QUALITY OF PRIVATE SECURITY SERVICES: VAN YYU APPLICATION
Öz
Security is one of the most important basic necessities of human life. Security necessity majorly met by government. Government establishes this obligation by law enforcers. Private security services get into act with the aim of helping to law enforcers, to disburden their work load density and meeting the needs when the law enforcers fall short of quantity. With the increase of quantity and importance of private security firms, it starts to come under question. Although quality management in private service firms, studies on evaluating the quality level of this services is unprecedented.
One of the most common methods on evaluating quality of services is ServPerf. This method that evaluates five dimensions of service quality commonly used for hosting, finance, education and many more service sectors. The aim of this study is to evaluate quality of private security services by using ServPerf. For this purpose, an application on private security services get into the act in the University of Yuzuncu Yıl has performed. A questionary includes 24 questions, 22 questions in conformity with ServPerf and 2 questions to evaluate overall service quality had prepared. The questionary applied on 470 people consist of students, administrative staffs and academic staffs.
Primarily as a result of factor analysis to determinate the quality dimensions of private security services, two dimensions responsiveness and assurance had merged and four dimensions defined. These are identified as tangibles, reliability, responsiveness and empathy.
According to survey results, it has in sighted that overall satisfaction level from private security services is low. Significant differences between satisfaction evaluations have defined for genders, age groups, transportation to university and position at university.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Clifford D. S. & Stenning P.C. (1981). Modern Private Security: Its Growth and Implications. Crime and Justice, Vol. 3
- Cronin J.J.& Taylor, S.A. (1992). Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing, 56, 3
- Cronin J.J. & Taylor, S.A. (1994). ServPerf versus ServQual: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, Vol 58, No:1
- Çakmakkaya B. Y., Batur N., Akpınar T., Erbay M., & Kopuz A. (2015). Adliye Binaları ve Toplam Kalite Yönetimi, Ankara
- Çetin, A. İ. (2007). Türkiye’de Özel Güvenlik Hizmetlerinin Yapısı ve Sorunları. Polis Akademisi Güvenlik Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara
- Geleri, A. (2005). Özel Güvenlik Temel Eğitim Kitabı. Ankara: Sözkesen Matbaacılık.
- Özel Güvenlik Hizmetlerine Dair Kanunun Uygulanmasına İlişkin Yönetmelik. Resmi Gazete. Sayı:25606. 07.10.2004
- Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implications for Future Research, Journal of Marketing, vol. 49
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
6 Kasım 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi
20 Kasım 2016
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2016