ÖRGÜTSEL ÇEKİCİLİK: BİR ÖLÇEK UYARLAMA ÇALIŞMASI

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 141 - 154, 01.07.2014

Seda Dural Gonca Aslan Merve Alinçe Aylin Araza

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Highhouse vd. 2003 tarafından geliştirilen Örgütsel Çekicilik Ölçeğini ÖÇÖ Türkçe’ye kazandırmak ve geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizlerini yapmaktır. Ölçek, öncelikle araştırmacılar ve bir dil uzmanı tarafından Türkçe’ye çevrilmiş, ardından ifadeler iki dilli 15 uzmanın görüşüne başvurularak dil ve anlam uygunluğu bakımından değerlendirilmiştir. Öneriler doğrultusunda son şeklini alan Türkçe form iki aşamada uygulanmıştır. İlk aşamada, test-tekrar test güvenirliğini sınamak amacıyla ölçek iki hafta ara ile 50 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Test tekrar-test güvenirlik katsayısı birincil değerlendirme için 0,85, ikincil değerlendirme için 0,89 olarak bulunmuştur. Uygulamanın ikinci aşamasında anket 257 öğrenciye uygulanarak ölçeğin iç tutarlılık katsayısı 0,89 olarak bulunmuştur. Yapılan analizler sonucunda ÖÇÖ’nün özgün ölçekte olduğu gibi üç faktörlü bir yapı gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Hiçbir madde atılmadan 15 madde ile üç boyutu ölçen geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Çekicilik, Ölçek Uyarlama, Geçerlik, Güvenirlik, DFA

RGANIZATIONAL ATTRACTIVENESS: A SCALE ADAPTATION STUDY

Öz

The purpose of the study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the organizational attractiveness scale which is developed by Highhouse et al. 2003 in Turkey. The 15 item scale was first translated into Turkish by researchers and one language expert, and then, translated sentences evaluated by 15 bilingual experts in terms of expression and linguistic suitability. In compliance with suggestions, the Turkish form was finalized and implemented in two stages. In the first stage, in order to analyze the reliability of test re-test, the scale was implemented with 50 students twice within two weeks and the reliability coefficient was found as 0,85 and 0,89 respectively. In the second stage, the scale was implemented with 257 students and the Cronbach Alpha was found as 0,89. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that Organizational Attractiveness Scale has a three dimensional structure as it is in the original form. Without excluding any items, a valid and reliable scale which consists of three dimensions and fifteen items were obtained

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Attractiveness, Scale Adaptation, Validity, Reliability, CFA

Kaynakça

• AIMAN-SMITH, L., BAUER, T.N., CABLE, D.M. (2001). Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16 (2), 219-237. ss.
• AJZEN, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. ss.
• AKÇAY, A.D. (2014). Örgütsel Çekicilik Bağlamında Otel İşletmelerini Rakiplerinden Ayıran Özellikler. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14 (1), 175-186. ss.
• AKÇAY, A.D., TİMUR, N., ULUKAN, C. (2013). Kent Merkezinde Faaliyet Gösteren Beş Yıldızlı Otel İşletmelerinde Araçsal ve Sembolik Özelliklerin Örgütsel Çekiciliğe Etkisi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 8(1), 319-340. ss.
• ALBINGER, H.S., FREEMAN, S.J. (2000). Corporate social performance and attractiveness asan employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28 (3), 243- 253. ss.
• ARBAK, Y., YEŞİLADA, T. (2003). Örgüt Kişi Uyumu ve Örgütsel Çekicilik: Hangi Kişiler Ne Tür Örgütleri Daha Çekici Bulur? Journal of İstanbul Kültür University, (3), 23-37. ss.
• BACKHAUS, K.B., STONE, B.A., HEINER, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society, 41 (3), 292- 318. ss.
• BARTKO, J. J. (1976). On Various Intracalass Correlation Reliability Coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83 (5), 762-765. Ss.
• BLACKMAN, A. (2006). Graduating students' responses to recruitment advertisements. Journal of Business Communication, 43 (4). 367-388. ss.
• BRADDY, P.W., MEADE, A.W., KROUSTALIS, C.M. (2006). Organizational recruitment website effects on viewers’ perceptions of organizational culture. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20 (4), 525-543. ss.
• CABLE, D.M., GRAHAM, M.E. (2000). The determinants of job seekers' reputation perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 21 (8), 929-947. ss.
• CALIGIURI, P., COLAKOGLU, S., CERDIN, J.L., KIM, M.S. (2010). Examining crosscultural and individual differences in predicting employer reputation as a driver of employer attraction. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10 (2), 137-151. ss.
• CAMPBELL, D. T., FISKE, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait-multi-method matrix. Psychological Bulettin, 56 (2), 81-105. ss.
• CHATMAN, J.A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of personorganization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14 (3), 333-349. ss.
• CRAMER, D., HWITT, D. (2004). The Sage Dictionary of Statistics: A Practical Resource For Students in The Social Sciences. London: Sage Publications.
• ÇOKLUK, Ö., ŞEKERCİOĞLU, G., BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel Uygulamaları. 1. Baskı., Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• DEVENDORF, S.A., HIGHHOUSE, S. (2008). Applicant-employee similarity and attraction to an employer. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81 (4), 607-617. ss.
• DURMUŞ, B., YURTKORU, E. S., ÇİNKO, M. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS’le Veri Analiz. 4. Baskı, İstanbul: Beta Yayınclık.
• ERDOĞAN, İ. (2007). Pozitivist Metodoloji. 2. Baskı, Ankara: Erk Yayınları.
• FISHBEIN, M., AJZEN, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research”, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• FISHER, C.D., ILGEN, D.R., HOYER, W.D. (1979). Source credibility, information favorability, and job offer acceptance. Academy of Management Journal, 22 (1), 94-103. ss.
• EHRHART, K.H., ZIEGERT, J.C. (2005). Why are individuals attracted to organizations?. Journal of Management, 31 (6), 901-919. ss.
• FAGOT, R. F. (1991). Reliability of Ratings for Multiple Judges: Intraclass Correlation and Metric Scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15 (1), 1-11. ss
• FIELD, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Third Edition, London: Sage Publications.
• FLOYD, F. J., Widaman, K.F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7 (3), 286-299. ss.
• GIDDENS, A. (2008). Sosyoloji, 1. Baskı, İstanbul: Kırmızı Yayınları.
• GOMES, D., NEVES, J. (2011). Organizational attractiveness and prospective applicants' intentions to apply. Personnel Review, 40 (6), 684-699. ss.
• GREENING, D.W., TURBAN, D.B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39 (3), 254-280. ss.
• HAIR, J.F., BLACK, W.C., BABIN, B.J., ANDERSON R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Seventh Edition, Pearson: New Jersey.
• HIGHHOUSE, S., BEADLE, D., GALLO, A., MILLER, L. (1998). Get’ em while they last! Effects of scarcity information in job advertisements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28 (9), 779-795. ss.
• HIGHHOUSE, S., LIEVENS, F., SINAR, E.F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63 (6), 986-1001. ss.
• HOYE, G.V., LIEVENS, F. (2005). Recruitment-related information sources and organizational attractiveness: Can something be done about negative publicity?. International Journal of Selection and Assessement, 13 (3), 179-187. ss.
• JIANG, T., ILES, P. (2011). Employer-brand equity, organizational attractiveness and talent management in the Zhejiang private sector,China. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6 (1), 97-110. ss.
• KIM, S.Y., PARK, H. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as an organizational attractiveness for prospective public relations practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 103 (4), 639-653.ss.
• KRISTOF-BROWN, A.L., ZIMMERMAN, R.D., JOHNSON, E.C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58 (2), 281-342. ss.
• LEHMANN, D. R. (1988). An Alternative Procedure for Assessing Convergent and Discriminant Validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12 (4), 411-423. Ss. LIEVENS, F., HIGHHOUSE, S. (2003). The Relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes toa company’s attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56 (1), 75-102. ss.
• LUCE, R.A., BARBER, A.E., HILLMAN, A.J. (2001). Good deeds and misdeeds: A mediated model of the effect of corporate social performance on organizational attractiveness. Business & Society, 40 (4), 397-415. ss.
• PLOYHART, R.E., RYAN, A.M. (1998). Applicants’ reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: The effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (1), 3-16. ss.
• RYNES, S.L., MILLER, H.E. (1983). Recruiter and job influences on candidates for employment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68 (1), 146-154. ss.
• SCHREURS, B., DRUART, C., PROOST, K., DE WITTE, K. (2009). Symbolic attributes and organizational attractiveness: The moderating effects of applicant personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17 (1), 35-47. ss.
• SCHWOERER, C.E., ROSEN, B. (1989). Effects of employment-at-will policies and compensation policies on corporate image and job pursuit intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 653-656. ss.
• SLAUGHTER, J.E., GREGURAS, G.J. (2009). Initial attraction to organizations: The influence of trait inferences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 17 (1), 1-18.ss.
• STAPLETON, C.D. (1997). Basic concepts and procedures of confirmatory factor analysis. [Erişim adresi]: http://ericae.net/ft/tamu/Cfa.htm(15.06.2012) <http://www.bilgiyonetimi. org/cm/pages/mkl_gos.php?nt=498>, [Erişim tarihi: 20.10.2012].
• THOMAS, K.M., WISE, P.G., (1999). Organizational attractiveness and individual differences: Are diverse applicants attracted by different factors?. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13 (3), 375-390. ss.
• THORSTEINSON, T.J., HIGHHOUSE, S. (2003). Effects of goal framing in job advertisementson organizational attractiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33 (11), 2393-2412.ss.
• TSAI, W.C., YANG, I.W.F. (2010). Does image matter to different job applicants? The influences of corporate image and applicant individual differences on organizational attractiveness”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18 (1), 48-63. ss.
• TURBAN, D.B., CABLE, D.M. (2003). Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (6), 733-751. ss.
• TURBAN, D.B., FORRET, M.L., HENDRICKSON, C.L. (1998). Applicant attraction to firms: Influencesof organization reputation, job and organizational attributes, and recruiter behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52 (1), 24-44. ss.
• TURBAN, D.B., GREENING, D.W. (1996). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. The Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3), 658- 672. ss.
• TURBAN, D.B., KEON, T.L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (2), 184-193. ss.
• WILLIAMSON, I.O., KING JR, J.E., LEPAK, D., SARMA, A. (2010), Firm reputation, recruitment, websites, and attracting applicants. Human Resource Management, 49 (4), 669- 687. ss.
• WOOD, D.J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (1), 50-84. ss.
• VAN HOYE, G., SAKS, A.M. (2011). The instrumental-symbolic framework: Organisational image and attractiveness of potential applicants and their companions at a job fair. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60 (2), 311-335. ss.
• YILDIZ, M.L. (2013). Algılanan Kişi-Örgüt Uyumu, Tanınırlık, İmaj, Örgütsel Çekicilik ve İşe Başvurma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkilerin Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi İle İncelenmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B. Dergisi, 34 (1), 153-173. ss.