Disaster Risk Perception Regarding Culture and Personality

Öz

Disasters appear in different ways as a result of dangerous and risky situations. The impact of events that may lead to disasters differs according to societies' risk reduction and preparedness levels. In order for societies to attach importance to risk management activities, it is important that they first perceive the hazards and risks that may lead to disasters in their regions. In this framework firstly, the disaster risk perception scale was developed and then it was tried to reveal whether it is related to culture and personality. The survey was limited to 900 people aged 18 and over living in Muğla and Van provinces in Türkiye. The data were analyzed in LISREL software. It was found that the agreeableness dimension of the personality scale was positively related to all dimensions of disaster risk perception. The conscientiousness dimension of the personality scale was found to be negatively related to the threat dimension of disaster risk perception, and the openness to experience was found to be negatively related to the fatalism dimension of disaster risk perception. No relationship was found between the extraversion dimension of personality and the perception of disaster risk. The uncertainty avoidance dimension of the culture scale was found to be positively correlated with the anxiety and controllability dimensions of disaster risk perception. No relationship was found between the collectivism dimension of culture and the perception of disaster risk.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Disaster
• disaster risk perception
• culture
• personality

Kültür ve Kı̇şilik Açısından Afet Rı̇skı̇ Algısı

Öz

Afetler tehlikeli ve riskli durumların bir sonucu olarak farklı şekillerde karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Afete yol açabilecek olayların etkisi ise toplumların risk azaltma ve hazırlık seviyelerine göre farklılık göstermektedir. Toplumların risk yönetimi faaliyetlerine önem vermeleri için ilk olarak bölgelerinde afete yol açabilecek tehlike ve riski algılamaları önemlidir. Bu çerçevede ilk olarak afet risk algısı ölçeği geliştirilmiş, daha sonra kültür ve kişilikle ilişkili olup olmadığı ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır. Anket çalışması, Türkiye’de Muğla ve Van illerinde yaşayan 18 yaş ve üstü 900 kişiyle sınırlandırılmıştır. Veriler LISREL programında analize tabi tutulmuştur. Kişilik ölçeği uyumluluk boyutunun, afet risk algısı boyutlarının tümüyle pozitif yönde ilişkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Kişilik ölçeğinin sorumluluk boyutu, afet risk algısının tehdit boyutuyla; yeniliğe açıklık boyutu da, afet risk algısının kadercilik boyutuyla negatif ilişkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Kişiliğin dışadönüklük boyutuyla afet risk algısı arasında ilişki tespit edilmemiştir. Kültür ölçeğinin ise belirsizlikten kaçınma boyutunun, afet risk algısının endişe ve kontrol edebilirlik boyutlarıyla pozitif ilişkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Kültürün kolektivizm boyutuyla afet risk algısı arasında ilişki tespit edilmemiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Afet
• afet risk algısı
• kültür
• kişilik

Kaynakça

1. AFAD. (2014). Açıklamalı afet yönetimi terimleri sözlüğü. T.C. Başbakanlık Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/3495/xfiles/sozluk.pdf (access date: 22.09.2019)
2. AFAD. (2018). Türkiye’de afet yönetimi ve doğa kaynaklı afet istatistikleri. https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/35429/xfiles/turkiye_de_afetler.pdf (access date: 12.08.2019)
3. Ağçoban, S. (2018). İmam hatip liselerinde okutulan ders kitaplarının bireycilik ve kolektivizm açısından incelenmesi. Talim: Journal of Education in Muslim Societies and Communities, 2(1), 53-83. https://dx.doi.org/10.12738/talim.2018.1.0104
4. Adelekan, I. O., & Asiyanbi, A. P. (2016). Flood risk perception in flood-affected communities in Lagos, Nigeria. Nat Hazards, 80, 445–469. doi 10.1007/s11069-015-1977-2
5. Alcántara-Ayala, I., & Moreno, A. R. (2016). Landslide risk perception and communication for disaster risk management in mountain areas of developing countries: a Mexican foretaste. J. Mt. Sci. 13(12), 2079-2093. doi: 10.1007/s11629-015-3823-0.
6. Ayvazoğlu, G., Çekiç, M. ve Yücel, H. (2020). Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin afet risk algısı ve afete hazırlık durumlarının değerlendirilmesi. SBedergi, 4(7), 85-97.
7. Baytiyeh, H., & Öcal, A. (2016). High school students’ perceptions of earthquake disaster: A comparative study of Lebanon and Turkey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 18, 56–63. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.004.
8. Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750.

9. Benli, B. (2019). A comparative study among Turkish and American consumers on the relationship between cultural dimensions and the two important outcomes of consumer society: Conspicuous consumption and online compulsive buying behavior. [Doktora Tezi, Işık Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi Veri Tabanı (579418).
10. Castro, C.- P., Sarmiento, J.-P., Edwards, R., Hoberman, G., & Wyndham, K. (2017). Disaster risk perception in urban contexts and for people with disabilities: case study on the city of Iquique (Chile). Nat Hazards, 86, 411–436. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2698-x
11. Chauvin, B., Hermand, D., & Mullet, E. (2007). Risk perception and personality facets. Risk Analysis, 27(1), 171-185. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00867.x
12. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Neo PI-R. professional manual. Odessa, Fl: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
13. Coşkun, R., Altunışık, R. ve Yıldırım, E. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: SPSS uygulamalı, (9. Baskı). Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık.
14. Coppola, D. P. (2006). Introduction to international disaster management. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, USA.
15. Cui, F., Liu, Y., Chang, Y., Duan, J., & Li, J. (2016). An overview of tourism risk perception. Nat Hazards, 82, 643–658. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2208-1
16. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London and New York: Routledge and Keagan Paul.
17. Douglas, M. (1978). Cultural bias (No. 35). Royal Anthropological Institute.
18. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and
19. Fang, S. C., & Yu, T. Y. (2015). A risk perception model of climate change for university students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(3), 339-350.
20. Fyhri, A., & Backer-Grøndahl, A. (2012). Personality and risk perception in transport. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 49, 470– 475, doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.017
21. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26-34.
22. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: felsefe-yöntem-analizi, (4. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
23. Güler, İ. (2019). Düzce kentinde risk algısının yer bağlılığı ile ilişkisi. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Düzce Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi Veri Tabanı (588316).
24. Habibnezhad, M., & Esmaeili, B. (2016). The influence of individual cultural values on construction workers’ risk perception. 52nd ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings.
25. Ho, M. C., Shaw, D., Lin, S., & Chiu, Y. C. (2008). How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception?. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 28(3), 635-643. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01040.x
26. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Baverly Hills, California: Sage.
27. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
28. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of mind, (Revised and Expanded Third Edition). New York: McGrawHill.
29. Huck, S. W. (2012). Reading statistics and research, (Sixth edition). Boston: Pearson.
30. Işık, Ö., Aydınlıoğlu, H. M., Koç, S., Gündoğdu, O., Korkmaz, G. ve Ay, A. (2012). Afet yönetimi ve afet odaklı sağlık hizmetleri. Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi, 28(Ek sayı 2), 82-123. doi:10.5222/otd.supp2.2012.082
31. Jozi, E. S., Entezar, R. K., Najafi, Z., Eskandari, S., Taj, L., Seyedalinaghi, S., et al. (2018). Relation between personality dimensions, risk perception and coping strategies in people living with hiv. Journal of International Translational Medicine, 6(2), 80-86. doi: 10.11910/2227-6394.2018.06.02.06
32. Karl, M. (2018). Risk and uncertainty in travel decision-making: Tourist and destination perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 57(1), 129–146. doi: 10.1177/0047287516678337
33. Kim, H., Schroeder, A., & Pennington-Gray, L. (2016). Does culture influence risk perceptions? Tourism Review International, 20, 11-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/154427216X14581596798942
34. Kundak, S., Türkoğlu, H., & İlki, A. (2014). Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. A| Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 11(1), 117-137.
35. Lechowska, E. (2018). What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements. Natural Hazards, 94,1341-1366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3480-z.
36. Man, K. S. S., & Chan, A. H. S. (2018). Influence of personality and safety climate on risk perception of hong kong construction workers. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2018 Vol II. IMECS 2018, March 14-16, Hong Kong.
37. Mañez, M., Carmona, M., Haro, D., & Hanger, S. (2016). (Ed. Aerts, J. & Mysiak, J.). Risk perception. In novel multi-sector partnerships in disaster risk management. Results of the enhance project. Commissioned EU FP7 Project ENHANCE: Brussels, Belgium, 51–67.
38. Marcus, J., Kahraman, F., Su, S. ve Fritzsche, B.A. (2019). Türkiye’nin 81 ilinde bireycilik ve toplulukçuluk: Türkiye’deki mikrotoplumlar. 27. ulusal yönetim ve organizasyon kongresi içinde ( ss.756-769). 18-20 Nisan 2019/Antalya.
39. Matanggaran, V. (2017). Explaining risk perception of climate change in Indonesia through cultural dimension of uncertainty avoidance, collectivism, and long-term orientation. Master Thesis. Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences Department of Psychology of Conflict, Risk and Safety. University of Twente.
40. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
41. McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 323-337.
42. Mızrak, S., & Aslan, R. (2020). Disaster risk perception of university students. Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy, 11(4), 411–433. doi:10.1002/rhc3.12202
43. Nguyen, L., Gallery, G., & Newton, C. (2019). The joint influence of financial risk perception and risk tolerance on individual investment decision-making. Accounting and Finance, 59, 747–771. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12295.
44. Oehler, A., & Wedlich, F. (2018). The relationship of extraversion and neuroticism with risk attitude, risk perception, and return expectations. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 11(2), 63–92. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000088
45. Oltedal, S., Moen, B.-E., Klempe, H., & Rundmo, T. (2004). Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of cultural theory. Trondheim: Rotunde, no: 85.
46. Özdemir, A. (2018). Toplumun afet risk algısı ve afete hazırlıklı olma durumu: Kocaeli ili örneği. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi Veri Tabanı (508189).
47. Renn, O. (2004). Perception of risks. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 29(1), 102–114.
48. Roder, G., Ruljigaljig, T., Lin, C.-W., & Tarolli, P. (2016). Natural hazards knowledge and risk perception of Wujie indigenous community in Taiwan. Nat Hazards, 81, 641–662. doi 10.1007/s11069-015-2100-4
49. Salvati, P., Bianchi, C., Fiorucci, F., Giostrella, P., Marchesini, I., & Guzzetti, F. (2014). Perception of flood and landslide risk in Italy: a preliminary analysis. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2589–2603. doi:10.5194/nhess-14-2589-2014
50. Seçer, İ. (2018). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları, (2. Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
51. Shrestha, S. R., Sliuzas, R., & Kuffer, M. (2018). Open spaces and risk perception in post-earthquake Kathmandu city. Applied Geography, 93, 81–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.02.016.
52. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982). Why study risk perception? Risk analysis, 2(2), 83-93.
53. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
54. Sümer, N., Lajunen,T., & Türker, O. (2005). Big five personality traits as the distal predictors of road accident involvement. Underwood, G. (Der.). Traffic and Transport Psychology. USA: Elsevier Ltd. 215-227.
55. Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınları.
56. Şişman, M. (2014). Örgütler ve kültürler, (4. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
57. Tercan, B. (2018). Türkiye’de afet politikaları ve kentsel dönüşüm. Abant Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(5), 102-120.
58. Wang, C. M., Xu, B. B., Zhang, S. J., & Chen, Y. Q. (2016). Influence of personality and risk propensity on risk perception of Chinese construction project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 1294–1304. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.07.004
59. Xu, D., Peng, L., Su, C., Liu, S., Wang, X., & Chen, T. (2016). Influences of mass monitoring and mass prevention systems on peasant households’ disaster risk perception in the landslide-threatened Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Habitat International, 58, 23-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.09.003
60. Xu, D., Liu, E., Wang, X., Tang, H., & Liu, S. (2018). Rural households’ livelihood capital, risk perception, and willingness to purchase earthquake disaster insurance: Evidence from Southwestern China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15, 1319. doi:10.3390/ijerph15071319.
61. Yildiz, A., Teeuw, R., Dickinson, J., & Roberts, J. (2020). Children's earthquake preparedness and risk perception: A comparative study of two cities in Turkey, using a modified PRISM approach. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 49, 101666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101666
62. Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(3-4), 193-210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2011.578059
63. Yong, A. G., Lemyre, L., Pinsent, C., & Krewski, D. (2017). Risk perception and disaster preparedness in immigrants and Canadian-born adults: Analysis of a national survey on similarities and differences. Risk Analysis, 37(12), 2321- 2333. doi: 10.1111/risa.12797
64. Yücel, H., & Cengiz, S. (2020). Assessment of the relationship between the risk perception and preparedness attitudes of search & rescue and firefighting teams against event site hazards in CBRN events: Adana province case. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(Ek), 347-354.