KRİZDEN İNNOVASYONA: GÜNEY KORE ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

South Korea has developed rapidly after the Korean War and is a member of both G-20 and OECD now. Import substitution policy was followed after the war and export oriented development strategy was implemented after the 1960s. Development incentives were supplied mainly to the big family enterprises (chaebols) that were loyal to government policies and strategies. It is obvious that developing industries in the 70’s was heavy industry and chemical industry, automotive and electronics in the 80’s and information technologies during 90’s. South Korea has followed different strategies to overcome 1997 Asian Finacial Crisis and turn it to an opportunity for innovative policies. Big Korean family holdings (Chaebols) that was difficult to control, became a burden to national economy and diversified in many areas were restructured. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), especially the entrepreneurial venture businesses, that were aiming to conduct technological research and development, were activily supported by government. In spite of experiencing both Korean War and Asian Financial Crisis, Korea changed them to an opportunity for economic development

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

KRİZDEN İNNOVASYONA: GÜNEY KORE ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Kore harbinden sonra hızla gelişen Güney Kore, bugün hem OECD, hem de G-20 üyesidir. Savaş sonrasında ithalat ikamesine yönelik bir politika izlenmişken, 1960’lardan sonra ihracat eksenli bir kalkınma stratejisi izlendi. Girişimcilikleriyle öne çıkmış ve hükümet planlamalarına sadık aile şirketlerine (chaebol) sağlanılan teşviklerle kalkınma tercih edildi. 1970’lerde ağır sanayi ve kimya sanayi, 80’li yıllarda otomotiv ve elektronik, 90’lı yıllardan itibaren ise bilişime doğru kayan bir süreç izlendi. Güney Kore, 1997 yılında Asya Ekonomik Krizini aşmak ve bunu bir fırsata çevirmek için değişik stratejiler izledi. Çok büyümüş, pek çok alanda farklılaşmış, kontrol edilmesi zorlaşan ve bu halleriyle ülke ekonomisine yük hale gelmeye başlayan chaeboller yeniden yapılandırıldı. Küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmeler (KOBİ’ler), özelliklede teknolojik araştırma geliştirme yapmayı hedefleyen girişimci işletmeler (Venture Business) desteklenerek gelişmeleri sağlandı. Hem Kore Savaşını, hem de Asya Ekonomik Krizini yaşayan Kore, krizleri fırsatlara çevirmesini bildi

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kore, Ekonomik Kalkınma, İnnovasyon, Chaebol, Venture İşletmeler, KOBİ

Kaynakça

1. Amsden, Alice. (1989), Asia’s Next Giant, Oxford University Press, New York
2. Baygan, Günseli. (2003), Venture Capital Policies in Korea, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working
3. Papers 2003/02. OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/248000716362
4. Chang, Yunsik. (2008), Korea Confronts Globalization, Taylor & Francis, London.
5. Choi, H.J., (1976), Selection of Papers on the Korean Economy, Yonsei University Press, Seoul (Korece).
6. Congressional Budget Office Memorandum (1997), The Role of Foreign Aid in Development: South Korea and the Philippines. Washington: USA Congressional Budget Office, http://www.cbo.gov/publication/14518
7. Chung, H.H. (2007), Lessons from the Korean Venture Industry Development, World Bank Working Paper, 39379.
8. Chung, K. H., Lee, H.C. and Jung, K.H. (1997), Korean Management: Global Strategy and Cultural Transformation,

9. New York: Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York. Chung, S. (1999), Korean Innovation Policies for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, Science and Public Policy, 26(2), 70-82
10. Chung, S. (2010), Innovation, Competitiveness and Growth: Korean Experiences, Annual Word Bank Conference on Development Economics 2010, Global.
11. Cyhn, J.W. (2002), Technology Transfer and International Production: The Development of the Electronics
12. Industry in Korea, Edward Elgar Publishing, North Hampton. Diaz, L. M. (2009), Globalizing in Hard Times: The Politics of Banking-Sector Opening in the Emerging World,
13. Cornell University Press, New York. Eriksson, S. (2005), Innovation Policies in South Korea and Taiwan, Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems, Jonkoping.
14. Gregory, G. Harvie, C. ve Lee, H.H., (2002), Korean SMEs in the Wake of the Financial Crisis: Strategies,
15. Constraints, and Performance in a Global Economy. University of Wollongong: Working Paper, 02-12. Hahm, J.H. (2003), “The Government, the Chaebol and Financial Institutions before the Economic Crisis”, Edts:
16. Haggard, S. Lim, W. and Kim, E., Economic Crisis and Corporate Restructuring in Korea: Reforming the Chaebol, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Hamilton, G.G. Feenstra, R. Choe, W. Kim, C.K. ve Lim, E.M. (2000) Neither States Nor Markets: The Role of
17. Economic Organization in Asian Development. International Sociology, 15(2): 288–305. Harvie, C. and Lee, B.C. (2002), the Role of SMEs in National Economies in East Asia, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
18. Hiemenz, U. (1999), Growth and Competition in the New Global Economy, OECD Publishing, Paris.
19. Hobday, M. Howard, R. ve John, B. (2004), Approaching the Innovation Frontier in Korea: The Transition Phase to
20. Leadership. Research Policy, 33 (10): 1433-1457.
21. Jones, L. P. and SaKong I. (1980), Government, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case, Harvard University Press, Mass.
22. Kim, E. M. (1997), Big business, Strong State: Collusion and Conflict in South Korean, State university of New York Press, Albany.
23. Kim, K. J. (2006), The Development, Capitalist Development and National Identity, Routledge, New York.
24. Kim, D.O. and Bae, J. S. (2004), Employment Relations and HRM in South Korea, Ashgate Publishing, Hampshire.
25. Kim, L. (1997), Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
26. Kim, L. and Nelson, R. (2000), Technology, Learning, and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing
27. Economies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Kim, L. and Rahlman, C .J. (1999), Technology Policy for Industrialization, in (edt), Kim, L., Learning and innovation in Economic Development, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northhamten.
28. Kim, S and Lee, K. (2000), Characteristics and Economic Efficiency of the Venture Companies in Korea:
29. Comparison with the Chaebols and Other Traditional Firms, Seoul Journal Economics, 3(3): 335-360. Kong, T.Y. (2000), the Politics of Economic Reform in South Korea: A Fragile Miracle, Routledge, London.
30. Krause, L.B. (2000), the Aftermath of the Asian Financial Crisis for South Korea, the Journal of the Korean Economy, 1(1):1-21.
31. Landsberg, M. H., Jeong, S. and Westra, R. (2007), Marxist Perspectives on South Korea in the Global Economy,
32. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. , Hampshire. Lee, S. C. (2006), “Industrial Policy in the Park Chong Hee Era”, Edt: Yi, P. C., Developmental Dictatorship and the Park Chung-Hee Era: The Shaping of Modernity in the Republic of Korea, Homa & Sekey Books, New Jersey.
33. Lee, K. and Kim, S. S. (2000), Characteristics and Economic Efficiency of the Venture Companies in Korea:
34. Comparison with the Chaebols and Other Traditional Firms, Seoul Journal of Economisc, 13(3): 335-360. Lee, Y. I. (2003), From Evolution to Revolution: Korea’s New Market Environment, Ashgate Publishing, London.
35. Miller, D. (1990), The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring About Their Own Downfall, Harper Business, New York.
36. Mo, J. and Moon C. I. (2003), “Business Government Relations under Kim Dae Jung”, Edts: Haggard S., Lim W. and Kim E., Economic Crisis and Corporate Restructuring in Korea: Reforming the Chaebol, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. OECD, (2005), OECD Economic Surveys: Korea 2005, OECD Publishing, Paris.
38. OECD, (1998), OECD Economic Surveys: Korea 1998, OECD Publishing, Paris.
39. UN. (2004), Promoting Business and Technology Incubation for Improved Competitiveness of Small and Medium- sized Industries Through Application of Modern and Efficient Technologies, United Nations Publications, New York.
40. Ungson, G.R., Steers, R.M. and Park, S. H. (1997), Korean Enterprise: The Quest for Globalization, Harvard
41. Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts. Sharma, S.D. (2003), The Asian financial Crisis: Crisis, Reform and Recovery, Manchester University Press, New York.
42. Sridharan, E. (1996), The Political Economy of Industrial Promotion: Indian, Brazilian, and Korean Electronics in
43. Comparative Perspective 1969-1994, Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport.
44. Park, M. (2008), Democracy and Social Change: A History of South Korean Student Movements, 1980-2000, Peter Lang, Bern.
45. Wade, R. (1998), the Asian Debt-and-Development Drisis of 1997–? Causes and Consequences, World Development, 26:1535–53.
46. Wook, J. J. (2004), the Effect of Institutional Mechanisms under the Uncertain Environment: The Case of the Venture Firm Recognition System in South Korea and Its Implications for the Failure of Institutions, Development and Society, 33(1):123~145.
47. Yoo, C and Winsor, R. D. (2009), “The Changing Face of Korean Marketing Management”, Edts: Rowley, C. Paik,
48. Y., the Changing Face of Korean Management, Routledge, New York.