TÜRK SÜRÜCÜLERİNİN KENDİ BİLDİRİMLERİNE DAYANAN TRAFİK İHLALLERİ VE RİSKLİ SÜRÜŞ TUTUMLARI: ESKİŞEHİR ÖRNEĞİ

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 127 - 138, 01.01.2006

Veysel Yılmaz H. Eray Çelik

Öz

Riskli sürücü tutumu terminolojide, trafik güvenliğiyle ilgili sürüş, tutumlar, trafik kural ihlalleri veya hızlı sürüş gibi kaza riskini doğrudan arttıran davranışları açıklamak için kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışma trafik kazalarındaki sürücüden kaynaklanan faktörleri ve özellikle riskli sürücü tutum eğilimini açıklamaya odaklanmıştır. Çalışmada hız kurallarına uyma, trafik kazalarına karşı ilgi, trafikte risk alma eğilimi ve temel trafik kural ihlalleri faktörleriyle açıklanan “Riskli Sürücü Tutum Modeli” geliştirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla LISREL 8.54 kullanılarak Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri yardımıyla bir model geliştirilmeye çalışılmış ve geliştirilen model çeşitli uyum kriterleri dikkate alınarak uygunluğu tartışılmıştır. Diğer yandan riskli sürücüleri betimlemek için cinsiyet, eğitim durumu, yaş ve sürüş deneyimi faktörleri yardımıyla varyans analizi yapılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Riskli sürücü tutumları, Sürüş davranışı, Trafik, Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi

RISKY DRIVING ATTITUDES AND SELF-REPORTED TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS AMONG TURKISH DRIVERS: THE CASE OF ESKİŞEHİR

Öz

Risky driving attitude terminology is used to explain behaviors, which directly increase accident risk, such as over speeding or violation to traffic rules while driving and attitudes related to traffic safety. This study is focused on driver factors in traffic accidents and was carried out in order to show risky drivers' attitudes tendency, especially. In this study, in order to develop a risky driver attitude model, factors explaining obedience to speed rules, caring about traffic accidents, risk taking tendency in traffic and violations of basic traffic rules were studied. For this reason with the assistance of structural equation models LISREL 8.54 was used to try to develop a model, and fitness of the model has been discussed considering various fitness criteria. On the other hand, analysis of variance was performed for factors measuring sex, education level, age and driving experience, in order to portrait risky drivers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Risky Driver Attitudes, Driving Behaviour, Traffic, Structural Equation Modelling

Kaynakça

• BEGG, D.J., ANGEY, J.D. (2004). Identifying predictors of persistent non-alcohol or drug-related risky driving behaviours among a cohort of young adults. Accident Analysis and Prevention,36(6),1067-1071.
• BELL, N.S., AMOROSO, P.J., YORE, M.M., SMITH, G.S., JONES, B.H. (2000). Self –reported risk- taking behaviours and hospitalisation for motor vehicle injury among active duty army personnel. American Journal of Prevention Medicine, 18, 85-95.
• BLOCKE, P.N., HARTLEY, L.R. (1995). Aberrant driving behaviour: errors and violations. Ergonomics, 38, 1759-1771.
• BYRNE, B.M. (1998). Structural Equation Modelling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, Applications, and Programming, New Jersey : Lawrence Erbaum Associates Publisher.
• CELLAR, D.F., NELSON, Z.-C., YORKE, C.M. (2000). The five-factor model and driving behaviour. Personality and involvement in vehicular accidents. Psychological Reports, 86, 454–456.
• CHENG, E.W.L.,(2001). SEM Being more Effective than Multiple Regression in Parsimonious Model Testing for Management Development Research. Journal of Management Development, 20 (7), 650-667.
• CUDECK, R., TOIT, D.S., SÖRBOM, D. (2000). Structural Equation Modelling: Present and Future, Scientific Software International Inc., Chicago.
• HAYDUK L.A. (1987). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL Essential and Advances. The John Hopkins University Press.
• HILAKIVI, I., VEILAHTI, J., ASPLUND, P., SINIVUO, J., LAITINEN, L., KOSKENVUO, K. (1989). A sixteen-factor personality test for predicting automobile driving accidents of young drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 21, 413–418.
• IVERSEN, H. (2004). Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour. Transportation Research Part F, 7(3), 135-150.
• IVERSEN, H., RUNDMO, T. (2002). Personality, risky driving and accident involvement among Norwegian drivers. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1251-1263.
• JASHUA, S.C. , GARBER, N.J. (1992). A Causal Analysis of Large Vehicle Accidents Through Faulth- Tree Analysis, Risk Analysis, 12, 173- 187.
• JONAH, B.A. (1997). Sensation seeking and risky driving: a review and synthesis of the literature. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29, 651–665.
• JÖRESKOG, K., SÖRBOM, D. (2001). LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide, Scientific Software International Inc., Chicago.
• LAJUNEN, T., PARKER, D. (2001). Are aggressive people aggressive drivers? A study of the relationship between self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33, 243-255.
• LAWTON, M., KLEBAN, M.H., RAJAGOPAL, D., DEAN, J. (1992). Dimensions of effective experience in three age groups. Psychology and Aging, 7, 171-184.
• PANG, N.S.K. (1996). School Values and Teachers’ Feelings: a LISREL model. Journal of Educational Administration, 34 (2), 64-83.
• PARKER, D., MANSTEAD, A.S.R., STRADLING, S., REASON, J.T. (1992). Determinants of intention to commit driving violations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 24, 117–131.
• PARKER, D., WEST, R., STRADLING, S., MANSTEAD, A.S.R. (1995). Behavioural characteristics and involvement in different types of traffic accident. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 571-581.
• PECK, R.C. (1993). The identification of multiple accident correlates in high risk drivers with specific emphasis on the role of age, experience and prior traffic violation frequency. Paper presented at the Behavioural Factors that Determine Accident Rates Symposium, Santa Monica, CA, USA. Alcohol, Drugs & Driving, 9, 145-166.
• RAJALIN, S. (1994). The connection between risky driving and involvement in fatal accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26, 555-562.
• REASON, J., MANSTEAD, A., STRADLING, S., BAXTER, J., CAMPBELL, K. (1990). Errors and violations on roads. Ergonomics, 33, 1315-1332.
• REISINGER, Y., TURNER, L.(1999). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Application in Tourism., Tourism Management, 20, 71-88.
• Road Traffic Accident Statistics, (2002). State Institute of Statistics Prime Ministry Republic of Turkey, publication number: 2741
• RUNDMO, T., IVERSEN, H. (2004). Risk perception and driving behaviour among adolescents in two Norwegian counties before and after a traffic safety campaign. Safety Science, 42, 1-21.
• RUTTER, D.R., QUINE, L., CHESHAM, D.J. (1995). Predicting safe riding behaviour and accidents: demography, beliefs, and behaviour in motorcycling safety. Psychology and Health, 10, 369–386.
• SABEY, B.E., TAYLOR, H. (1980). The known risks we run: the highway. Department of Transport, TRRL SR567, Transport and Road Research Laboratory. Crowthorne, Berks.
• SCHERMELLEH-ENGEL, K., MOOSBRUGGER, H. (2003). Evaluating The Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness- of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, (8) 2, 23-74
• STEENKAMP, B.E.M., BAUMGARTNER, H. (2000). On the use of structural equation models for marketing modelling. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17, 195-202.
• SÜMER, N. (2003). Personality and behavioural predictors of traffic accidents: testing a contextual mediated model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 949- 964.
• SUMMALA, H. (1996). Accident risk and driver behaviour. Safety Science, 22, 103-112.
• TURNER, C., MCCLURE, R. (2004). Quantifying the role of risk-taking behaviour in causation of serious road crash-related injury. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 383-389.
• ULLEBERG, P., RUNDMO, T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41, 427-443.
• WEST, R. , HALL, J. (1997). The role of personality and attitudes in traffic accident risk. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 253–264.
• YIĞIT-IŞIK, İ., YASAK, Y. (1997). Driver behaviour profile in Turkey: relationship between driver behaviour and risk taking. 6th international workshop “driver improvement” (DI 97), October 20-22, Berlin Germany.