltılması, hasta ve hekim konforu, verilerin depolanabilmesi gibi bir çok avantajı bulunsa da kullanıcı deneyimi gerekmesi, yumuşak doku ve sulkusların kaydının zor olması ve kan tükürük gibi oral sıvılardan etkilenmesi gibi dezavantajları bulunmaktadır.
Sonuç: Tam protez üretimi sırasında dişsiz çenelerin doğru taranması çok önemli bir adımdır; ancak elde edilen dijital taramanın hassasiyeti hala tartışmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ağız içi tarayıcı, Tam dişsizlik, Dijital iş akışı

Kaynakça

• 1. Bidra AS, Taylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(6):361-6.
• 2. Oh KC, Park JM, Moon HS. Effects of Scanning Strategy and Scanner Type on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: A New Approach for Assessing the Accuracy of Scanned Data. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(6):518-23.
• 3. Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(6):755-9.
• 4. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44-56.
• 5. Goodacre CJ, Garbacea A, Naylor WP, Daher T, Marchack CB, Lowry J. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107(1):34-46.
• 6. Kawahata N, Ono H, Nishi Y, Hamano T, Nagaoka E. Trial of duplication procedure for complete dentures by CAD/CAM. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24(7):540-8.
• 7. Lo Russo L, Salamini A, Troiano G, Guida L. Digital dentures: A protocol based on intraoral scans. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(4):597-602.
• 8. Bonnet G, Batisse C, Bessadet M, Nicolas E, Veyrune JL. A new digital denture procedure: a first practitioners appraisal. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):155.
• 9. Patzelt SB, Vonau S, Stampf S, Att W. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144(8):914-20.
• 10. Chebib N, Kalberer N, Srinivasan M, Maniewicz S, Perneger T, Muller F. Edentulous jaw impression techniques: An in vivo comparison of trueness. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(4):623-30.
• 11. Zhang M, Hattori M, Elbashti ME, Sumita YI. Feasibility of Intraoral Scanning for Data Acquisition of Maxillectomy Defects. Int J Prosthodont. 2020;33(4):452-6.
• 12. Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ. Using Intraoral Scanning to Fabricate Complete Dentures: First Experiences. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(2):166-70.
• 13. Lee JH. Improved digital impressions of edentulous areas. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):448-9.
• 14. Murat S, Batak B. Fabrication of a 3-dimensionally printed definitive cast for an obturator prosthesis by merging intraoral scan image with cone beam computed tomography data: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(2):256 e1- e4.
• 15. Maeda Y, Minoura M, Tsutsumi S, Okada M, Nokubi T. A CAD/CAM system for removable denture. Part I: Fabrication of complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 1994;7(1):17-21.
• 16. Zarone F, Ruggiero G, Ferrari M, Mangano F, Joda T, Sorrentino R. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(6):761.e1-.e7.
• 17. Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Mäkynen A. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014;54:203-21.
• 18. Arakawa I, Al-Haj Husain N, Srinivasan M, Maniewicz S, Abou-Ayash S, Schimmel M. Clinical outcomes and costs of conventional and digital complete dentures in a university clinic: A retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(3):390-5.
• 19. Srinivasan M, Kalberer N, Naharro M, Marchand L, Lee H, Muller F. CAD-CAM milled dentures: The Geneva protocols for digital dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(1):27-37.
• 20. Kattadiyil MT, Jekki R, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(6):818-25.
• 21. Srinivasan M, Schimmel M, Naharro M, C ON, McKenna G, Müller F. CAD/CAM milled removable complete dentures: time and cost estimation study. J Dent. 2019;80:75-9.
• 22. Calesini G, Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Micarelli C, Fabianelli A, Papacchini F, et al. Effect of 2 impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of working implant prosthesis models: an in vitro study. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(3):822-7.
• 23. Gujjarlapudi MC, Reddy SV, Madineni PK, Ealla KK, Nunna VN, Manne SD. Comparative evaluation of few physical properties of epoxy resin, resin-modified gypsum and conventional type IV gypsum die materials: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13(1):48-54.
• 24. Thota KK, Jasthi S, Ravuri R, Tella S. A comparative evaluation of the dimensional stability of three different elastomeric impression materials after autoclaving - an invitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(10):Zc48-50.
• 25. Endera A, Mehlb A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions–an in-vitro study Ganzkieferaufnahmen: konventionelle versus digitale Abformtechnik–eine In-vitro-Untersuchung. International journal of computerized dentistry. 2011;14:11-21.
• 26. Güth J-F, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(4):1201-8.
• 27. Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt K-J, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Güth J-F. Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization–a laboratory study. Dental Materials. 2014;30(4):400-7.
• 28. Mangano A, Beretta M, Luongo G, Mangano C, Mangano F. Suppl-1, M8: Conventional Vs Digital Impressions: Acceptability, Treatment Comfort and Stress Among Young Orthodontic Patients. Open Dent J. 2018;12:118.
• 29. Hayama H, Fueki K, Wadachi J, Wakabayashi N. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62(3):347-52.
• 30. Bohner L, Hanisch M, De Luca Canto G, Mukai E, Sesma N, Neto PT. Accuracy of Casts Fabricated by Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions. J Oral Implantol. 2019;45(2):94-9.
• 31. Resende CCD, Barbosa TAQ, Moura GF, Tavares LDN, Rizzante FAP, George FM, et al. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(2):294-9.
• 32. Schimmel M, Akino N, Srinivasan M, Wittneben JG, Yilmaz B, Abou-Ayash S. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(4):1839-47.
• 33. Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(1):11-9.
• 34. Hack G, Liberman L, Vach K, Tchorz JP, Kohal RJ, Patzelt SBM. Computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws - An in vivo feasibility study. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(4):444-53.
• 35. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(6):1687-94.
• 36. Tasaka A, Uekubo Y, Mitsui T, Kasahara T, Takanashi T, Homma S, et al. Applying intraoral scanner to residual ridge in edentulous regions: in vitro evaluation of inter-operator validity to confirm trueness. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):264.
• 37. Fang JH, An X, Jeong SM, Choi BH. Digital intraoral scanning technique for edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(5):733-5.
• 38. Prudente MS, Davi LR, Nabbout KO, Prado CJ, Pereira LM, Zancope K, et al. Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(3):377-83.
• 39. Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(4):313-21.
• 40. Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(3):186-94.
• 41. Carlsson GE, Örtorp A, Omar R. What is the evidence base for the efficacies of different complete denture impression procedures? A critical review. J Dent. 2013;41(1):17-23.
• 42. CA O, JH W, Venezia P, Ferrari M, AJ K. Full arch precision of six intraoral scanners in vitro. journal of prosthodontic research. 2019;64(1):6-11.
• 43. Benic GI, Sailer I, Zeltner M, Gutermann JN, Ozcan M, Muhlemann S. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(3):426-31.
• 44. Muhlemann S, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hammerle CHF, Sailer I. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Part II: Time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):252-7.
• 45. Wang Y, Li Y, Liang S, Yuan F, Liu Y, Ye H, et al. The Accuracy of Intraoral Scan in Obtaining Digital Impressions of Edentulous Arches: A Systematic Review. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2024;24(1):101933.
• 46. Janosi KM, Cerghizan D, Martha KI, Elekes E, Szakacs B, Elekes Z, et al. Evaluation of Intraoral Full-Arch Scan versus Conventional Preliminary Impression. J Clin Med. 2023;12(17):5508.