Karbon Emisyon Politikalarının Tersine Tedarik Zincir Ağı Tasarımı Üzerindeki Etkiler

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1, 99 - 111, 01.01.2018

Bandar A Alkhayyal Surendra M. Gupta

Öz

Küresel tedarik zincirinde önemli bir rol oynayan tersine tedarik zinciri, ömrünü tamamlamış ürünler için çevreye karşı sorumlu çözümler arayanların bir girişimi olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Tersine tedarik zincirinin nispi ekonomik ve çevresel faydaları, toplama, nakliye, geri kazanım tesisleri, demontaj, geri dönüşüm, yeniden imalat ve geri dönüşü olmayan bileşenlerin imha edilmesi sırasında oluşan maliyetler ve emisyonlardan etkilenmektedir.ekonomik ve çevresel hedefleri dikkate almaktadır. Bu makale, sıkı karbon kapsülleri, karbon vergisi, karbon emisyon üst sınırı ve ticareti olmak üzere üç ortak düzenleyici politikada ters tedarik zincirinin tasarımını ele almaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sera gazı emisyonları, düşük karbonlu lojistik, tersine tedarik zinciri, sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri

The Impact of Carbon Emissions Policies on Reverse Supply Chain Network Design

Öz

Reverse Supply Chain is described as an initiative that plays an important role in the global supply chain for those who seek environmentally responsible solutions for their end-of-life products. The relative economic and environmental benefits of reverse supply chain are influenced by costs and emissions during collection, transportation, recovery facilities, disassembly, recycling, remanufacturing, and disposal of unrecoverable components. The design of reverse supply chain network takes into account social, economic and environmental objectives. This paper addresses the design of reverse supply chain under the three common regulatory policies, strict carbon caps, carbon tax, and carbon cap-and-trade.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, low carbon logistics, reverse supply chain, sustainably supply chain

Kaynakça

• Foot Truck. (2017). Retrieved from Penske Truck Leasing Corporation: http://www.pensketruckrental.com/moving-trucks/12-foot-truck/
• Abdallah, T. Farhat, A. Diabat, A. Kennedy, S. (2012). Green supply chains with carbon trading and environmental sourcing: Formulation and life cycle assessment, Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 36. p. 4271–4285.
• Alkhayyal, B & Gupta, S. M. (2015). “A Linear Physical Programming Approach to Evaluate Collection Centers for End-Of-Life Products”. Proceedings of the 2015 Northeast Decision Sciences Institute Conference.
• Bellmann, K. and Khare, A.( 2000). Economic Issues in Recycling End-of-Life Vehicles, Technovation, Vol. 20, 677-690
• Benjaafar, S. Li, Y. Daskin, M. (2013). Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models, IEEE Transactions Automotive Science Eng. Vol. 10. p. 99-116.
• Boon, J. E., Isaacs, J. A., & Gupta, S. M. (2000) “Economic Impact of Aluminum‐ Intensive Vehicles on the US Automotive Recycling Infrastructure”. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(2), 117-134.
• Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Institute. (2016). Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIO-LCA) US 2002 (428 sectors) Producer model [Internet], Available from: <http://www.eiolca.net/> [Accessed 21 June, 2017].
• Carter, C. R. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, vol. 38, no 5, p. 360.
• Chaabane, A., Ramudhin, A. Paquet, M. (2012). Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 135, p. 37-49.
• Conference of the Parties (COP21). (2015). The Paris Agreement. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Available from http://www.cop21paris.org/ [Accessed May. 12, 2017].
• Das, J. K. (2002). Responding to Green Concerns: the Role of Government and Business, Vikalpa, Vol. 27, 3-12.
• Dekker, R., & Fleischmann, M. (Eds.). (2004). Reverse logistics: quantitative models for closed-loop supply chains. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Diabat, A, Abdallah, T. Al-Refaie, A. Svetinovic, D. Govindan, K. (2013). Strategic Closed-Loop Facility Location Problem With Carbon Market Trading, IEEE Transactions on engineering Management, vol. 60, no. 2. p. 398-408.
• Diabat, A. Simichi-Levi, D. (2010). A carbon-capped supply chain network Problem. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. p. 523-27.
• Dotoli, M. (2005). A multi-level approach for network design of integrated supply chains. International journal of production research, 43:4267–4287.
• Fahimnia, B. Sarkis, J. Dehghanian, F. Banihashemi, N. Rahmanm. S. (2013). The impact of carbon pricing on a closed-loop supply chain: an Australian case study, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 59. p. 210-25.
• Ferguson, N., & Browne, J. (2001). “Issues in end-of-life product recovery and reverse logistics”. Production Planning & Control, 12(5) (2001), 534-547.
• Fleishmann, M. (2000). Quantitative models for reverse logistics. Rotterdam.
• Guide, V. D. R. (2000). Production Planning and Control for Remanufacturing: Industry Practice and Research Needs, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 18, 467- 483.
• Guide, V. D. R., Jayaraman, V., & Srivastava, R. (1999). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: a state-of-the-art survey. Robotics and Computer- Integrated Manufacturing, 15(3), 221-230.
• Guillen-Gosalbez, G. and Grossmann, I. (2009). Optimal design and planning of sustainable chemical supply chains under uncertainty. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 55:99–121.
• Gungor, A., & Gupta, S. M. (1999). Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 36(4), 811-853.
• Gupta, S. M. (2013). Reverse Supply Chains: Issues and Analysis, CRC Press, ISBN: 978-1439899021.
• Henshaw, J. M. (1994). Design for recycling: new paradigm or just the latest 'design– for–X' fad?. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology, 9(1), 125-138.
• Hugo, A. and Pistikopoulos, E. (2005). Environmentally conscious long-range planning and design of supply chain networks. Journal of Cleaner Production: Recent advances in industrial process optimization, 13:1471–1491.
• Hugo, A., Rutter, P., Pistikopoulos, S., Amorelli, A., & Zoia, G. (2005). Hydrogen infrastructure International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30(15), 1523-1534. planning using multi-objective optimization.
• Ilgin, M. A., & Gupta, S. M. (2010). Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): a review of the state of the art. Journal of environmental management, 91(3), 563-591.
• Interagency Working Group, (2013). Technical update on the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis-under executive order 12866. United States Government.
• IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
• Jayaraman, V. (2006). Production planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery and reuse: An analytical approach. International Journal of Production Research, 44:981–998.
• Jin, M. Granda-Marulanda, N.A. Ian, D. (2014). The impact of carbon policies on supply chain design and logistics of a major retailer, Journal of Cleaner Production; vol. 85. p. 453-461.
• LG Model: LW1213ER Refurbished. (2015). World Wide Voltage, LG Electronics. Air Conditioners. Available from http://www.worldwidevoltage.com/lg- lw1213er-12-000-btu-window-air-conditioner-with-remote-fectory- refurbished--only-for-usa-- .html?utm_source=googlepeplaandutm_medium=adwordsandid=61865531738 [Accessed Feb. 17, 2017].
• Meixell, M. and Gargeya, V. (2005). Global supply chain design: A literature review and critique. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41:531– 550.
• Nagurney, A., Zugang, L, & Trisha, W. (2007). Sustainable Supply Chain and Transportation Networks. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, vol. 1, no 1, p. 29 - 51.
• Paksoy, T. Bektaş, T. Özceylan, E. (2011). Operational and environmental performance measures in a multi-product closed-loop supply chain, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 47, no. 4. p. 532-46.
• Paul R. K., Kalyan. S, & Luk N. W. (2005). Sustainable Operations Management. Production and Operations Management, vol. 14, no 4, p. 482-492.
• Seuring S, Müller M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 16, No. 15, pp. 1699-1710.
• Seuring, S., Joseph, S., Martin, M., & Purba, R. (2008). Sustainability and supply chain management - An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 16, no 15, p. 1545-1551.
• Sheu, J. (2008). Green supply chain management, reverse logistics and nuclear power generation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44:19– 46.
• Srivastava, S. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9:53–80.
• U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2015). Table 5.6.A. Average Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector, Electric Power Monthly [Internet], Available from
• http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_5_6_a [Accessed 20 June, 2017].
• US Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). The Social Cost of Carbon. Climate Change - Social Cost of CO2, 2015-2050 [Internet]. Available from http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/EPAactivities/economics/scc.html (Accessed 14 June, 2017].
• Vadde, S., Kamarthi, S. V., & Gupta, S. M. (2006). Pricing decisions for product recovery facilities in a multi-criteria setting using genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the SPIE International Conference on Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing VI, (6385) 108-118.