BİREYSEL BAŞARI GÜDÜSÜ ORGANİZASYONEL BAĞLILIĞI NASIL ETKİLER?

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, çalışanların bireysel başarı güdüsü ve organizasyonel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişkinin ölçülmesidir. Bu amaçla faktörler arasındaki ilişkileri test edebilmek için oluşturulan anket modeli, kamu sektöründe faaliyet gösteren 412 adet çalışan teknik personel/ yönetici üzerinde uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada ele alınan faktörler; başarı güdüsü ile ilgili olarak başarıya inanma, farklı olma, odaklanma ve bireysel sorumluluk alma, organizasyonel bağlılık ile ilgili olarak ise duygusal bağlılık, devamlılık bağlılığı ve normatif bağlılıktır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre; duygusal bağlılık ile başarıya inanma ve farklı olma değişkenleri arasında pozitif yönde, bireysel sorumluluk alma değişkeni arasında ise negatif yönde bir ilişki olduğu görülmektedir. Devamlılık zorunluluk bağlılığı ve normatif ahlaki bağlılık değişkenleri ile sadece bireysel sorumluluk alma değişkeni arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Organizasyonel bağlılık değişkenlerinin, odaklanma değişkeni ile aralarında herhangi bir ilişkinin olmadığı dikkati çekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Başarı Güdüsü, Organizasyonel Bağlılık

HOW DOES THE MOTIVE OF INDIVIDUAL ACHIEVEMENT AFFECT ORGANİZATIONAL COMMITMENT?

Öz

The purpose of the research is to determine the relationship between individual achievement motive and organizational commitment of employees. With this purpose, to be able to test the relationships between the factors data collected from 412 employees technical / management staff working in different public organizations. The factors which have been studied in the research are; about achievement motive confidence in success, competitiveness - status orientation, focus on work, in charge of individual task and organizational commitment affective commitment, continuance or calculative commitment and normative commitment . According to the analysis results; the factors which affect positively to personnel’s perception of affective commitment are; confidence in success and being different. The factor which affects negatively to personnel’s perception of affective commitment is in charge of individual task. The factor which affect positively to personnel’s perception of continuance commitment and normative commitment is in charge of individual task. The results of this research show that there isn’t any relationship between factor of focus on work and all organizational commitment factors

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Achievement motive, Organizational commitment

Kaynakça

1. ALLEN, N.J., GRISAFFE, D.B. (2001). Employee commitment to the organization and customer reactions: mapping the linkages. Human Resource Management Review, 11, pp.209-236.
2. ALLEN, N.J., MEYER, J.P., (1990). The Measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63 (1), pp.1-18.
3. AMES, C. (1992). Achievement goals and classroom motivational climate, içinde A. LEONDARI, G. VASILIOS, (2002) Implicit Theories, goal orientations, and perceived competence: impact on students’ achievement behavior. Psychology in Schools, 39 (3), pp.279-291.
4. ANGLE, H.L., LAWSON, M.B. (1993). Changes in affective and continuance commitment in times of relocation. Journal of Business Research, 26, pp.3-16.
5. ATKINSON, J.W. (1964). An Introduction to motivation, New York, D. Van Nostrand Company. In: A. SAGIE, D. ELIZUR, (1999) Achievement motive and entrepreneurial orientation: a structural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, pp.375-387.
6. BECKER, T.E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: are they distinctions worth making, Academy of Management Journal, 35, pp.232-244.
7. BROWN, R.B. (1996). Organizational commitment: clarifying the concept and simplifying the existing construct typology. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, pp.230-251.
8. BURGESS, R., TURNER, S. (2000). Seven key features for creating and sustaining commitment. International Journal of Project Management, 18, pp.225-233.

9. BYRNE, Z.S., MUELLER-HANSON, R.A., CARDADOR, J.M., THORNTON, G.C., SCHULER, H., FRINTRUP, A., FOX, S. (2004). Measuring achievement motivation: tests of equivalency for English, German, and Israeli versions of the achievement motivation inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, pp.203-217.
10. CAN, H. (1985). Başarı güdüsü ve yönetsel başarı, Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İİBF Yayınları.
11. CASSIDY, T. ve LYNN, R.A. (1989). Multifactorial approach to achievement motivation: the development of a comprehensive measure. Journal of Occupational and Applied Psychology, 12 pp.301-311.
12. CHEN, Z.X., FRANCESCO, A.M. (2003). The Relationship between the three components of commitment and employee performance in China. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62 pp.490-516.
13. DEMİRCAN, N., ERGÜN, E., ÇÖL, G. (2004). Üniversite personelinin kendilerini güçlü hissetme algılarının örgüte bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi. D.E.Ü. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 5 (1), 1-22.ss.
14. DRUMMOND, H. (2000). Introduction to organizational behavior, New York, Oxford University Press.
15. DURNA, U., EREN, V. (2005). Üç bağlılık unsuru ekseninde örgütsel bağlılık, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 6(2), 210-219.ss.
16. ELIZUR, D. (1986). Achievement motive and sport performance. International Review of Applied Psychology, 35, pp209-224.
17. (1979). Assessing achievement motive of American and Israeli managers. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, pp.201-212.
18. EPSTEIN, J.A., HARACKIEWICZ, J.M. (1992). Winning is not enough: the effects of competition and achievement orientation on intrinsic interest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, pp.128-138.
19. GROTE, G.F., JAMES, L. R. (1991). Testing behavioral consistency and coherence with the situationrResponse measure of achievement motivation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, pp.655-691.
20. HIGGINS, E.T., FRIEDMAN, R.S., HARLOW, R.E., IDSON, L.C., AYDUK, O.N., TAYLOR, A. (2001). Achievement orientation from subjective histories of success: promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, pp.3-23.
21. HUCZYNSKI, A., BUCHANAN, D. (2001). Organizational behavior: an introductory text, England, Prentice Hall.
22. İŞCAN, Ö.F., NAKTİYOK, A. (2004). Çalışanların örgütsel bağdaşımlarının belirleyicileri olarak örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel adalet algısı. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 59 (1), 181-201.ss.
23. KETCHLAND, A. (1998). The Existence of multiple measures of organizational commitment and Experience-Related Differences in a Public Accounting Setting, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 10, pp.112-115.
24. LYONS, S., DUXBURY, L.E., HIGGINS, C.A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees, Public Administration Review, 66 (4), pp.605-618.
25. MATHIEU, J. E., ZAJAC, D.M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, pp.171-194.
26. McCLELLAND, D.C. (1985). Human motivation, Gelenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
27. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, Van Nostrand. In: CAN, H. (1985). Başarı güdüsü ve yönetsel başarı, H.Ü. İİBF Yayınları, No:12.
28. MEYER, J.P., ALLEN, N.J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: theory research and application. London, Sage Publication.
29. MEYER, J., ALLEN, N. (1984). Testing the “Side-Bet” theory of organizational commitment: some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, pp. 372-378.
30. MOWDAY, R.T., PORTER, L.W., STEERS, R.M. (1982). Employee-organizaton linkages: the psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover, New York, Academic Pres.
31. O’REILLY, C., CHATMAN, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: the effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 3, pp.492-499.
32. ÖZKAYA, M.O., KOCAKOÇ, İ.D., KARAA, E. (2006). Yöneticilerin örgütsel bağlılıkları ve demografik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkileri incelemeye yönelik bir alan çalışması. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İİBF Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 13 (2), pp.77-96.
33. ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, M. (2003). Algılanan örgütsel destek ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma, D.E.Ü. İ.İ.B.F Dergisi, 18 (2), pp.113-130.
34. ROWDEN, R.W (2000). The Relationship between charismatic leadership behaviors and organizational commitment. Leadership Organizational Development Journal, 21(1), pp.30-35.
35. SAGIE, A., ELIZUR, D. (1999). Achievement motive and entrepreneurial orientation: a structural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, pp.375-387.
36. SCHULER, H., ve PROCHASKA, M. (2001). Leistungsmotivationsinventar (LMI), Goettingen, Germany:Hogrefe. In: Z.S. BYRNE, R. A. MUELLER-HANSON, J. M. CARDADOR, G.C. THORNTON, H. SCHULER, A. FRINTRUP and S. FOX (2004). Measuring achievement motivation: tests of equivalency for English, German, and Israeli Versions of the achievement motivation inventory, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, pp.203-217.
37. SHYE, S. (1978). Achievement motive: a faceted definition and structure analysis, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 3(1), pp.327-346.
38. SPENCE, J.T., PRED, R.S., HELMREICH, R.L. (1989). Achievement strivings, scholastic aptitude, and academic performance: a follow-up to "Impatience versus achievement strivings in the Type A pattern", Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, pp.176-178.
39. YOUNG, B.S., WORCHEL, S., WOEHR, D.J. (1998). Organizational commitment among public service employees, Public Personnel Management, 27 (3), pp.339- 348.
40. WASTI, A. (2003). Organizational commitment, turnover intentions and the influence of cultural values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, pp.303-321.
41. WEINER, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: a normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7, pp.418-428.
42. ZEFFANE, R. (1995). Organizational commitment and perceived management styles: the public –private sector contrast, Management Research News, 18 (6-7), pp.9-21.