Çocuklarda ve Yetişkinlerde Bruksizm Konulu YouTube Videolarının Analizi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 86 - 97, 29.08.2025

Zeynep Öztürk , Büşra Tosun

https://doi.org/10.21306/dishekimligi.1656578

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, bruksizmin tanımı, etiyolojisi, tanısı ve tedavisi gibi konuları ele alan YouTube videolarının güvenilirliğini, kalitesini ve içeriğini değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: “Bruksizm”, “diş sıkma ve gıcırdatma” ve “çocuklarda bruksizm” anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak bir YouTube araması yapıldı. YouTube videoları dört analiz tekniği kullanılarak incelendi: etkileşim indeksi, video içeriğinin kalite puanı, Küresel Kalite Ölçeği (GQS) ve DISCERN güvenilirlik analizi. İstatistiksel analizler IBM SPSS 25 kullanılarak yapıldı ve anlamlılık P < 0.05 düzeyinde belirlendi.
Bulgular: Taranan ilk 180 videodan 109'u analize dahil edildi. Videoların sıklıkla profesyonel kaynaklar tarafından üretildiği (% 90.8) gözlemlendi. Ancak, bireysel kaynaklardan yüklenen videoların ortalama etkileşim indeksi (2.07±0.93), hastaneler/kurumlar tarafından yüklenen videolardan (1.18±2.06) daha yüksekti. Bireysel kaynaklar tarafından yüklenen videolara olan ilgi yüksek olsa da, bu tür videoların güvenilirliği (1.00±0.94) hastane kurumları (1.53±1.05) ve diş hekimleri/sağlık profesyonelleri (1.63±0.66) tarafından yüklenen kaynaklardan daha düşüktü. >6 dakika süren videolar, ≤6 dakika süren videolardan daha yüksek bir DISCERN puanına sahiptir. Videolarda, etiyolojik faktörler olarak % 41,79 oranında psikolojik faktörlere, % 34,32 oranında sistemik rahatsızlıklara ve % 18,65 oranında maloklüzyona değinildi. Tedavi yöntemleri açısından ise okluzal splint uygulamaları (% 33,7) ve önleyici tedaviler (% 18,78) en yaygın bahsi geçen yaklaşımlar olarak öne çıktı.
Sonuç: Bruksizmle ilgili YouTube videolarının güvenilirliği ve kalitesi yetersizdir. Sağlık profesyonelleri, güvenilir ve kapsamlı videolar paylaşarak dijital platformların yararlılığını artırmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bruksizm , DISCERN , Küresel Kalite Ölçeği , YouTube

Analysis of YouTube Videos on Bruxism in Children and Adults

Öz

Aim: This study aimed to assess the reliability, quality, and content of YouTube videos that cover topics such as the definition, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of bruxism.
Material and Methods: A YouTube search was conducted using the keywords “bruxism,” “teeth clenching and grinding,” and “bruxism in children.” YouTube videos were examined using four analysis techniques: interaction index, quality score of video content, Global Quality Scale (GQS), and DISCERN reliability analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 25, and significance was set at P< 0.05 level.
Results: Of the first 180 videos scanned, 109 were included in the analysis. We observed that videos were frequently produced by professional sources (90.8%). However, the mean interaction index of videos uploaded from individual sources (2.07±0.93) was higher than videos uploaded by hospitals/institutions (1.18±2.06). Although interest in videos uploaded by individual sources is high, the reliability of such videos (1.00±0.94) was lower than sources uploaded by hospital institutions (1.53±1.05) and dentists/health professionals (1.63±0.66). Videos with a duration of >6 min have a higher DISCERN score than those with a duration of ≤6 min. In the videos, 41.79% of the etiological factors were psychological factors, 34.32% were systemic disorders, and 18.65% were malocclusion. In terms of treatment methods, occlusal splint applications (33.7%) and preventive treatments (18.78%) were the most commonly mentioned approaches.
Conclusion: The reliability and quality of YouTube videos on bruxism are inadequate. Health professionals should increase the usefulness of digital platforms by sharing reliable and comprehensive videos.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bruxism , DISCERN , Global Quality Scale , YouTube

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmada daha önce insanlardan toplanan herhangi bir veri kullanılmadığı için etik kurul onayı alınmamıştır.

Kaynakça

• 1. Manfredini D, Serra-Negra J, Carboncini F, Lobbezoo F. Current concepts of bruxism. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30:437–8.
• 2. Koyano K, Tsukiyama Y, Ichiki R, Kuwata T. Assessment of bruxism in the clinic. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:495–508.
• 3. Lavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael K. Bruxism physiology and pathology: An overview for clinicians. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:476–94.
• 4. Klasser G, Greene C. Role of oral appliances in the management of sleep bruxism and temporomandibular disorders. Alpha Omegan. 2007;100:111–9.
• 5. Carra MC, Huynh N, Lavigne GJ. Sleep bruxism: A comprehensive overview for the dental clinician interested in sleep medicine. Dent Clin North Am. 2012;56:387–413.
• 6. Ölçer-Us Y, Us M. Evaluation of reliability, quality, accuracy, and content of YouTube™ videos on bruxism in children: A descriptive study. J Child. 2023;23:69–79.
• 7. Aygör FA. YouTube™ as an information resource on bruxism: Cross-sectional content analysis. ADO Klin Bilim Derg. 2023;12:242–50.
• 8. Johansson A, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Bruxism and prosthetic treatment: A critical review. J Prosthodont Res. 2011;55:127–36.
• 9. Pergamalian A, Rudy T, Zaki H, Greco C. The association between wear facets, bruxism, and severity of facial pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:194–200.
• 10. Manfredini D, Winocur E, Guarda-Nardini L, Paesani D, Lobbezoo F. Epidemiology of bruxism in adults: A systematic review of the literature. J Orofac Pain. 2013;27:99–110.
• 11. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Inform J. 2015;21:173–94.
• 12. Leong AY, Sanghera R, Jhajj J, Desai N, Jammu BS, Makowsky MJ. Is YouTube useful as a source of health information for adults with type 2 diabetes? A South Asian perspective. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42:395-403.e4.
• 13. Fernandez-Llatas C, Traver V, Borras-Morell JE, Martinez-Millana A, Karlsen R. Are health videos from hospitals, health organizations, and active users available to health consumers? An analysis of diabetes health video ranking in YouTube. Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:8194940.
• 14. Bärtl M. YouTube channels, uploads and views: A statistical analysis of the past 10 years. Converg. 2018;24:16–32.
• 15. Nason G, Tareen F, Quinn F. Hydrocele on the web: An evaluation of internet-based information. Scand J Urol. 2013;47:152–7.
• 16. Ozsoy-Unubol T, Alanbay-Yagci E. YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24:197–202.
• 17. Onder M, Zengin O. YouTube as a source of information on gout: A quality analysis. Rheumatol Int. 2021;41:1321–8.
• 18. Kovalski LNS, Cardoso FB, D’Avila OP, Corrêa APB, Martins MAT, Martins MD, et al. Is YouTube™ a useful source of information on oral leukoplakia? Oral Dis. 2019;25:1897–905.
• 19. Aydin MA, Akyol H. Quality of information available on YouTube videos pertaining to thyroid cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2020;35:599–605.
• 20. Aydin MF, Aydin MA. Quality and reliability of information available on YouTube and Google pertaining to gastroesophageal reflux disease. Int J Med Inform. 2020;137:104107.
• 21. Fernandez-Alvarez M del M, Cachero-Rodríguez J, Fu MR, Sánchez-Fernández P, Ureña-Lorenzo A, Martin-Payo R. YouTube videos on lymphedema as an information source for Spanish-speaking breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32:1–8.
• 22. Tayan E, Gökmenoğlu C, Büyük SK. YouTube™ as an education platform for dental implants. J Int Dent Sci. 2024;159–66.
• 23. Duman C. YouTube™ quality as a source for parent education about the oral hygiene of children. Int J Dent Hyg. 2020;18:261–7.
• 24. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54303.
• 25. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2016;49:1194–200.
• 26. Sahin AN, Sahin AS, Schwenter F, Sebajang H. YouTube videos as a source of information on colorectal cancer: What do our patients learn? J Cancer Educ. 2019;34:1160–6.
• 27. Rachmawati Y, Putri D, Hariyani N, Bahar A, Maharani D. Analysis of quality, usefulness, reliability, visibility, and popularity of videos about dental caries on YouTube: A cross-sectional analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022;12:245–51.
• 28. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis: A wake-up call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39:899–903.
• 29. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis. 2016;22:202–8.
• 30. Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera MN, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTube™ videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018;23:e463– 8.
• 31. Pons-Fuster E, Ruiz Roca J, Tvarijonaviciute A, López-Jornet P. YouTube information about diabetes and oral healthcare. Odontology. 2020;108:84–90.
• 32. Fortuna G, Schiavo JH, Aria M, Mignogna MD, Klasser GD. The usefulness of YouTube™ videos as a source of information on burning mouth syndrome. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:657–65.
• 33. Oz E, Kırzıoğlu Z. An analysis of YouTube videos on oral hygiene practices during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. J Glob Oral Health. 2021;4:84–93.
• 34. Wai A, Yeung K. Evaluation of content quality of online health information by Global Quality Score: A case study of researchers misnaming it and citing secondary sources. JMIR Med Educ. 2025;13:e12345.
• 35. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2070–7.
• 36. Li HOY, Bailey A, Huynh D, Chan J. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: A pandemic of misinformation? BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5:e002604.
• 37. Fox S. The social life of health information, 2011. California Healthcare Foundation; 2011. Available from: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Life-ofHealth-Info.aspx Accessed 09.01.2025.
• 38. Deste Gökay G, Görürgöz C, Doğanay-Yildiz E. Temporomandibular disfonksiyon ile ilgili Türkçe YouTube™ videolarının içerik değerlendirilmesi: Kesitsel çalışma. Turk Klin J Dent Sci. 2022;28:123–9.
• 39. Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube videos useful for patients interested in botulinum toxin for bruxism? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:1776–83.
• 40. Brame CJ. Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016;15:es6.
• 41. Demirci GK, Dindaroğlu F. Travmatik dental yaralanmaların acil tedavisi hakkında bilgi kaynağı olarak YouTube™: Kesitsel içerik analizi. Selcuk Dent J. 2021;8:808–16.