KOLAYLIK FAKTÖRÜNÜN TÜKETİCİLERİN ARAŞTIRMA ALIŞVERİŞİ (SHOWROOMİNG /WEBROOMİNG) DAVRANIŞI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 75 - 98, 24.01.2025

Deniz Hasipek , Özge Baruönü

https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1411411

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, perakendecilerin tüketicilere kesintisiz bir deneyim sunmak için omni-channel stratejilerini kullanmaya çalıştığı bir ortamda, webrooming ve showrooming davranışlarını etkileyen kolaylık unsurlarını belirlemektir. Webrooming: Tüketicilerin bir ürünü web sitesinden inceleyip, fiziki mağazalardan satın alması; showrooming ise tüketicilerin bir ürünü fiziksel mağazalardan inceleyip Web sitesinden satın alması olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Araştırma tanımlayıcı nitelikte olup, ‘Kolayda Örnekleme’ yöntemi ile seçilen 419 kişi üzerinden online anket formları aracılığıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular, çevrimiçi ve çevrimdışı kanallarda algılanan kolaylık unsurlarının bu davranışlar üzerinde farklı etkileri olduğunu göstermektedir. Çevrimdışı mağazalarda ürünü fiziksel olarak deneyimlemenin ve satış temsilcisinden daha derin bilgi almanın webrooming niyetini artırdığı bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, çevrimdışı mağazalarda algılanan satış sonrası hizmet kolaylığının da webrooming niyetini olumlu etkilediği görülmüştür. Çevrimiçi mağazalarda ise web sitesine kolay erişim ve hızlı satın alma kolaylığının showrooming niyetini artırdığı belirlenmiştir. Ancak, çevrimiçi mağazalardaki değerlendirme ve satış sonrası hizmet kolaylığının showrooming niyetini etkilemediği gözlemlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, çevrimdışı mağazalarda yaratılan kolaylık algısı webrooming davranışını desteklerken, çevrimiçi mağazaların kolaylık algılarının showrooming davranışında önemli bir rol oynamadığı sonucuna varılmıştır. Çalışmanın gelecekteki araştırmalar için, webrooming ve showrooming davranışlarının daha geniş bir bağlamda incelenmesi ve diğer değişkenlerin de dikkate alınması önerilmektedir. Ayrıca, bu bulguların marka ve mağaza yöneticileri için stratejik ipuçları sunabileceği vurgulanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tüketici Pazarlaması, Kolaylık, webrooming, showrooming

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmanın, özgün bir çalışma olduğunu; çalışmanın hazırlık, veri toplama, analiz ve bilgilerin sunumu olmak üzere tüm aşamalarından bilimsel etik ilke ve kurallarına uygun davrandığımı; bu çalışma kapsamında elde edilmeyen tüm veri ve bilgiler için kaynak gösterdiğimi ve bu kaynaklara kaynakçada yer verdiğimi; kullanılan verilerde herhangi bir değişiklik yapmadığımı, çalışmanın Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)' in tüm şartlarını ve koşullarını kabul ederek etik görev ve sorumluluklara riayet ettiğimi beyan ederim. Herhangi bir zamanda, çalışmayla ilgili yaptığım bu beyana aykırı bir durumun saptanması durumunda, ortaya çıkacak tüm ahlaki ve hukuki sonuçlara razı olduğumu bildiririm.

Destekleyen Kurum

Maltepe Üniversitesi

THE EFFECT OF THE CONVENIENCE FACTOR ON CONSUMERS' RESEARCH SHOPPING (SHOWROOMING / WEBROOMING) BEHAVIOR

Öz

The main purpose of this study is to determine the convenience factors that affect webrooming and showrooming behaviors in an environment where retailers try to use omni-channel strategies to offer consumers an uninterrupted experience. The term ‘webrooming’ refers to the consumer behavior where customers research products online before going to a physical store to make the actual purchase. Showrooming, on the other hand, refers to the consumer behavior where customers visit physical retail stores to examine and experience products in person before purchasing them online. The research is descriptive in nature and was conducted through online survey forms with 419 people selected via convenience sampling. Research shows that perceived convenience across online and offline channels has different effects on these behaviors. It has been found that physically experiencing the product in offline stores and receiving detailed information from a sales representative increases webrooming intention. Additionally, the perceived ease of after-sales service in offline stores has been found to positively affect webrooming intention. In online stores, it has been determined that easy access to the website and ease of quick purchasing increase showrooming intention. However, it has been observed that the ease of evaluation and after-sales service in online stores does not affect showrooming intention. As a result, it was concluded that while the perception of convenience created in offline stores supports webrooming behavior, the convenience perceptions of online stores do not play a significant role in showrooming behavior. The study recommends that for future research, webrooming and showrooming behaviors should be examined in a broader context and that other variables should be taken into account. Additionally, it was emphasized that these findings could provide strategic clues for brand and store managers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Consumer Marketng, Convenience, Webrooming, Showrooming

Kaynakça

• Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer, A., ve Wood, S. (1997). Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61, 38-53.
• Almarashdeh, I., Jaradat, G. M., Abuhamdah, A., Alsmadi, M., Alazzam, M. B., Alkhasawneh, R. A., ve Awawdeh, I. (2019). The difference between shopping online using mobile apps and website shopping: A case study of service convenience. International Journal of Computer İnformation Systems and İndustrial Management Applications., 11, 151-160.
• Amirtha, R., Sivakumar , V., ve Hwang, Y. (2021). Influence of perceived risk dimensions on e-shopping behavioural intention among women-a family life cycle stage perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(3), 320-355. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16030022
• Arora, S., Singha, K., ve Sahney, S. (2017). Understanding consumer’s showrooming behaviour: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing, 29(2), 409-432.
• Avery, J., Steenburgh, T., Deighton, J., ve Caravella, M. (2011). Adding bricks to clicks: Predicting the patterns of cross-channel elasticities over time. Journal of Marketing, 76(3). Doi: 10.2307/41714491
• Beauchamp, M. B., ve Ponder, N. (2010). Perceptions of retail convenience for in-store and online shoppers. The Marketing Management Journal, 20(1), 49-65.
• Bettencourt, L. A., Lusch, R. F., ve Vargo, S. L. (2014, Fall). A service lens on value creation: Marketin's role in achieving strategic advantage. California Management Review, 57(1), 44-66.
• Bhatti, A., Saad, S., ve Gbadebo, S. M. (2018). The effect of financial risk and convenience risk on online shopping behavior with the moderating role of trust. International Journal of Academic Management Science Research (IJAMSR), 2(8), 38-42.
• Blagoeva, K. T., ve Mijoska, M. (2017). Applying TAM to study online shopping adoption among youth in the republic of Macedonia. Management International Conferance, (543-554 ss). Venice - Italy.
• Bucklin, L. P. (1963). Retail strategy and the classification of consumer goods. Journal Of Marketing, 27(1), 50-55.
• Copeland, M. T. (1923). Relation of consumers’ buying habits to marketing methods. Harvard, 1(2), 282-289. Cao, L., ve Li, L. (2015). The impact of cross-channel integration on retailers’ sales growth. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 198-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.12.005
• Chimborazo-Azogue, L.-E., Frasquet , M., Descals, A. M., ve Miquel-Romero, M.-J. (2021). Understanding mobile showrooming based on a technology acceptance and use model. Sustainability, 13(7288).
• Cox, R. (1959). Consumer convenience and the retail structure of cities. Journal of Marketing, 23(4), 355– 62.
• Duarte, P., Costa e Silva, S., ve Ferreira, M. B. (2018). How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 161-169.
• Flavián, C., Gurrea, R., ve Orús, C. (2020). Combining channels to make smart purchases: The role of webrooming and showrooming. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101923
• Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha , J., ve Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7-18.
• Gensler, S., Neslin, S. A., ve Verhoef, P. C. (2017). The showrooming phenomenon: It's more than just about price. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 38, 29-48.
• Grewal, D., ve Levy, M. (2009). Emerging issues in retailing research. Journal of Retailing, 4(85), 522-526.
• Holbrook, M. B., ve Howard, J. A. (1977). Frequently purchased nondurable goods and services. R. Ferber (Ed.) Selected aspects of consumer behavior içinde (189-222 ss.). Washington DC: National Science Foundation.
• Hsiao, C. C., Rebecca Yen, H. J., ve Li, E. (2012). Exploring consumer value of multi-channel shopping: A perspective of means-end theory. Internet Research, 22(3).
• Kaçer, Z. (2020). Tüketicileri showrooming ve webrooming davranışlarına yönlendiren motivasyonlar ve alışveriş sonrası deneyimleri Sonrası oluşan tepkiler üzerine bir araştırma. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi İşletme Anabilim dalı, Erzurum.
• Kamath, N., ve Saurov, S. (2016). Handbook of research and strategic supply chain management in the retail industry (1st Edition). IGI Global.
• Kelley, E. J. (1958). The importance of convenience in consumer purchasing. Journal of Marketing, 23(1), 32-38. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1248014
• Khurana, S., ve Kaur, B. (2017). Online consumer behaviour models: A literature review. Biz and Bytes, 8(1), 209-217.
• Kleinlercher, K., Linzmajer, M., Verhoef, P. C., & Rudolph, T. (2020). Antecedents of webrooming in omnichannel retailing. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(606798), 1-16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.606798
• Knutsson, J., ve Silden, V. L. (2017). Developing a supply chain framework for omni-channel presence: Retailer omni-channel knowledge framework. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Molde University Collage, Logistics, Norvey.
• Kollmann, T., Kuckertz, A., ve Kaysera, I. (2012). Cannibalization or synergy? Consumers’ channel selection in online-offline multichannel systems. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(2), 186-194. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.11.008
• Kotler, P., Hermawan , K., ve Setiawan, I. (2017). Marketing 4.0. moving from traditional to digital. Hoboken: John Willey & Sons, Inc.
• Lakshmi, S. (2016). Consumer Buying Behavior Towards Online Shopping. International Journal of Research - GRANTHAALAYAH, 4(8), 60-65.
• Lee, W. J. (2020). Unravelling consumer responses to omni-channel approach. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(3), 37-49.
• Li, A., ve Kannan, P. K. (2014). Attributing conversions in a multichannel online marketing environment: An empirical model and a field experiment. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(1), 40-56. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0050
• Maggioni, I., Pallant, J., Sands, S., ve Tojib, D. (2020). Consumer cross-channel behavior: Is it always planned? International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 1-43. doi:10.1108/IJRDM-03-2020-0103
• Miracle , G. E. (1965). Product characteristics and marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 29, 18-24.
• Mosquera, A., Olarte-Pascual, C., Juaned, E., ve Murillo, Y. S. (2017). The role of technology in an omnichannel physical store. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 23(2), 63-81.
• Neslin, S. A., ve Shankar, V. (2009). Key issues in multichannel customer management: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 70-81.
• Neslin, S. A., Grewal, D., Leghorn, R., Shankar, V., Teerling, M. L., Thomas, J. S., ve Verhoef, P. C. (2006). Challenges and opportunities in multichannel customer management. Journal of Service Research, 9(2), 95-112.
• Otero, T. P., ve Rolán, X. M. (2016). Understanding digital marketing-basics. MBA, Management and Industrial Engineering,, 37-74. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28281-7_2
• Otto, J. R., ve Chung, Q. B. (2000). A framework for cyber-enhanced retailing: Integrating e-commerce. Electronic Markets, 10(3), 185–191.
• Panwar, C. (2018). Consumer perceived risk in online shopping environment via Facebook as medium. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 2485-2490.
• Rabinovich, E., ve Laseter, T. M. (2011). Internet retail operations:Integrating theory and practice for managers (1st Edition). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11029
• Rigby, D. K. (2011). The future of shopping. Harward Business Review, 89(12), 65-76.
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., ve Thornhill, A. (2000). Research methods for business students. (Harlow, Dü.) Prentice Hall.
• Schneider, P. J. (2020). The showrooming phenomenon –threat, opportunity or challenge in multi-channel retailing? (Yayımlanmamış Doktora tezi), University of Wuppertal, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics.
• Seiders, K., Berry, L. L., ve Gresham, L. G. (2000). Attention, retailers! How convenient is your convenience strategy? Sloan Management Review, 49(3), 79-90.
• Semiz, B. B. (2021). Investigation of the effect of perceived risk and e-distrust, webrooming intention and webrooming behavior in the framework of theory of reasoned action. Journal of Marketing,Management and Logisics, 8(1), 53-63.
• Shankar, A., Yadav, R., ve Gupta, M. (2021). How does online engagement drive consumers’ webrooming intention? A moderated-mediation approach. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(6), 1-25.
• Shankar, A., Kumar, A., Kumar Tiwari, A., Tiwari, A., Behl, A., ve Gupta, M. (2021). How does convenience impact showrooming intention? Omnichannel retail strategies to manage global retail apocalypse. Journal of Strategic Marketing. Doi:10.1080/0965254X.2021.1965189
• Sipahi, B., ve Arsoy, A. P. (2010). Finansal raporlamada yeni yaklaşımlar-New. Öneri Dergisi, 9(33), 51-57.
• Steinfield , C. W., Bauwman, H., ve Adelaar, T. (2002). The Dynamics of click-and-mortar electronic commerce: Opportunities and management strategies. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(1), 93-119. Doi:10.1080/10864415.2002.11044254
• Svatosova, V. (2020). The importance of online shopping behavior in the strategic management of e-commerce competitiveness. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(4), 143-160
• Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2020). Çok değişkenli istatistiklerin kullanımı (6. Baskı). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Timmermans, H. J., Heijden, R. V., ve Westerveld,, H. (1982). Cognition of urban retailing structures: A Dutch case study. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Journal of Economic and Social Geography,73(1),2-12,
• TUİK. (2021). Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri (BT) Kullanım Araştırması. 2021,www.tuik.gov.tr:https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Survey-on-Information-and-Communication-Technology-(ICT)-Usage-in-Households-and-by-Individuals-2021.
• Verhoef, P. C., Neslin, S. A., ve Vroomen, B. (2007). Multichannel customer management: Understanding the research-shopper phenomenon. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(2), 129-148.
• Fernández, N., Pérez, M., ve Casielles, R. (2020). Is showrooming really so terrible? Start understanding showroomers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (54).1-16