Investigating Validation of Armey Curve Hypothesis for G7 Countries using ARDL Model

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 49 - 59, 01.01.2019

Gürkan Bozma Selim Başar Murat Eren

Öz

The effect of the government size on economic growth still keeps its unclear status despite the works in this field. According to the Armey Hypothesis 1995 , which one of the studies developed for the volume of government size in economy, the increase in the public volume in economy will increase economic growth up to a certain level, and when the maximum level is reached, the increase in public volume will cause decreases in economic growth. In this study, the issues of whether the Armey Hypothesis is valid or not for G7 countries has been investigated, and the optimum public volume has been determined for G7 countries. In testing Armey Curve hypothesis, we use ARDL cointegration procedure. The results of empirical findings argue that the Armey Hypothesis is valid for US, and Canada, and France when it is invalid for other G7 countries.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Armey Curve, Government Size, Economic Growth, Cointegration.

G7 Ülkeleri için Armey Eğrisi Hipotezinin ARDL Modeli ile İncelenmesi

Öz

Kamu büyüklüğünün ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi, literatür genelindeki çalışmalara rağmen belirsizliğini korumaktadır. Armey Hipotezi'ne 1995 göre, kamu hacmindeki artış, belli bir seviyeye kadar ekonomik büyümeyi pozitif olarak etkilerken belli bir maksimum düzeyenden sonra kamu hacmindeki artış ekonomik büyümede düşüşe neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Armey Hipotezinin G7 ülkeleri için geçerli olup olmadığı konusu araştırılmış ve G7 ülkeleri için optimum kamu hacmi belirlenmiştir. Armey Curve hipotezini test edilmesinde, ARDL eşbütünleşme modeli kullanılmıştır. Ampirik bulgulara göre, Armey Hipotezinin ABD, Kanada ve Fransa için geçerli iken diğer G7 ülkelerinde geçerli olmadığı tespit edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Armey Eğrisi, Kamu Büyüklüğü, Ekonomik Büyüme, Eşbütünleşme

Kaynakça

• Abounoori, E, Nademi, Y., (2006). "Government size threshold and economic growth in Iran", International Journal of Business and Development Studies, 2(1), 95- 108.
• Afonso, A, Jalles, J T. (2016). “Economic performance, government size, and institutional quality”. Empirica, 43(1), 83-109.
• Akpan, U F, Abang, D E. (2013). "Does government spending spur economic growth? Evidence from Nigeria". Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(9), 36-52.
• Altunc, O F, Aydın, C. (2013). "The relationship between optimal size of government and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria". Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 66-75.
• Altunç, Ö, Aydın, C. (2012). "Türkiye'de Kamu Sektörü Büyüklüğü ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisinin Ampirik Analizi". Ekonomik Yaklasim, 23(82), 79-98.
• Armey, D. (1996). “The freedom revolution: Why big government failed, why freedom works, and how we will rebuild America”, Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.
• Aydin, C, Akinci, M, Yilmaz, Ö. (2016). "The Analysis of Visible Hand of Government: The Threshold Effect of Government Spending on Economic Growth". International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 7(5), 170.
• Barro, R J. (1988). “Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth” ,National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass,, USA.
• Bergh, A, Karlsson, M. (2010). “Government size and growth: Accounting for economic freedom and globalization”, Public Choice, 142(1-2), 195-213.
• Chen, S-T, Lee, C-C. (2005) “Government size and economic growth in Taiwan: A threshold regression approach”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 27(9), 1051-1066.
• Chobanov, D, Mladenova, A. (2009). "What is the optimum size of government", Institute for Market Economics, Bulgaria.
• Choi, J, Son, M. (2016). "A note on the effects of government spending on economic growth in Korea", Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 21(4), 651-663.
• Connolly, M, Li, C. (2016). "Government spending and economic growth in the OECD countries", Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 19(4), 386-395.
• De Witte, K, Moesen, W. (2010). "Sizing the government", Public Choice, 145(1-2), 39-55.
• Elliot, B. E., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). “Efficient tests of the unit root hypothesis”, Econometrica, 64(8), 13-36.
• Ferris, J S, Voia, M C. (2015). "The effect of federal government size on private economic performance in Canada: 1870–2011", Economic Modelling, 49, 172- 185.
• Gwartney, J D, Lawson, R, Holcombe, R G. (1998). “The size and functions of government and economic growth”, Joint Economic Committee Washington, DC.
• Karras, G. (1997). "On the optimal government size in Europe: Theory and empirical evidence", The Manchester School, 65(3), 280-294.
• Lin, S. (1994). “Government spending and economic growth”, Applied Economics, 26(1), 83–94
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). “Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships”, Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
• Pevcin, P. (2004). "Economic output and the optimal size of government", Economic and Business Review for Central and South-Eastern Europe, 6(3), 213.
• Roy, A G. (2009). "Evidence on economic growth and government size", Applied Economics, 41(5), 607-614.
• Turan, T. (2014). "Optimal size of government in Turkey", International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(2), 286.
• Vedder, R K, Gallaway, L E. (1998). “Government size and economic growth”, The Committee.
• Wu, S-Y, Tang, J-H, Lin, E S. (2010). "The impact of government expenditure on economic growth: How sensitive to the level of development?", Journal of Policy Modeling, 32(6), 804-817.