BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Hata Yönetimi Kültürü ve Hizmet Yenilikçiliği İlişkisi

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 95 - 106, 01.01.2019

Öz

Günümüzde şirketler sürdürülebilir rekabet üstünlüğü sağlamak için daha yenilikçi olma çabasındadır. Hatalar ise örgütler için öğrenme ve yenilik yapma gibi önemli sonuçlar doğurabilmektedir. Bu kapsamda çalışmanın amacı, kurumlardaki hata yönetimi ve hizmet yenilikçiliği ilişkisi ile ilgili olarak kavramsal bir çözümleme yapmaktır. Çalışmanın ilk bölümünde hata yönetimi ve hizmet yenilikçiliği kavramlarının detaylı olarak tanımlamalarına yer verilmiş olup, ilerleyen bölümlerinde ise söz konusu kavramların arasında bulunan ilişkinin teorik olarak incelemesi yapılmaktadır. Sonuç olarak çalışma hata yönetimi kültürünün hizmet yenilikçiliğine olan etkisi ile ilgili olarak teorik bir çerçeve oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada ekonomik gelişmede önemli bir rol oynayan finans sektöründeki yenilikçilik faaliyetlerine de değinilmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., ve John, B. (2009). Organizational emotional capability, product and process innovation, and firm performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 103-130.
  • Alegre, J., ve Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Science Direct, 315-326.
  • Avlontis, G., Papastathopoulou, P., ve Gounaris, S. (2001). An empiricalbased typology of product innovativeness for new Şnancial services: Success and failure scenario. Journal of Product Innovation Management (18), 324–342.
  • Barras, R. (1986). Towards a Theory of Innovation in Services. Research Policy (15), 73-161.
  • Barras, R. (1990). Interactive Innovation in Financial and Business Services: the Vanguard of the Service Revolution. Research Policy (19), 37-215.
  • Blazevic, V., ve Lievens, A. (2004). Learning during the new financial service innovation process antecedents and performance effects. Journal of Business Research (57), 374-391.
  • Bowers, R. M. (1989). Developing New Services: Improving the Process Makes It Better. The Journal of Services Marketing, 15.
  • Brentani, U. (1995). New Industrial Service Development: Scenarios for Success and Failure. Journal of Business Research (32), 93-103.
  • Bryson, J. R., ve Monnoyer, M. (2002). Understanding the Relationship Between Services Innovation: The Reser Review of the European Service Literature on Innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 24(1), 205-222.
  • Carmeli, A., ve Gittell, J. H. (2009). High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 709-729.
  • Clampit, P., ve DeKoch, R. (2011). Transforming Leaders into Progress Makers Leadership for the 21st Century. USA: SAGE Publications.
  • Clarke, L. (1999). Mission improbable: Using fantasy documents to tame disaster. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Davison, H., Watkins, T., ve Wright, M. (1989). Developing new personal financial products –some evidence on the role of market research. International Journal of Bank Marketing (7), 8-15.
  • Edmondson, A. (2004). Learning from failure in health care: Frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(6),3–9.
  • Frese, M. (1991). Error management or error prevention: Two strategies to deal with errors in software. Elsevier, 776-782.
  • Frese, M. (1995). Error management in training: Conceptual and empirical results. Organizational learning and technological change, 112-124.
  • Gallouj, F., ve Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy (26), 537-556.
  • Goodman, P., Ramanujam, R., Carroll, J., Edmondson, A., Hofmann, D., ve Sutcliffe, K. (2011). Organizational Errors: Directions for Future Research. 31, 151-176.
  • Gronewold, U., ve Donle, M. (2011). Organizational Error Climate and Auditors’ Predispositions toward Handling Errors. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 69- 92.
  • Helmreich, R. L. (1998). Error Management as Organizational Strategy. In Proceedings of the IATA Human Factors Seminar, 1-7.
  • Hipp, C., Tether, B., ve Miles, I. (2000). The incidence and effects of innovation in services: Evidence from Germany. International Journal of Innovation Management (4), 417–453.
  • Johne, A., ve Storey, C. (1998). New Service Development: A Review of the Literature and Annotated Bibliography. European Journal of Marketing (32), 184-252.
  • Kandampully, J. (2002). Innovation as the core competency of a service organization: the role of technology, knowledge and networks. European Journal of Innovation Management(5), 18-26.
  • Keith, N., ve Frese, M. (2011). Enhancing Firm Performance and Innovativeness Through Error Management Culture. The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate (s. 137-157). USA: SAGE Publications.
  • Krause, D. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors an empirical investigation. Science Direct, 79-102.
  • Lemon, M., ve Sahota, P. S. (2004). Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity. Technovation, 483-498.
  • March, J. G., Schulz, M., ve Zhou, X. (2000). The dynamics of rules: Change in written organizational codes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Naslund, B. (1986). Financial Innovations. A Comparison with R&D in Physical Products. EFI Research Paper/Report. Stockholm.
  • O'Cass, A., Song, M., ve Yuan, L. (2013). Anatomy of service innovation: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Research (66), 1060–1062.
  • Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Reidenbach, R., ve Grubbs, M. (1987). Developing New Bunking Products. Englewood Cliffs.
  • Reidenbach, R., ve Moak, D. (1986). Exploring Retail Bank Performance and New Product Development: A Profile of Industry Practice. Journal of Product innovation Management(3), 187-94.
  • Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M., ve Batinic, B. (1999). Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(4), 527-547.
  • Scarborough, H., ve Lanon, R. (1988). The successful exploitation of new technology in banking. J Gen Manage (51), 13:38.
  • Schulman, P. R. (2004). General attributes of safe organizations. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 39-44.
  • Spencer, B. A. (1994). Models of organization and total quality management: A comparison and critical evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 446.
  • Sundbo, J. (1997). Management of Innovation in Services. The Service Industries Journal 17(3), 432-455.
  • Sutcliffe, K. M., ve Vogus, T. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, ve R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship, 94-110.
  • Tamuz, M., ve Thomas. (2006). Classifying and interpreting threats to patient safety in hospitals: Insights from aviation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (7), 919–940.
  • Van Dyck, C. (2000). Putting Errors To Good Use: Error Management Culture in Organizations. Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences.
  • Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., ve Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational Error Management Culture and Its Impact on Performance: A Two-Study Replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1228-1240.
  • Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., ve Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. In B. M. Staw ve L. L.Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior (81–123).
  • Wildavsky, A. (1991). Searching for safety. NJ: New Brunswick.
  • Wilson, J., Goodman, P. S., ve Cronin, M. A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1041–1059.
  • Zhao, Y. L., ve Anthony Di Benedetto, C. A. (2013). Designing service quality to survive: Empirical evidence from Chinese new ventures. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1098-1107.

The Relationship of Error Management Culture and Service Innovativeness

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 95 - 106, 01.01.2019

Öz

Today companies strive for being more innovative to be able to provide sustainable competitive advantage. Errors can lead to significant results such as learning and innovation for organizations. Within this scope, the purpose of this study is to make a conceptual analysis on the relationship of error management and service innovativeness in organizations. The first section of the study includes the detailed definition of the concepts error management and service innovativeness while the other sections cover the analysis of the relationship between the concepts in a theoretical framework. As a result, the study provides a theoretical framework for the effect of error management culture on service innovativeness. Additionally, innovative activities within financial sector that play a crucial role in economic development are also touched upon in this study

Kaynakça

  • Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., ve John, B. (2009). Organizational emotional capability, product and process innovation, and firm performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 103-130.
  • Alegre, J., ve Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Science Direct, 315-326.
  • Avlontis, G., Papastathopoulou, P., ve Gounaris, S. (2001). An empiricalbased typology of product innovativeness for new Şnancial services: Success and failure scenario. Journal of Product Innovation Management (18), 324–342.
  • Barras, R. (1986). Towards a Theory of Innovation in Services. Research Policy (15), 73-161.
  • Barras, R. (1990). Interactive Innovation in Financial and Business Services: the Vanguard of the Service Revolution. Research Policy (19), 37-215.
  • Blazevic, V., ve Lievens, A. (2004). Learning during the new financial service innovation process antecedents and performance effects. Journal of Business Research (57), 374-391.
  • Bowers, R. M. (1989). Developing New Services: Improving the Process Makes It Better. The Journal of Services Marketing, 15.
  • Brentani, U. (1995). New Industrial Service Development: Scenarios for Success and Failure. Journal of Business Research (32), 93-103.
  • Bryson, J. R., ve Monnoyer, M. (2002). Understanding the Relationship Between Services Innovation: The Reser Review of the European Service Literature on Innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 24(1), 205-222.
  • Carmeli, A., ve Gittell, J. H. (2009). High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 709-729.
  • Clampit, P., ve DeKoch, R. (2011). Transforming Leaders into Progress Makers Leadership for the 21st Century. USA: SAGE Publications.
  • Clarke, L. (1999). Mission improbable: Using fantasy documents to tame disaster. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Davison, H., Watkins, T., ve Wright, M. (1989). Developing new personal financial products –some evidence on the role of market research. International Journal of Bank Marketing (7), 8-15.
  • Edmondson, A. (2004). Learning from failure in health care: Frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(6),3–9.
  • Frese, M. (1991). Error management or error prevention: Two strategies to deal with errors in software. Elsevier, 776-782.
  • Frese, M. (1995). Error management in training: Conceptual and empirical results. Organizational learning and technological change, 112-124.
  • Gallouj, F., ve Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy (26), 537-556.
  • Goodman, P., Ramanujam, R., Carroll, J., Edmondson, A., Hofmann, D., ve Sutcliffe, K. (2011). Organizational Errors: Directions for Future Research. 31, 151-176.
  • Gronewold, U., ve Donle, M. (2011). Organizational Error Climate and Auditors’ Predispositions toward Handling Errors. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 69- 92.
  • Helmreich, R. L. (1998). Error Management as Organizational Strategy. In Proceedings of the IATA Human Factors Seminar, 1-7.
  • Hipp, C., Tether, B., ve Miles, I. (2000). The incidence and effects of innovation in services: Evidence from Germany. International Journal of Innovation Management (4), 417–453.
  • Johne, A., ve Storey, C. (1998). New Service Development: A Review of the Literature and Annotated Bibliography. European Journal of Marketing (32), 184-252.
  • Kandampully, J. (2002). Innovation as the core competency of a service organization: the role of technology, knowledge and networks. European Journal of Innovation Management(5), 18-26.
  • Keith, N., ve Frese, M. (2011). Enhancing Firm Performance and Innovativeness Through Error Management Culture. The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate (s. 137-157). USA: SAGE Publications.
  • Krause, D. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors an empirical investigation. Science Direct, 79-102.
  • Lemon, M., ve Sahota, P. S. (2004). Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity. Technovation, 483-498.
  • March, J. G., Schulz, M., ve Zhou, X. (2000). The dynamics of rules: Change in written organizational codes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Naslund, B. (1986). Financial Innovations. A Comparison with R&D in Physical Products. EFI Research Paper/Report. Stockholm.
  • O'Cass, A., Song, M., ve Yuan, L. (2013). Anatomy of service innovation: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Research (66), 1060–1062.
  • Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Reidenbach, R., ve Grubbs, M. (1987). Developing New Bunking Products. Englewood Cliffs.
  • Reidenbach, R., ve Moak, D. (1986). Exploring Retail Bank Performance and New Product Development: A Profile of Industry Practice. Journal of Product innovation Management(3), 187-94.
  • Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M., ve Batinic, B. (1999). Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(4), 527-547.
  • Scarborough, H., ve Lanon, R. (1988). The successful exploitation of new technology in banking. J Gen Manage (51), 13:38.
  • Schulman, P. R. (2004). General attributes of safe organizations. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 39-44.
  • Spencer, B. A. (1994). Models of organization and total quality management: A comparison and critical evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 446.
  • Sundbo, J. (1997). Management of Innovation in Services. The Service Industries Journal 17(3), 432-455.
  • Sutcliffe, K. M., ve Vogus, T. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, ve R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship, 94-110.
  • Tamuz, M., ve Thomas. (2006). Classifying and interpreting threats to patient safety in hospitals: Insights from aviation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (7), 919–940.
  • Van Dyck, C. (2000). Putting Errors To Good Use: Error Management Culture in Organizations. Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences.
  • Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., ve Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational Error Management Culture and Its Impact on Performance: A Two-Study Replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1228-1240.
  • Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., ve Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. In B. M. Staw ve L. L.Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior (81–123).
  • Wildavsky, A. (1991). Searching for safety. NJ: New Brunswick.
  • Wilson, J., Goodman, P. S., ve Cronin, M. A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1041–1059.
  • Zhao, Y. L., ve Anthony Di Benedetto, C. A. (2013). Designing service quality to survive: Empirical evidence from Chinese new ventures. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1098-1107.
Toplam 45 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Halit Keskin Bu kişi benim

Süleyman Yigital Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Keskin, H., & Yigital, S. (2019). Hata Yönetimi Kültürü ve Hizmet Yenilikçiliği İlişkisi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 20(1), 95-106.