Eski Mısır’da Kralların Yönetiminden Tanrıların İdaresine Geçiş (III. Ara Dönem)

Yıl 2026, Sayı: 89 , 161 - 172 , 30.04.2026

Ercüment Yıldırım

https://izlik.org/JA69JY37SZ

Öz

Binyıllar boyunca, onlarca hanedana mensup, yüzlerce kral tarafından yönetilen Mısır’daki en uzun süren siyasi bölünmüşlük, MÖ 1069 - 664 yılları arasına tarihlenen III. Ara Dönem boyunca yaşanmıştır. III. Ara Dönem, Yeni Krallık Dönemi’nin sonunda siyasi birliğin kaybolmasından başlamış, I. Psamtek döneminde merkezi otoritenin yeniden kurulmasına kadar sürmüştür. III. Ara Dönem’in parçalanmış siyasi yönetiminin oluşumunda, iktisadi yapı temel belirleyici olurken idari noktada Amon tapınakları, kralın sarayından daha üst bir konuma yerleşmiştir. III. Ara Dönem’de, Mısır’ın siyasi örgütlenmesinde, toplum yapısında ve kültüründe kalıcı değişiklikler meydana gelmiştir. Merkezi yönetim, yerini yerel güç merkezlerine bırakırken, Libya ve Nübye halkının bir kısmı Mısır’a kalıcı olarak yerleşmiştir. III. Ara Dönem’in ilk zamanlarında Delta bölgesinde Libya kökenli birçok yerel kral hüküm sürerken Vadi bölgesinde, Teb kentindeki Amon Tapınağının ruhban sınıfı mensupları en etkin siyasi güç olmuştur. Bu çalışma, Eski Mısır tarihinde merkezi otoritenin çöktüğü, Libya ve Nübyeli toplulukların Mısır’a kalıcı olarak yerleştikleri, yabancı kralların Mısır hakimiyeti için savaştığı, “Amon kral’dır” anlayışıyla geleneksel yönetim anlayışının ortadan kalktığı, III. Ara Dönem’in siyasi ve kültürel yapısını açıklayarak oluşan idari durum hakkına yeni yorumlar üretmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eski Mısır , III. Ara dönem , Smendes , I. Şeşonk , Piye

The Transition from the Rule of Kings to the Rule of the Gods in Ancient Egypt (Third Intermediate Period)

https://izlik.org/JA69JY37SZ

Öz

Ruled by hundreds of kings from dozens of dynasties over millennia, Egypt's longest-lasting political fragmentation occurred during the III. Intermediate Period, dating from 1069 - 664 BCE. The Third Intermediate Period began with the loss of political unity at the end of the New Kingdom. It lasted until the reestablishment of central authority under Psamtek I. The economic structure was the primary determinant of the fragmented political administration of the Third Intermediate Period, while the temples of Amun were placed administratively above the king's palace. During the Third Intermediate Period, lasting changes occurred in Egypt's political organization, social structure, and culture. While central authority gave way to local power centers, sections of the Libyan and Nubian populations settled permanently in Egypt. In the early phase of the Third Intermediate Period, many local rulers of Libyan origin governed the Delta region, whereas in the Valley the most influential political force was the priesthood of the Temple of Amun at Thebes. This study aims to explain the political and cultural structure of the Third Intermediate Period in Ancient Egyptian history—a period marked by the collapse of central authority, the permanent settlement of Libyan and Nubian communities in Egypt, struggles among foreign rulers for control of Egypt, and the disappearance of the traditional system of governance under the principle that “Amun is king”—and to offer new interpretations regarding the administrative structure that emerged as a result.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ancient Egypt , Third Intermediate period , Smendes , Shoshenq I , Piye

Kaynakça

• Adel, M. (2023a). The economic role god’s wife of Amun through her officials in late period. Minia Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research MJTHR, 16(2), 82-95.
• Adel, M. (2023b). The political role of god's wife of Amun from her titles. Minia Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research MJTHR, 16(29), 96-107.
• Aja Sánchez, J. R. (2012). Qebeh, qebehet and “cool water” in piye’s victory stela. Chronique d'Egypte, 87, 218-232.
• Aston, D. A. (1989). Takeloth II: A king of the “Theban twenty-third dynasty”?. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 75, 139-153.
• Aston, D. A. (1991). Two osiris figures of the third intermediate period. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 77, 95-107.
• Aston, D. A. (2020). The third intermediate period. I. Shaw ve E. Bloxam, (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Egyptology içinde (s. 684-719). Oxford University Press.
• Ayad, M. F. (2007). On the identity and role of the god’s wife of Amun in the rites of royal and divine dominion. JSSEA, 34, 1-13.
• Bodine, J. J. (2009). The shabaka stone: An introduction. Studia Antiqua, 7(1), 3-21.
• Breasted, J. H. (1901). The philosophy of a Memphite priest. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 39(1), 39-54.
• Broekman, G. P. F. (2012a). Manetho’s “Three other kings” between osorthôn and takelôthis, and their importance for the chronology of the third intermediate period and the New Kingdom. Ägypten Und Levante / Egypt and the Levant, 22, 349-351.
• Broekman, G. P. F. (2012b). The theban high-priestly succession in the first half of the twenty-first dynasty. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 98, 195-209.
• Broekman, G.P.F. (2010). Libyan rule over Egypt. The influence of the tribal background of the ruling class on political structures and developments during the Libyan period in Egypt. Studien Zur Altägyptischen Kultur, 39, 85-99.
• Campbell, K. E. (2006). Rhetoric from the ruins of African antiquity. Rhetorica, 24(3), 255-274.
• Christine, I. (1979). A bronze statuette of unnūfer, choachyte of king ḥarsiēse, in the Fitzwilliam Museum. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 65, 167-169.
• Cole, E. M. (2015). Foreign influence in the late New Kingdom and Third Intermediate Period. M. S. Pinarello, J. Yoo, J.Lundock, C. Walsh (Ed.), Current research in Egyptology içinde (s. 113-122). Oxbow Books.
• Cooper, J. (2018). Kushites expressing ‘Egyptian’ kingship: Nubian dynasties in hieroglyphic texts and a phantom Kushite king. Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant, 28, 143-168.
• Costa, S. (2006). On the scenes of the king receiving the sed-fests in the Theban Temples of the Ramesside period. Studien Zur Altägyptischen Kultur, 35, 61-74.
• David, R. (2021). Life and death in Egypt during the 25th dynasty. R. David, E. Murphy (Ed.), The Life and Times of Takabuti in Ancient Egypt içinde (s. 14-23). Liverpool University Press.
• Davino, I. (2014). Amon and the god’s wife: The ritual activity at Karnak. T. Lekov ve E. Buzov (Ed.), Cult and belief in Ancient Egypt. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress for Yong Egyptologists içinde (s. 190-199), New Bulgarian University Press.
• Depuydt, L. (1993). The date of Piye’s Egyptian campaign and the chronology of the twenty-fifth dynasty. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 79(1), 269-274.
• Dodson, A. (1993). Psusennes II and Shoshenq I. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 79, 267-268.
• Edgerton, W. F. (1947). The government and the governed in the Egyptian empire. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 6(3), 152-160.
• Ertman, E. L. (1972). The earliest known three-dimensional representation of the god Ptah. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 31(2), 83-86.
• Finkelstein, I. (2002). The campaign of Shoshenq I to Palestine: A guide to the 10th century BCE polity. Zeitschrift Des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins, 118(2), 109-135.
• Finnestad, R. B. (1976). Ptah, creator of the gods: Reconsideration of the Ptah section of the Denkmal. Numen, 23(2), 81-113.
• Galpaz-Feller, P. (1993). The victory stela of king Piye: the biblical perspective on war and peace. Revue Biblique, 100, 399-414.
• Galpaz-Feller, P. (1995). The stela of King Piye. Revue Biblique, 102, 506-521.
• Gilboa, A. (2015). Dor and Egypt in the early iron age: An archaeological perspective of (Part of) the Wenamun report. Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant, 25, 247-274.
• Gozzoli, R. B. (2001). The Triumphal stele of Piye as sanctification of a king. Göttinger Miszellen, 182, 59-67.
• Gozzoli, R. B. (2021). Pharaoh Pianchy and his great stela. The Books behind the masks: Sources of warfare leadership in ancient Egypt. A. Spalinger (Ed.), Ancient Warfare Series Vol. 4 içinde (s. 350-395). Brill.
• Höflmayer, F. (2021). Assyria in Egypt: how to trace defeat in ancient Egyptian sources. K. Streit ve M. Grohmann (Ed.), Culture Of Defeat Submission In Written Sources And The Archaeological Record içinde (s. 192-193). Proceedings of a Joint Seminar of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the University of Vienna, Gorgias Press.
• Hubschmann, C. (2010). Searching for the “archaeologically invisible”: Libyans in Dakhleh Oasis in the Third Intermediate Period. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt, 46, 173-187.
• Jacquet-Gordon, H. K. (1960). The inscriptions on the Philadelphia: Cairo statue of Osorkon II. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 46, 12-23.
• James, P. ve Van der Veen, P. (2011). When did Shoshenq I campaign in Palestine. Juan Manuel Tebes, (Ed.), Current perspectives from archaeology, epigraphy, history and chronology içinde (s. 127-136). Sidney Sussex College.
• James, P. ve Robert M. (2010). Herihor’s kingship and the high priest of Amun Piankh. Journal of Egyptian History, 3(2), 231-260.
• Kahn, D. E. (2006). A problem of Pedubasts?. Antiguo Oriente, 4, 21-40.
• Kahn, D.(2006). The Assyrian invasions of Egypt (673-663 BC) and the final expulsion of the Kushites. Studien zur altägyptischen Kultur, 34, 251-267.
• Kitchen, K. A. (2001). The Shoshenqs of Egypt and Palestine. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 25(93), 3-12.
• Kitchen, K. A. (2009). The Libyan anarchy: Inscriptions from Egypt’s third intermediate period. Society of Biblical Literature.
• Kuhrt, A. (2020). The Ancient Near East: c. 3000–330 BC (Vol.1). Routledge.
• Manetho, (1964). Aigyptiaka, (Çev: W. G. Waddell), Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.
• Morkot, R. (2007). Tradition, innovation, and researching the past in Libyan, Kushite, and Saïte Egypt get access arrow. H. Crawford (Ed.), Regime change in the Ancient Near East and Egypt içinde (s. 141-164), British Academy.
• Muhs, B. (1998). Partisan royal epithets in the late third intermediate period and the dynastic affiliations of Pedubast I and Iuput II. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 84, 220-223.
• Myśliwiec, K. (2000). The twilight of ancient Egypt: first millennium BCE. Cornell University Press.
• Naunton, C. (2010). Libyans and Nubians. A. B. L. (Ed.), A companion to ancient Egypt volume I. içinde (s. 120-139). Wiley – Blackwell.
• Niwiński, A. (1979). Problems in the chronology and genealogy of the XXIst Dynasty: New proposals for their interpretation. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt, 16, 49-68.
• Niwiński, A. (1988). The wives of Pinudjem II: A topic for discussion. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 74, 226-230.
• Rice, M. (2002). Who’s who in ancient Egypt. Routledge.
• Ridealgh, K. (2014). A tale of semantics and suppressions: reinterpreting papyrus Mayer A and the so-called “War of the high priest” during the reign of Ramesses XI. Studien Zur Altägyptischen Kultur, 43, 359-373.
• Ritner, R. K. (2003). The victory stela of Piye. W. K. Simpson (Ed.), The literature of ancient Egypt içinde (s. 367-385). Yale University Press.
• Schneider, T. (2010). Contributions to the chronology of the New Kingdom and the Third Intermediate Period. Ägypten Und Levante / Egypt and the Levant, 20, 373-403.
• Soliman, M. (2023). Libyan political and social impacts on ancient Egypt in the third intermediate period. A. Bouhafs, L. Chapon, M. Claude (Ed.), Current research in Egyptology 2022: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Symposium, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3 içinde (s. 356-368). Archaeopress Publishing.
• Spalinger, A. (1979). The military background of the campaign of Piye (Piankhy). Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur, 7, 273-301.
• Spalinger, A. (1974). Asarhaddon and Egypt: An analysis of the first invasion of Egypt. Orientalia, 43, 295-326.
• Taylor, J. H. (1988). A daughter of King Harsiese. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 74, 230-231.
• Taylor, J. H. (2003). The third intermediate period. I. Shaw (Ed.), The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt içinde (s. 330-368). Oxford University Press.
• Thijs, A. (2003). The troubled careers of Amenhotep and Panehsy: The high priest of Amun and the viceroy of Kush under the last Ramessides. Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur, 31, 289-306.
• Thijs, A. (2005). In search of king Herihor and the Penultimate ruler of the 20th dynasty. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 132(1), 73-110.
• Uphill, E. (1967). The date of Osorkon II’s sed-festival. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 26(1), 61-62.
• Wainwright, G. A. (1962). The Meshwesh. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 48(1), 89-99.
• Wilson, K. A. (2001). The campaign of pharaoh Shoshenq I into Palestine, [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. The Johns Hopkins University.
• Yıldırım, E. (2021). Eski Mısır’daki Memfis teolojisine göre yaratılış anlayışı ve tanrısal hiyerarşinin düzenlenmesi. Milel ve Nihal, 18(2), 239-263.
• Yıldırım, E. (2023). Eski Mısır’da Asur hakimiyetinin başlangıcı ve sonrasında oluşturulan idari organizasyon. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 1-18.
• Yıldırım, E. (2025). Merneptah zafer yazıtına (İsrail steli) göre Kenan bölgesinde Mısır hakimiyeti. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 65(1), 372-392