The Relationship Between Paradoxical Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: A Meta-Analysis

Öz

The purpose of this study is to clarify the conflicting findings in the literature regarding the relationship between paradoxical leadership and innovative work behavior. This meta-analysis aims to reveal the current pooled effect size of this relationship by systematically examining 12 empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025. Analyses conducted with a total of 4,543 participants indicate that paradoxical leadership has a moderately positive effect on innovative work behavior (r = 0.460). Exploratory moderator analyses did not show significant effects of publication year, sample size, country/geography, or IWB scale group. The findings emphasize that the impact of paradoxical leadership is context-sensitive and shaped not by a single theory but by a combination of cognitive, motivational, and relational mechanisms.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Paradoxical leadership
• Innovative work behavior
• Meta-analysis

Paradoksal Liderlik ile Yenilikçi Çalışma Davranışı Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Meta-Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, paradoksal liderlik ile yenilikçi iş davranışı arasındaki ilişkiye dair alan yazında yer alan çelişkili bulguları açıklığa kavuşturmaktır. Bu meta-analiz, 2015–2025 yılları arasında yayımlanan 12 ampirik çalışmayı sistematik olarak inceleyerek söz konusu ilişkinin mevcut birleştirilmiş etki boyutu ortaya koymayı hedeflemektedir. Toplam 4.543 katılımcı üzerinden gerçekleştirilen analizler, paradoksal liderliğin yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerinde orta düzeyde ve pozitif bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir (r = 0,460). Keşifsel moderatör analizleri, yayın yılı, örneklem boyutu, ülke/coğrafya veya IWB ölçek grubu açısından anlamlı bir etki göstermemiştir. Bulgular, paradoksal liderliğin etkisinin bağlama duyarlı olduğunu ve tek bir kuramsal çerçeveden ziyade bilişsel, motivasyonel ve ilişkisel mekanizmaların bir bileşimi tarafından şekillendiğini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Paradoksal liderlik
• Yenilikçi iş davranışı
• Meta-analiz

Kaynakça

1. Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F. & Bin Saeed, B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(8), 1270–1300.
2. Ariyani, N., & Hidayati, S. (2018). Influence of transformational leadership and work engagement on innovative behavior. Etikonomi, 17(2), 275-284.
3. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1, pp. 141-154). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice hall.
4. Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193-206.
5. Botha, L. & Steyn, R. (2022). Employee voice and innovative work behaviour: Empirical evidence from South Africa. Cogent Psychology, 9(2080323), 1-19.
6. Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169-191.
7. Chen, L., Ruan, R., & He, P. (2022). The double‐edged sword: A work regulatory focus perspective on the relationship between organizational identification and innovative behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(1), 64-76.
8. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

9. Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
10. Duanguppama, S., Jadesadalug, V. & Ponchaitiwat, K. (2025). Influence of employee well-being and work flexibility on innovative work behavior and job performance: A comparative study of full-time and gig workers in digital business. Tourism and Hospitality, 6(4), 166.
11. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric "trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89–98. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905
12. Feng, L., Li, M., Peng, J., Xu, D., Yang, W. & Luo, D. (2022). How and when paradoxical leadership fosters employee innovative behaviours: The role of proactive personality and work engagement. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 32(6), 545-551.
13. Franken, E., G. Plimmer, & S. Malinen. 2019. Paradoxical leadership in public sector organisations: its role in fostering employee resilience. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(1), 93-110.
14. Fürstenberg, N., Alfes, K., & Kearney, E. (2021). How and when paradoxical leadership benefits work engagement: The role of goal clarity and work autonomy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 672-705.
15. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.
16. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300.
17. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interven tions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/archive/v5.1.0.
18. Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557–560.
19. Hofstede Insights. (n.d.). Country comparison tool. The Culture Factor. https://www.theculturefactor.com/country-comparison-tool
20. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
21. Hunter, J. E. & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2nd ed.), California: Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
22. Ishaq, E., Bashir, S., & Khan, A. K. (2021). Paradoxical leader behaviors: Leader personality and follower outcomes. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 342-357.
23. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
24. Kundi, Y. M., Aboramadan, M. & Abualigah, A. (2023). Linking paradoxical leadership and individual in-role and extra-role performance: a multilevel examination. Management Decision, 61(10), 2851–2871.
25. Lavine, M. (2014). Paradoxical leadership and the competing values framework. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 189-205.
26. Li, W. & Yang, C. C. (2025). Exploring the possibility of cautious innovation: The impact of perceived paradoxical leadership on innovative work behavior among collegiate teachers. Cogent Education, 12(1).
27. Lipsey, M. & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications, Inc.
28. Liu, Y., Xu, S., & Zhang, B. (2020). Thriving at work: How a paradox mindset influences innovative work behavior. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(3), 347-366.
29. Luo, G., Zhu, G. & Guo, Y. (2023). Effect of paradoxical leadership on employee innovation behavior in a Confucian context. Asian Business & Management, 22, 2249–2279.
30. Madaan, K., Jain, D., & Sharma, H. (2025). Does paradoxical leadership predict employee job performance in hospitality? A sequential mediation of harmonious work passion and innovative work behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 8(4), 1458-1477.
31. Meng, X., Chenchen, N., Liang, F., & Ocean Liu, Y. (2021). Research on the influence of paradoxical leadership on compulsory organizational citizenship behavior. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 1959-1970.
32. Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2014). Exploring the role of target specificity in the facilitation of vocational teachers’ innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 80-101.
33. O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338.
34. Oh, S. H., Dong, L., Nahm, A. Y., & Yu, G. C. (2023). Fostering innovation and involvement among Korean workers in problem solving through trust and psychological safety: The role of paradoxical leader behaviours. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29(3), 701-718.
35. Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I, Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 18(3):e1003583.
36. Pan, Z. (2021). Paradoxical leadership and organizational citizenship behaviour: the serial mediating effect of a paradoxical mindset and personal service orientation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(6), 869-881.
37. Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (1997). “That’s not my job”: Developing flexible employee work orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 899–929.
38. Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652.
39. Rao Jada, U., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Titiyal, R. (2019). Empowering leadership and innovative work behavior: a moderated mediation examination. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 915-930.
40. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (2008). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
41. Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956-974.
42. Salas-Vallina, A., Pozo, M., & Fernandez-Guerrero, R. (2020). New times for HRM? Well-being oriented management (WOM), harmonious work passion and innovative work behavior. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(3), 561-581.
43. Schermuly, C. C., Meyer, B., & Dämmer, L. (2013). Leader-member exchange and innovative behavior. Journal of Personnel Psychology.
44. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
45. Shao, Y., Nijstad, B. A., & Täuber, S. (2019). Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 7-19.
46. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381-403
47. Sulaiman, G., Ali, A. & Urooge, S. (2023). The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership on employee Outcome: Moderating Role of Regulatory Focus and Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment. Journal of Business and Management Research, 2(2), 518-539.
48. Waldman, D. A., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Learning to be a paradox-savvy leader. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 316-327.
49. Wang, M., Zhang, J., He, J., & Bi, Y. (2022). Paradoxical leadership and employee innovation: Organization-based selfesteem and harmonious passion as sequential mediators. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 50(7), e11634.
50. Yang, Y., Li, Z., Liang, L., & Zhang, X. (2021). Why and when paradoxical leader behavior impact employee creativity: Thriving at work and psychological safety. Current Psychology, 40(4), 1911-1922.
51. Yin, J. (2022). Living with tensions in the workplace: a grounded theory of paradoxical leadership in cultivating subordinates' paradox mindset. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(6), 862-873.
52. Yuan, F. Q. (2024). The impact of paradoxical leadership on employee innovative behavior: A mediated moderation model. In S. H. B. D. M. Zailani et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (ICMSEM 2023) (pp. 1083–1092). Atlantis Press.
53. Yücel, C. (2001). An illustration of meta analytic integration of previous research findings using school bureaucratization as an example. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 71-87.
54. Zhang, M. J., Zhang, Y., & Law, K. S. (2022). Paradoxical leadership and innovation in work teams: The multilevel mediating role of ambidexterity and leader vision as a boundary condition. Academy of Management Journal, 65(5), 1652-1679.
55. Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538-566.
56. Zhao, K., & Kamil, N. L. M. (2025). How and When Paradoxical Leadership Nurture Innovation: The Role of Self-Leadership and Leader-Member Exchange. SAGE Open, 15(2).
57. Zhu, J., Lv, H., & Feng, Y. (2022, March). The effect of psychological safety on innovation behavior: A meta-analysis. In 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022) (pp. 3082-3087). Atlantis Press.