HIGHBROW CULTURAL CONSUMPTION AND THE PERCEPTION OF SOCIAL PRESTIGE IN EUROPE

Öz

The association between class and culture as an important way to understand the determinants of individual tastes is well-known. Although numerous studies have confirmed this association by using education and income as proxies of cultural and economic capital in highbrow cultural consumption at the individual level, cross-national comparisons remain scarce. I contribute to the existing body of knowledge by focusing on taste publics—groups of individuals distinguished by their levels of economic and cultural capital—rather than separately dealing with education and family affluence. I examine the extent to which taste publics and specific country characteristics such as a country’s population characteristics, its wealth, and its level of cultural funding affect highbrow cultural consumption across European countries. I further test the extent to which the association between taste publics and highbrow cultural consumption is moderated by these country characteristics. Using Eurobarometer (2007) data, I show that taste publics have distinct highbrow cultural consumption scores and the association between taste publics and highbrow cultural consumption varies across Europe. Furthermore, I show that highbrow cultural consumption is affected by specific country characteristics. Lastly, I find that the social prestige perceived through consuming highbrow culture becomes an important predictor of who consumes highbrow culture.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Taste Publics,Pierre Bourdieu,Homology,Highbrow Cultural Consumption

AVRUPA’DA ENTELEKTÜEL KÜLTÜREL TÜKETİM VE SOSYAL PRESTİJ ALGISI

Öz

Birey beğenilerinin belirleyici faktörlerini anlamak için sınıf ve kültür arasındaki ilişki önemli bir yöntem olarak bilinir. Birey seviyesindeki entelektüel kültürel tüketimde eğitim ve gelir seviyesini kültürel ve ekonomik sermayenin temsilcisi olarak kullanarak hazırlanan birçok çalışma bu ilişkiyi doğrulamasına rağmen, uluslararası kıyaslamalar yapan çalışmaların sayısı oldukça azdır. Bu çalışma, mevcut literatüre eğitim ve aile servetini ayrı birer etken olarak incelemek yerine beğeni grupları—ekonomik ve kültürel sermaye seviyelerine göre ayrışmış birey grupları—üzerine odaklanarak katkıda bulunmaktadır. Avrupa ülkelerinde ülkelerin nüfusları, zenginlikleri ve kültürel kaynak yaratma seviyeleri gibi ülkesel özellikleri ile beğeni gruplarının o ülkelerdeki entelektüel kültürel tüketimi ne oranda etkilediklerini incelenmektedir. Ayrıca, beğeni grupları ile entelektüel kültürel tüketim arasındaki ilişkinin ülkesel özellikler tarafından ne oranda ılımlaştırıldığı test edilmektedir. Eurobarometer (2007) veri setini kullanarak, beğeni gruplarının farklı entelektüel kültürel tüketim puanları olduğu ve beğeni grupları ile entelektüel kültürel tüketim arasındaki ilişkinin Avrupa ülkelerinde değişkenlik gösterdiği gösterilmiştir. Buna ek olarak, entelektüel kültürel tüketimin ülkesel özelliklerden de etkilendiği gösterilmiştir. Son olarak, entelektüel kültür tüketim sonucu elde edilen sosyal prestij algısının kimin entelektüel kültür tüketeceğinin önemli bir göstergesi olduğu bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Beğeni Grupları,Pierre Bourdieu,Türdeşlik,Entelektüel Kültürel Tüketim

Kaynakça

1. Bassili, J. N. (2003). The Minority Slowness Effect: Subtle Inhibitions in the Expression of Views Not Shared by Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 84(2), 261-276.
2. Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E., Warde, A. Gayo-Cal, M., & Wright, D. (2009). Culture, Class, Distinction. London: Routledge.
3. Blasius, J. & Friedrichs, J. (2008). Lifestyles in Distressed Neighborhoods: A Test of Bourdieu’s ‘Taste of Necessity’ Hypothesis. Poetics. 36, 24-44.
4. Bond, R. & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and Conformity: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) Line Judgment Task. Psychological Bulletin. 119(1), 111-137.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge.
6. Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. Sage, London.
7. Bryson, B. (1996). Anything But Heavy Metal: Symbolic Exclusion and Musical Dislikes. American Sociological Review. 61, 884-899.
8. Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology. 55, 591-621.

9. DiMaggio, P. & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital Selection. American Journal of Sociology. 90, 1231-1261.
10. DiMaggio, P. & Useem, M. (1987). Social Class and Arts Consumption. Theory and Society. 5, 141-161.
11. DiMaggio, P. & Mukhtar, T. (2004). Arts Participation As Cultural Capital in the United States, 1982-2002: Signs of Decline? Poetics. 32, 169-194.
12. Erickson, B. (1996). Culture, Class, and Connections. American Journal of Sociology. 102, 217-251.
13. European Commision. (2007). Eurobarometer 67.1 Cultural Values, Poverty and Social Exclusion, Developmental Aid, and Residential Mobility. February-March 2007. TNS OPINION & SOCIAL. Brussels (Producer); GESIS, Cologne (Publisher): ZA4529.
14. Gans, H. (1973). Popular Culture and High Culture. New York: Free Press.
15. Halle, D. (1992). The Audience for Abstract Art: Class, Culture, and Power. In M. Lamont & M. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality (pp. 131-151). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Holt, D. B. (1998). Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption? Journal of Consumer Research. 25, 1-25.
17. Hornsey, M. J., Louise M., Terry, D. J. & McKimmie, B. M. (2003). On Being Loud and Proud: Non-Conformity and Counter-Conformity to Group Norms. British Journal of Social Psychology. 42, 319-335.
18. Jacobs, M. D. & Hanrahan, N. W. (2005). The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
19. Kane, D. (2004). A Network Approach to the Puzzle of Women’s Cultural Participation. Poetics. 32, 105-127.
20. Katz-Gerro, T. (2002). Highbrow Cultural Consumption and Class Distinction in Italy, Israel, West Germany, Sweden, and the United States. Social Forces. 81(1), 207-229.
21. Lamont, M. (1992). Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
22. Lamont, M. (2000). The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. Russell Sage Foundation.
23. Lamont, M. & Lareau, A. (1988). Cultural Capital: Allusions, Gaps, and Glissandos in Recent Theoretical Developments. Sociological Theory. 6, 153-168.
24. Lizardo, O. & Skiles, S. (2009). Highbrow Omnivorousness on the Small Scale?: Cultural Industry System and Patterns of Cultural Choice in Europe. Poetics. 37, 1-23.
25. Lopez-Sintas, J. & Katz-Gerro, T. (2005). From Exclusive to Inclusive Elitists and Further: Twenty Years of Omnivorousness and Cultural Diversity in Arts Participation in the USA. Poetics. 33, 299-319.
26. Peterson, R. A. & Simkus, A. (1992). How Musical Tastes Mark Occupational Status Groups. In M. Lamont & M. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality (pp. 152-186). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Peterson, R. A. & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore. American Sociological Review. 61, 900-907.
28. Peterson, R. A. (1997). The Rise and Fall of Highbrow Snobbery As a Status Marker. Poetics. 25, 75-92.
29. Simmel, G. (1957). Fashion. American Journal of Sociology. 62, 541-558.
30. Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
31. van Hek, M & Kraaykamp, G. (2013). Cultural Consumption Across Countries: A Multi-Level Analysis of Social Inequality in Highbrow Culture in Europe. Poetics. 41, 323-341.
32. Wolf, S. & Latane, B. (1983). Majority and Minority Influence on Restaurant Preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45(2), 282-292.