TÜRKİYE’DE PAY GETİRİLERİ VE TAHVİL FAİZİ DEĞİŞİMLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Öz

Pay getirileri ile tahvil faizi değişimleri arasında, fiyatlama modellerindeki benzerlik nedeniyle negatif, pay ve tahvilin alternatif yatırım araçları olması nedeniyle pozitif ilişki mümkün olabilir. Bu çalışmada, ilişkinin ters yönlü olduğu, zaman içinde değişkenlik gösterdiği, 2007 Küresel Finans Krizi sonrasında zayıfladığı ve sektör bazında farklılık gösterebildiği bulgulanmıştır. Ayrıca, uç getiriler söz konusu olduğunda, ilişkinin yönü ve düzeyi değişmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Varlık Değerleme, Portföy Değişikliği, Pay Getirileri, Tahvil Faizi, Dinamik Koşullu Korelasyon (DCC)

THE RELATION BETWEEN STOCK RETURNS AND CHANGES IN BOND YIELD IN TURKEY

Öz

The relation between stock returns and changes in bond yield can be either negative due to the similarity in valuation methods or positive due to the fact that stocks and bonds are substitute investments . In this study, we provide evidence that this relation is mainly negative, time varying, lower in the period after the Global Financial Crisis of 2007 and shows differences across sectoral indices. Moreover, the direction and level of the relation change for extreme returns

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Asset Valuation, Portfolio Reallocation, Stock Returns, Bond Yields, Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC)

Kaynakça

1. ABURACHIS, A.T., KISH, R.J., (1999). International evidence on the co-movements between bond yields and stock returns: 1984-1994, Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 12 (2), ss. 67-81.
2. ANDERSEN, T.G., BOLLERSLEV, T., DIEBOLD, F.X., VEGA, C., (2007). Real-time price discovery in global stock, bond and foreign exchange markets, Journal of International Economics, 73, ss. 251-277.
3. ANDERSSON, M., KRYLOVA, E., VÄHÄMAA, S., (2008). Why does the correlation between stock and bond returns vary over time?, Applied Financial Economics, 18 (2), ss. 139-151.
4. BAKER, M.P., WURGLER, J., (2012). Comovement and predictability relationships between bonds and the cross-section of stocks, Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 2(1), ss. 57-87.
5. CAMPBELL, J.Y. and AMMER, J., (1993). What moves the stock and bonds market? Variance decomposition for long term asset returns, Journal of Finance, 48 (1), ss. 3-37.
6. CAPIELLO, L., ENGLE, R.F., SHEPPARD, K., (2006). Asymmetric dynamics in the correlations of global Eeuity and bond returns, Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4 (4), ss. 537-572.
7. CONNOLLY, R.A., STRIVES, C.T., SUM, L., (2005). Stock market uncertainty and the stock- bond return relation, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40, ss. 161-194.
8. ENGLE, R., (2002). Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20 (3), ss. 339-350.

9. ENGSTED T., TANGGAARD, C., (2001). The Danish stock and bond markets: comovement, return predictability and variance decomposition, Journal of Empirical Finance, 8 (3), ss. 243- 271.
10. GORDON, M.J. (1959). Dividens, earnings and stock prices, Review of Economics and Statistics, 41 (2), ss. 99-105.
11. LI, L., (2002). Macroeconomic factors and the correlation of stock and bond returns, Yale ICF Working Paper No. 02-46, AFA 2004 San Diego Meetings..
12. MANDACI, P.E., KAHYAOGLU, H., CAGLI, E. (2011). Stock and bond market interactions with two regime shifts: evidence from Turkey, Applied Financial Economics, 21 (18), ss. 1355-1368.
13. SHILLER, R.J., BELTRATTI, A. (1992). Stock prices and bond yields: can their comovements be explained in terms of present value models, Journal of Monetary Economics, 30 (1), ss. 25-46.