REEL EFEKTİF DÖVİZ KURUNUN DURAĞANLIĞININ YAPISAL KIRILMALI PANEL BİRİM KÖK TESTLERİ KULLANILARAK SINANMASI

Öz

Ülkelerin ekonomik istikrarı hakkında önemli bilgiler veren reel döviz kurlarının durağanlığını incelemek için son yıllarda oldukça fazla çalışma yapılmaktadır. Reel döviz kurlarının durağanlığını analiz etmek için, serinin hem genel hem de bireysel olarak durağanlığının incelenmesine imkan tanıyan panel birim kök testleri sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Genel olarak, makro iktisadi zaman serilerinde bazı yıllarda yapısal kırılmalar olduğu görülmektedir. Bu kırılmalar dikkate alınmadan birim kök testleri yapılırsa; kırılma noktası dikkate alınarak durağan olan bir seride, durağanlığın reddi gibi yanıltıcı bir sonuçla karşılaşılabilinir. Bu çalışmada, 25 OECD ülkesinde Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi teorisinin geçerliliğini sınamak için uygulanan panel durağanlık testleri, yapısal kırılmanın olduğu ve olmadığı durumlarda ele alınmıştır. Sonuçlara göre, yapısal kırılma dikkate alınmadan yapılan birim kök testlerinde sadece 10 ülkede SGP teorisi geçerli iken, kırılmalar dikkate alındığında teorinin ülkelerin tamamında geçerli olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi, Reel Döviz Kuru, Panel Birim Kök Testi, Yapısal Kırılma

ANALYZING OF THE STATIONARITY OF REEL EFFECTIVE EXCHANGE RATES USING PANEL UNIT ROOT TESTS WITH STRUCTURAL BREAKS

Öz

In the last years, many studies have analyzed the stationarity of reel exchange rates which gives important knowledge about economic stability of countries. The panel unit root tests which include both pooled and individual unit root tests are used frequently to analyze the stationarity of real exchange rates. Generally, structural breaks issue have taken place in macroeconomic time series for some years. If unit root tests are used without taking account these structural breaks, stationarity hypothesis can be rejected mistakenly. In this study, panel unit root tests with and without structural breaks were used to analyze the validity of Purchasing Power Parity hypothesis in 25 OECD countries. According to the results, while in panel unit root tests with no break, PPP theory is valid for only 10 countries; it is valid for all countries in panel unit root tests with structural breaks

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Purchasing Power Parity , Real Exchange Rates , Panel Unit Root Tes , Structural Break

Kaynakça

1. ABUAF, N., JORION, P. (1990). Purchasing Power Parity in the Long Run. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 45 (1), 157-174
2. ABUMUSTAFA, N. I. (2006). New Evidence of the Validity of Purchasing Power Parity from Jordan. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 13, 379-383
3. AMARA J. & PAPELL D.H. (2006). Testing for Purchasing Power Parity Using Stationary Covariates. Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 16 (1-2), 29-39
4. ANDERSSON, J., LYHAGEN, J. (1999). A Long Memory Panel Unit root Test: PPP Revisited. WP, Stockholm School of Economics
5. BANERJEE, A. (1999). Panel Data Unit Roots and Cointegration: An Overview. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 61 (4), 607-629
6. BANERJEE, A., MARCELLINO, M., OSBAT, C. (2005). Testing for PPP: Should We Use Panel Methods. Empirical Economics, Issue 1, 77-91
7. BEC F., SALEM M. B. & CARRASCO M. (2004). Detecting Mean Reversion in Real Exchange Rates from A Multiple Regime STAR Model. WP, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research
8. BEIRNE, J., HUNTER, J. (2007). Is the Real Exchange Rate Stationary? A Similar Sized Test Approach for the Univariate and Panel Cases. WP, Brunel University

9. BREITUNG, J., CANLEDON, B. (2005). Purchasing Power Parity During Currency Crisis: A Panel Unit Root Test under Structural Breaks. Review of World Economic, Vol. 141 (1), 124-140
10. BOYD, D., SMITH, R. (1999). Testing for Purchasing Power Parity: Econometric Issues and an Application to Developing Countries. The Manchester School, Vol. 67 (3), 287-303
11. BURDA, M., WYPLOSZ, C. (2005). Macroeconomics, 4th Edition, Oxford University Pres New York
12. CANZONERI, B. M., CUMBY, R., DIBA, B. (1999). Relative Labor Productivity and the Real Exchange Rate in the Long-Run: Evidence for A Panel of OECD Countries. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 47 (2), 245-266
13. CASHIN P., MCDERMOTT, J. (2006). Parity Reversion in Real Exchange Rates: Fast, Slow, or Not at All?. IMF WP/04/128
14. CASSEL, G. (1918) “Abnormal Deviations in International Exchanges. Economic Journal, Vol. 28, 413-415
15. CERRATO, M., SARANTIS, N. (2004). Cross Sectional Dependence, Panel Unit Root Tests, and Purchasing Power Parity. WP, Centre for International Capital Markets London Metropolitan University
16. CHOI, I., (2001). Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 20, 249-272
17. CHORTAREAS, G.E., KAPETANIOS, G. (2006). The Yen Real Exchange Rate may be Stationary after all: Evidence from Nonlinear Unit Root Tests. WP/311, Bank of England
18. CHORTAREAS, G. E., KAPETANIOS, G., SHIN, Y. (2002). Nonlinear Mean- Reversion in Real Exchange Rates. Economics Letter, Vol. 77, 411-417
19. CORBAE, D., OUTARIS, S. (1988). Cointegration and Tests of Purchasing Power Parity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70 (3), 508-511
20. CUDDINGTON, J. T., LIANG, H. (2000). Purchasing Power Parity Over Two Centuries” Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 19 (5), 753-757
21. DRINE, I., RAULT, C. (2003). A Re-Examination of the Purchasing Power Parity Using Non-Stationary Dynamic Panel Methods: A Comparative Approach for Developing and Developed Countries. WP/570, William Davidson Institute
22. FISHER, E., PARK, J. Y. (1991). Testing Purchasing Power Parity under the Null of Hypothesis of Co-integration. The Economic Journal, Vol. 101(409), 1476-1484
23. FROOT, K., ROGOFF, K. (1994). Perspectives on PPP and Long-Run Real Exchange Rates. WP/4952, National Bureau of Economic Research
24. HERNANDEZ, J.R., CARRACEDO, M.F. (2005). Testing for Long-run Purchasing Power Parity in the Post Bretton Woods Era: Evidence from Old and New Tests. Papeles de trabajo del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales Serie economía, No. 24, 1-56
25. HONG, S., PHILIPS, P. (2005). Testing Linearity in Cointegration Relations with an Application to Purchasing Power Parity. DP/154, Cowless Foundation
26. HUNTER, J., SIMPSON, M. (2001). A Panel Test of Purchasing Power Parity under the Null of Stationary. WP, Brunel University Department of Economics
27. IM, K., LEE, J., TIESLAU, M. (2005). Panel LM Unit-Root Test with Level Shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 67, 393-419
28. IM, K. S., PESARAN, M. H., SHIN, Y. (2003). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 115 (1), 53-74
29. JEWELL, T., LEE, J., TIESLAU, M., STRAZICICH, M. C. (2003). Stationary of Health Expenditures: A Re-Examination Using Panel Unit Root Tests with Heterogeneous Structural Breaks. Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 22(2), 313- 23
30. KAPETANIOS, G., SHIN, Y., SNELL, A. (2003). Testing For A Unit Root in the Nonlinear STAR Framework. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 112, 359-379
31. KIM, Y. (1990). Purchasing Power Parity in the Long Run: A Cointegration Approach. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 22 (4), 491-503
32. KUO, B., MIKKOLA, A. (2001). How Sure Are We About Purchasing Power Parity? Panel Evidence with the Null of Stationary Real Exchange Rates. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 33 (3), 767-789
33. LEVIN, A., LIN, C., CHU, C. J. (2002). Unit Root Test with Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 108 (1), 1-24
34. LOPEZ, C. (2003). Panel Unit Root Tests with GLS-Detrending with an Application to Purchasing Power Parity. WP, University of Amsterdam Econometrics and Empirical Economics
35. LOTHIAN, J., TAYLOR, M.P. (1996). Real Exchange Rate Behavior: The Recent Float from Perspective of the Past Two Centuries. Journal of Political Economy, Vol.104, 488-509
36. MACDONALD, R., (1996). Panel Unit Root Tests and Real Exchange Rates. Economics Letters, Vol. 50, 7-11
37. MADDALA, G. S., WU, S. (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data A New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue, Vol. 6, 631-652
38. MARK, N. C. (1990). Real and Nominal Exchanges Rates in The Long Run: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of International Economics, Vol.28 (1/2), 115- 136
39. MONTANES, A. (2000). Unit Roots, Level Shifts and Purchasing Power Parity. WP, University of Zaragosa
40. NARAYAN, P. K. (2005). New Evidence on Purchasing Power Parity from 17 OECD Countries. Applied Economics, Vol. 37 (9), 1063-1071
41. NARAYAN, P.K. (2006). Are Bilateral Real Exchange Rates Stationary? Evidence from Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Tests for India. Applied Economics, Vol.38, 63-70
42. O’CONNELL, P. G. (1998). The Overvaluation of Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 44, 1-19
43. OH, K. J. (1996). Purchasing Power Parity and Unit Root Tests Using Panel Data. Journal of International Money And Finance, Vol.15 (3), 405-418
44. PAUL, M. (2004). Empirical Evidence of Purchasing Power Parity in Six South East Asian Countries – A Panel Data Approach” DP/83, Institute of Economic Growth University of Delhi Enclaave
45. PEDRONI, P. (2001). Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 83 (4), 727-731
46. PEDRONI, P. (2004). Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis. Econometric Theory, Vol. 20, 597-625
47. PERRON, B. (1989). The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Econometrica, Vol. 57, 1361-1401
48. PERRON, B., MOON, H. R. (2003). Panel Evidence on Unit Roots in Exchange Rates and Interest Rates with Cross-Sectional Dependence” Canada Research Chair in Econometrics Financial Econometrics Conference
49. RAMIREZ, M.D., KHAN, S. (1999). A Cointegration Analysis of Purchasing Power Parity 1973-1996. International Advances In Economic Research, Vol.75(3), 369- 385
50. SHIVELY, P. (2003). Threshold Stationary Real Exchange Rates: A Nonlinear, Multivariate Approach. Economics Bulletin, Vol. 6 (2), 1-11
51. SEYİDOĞLU, H. (2003). Uluslarası İktisat Teori Politika ve Uygulama, İstanbul, 15. Baskı
52. STRAZICICH, M., TIESLAU, M., LEE, J. (2001). Hysteresis in Unemployment? Evidence from Panel Unit Root Tests with Structural Change. WP, University of North Texas
53. TAYLOR, M.P., PEEL, D.A., SARNO L. (2001). Nonlinear Mean-Reversion in Real Exchange Rates: Towards A Solution to the Purchasing Power Parity Puzzles. International Economic Review, Vol. 42, 1015-1042
54. WU, Y. (1996). Are Real Exchange Rates Stationary? Evidence from a Panel-Data Test. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol.28 (1), 54-63
55. YILDIRIM, O. (2003). Döviz Kurları Çerçevesinde Satın Alma Gücü Paritesinin Zaman Serisi Analizi ve Türkiye Ekonomisi Uygulaması. Bankacılar Dergisi, Sayı: 44, 3