Caring for Cultural Studies

Öz

This essay both inaugurates the new editorship of Ted Striphas and reflects on the contributions of Cultural Studies ’ longtime editor, Lawrence Grossberg. It opens by reflecting briefly on the journal’s transformations over the last 28 years before taking stock of the wellbeing of cultural studies as a field. The claim here is that cultural studies have devoted less time and attention than they used to with regard to thinking through its first principles; thus, the future of the field partially hinges on asking whether the field’s core concepts are up to the task of answering the urgent political questions of the present. The essay then recontextualizes the concept of culture, specifically with respect to the much maligned and indeed deservedly so tradition of high culture. The author identifies a fugitive theoretical line in the recesses of cultural studies, one in which culture signifies care rather than a subordination to patrician interests and aesthetic styles. This conceptual move sets the stage for the central argument of the essay, which states that for the field of cultural studies to live up to both its name and intellectual political ambitions, it must devote significant time to caring for the infrastructure that sustains its body of ideas. The piece concludes by highlighting some of Lawrence Grossberg’s efforts as an infrastructuralist, his care for cultural studies, and observations on how neither the field nor this journal will be able to sustain itself without moving forward .

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Lawrence Grossberg
• cultural studies
• culture
• high culture
• care
• infrastructure

Kültürel Çalışmaları Önemsemek

Öz

Bu makale hem Ted Striphas’ın editörlüğünü başlatmakta hem de Cultural Studies’in kıdemli editörü Lawrence Grossberg’in katkılarını yansıtmaktadır. Kültürel Çalışmalar1 alanının refahını değerlendirmeden önce derginin son 28 yılda yaşadığı dönüşümlere kısaca değinerek konuya giriş yapılmaktadır. Buradaki iddia, Cultural Studies’in başta gelen ilkeleriyle derinlemesine düşünmeye daha az zaman ve dikkat ayırdığı ve bu nedenle alanın geleceğinin temel kavramların zamanımızın acil politik sorularına yanıt verme görevine uygun olup olmadığını sorgulamaya kısmen bağlı olduğudur. Makale daha sonra kültür kavramını, özellikle çok kötülenmiş (aslında haklı olarak kötülenmiş) ‘yüksek kültür’ geleneği bakımından yeni bir bağlamda ele almaktadır. Yazar, soylu çıkarlara ve estetik tarzlara boyun eğmekten ziyade makalenin aralarında kültürün önemsemek anlamına geldiği şeklinde kaçak bir teorik çizgi tanımlamaktadır. Bu kavramsal hareket, makalenin ana argümanı için zemin hazırlamakta, yani Cultural Studies’in hem adına hem de entelektüel politik emellerini karşılaması için, dergi, görüşlerini ayakta tutan altyapıyı önemsemeye önemli ölçüde zaman ayırmalıdır. Makale, bir altyapı uzmanı olarak Lawrence Grossberg’in Cultural Studies’i önemsemek için gösterdiği bazı çabaların altını çizerek ve ileride ne alanın ne de bu derginin kendi başının çaresine bakamayacağını gözlemleyerek sona ermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Lawrence Grossberg
• Kültürel Çalışmalar
• kültür
• yüksek kültür
• önemsemek
• altyapı

Kaynakça

1. Abbas, A. and Erni, J.N., 2005. General introduction. In: A. Abbas, and J.N. Erni, eds. Internationalizing Cultural Studies: an anthology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 1-12. google scholar
2. Ahmed, S., 2018. Archaeology of babel: The colonial foundation of the humanities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. google scholar
3. Ang, I., 1985. Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. London: Routledge. google scholar
4. Bennett, T., 2015. Cultural Studies and the culture concept. Cultural studies, 29 (4), 546- 568. google scholar
5. Bhaskar, M., 2016. Curation: the power of selection in a world of excess. London: Piatkus Books. google scholar
6. Bourdieu, P., 1984. Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. google scholar
7. Chakrabarty, D., 2007. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference. New Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. google scholar
8. Cox, R., 2007. Nature’s crisis disciplines: does environmental communication have an ethical duty? google scholar

9. Environmental communication: A journal of nature and culture, 1 (1), 5-20. google scholar
10. Denning, M., 2004. Culture in the age of three worlds. London & New York: Verso. google scholar
11. Dutt-Ballerstadt, R. 2018. What to do when you are an academic under attack by right wing publications [online]. Inside Higher Ed. Available from: https://www. google scholar
12. insidehighered.com/advice/2018/03/02/what-do-when-you-are-academic-under attack-right-wing-publications-opinion [Accessed 3 Sep 2018]. google scholar
13. Erni, J.N., 1994. Unstable frontiers: technomedicine and the cultural politics of “curing” AIDS. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press. google scholar
14. Fiske, J., 1989. Understanding popular culture. London: Unwin Hyman. google scholar
15. Fitzpatrick, K., 2011. Planned obsolescence: Publishing, technology, and the future of the academy. New York: NYU Press. google scholar
16. Flusser, V., 2013. Natural: mind. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing. google scholar
17. Flusser, V., 2014. Gestures. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
18. Frank, T., 1999. New consensus for old. The baffler, (12). [online]. Available from: https:// thebaffler.com/ salvos/new-consensus-for-old [Accessed 19 July 2018]. Frow, google scholar
19. J., 1995. Cultural Studies and cultural value. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
20. Gray, A., 2016. Cultural Studies at Birmingham 1985-2002 - the last decades. In: K. Connell, and M. google scholar
21. Hilton, eds. Cultural Studies fifty years on. London: Roman and Littlefield, 49-61. google scholar
22. Gripsrud, J., 1989. ‘High culture’ revisited. Cultural studies, 3 (2), 194-207. google scholar
23. Grossberg, L., 1988. It’s a sin: essays on postmodernism, politics, and culture. Sydney: Power Publications. google scholar
24. Grossberg, L., 1992. We gotta get out of this place: popular conservatism and postmodern culture. New York: Routledge. google scholar
25. Grossberg, L., 1997. Bringing it all back home: essays on Cultural Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. google scholar
26. Grossberg, L., 2005. Caught in the crossfire: kids, politics, and America’s future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. google scholar
27. Grossberg, L., 2006. Does Cultural Studies have futures? Should it? (Or what’s the matter with New York?). Cultural studies, 20 (1), 1-32. google scholar
28. Grossberg, L., 2010. Cultural Studies in the future tense. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. google scholar
29. Grossberg, L., 2015. We all want to change the world: the paradox of the U.S. left - a polemic. London: Lawrence & Wishart. google scholar
30. Grossberg, L., 2018. Under the cover of chaos: Trump and the battle for the American right. London: Pluto Press. google scholar
31. Guillory, J., 1993. Cultural capital: the problem of literary canon formation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
32. Hale, C.R., 2018. When I hear the word culture ... . Cultural studies, 32 (3), 497-509. google scholar
33. Hall, G., 2008. Digitize this book! The politics of new media, or why we need open access now. google scholar
34. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
35. Hall, G., 2016. The Uberfication of the university. [Online]. Available from: https:// manifold.umn.edu/ project/the-uberfication-of-the-university [Accessed 6 July 2018]. google scholar
36. Hall, S., 1988. The hard road to renewal: Thatcherism and the crisis of the left. London: Verso. google scholar
37. Hall, S., 1992. Cultural Studies and its theoretical legacies. In: L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P. Treichler, eds. Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, 277-294. google scholar
38. Hall, S., 1993. Encoding/decoding. In: S. During, ed. The Cultural Studies reader. London and New York: Routledge, 507-517. google scholar
39. Hall, S., 1998. Notes on deconstructing ‘the popular’. In: J. Storey, ed. Cultural theory and popular culture: A reader. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 442-453. google scholar
40. Hall, S., et al., 1978. Policing the crisis: mugging, the state, and law and order. London: Macmillan. google scholar
41. Hallinan, B., 2017. The Sokal affair. Presentation: COMM 6200, 16 March. google scholar
42. Boulder, CO. Hallinan, B. and Striphas, T., 2016. Recommended for you: the Netflix prize and the pro duction of algorithmic culture. New media & society, 18 (1), 117-137. google scholar
43. Harper, D., 2018. computation (n.) [online]. Online Etymology Dictionary. Available from: [Accessed 31 Aug 2018]. google scholar
44. Heidegger, M., 1962. Being and time. New York: HarperOne. google scholar
45. Hernstein Smith, B., 1991. Contingencies of value: alternative perspectives for critical theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. google scholar
46. Hoggart, R., 1957. The uses of literacy: changing patterns in English mass culture. Fair Lawn, NJ: Essential Books. google scholar
47. Horowitz, D., 2006. The professors: the 101 most dangerous academics in America. Washington, DC and Lanham, MD: Regnery Publishing. google scholar
48. Ismail, Q., 2015. Culture and eurocentrism. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield International. google scholar
49. Jenkins, H., 1992. Textual poachers: television fans and participatory culture. New York: Routledge. google scholar
50. John, N.A., 2016. Sharing. In: B. Peters, ed. Digital keywords: a vocabulary of information society and culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 269-277. google scholar
51. John, N.A., 2017. The age of sharing. Malden, MA: Polity. google scholar
52. Kay, J.B., 2017. Arriving late to the party? Histories of Cultural Studies as resources of hope. European journal of Cultural Studies, 20 (6), 763-771. google scholar
53. Kittler, F.A., 1999. Gramophone, film, typewriter. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. google scholar
54. Kuhn, T.S., 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
55. Littler, J., 2016. On not being at the CCCS. In: K. Connell, and M. Hilton, eds. Cultural Studies fifty years on. London: Roman and Littlefield, 275-283. google scholar
56. Manganaro, M., 2002. Culture, 1922: The emergence of a concept. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. google scholar
57. Mbembe, A. and Goldberg, D.T. Conversation: Achille Mbembe and David Theo Goldberg on Critique of black reason, 2018. Theory, culture & society. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 5 July 2018]. google scholar
58. Miles, C., 2018. Personal communication, 21 March. google scholar
59. Morley, D., 1980. The ‘Nationwide’ audience: structure and decoding. London: BFI. google scholar
60. Morris, M., 1990. Banality in Cultural Studies. In: P. Mellencamp, ed. Logics of television: essays in cultural criticism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 14-43. google scholar
61. Morris, M., 2006. “Please explain?”: ignorance, poverty, and the past. In: Identity anec dotes: translation and media culture. London: Sage Publications, 227-240. google scholar
62. Morris, M. and Muecke, S., 1991. Relations of theory: Meaghan Morris talks with Stephen Muecke. In: D. Carter, ed. Outside the book: contemporary essays on literary periodicals. Sydney: Local Consumption Publications, 57-78. google scholar
63. Peters, J.D., 2005. Courting the abyss: free speech and the liberal tradition. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. google scholar
64. Peters, J.D., 2015. The marvelous clouds: toward a philosophy of elemental media. Chicago and London: University Of Chicago Press. google scholar
65. Pezzullo, P.C. 2017. Environment. Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. [online]. Available from: http://communication.oxfordre.com/abstract/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/ acrefore-9780190228613-e575?rskey=w965U8 &result=1 [Accessed 8 July 2018]. google scholar
66. Pluckrose, H., Lindsay, J., and Boghossian, P. 2018. Academic grievance studies and the corruption of scholarship [online]. Areo. Available from: https://areomagazine.com/ google scholar
67. 2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/ [Accessed 19 Oct 2018]. google scholar
68. Professor Watchlist (Home) [online], 2018. Professor Watchlist. Available from: https:// www. professorwatchlist.org/ [Accessed 3 Sep 2018]. google scholar
69. Radway, J.A., 1984. Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. google scholar
70. Readings, B., 1996. The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. google scholar
71. Said, E.W., 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage. google scholar
72. Scannell, P., 1996. Radio, television, and modern life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. google scholar
73. Sharma, S., 2014. In the meantime: temporality and cultural politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. google scholar
74. Sokal, A., 1996a. A physicist experiments with Cultural Studies. Lingua franca, (May/ June), 62-64. google scholar
75. Sokal, A., 1996b. Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social text, 46-47, 217-252. google scholar
76. Statement concerning fraudulent submissions [online], 2018. Hypatia. Available from: http:// hypatiaphilosophy.org/statements/statement-concerning-fraudulent submissions/ [Accessed 19 Oct 2018]. google scholar
77. Striphas, T., 2010. Acknowledged goods: Cultural Studies and the politics of academic journal publishing. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 7 (1), 3-25. google scholar
78. Striphas, T., 2011. The visible college. International journal of communication, 5, 1744- 1751. google scholar
79. Striphas, T., 2015. Algorithmic culture. European journal of Cultural Studies, 18 (4-5), 395-412. google scholar
80. Striphas, T., 2016. Culture. In: B. Peters, ed. Digital keywords: a vocabulary of information society and culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 70-80. google scholar
81. Striphas, T., 2017. Known-unknowns: Matthew Arnold, F. R. Leavis, and the government of culture. Cultural Studies, 31 (1), 143-163. google scholar
82. Striphas, T. and Hayward, M., 2013. Working papers in Cultural Studies, or, the virtues of grey literature. New formations, 78, 102-116. google scholar
83. Thompson, E.P., 1966. The making of the English working class. New York: Vintage. google scholar
84. Trilling, L., 2008. The liberal imagination. New York: NYRB Classics. google scholar
85. Viswanathan, G., 2014. Masks of conquest: literary study and British rule in India. 25th Anniversary Edition. New York: Columbia University Press. google scholar
86. Whyte, K.P. and Cuomo, C., 2016. Ethics of caring in environmental ethics: indigenous and feminist philosophies [online]. In: S. M. Gardiner, and A. Thompson, eds. The Oxford handbook of environmental ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available from: http://www. oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/ 9780199941339.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199941339-e-2 [Accessed 19 October 2018]. google scholar
87. Williams, R., 1958. Culture and society, 1780-1950. New York: Columbia University Press. google scholar
88. Williams, R., 1973. The country and the city. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
89. Williams, R., 1977. Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
90. Williams, R., 1981. The sociology of culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
91. Williams, R., 1983. Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. Rev. Ed. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
92. Williams, R., 1989. Culture is ordinary. In: Resources of hope: culture, democracy, social ism. London: Verso, 3-18. google scholar
93. Williams, R., 2001. The long revolution. Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press. google scholar
94. Wood, J.T., 1994. Who cares? Women, care, and culture. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. google scholar