Examining the Role of Profitability and Momentum Factors in the Fama-French Six-Factor Model: An Example of Borsa Istanbul

Öz

This study aims to test the Fama-French five-factor model (FF5F) and the Fama-French six-factor model (FF6F), which are asset pricing models. For this purpose, quarterly data for the period 2019:Q1-2023:Q4 of 58 firms traded in both Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index and Corporate Governance Index were used. In addition, models that take into account return on equity (ROE) as well as profitability (operating profitability) instead of just one profitability measure were constructed and compared with other models. The obtained data was subjected to panel data analysis. According to the analyses, it was observed that the market risk factor contributes most to the explanatory power of all models. Firm size was identified as the second most important factor contributing to the model. As a result, hypotheses stating that " the FF6F model explains share returns better than the FF5F model" and "ROE is more effective than operating profitability in explaining share returns" were accepted.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fama-French five-factor model
• Fama-French six-factor model
• Profitability
• Momentum
• BIST

Fama-French Altı Faktör Modelinde Karlılık ve Momentum Faktörlerinin Rolünün İncelenmesi: Borsa İstanbul Örneği

Öz

Bu çalışmada varlık fiyatlama modellerinden Fama ve French beş faktör modeli (FF5F) ile Fama ve French altı faktör modelinin (FF6F) test edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla Borsa İstanbul Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi ve Kurumsal Yönetim Endekslerinin her ikisinde de işlem gören 58 işletmenin 2019:Q1-2023:Q4 dönemine ait çeyreklik verileri kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca ilgili modellerde kullanılan karlılık (faaliyet karlılığı) değişkeni yerine özsermaye karlılığını da (ROE) dikkate alan modeller oluşturularak diğer modeller ile kıyaslanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler panel veri analizi ile test edilmiştir. Yapılan analizlere göre modellerin tamamının açıklayıcılığına en çok katkıyı piyasa risk faktörünün sağladığı görülmüştür. İşletme büyüklüğü ise modele en önemli katkıyı sağlayan ikinci faktördür. Sonuç olarak “pay getirilerini FF6F modeli FF5F modeline göre daha iyi açıklar” şeklindeki hipotez ile “pay getirilerini açıklamada özsermaye karlılığı faaliyet karlılığına göre daha etkindir” şeklinde kurulan hipotezler kabul edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fama-French 5 faktör modeli
• Fama-French 6 faktör modeli
• Karlılık
• Momentum
• BİST

Kaynakça

1. Ahmed, S., Bu, Z., Symeonidis, L. & Tsvetanov, D. (2023). Which factor model? A Systematic return covariation perspective. Journal of International Money and Finance, 136, 102865.
2. Ali, F., Khurram, M. U. & Jiang, Y. (2021). The Five-factor asset pricing model tests and profitability and ınvestment premiums: Evidence from Pakistan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(9), 2651-2673.
3. Altinay, T. A., Dogan, M., Demirel, B. L. E. & Alshiqi, S. (2023). The Fama-french five-factor asset pricing model: A Research on Borsa Istanbul. Economic Studies (Ikonomicheski Izsledvania), 32(4), 3-21.
4. Aras, G., Çam, İ., Zavalsız, B. ve Keskin, S. (2019). Fama-French çok faktör varlık fiyatlama modellerinin performanslarının karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul üzerine bir uygulama. Istanbul Business Research, 47(2), 183-207.
5. Arda, A., Saldanlı, A. ve Uzun, S. (2023). Validity of asset pricing models in Istanbul stock exchange (ISE) information technology index. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 634(1), 115-136.
6. Arı, G. ve Eren Sarıoğlu, S. (2021). Fama french beş faktör varlık fiyatlama modelinin Borsa İstanbul’da 2006-2018 dönemi için geçerliliğinin test edilmesi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 21(2), 114-131.
7. Asness, C. & Frazzini, A. (2013). The Devil in HMLs details. Journal of Portfolio Management, 39, 49-68.
8. Barillas, F. & Shanken, J. (2018). Comparing asset pricing models. Journal of Finance, 73(2), 715-754.

9. Büyükoğlu, B. (2023). Fama French üç ve beş faktör varlık fiyatlama modelinin geçerliliğinin test edilmesi BIST 30 endeksi örneği. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(25), 1-20.
10. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On Persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
11. Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D. & Sun, L. (2020). Short and long horizon behavioral factors. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(4), 1673-1736.
12. Dasril, Y. D. D., Indriati, P., Pujiharta, P., Hartati, N. & Indriani, M. (2024). Mampukah model enam faktor fama and french menggungguli model tiga faktor fama and french dengan proksi ındeks kompas 100. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan (JRAP), 11(1), 89-104.
13. Dirkx, P. & Peter, F. J. (2020). The Fama-French five-factor model plus momentum: Evidence for the German market. Schmalenbach Business Review, 72(4), 661-684.
14. Doğan, M., Kevser, M. & Leyli Demirel, B. (2022). Testing the Augmented Fama-French Six‐Factor Asset Pricing Model with Momentum Factor for Borsa Istanbul. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022(1), 3392984, 1-9.
15. Douagi, F. W. B. M., Chaouachi, O. & Sow, M. (2021). The portfolio management: investigation of the Fama-French five- and six-factor asset pricing models. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(1), 106-118.
16. Fabozzi, F. J. & Drake, P. P. (2009). Finance: Capital markets. financial management, and ınvestment management. (1st Edition). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
17. Fabozzi, F. J., Huang, D., Jiang, F. & Wang, J. (2024). What difference do new factor models make in portfolio allocation? journal of ınternational money and finance, 140, 1-20.
18. Fama, E. F. & French, K. R. (1992). The cross‐section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
19. Fama, E. F. & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56.
20. Fama, E. F. & French, K. R. (2015). A Five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22.
21. Fama, E. F. & French, K. R. (2018). Choosing factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(2), 234-252.
22. Foye, J. (2018). A Comprehensive test of the fama-french five-factor model in Emerging Markets. Emerging Markets Review, 37, 199-222.
23. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. (Gözden Geçirilmiş ve Güncellenmiş 3. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
24. Hou, K., Xue, C. & Zhang, L. (2019). Which factors? Review of Finance, 23(1), 1-35.
25. Kubota, K. & Takehara, H. (2018). Does the Fama and French five‐factor model work well in Japan? International Review of Finance, 18(1), 137-146.
26. Linter, J. (1965). The Valuation of risky assets and the selection of risky ınvestments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 13-37.
27. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
28. Mollaahmetoğlu, E. (2020). Fama-french five-factor asset pricing model: Testing validity for Borsa Istanbul and German Stock Exchange. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(4), 3310-3318.
29. Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrimn in a Capital Asset Market. Econometrica, 34(4), 768-783.
30. Munawaroh, U. & Sunarsih, S. (2020). Fama-French six factor: Evidence from Indonesia Sharia Stock Index (ISSI). Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 6(2), 119-133.
31. Musawa, N., Kapena, S. & Shikaputo, C. (2018). A Comparative analysis of fama French five and three-factor model in explaining stock returns variation. International Journal of Economics, 3(1), 30-48.
32. Nagy, B. Z. & Dezméri, T. (2022). A Six-Factor Extension of the Fama-French Asset Pricing Model–The Case of The Polish Stock Market. Argumenta Oeconomica, 49(2), 5-22.
33. Novak, D. G. (2022). The Fama and French six-factor model: Evidence for the German Market [Master dissertation], Master in Finance Executive Program at Católica-Lisbon School of Business and Economics.
34. Roy, R. & Shijin, S. (2018). A Six-factor asset pricing model. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(3), 205-217.
35. Seçer, İ. (2015). SPSS ve Lisrel ile pratik veri analizi-analiz ve raporlama. (Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
36. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A Theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442.
37. Stambaugh, R. F. & Yuan, Y. (2017). Mispricing factors. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(4), 1270-1315.
38. Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2016). Panel veri ekonometrisi: Stata uygulamalı. (Genişletilmiş 3. Baskı). İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
39. Westerlund, J. (2006). Some cautions on the use of the LLC panel unit root test. METEOR, Maastricht University School of Business and Economics. METEOR Research Memorandum No. 055.