BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

KÜRESELLEŞME: NE KADAR TEK BOYUTLU?

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 25 - 38, 01.01.2006

Öz

Küreselleşme tartışmalarının özellikle Doğu Bloku'nun yıkılmasından sonra yoğunluk kazandığı gözlemlenmektedir. Her ne kadar daha önce de bu alanda kimi kavramsallaştırma girişimleri ortaya çıkmışsa da, 1990'lı yıllarla birlikte 'küreselleşme', sosyal bilimler alanında üzerinde münhasıran çalışılacak en önemli konulardan bir haline gelmeye başlamıştır. Son 15-20 yıldır küreselleşme üzerine sayısız eser üretilmiş ve farklı bakış açılarına göre de küreselleşmeden ne anlaşılması gerektiği bir o kadar farklılaşmıştır. Küreselleşmenin farklı şekillerde anlaşılmasına neden olan en önemli konulardan birisi kuşkusuz, kavrama yüklenen ideolojik anlamdır. Bu kısa çalışmada, ideolojik olarak karşıt veya taraftarı olunmadan, küreselleşmenin ortak bir düzlemde nasıl kavramsallaştırılabileceğine ilişkin bir öneri sunulmaya çalışılacaktır.

Kaynakça

  • ALBROW, M., KING, E. (1990) Globalization, knowledge and society, London, Sage.
  • AMIN, S. (1997) Capitalism in the age of globalization, London, Zed Books.
  • ANDERSON, P. (1974) Lineages of absolutist state, London, Verso.
  • AVINERI, S., DE-SHALIT, A. (1992) Communitarianism and individualism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • BRETHERTON, C. (1996) Introduction: global politics in 1990s. İçinde : Bretherton, C, Ponton, G. der. Global politics: an introduction. Oxford, Blackwell.
  • FRIEDMAN, J. (1992) Global system, globalization and the parameters of modernity. İçinde: Feathersone, M. , Lash, S. , Robertson, R. der. Global modernities. London, Sage.
  • FUKUYAMA, F. (1992) The End of the history and the last man, New York, Macmillan.
  • GIDDENS, A. (1990) The consequences of modernity, Standford, Standford University Press.
  • GILL, S. (2000) Globalization, market, civilization, and disciplinary liberalism. İçinde: Linklater, A. der. International relations: critical concepts in political science. London, Routledge.
  • HILL, C. (1969) Reformation to industrial revolution, England, Penguin Books.
  • HOBSBAWM, E.C. (1968) Industry and Empire, New York, Pantheon Books.
  • ROBERTSON, R. (1992) Globalization: social theory and global culture, London, Sage.
  • SALAMON, L. (2000) Non-state actors on the global scene: the case of civil society organizations. Paper presented to the National Intelligence Council Project, April 18.
  • SCOTT, A. (1997) The limits of globalization: case and arguments, London, Routledge.
  • TILLY, C. (1984) Big structures large processes huge comparisons, New York, Russel Sage Foundation.
  • UNCTAD (1999) World Invest Report 1998.
  • WALLERSTEIN, I. (1974) The modern world system, New York, Academic Press.

GLOBALIZATION : TO WHAT EXTENT IS IT ONE-DIMENSIONAL?

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 25 - 38, 01.01.2006

Öz

ABTRACT: Discussions on globalization began to get strengthened particularly after the collapse of Eastern Bloc. Despite the fact that there were some attempts before 1990s to conceptualize globalization, it became one of the distinguished fields of study in social sciences 1990s onwards. In the last two decades it has been produced a vast amount of works on globalization, and in line with each attempt, there emerged lots of different viewpoints on globalization. One of the most important issues that lead to differentiation in perception of globalization is undoubtedly ideological charging on the term. In this short paper, without becoming ideologically pro- or anti-, it will be attempted to present a proposal on how globalization can be conceptualized within a common context

Kaynakça

  • ALBROW, M., KING, E. (1990) Globalization, knowledge and society, London, Sage.
  • AMIN, S. (1997) Capitalism in the age of globalization, London, Zed Books.
  • ANDERSON, P. (1974) Lineages of absolutist state, London, Verso.
  • AVINERI, S., DE-SHALIT, A. (1992) Communitarianism and individualism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • BRETHERTON, C. (1996) Introduction: global politics in 1990s. İçinde : Bretherton, C, Ponton, G. der. Global politics: an introduction. Oxford, Blackwell.
  • FRIEDMAN, J. (1992) Global system, globalization and the parameters of modernity. İçinde: Feathersone, M. , Lash, S. , Robertson, R. der. Global modernities. London, Sage.
  • FUKUYAMA, F. (1992) The End of the history and the last man, New York, Macmillan.
  • GIDDENS, A. (1990) The consequences of modernity, Standford, Standford University Press.
  • GILL, S. (2000) Globalization, market, civilization, and disciplinary liberalism. İçinde: Linklater, A. der. International relations: critical concepts in political science. London, Routledge.
  • HILL, C. (1969) Reformation to industrial revolution, England, Penguin Books.
  • HOBSBAWM, E.C. (1968) Industry and Empire, New York, Pantheon Books.
  • ROBERTSON, R. (1992) Globalization: social theory and global culture, London, Sage.
  • SALAMON, L. (2000) Non-state actors on the global scene: the case of civil society organizations. Paper presented to the National Intelligence Council Project, April 18.
  • SCOTT, A. (1997) The limits of globalization: case and arguments, London, Routledge.
  • TILLY, C. (1984) Big structures large processes huge comparisons, New York, Russel Sage Foundation.
  • UNCTAD (1999) World Invest Report 1998.
  • WALLERSTEIN, I. (1974) The modern world system, New York, Academic Press.
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Davut Ateş Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2006
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2006 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Ateş, D. (2006). KÜRESELLEŞME: NE KADAR TEK BOYUTLU?. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(1), 25-38.