2000 YILINDA İSTANBUL MENKUL KIYMETLER BORSASIN’DA HALKA İLK ARZI YAPILAN HİSSE SENETLERİNİN PERFORMANSI

Öz

Firmaların halka ilk arz yoluyla küçük ve kurumsal yatırımcılardan fon toplaması dü ük maliyetli finanslama yollarından biri olabilir. Tahvil ihracı ve bankalardan kısa ve uzun vadeli kredi almanın maliyetleri, halka ilk arzın komisyon ve di er maliyetleriyle kar ıla tırıldı ında oldukça yüksek olabilir. Bu ampirik çalı ma 2000 yılında Istanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsasında halka ilk arzı yapılan hisse senetlerinin performanslarını incelemektedir. Bu analizde literatürde yaygın olarak kullanılan “event-study” yöntemi uygulanarak halka ilk arzı yapılan 34 firmanın 30 günlük arz sonrası performansı ölçülmü tür. Ampirik bulgular literatürde geçen di er çalı malar sonuçlarıyla uyumludur. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, halka arzın ilk iki gününde yatırımcıların normal üstü getiri elde etmeleri mümkündür

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Halka ilk arz, düşük fiyatlama, normal üstü getiri, olay çalışması

THE PERFORMANCE OF IPOS IN ISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE IN YEAR 2000

Öz

Initial public offering IPO may be the lowest cost financing for firms to obtain funds from small and institutional investors. The commissions, fees and other related expenses incurred are considerably small compared to those of short or long term loan or bond financing. This empirical study examines the performance of all IPOs in Istanbul Stock Exchange during the year of 2000. The study employs standard event study methodology for 34 IPOs over a 30 day event window. The empirical findings are consistent with most of the previous literature. The results support that the first two days of IPOs generally provide positive abnormal returns.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Initial Public Offering, Underpricing, Abnormal Return, Event - Study

Kaynakça

1. AGGARWAL, R. & CONROY, P., (2000) Price discovery in ınitial public offerings and the role of the lead underwriter, The Journal of Finance, vol. LV, no. 6, pp. 2921.
2. AGGARWAL, R., (2000) Stabilization activities by underwriters after ınitial public offerings, The Journal of Finance, vol. LV, no. 6, pp.1075-1102.
3. AGRAWAL, J., KAMAKURA, W.A., (1995). The Economic worth of celebrity endorsers : an event study analysis. Journal of Marketing, 59, pp. 56-62.
4. ASQUITH, D., JONES, D. J., KIESCHNICK, R., (1998). Evidence on price stabilization and underpricing in early IPO returns, The Journal of Finance, vol. LIII, no. 5, pp. 1759-1773.
5. AYDO AN, K., GÜNEY, A., (1997) Hisse senedi fiyatlarının tahmininde F/K oranı ve temettü verimi, MKB Dergisi, cilt 1, no:1, 83-96. ss.
6. BARON, D. P. (1982) A Model of the demand for Investment Bank advising and distribution services for new issues. Journal of Finance, 45, pp. 1045-1067.
7. BRAV, A., GOMPERS, P.A., (1997) Myth or reality? the long-run underperformance of initial public offerings : evidence from venture and non- venture backed capital companies, The Journal of Finance, vol. LII, no. 5, pp. 2921.
8. CASARES, L., (1996) Is institutional investment in initial public offerings related to the long-run performance of these firms? Abstracts of Papers Presented at the AFA Meetings, The Journal of Finance, pp. 1039-40.

9. CHEN, H.C., RITTER, J.R., (2000) The Seven percent solution, The Journal of Finance, vol. LV, no. 3, pp. 1105-1130.
10. ELLIS K., MICHAELY R., O’HARA M., (2000) When the underwriter is the market maker : an examination of trading in the IPO aftermarket, The Journal of Finance, vol. IV, no. 3, pp.1039-1073.
11. FAYMAN, J. T, GREENBERG, J., (2000) Price is right, Best's Review, Oldwick, vol. 100, issue 10, pp. 99-102.
12. JAIN, B.A., KINI, O., (2000). The Post-issue operating performance of IPO firms, The Journal of Finance, vol. XLIX, no. 5, pp. 1699-1721.
13. KIYMAZ, H., (1997) MKB’de halka arzedilen mali sektör hisse senetlerinin uzun dönem performanslarını etkileyen faktörler. MKB Dergisi, cilt 1, no:2, 69-89. ss.
14. KRIGMAN, L., SHAW, W.H., WOMACK, K.L., (1999) The Persistence of IPO mispricing and the predictive power of flipping, The Journal of Finance, vol. LIV, no.3, June, pp. 1015-1045.
15. LEE, P.J., TAYLOR, S.L., WALTER, T.S., (1999) IPO underpricing explanations: implications from investor application and allocation schedules, Journal of
16. Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Seattle, vol. 34, issue, 4, pp.425-444. McCARTHY, E., (1999), Pricing IPOs : science or science fiction?, Journal of
17. Accountancy New York, vol. 58, issue, 3, Sept., p.51. McWILLIAMS, A., SIEGEL, D., (1997) Event studies in management research : theoretical and empirical issues. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 40, issue , pp. 626-657.
18. McWILLIAMS, A., SIEGEL, D., TEOH, S.H., (1999). Issues in the use of event study methodology : a critical analysis of corporate social responsibility studies,
19. Organizational Search Methods, vol. 2, no. 4, pp.340-365. PAGANO, M., PANETTA, F., ZINGALES, L., (1999). Why do companies go public? an empirical analysis, Journal of Finance, vol. LIII, no. 1, pp.27-62.
20. ROCK, K., (1986) Why new issues are underpriced, Journal of Financial Economics, 15, pp.187-212
21. TEOH, H.S., WELCH, I., WONG, T.J., (1998). Earnings management and the long- run market performance of initial public offerings, The Journal of Finance, vol. LIII, no. 6, pp.1935-1973.
22. TIM, L., RITTER, J.R., (2000). The New issues puzzle, The Journal of Finance, vol. L, no. 1, pp.23-49. ---------------- 0 ------------------ APPENDIX A Maturity day day day day day day day day day day November 2000 Interest Rate 52 % 59 % 82 % 32 % 76 % 18 % 06 % 76 % 94 % 80 %