15.HİNDİSTAN OMBUDSMANI: YAPISAL-KURUMSAL VE İŞLEVSEL YÖNLERİ

Öz

Generally the ombudsman is a concept belonging to the public administration and citizens who suffered violation of rights and powers is to advocate and retention across government agencies. Ombudsman which find application in various state-level in all continents of the World, has been carried out in Asia. The purpose of this article, is given information about Indian Ombudsman depending on structural-institutional and functional aspects. In this way, in terms of India’s democracy and public administration of the ombudsman are asked to focus on place and importance

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Asia, Ombudsman, Public Administration, India

15.HİNDİSTAN OMBUDSMANI: YAPISAL-KURUMSAL VE İŞLEVSEL YÖNLERİ

Öz

Ombudsman, genel anlamıyla kamu yönetimine ait bir kavramdır ve hak ve yetki ihlaline uğrayan vatandaşların devlet kurumları karşısında savunuculuğunu ve koruyuculuğunu yapmaktadır. Dünyanın tüm kıtalarında farklı devlet düzeylerinde uygulama alanı bulan ombudsman, Asya’da da uygulanmaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı, Asya’dan Hindistan Ombudsmanı’nın yapısal-kurumsal ve işlevsel yönlerine bağlı olarak bilgi verilmesidir. Bu bağlamda da ombudsmanın Hindistan demokrasisi ve kamu yönetimi açısından yeri ve önemi üzerinde durulmak istenmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Asya, Ombudsman, Kamu Yönetimi, Hindistan

Kaynakça

1. ABADAN, Y. (1951). “Yeni Hint Anayasası”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1-2): 208-255.
2. ABDİOĞLU, H. (2007). “Yönetişim Ülkelerinin Uygulanmasında Kamu Denetçiliği (Ombudsmanlık) Kurumu ve Avrupa Birliği
3. Sürecinde Türkiye Açısından Önemi”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11: .79-102. ABEDIN, N. (2013). “A Critical and Argumentative Study of the Development and Performance of the Ombudsman Institution in a Small Multiracial Society: The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago”, Public Organization Review, 13(3): 261-289.
4. ALTUĞ, Y. (1968). “Vatandaşı İdarenin Yetki Tecavüzlerine Karşı Koruyan “Ombudsman” Müessesesi”, Yargıtay Yüzüncü
5. Yıldönümü Armağanı, İstanbul: Cezaevi Matbaası: 159-172. BAYLAN, Ö. (1978). Vatandaşın Devlet Yönetimi Hakkındaki Şikâyetleri ve Türkiye İçin İsveç Ombudsman Formülü, Ankara:
6. İçişleri Bakanlığı Tetkik Kurul Başkanlığı Yayınları. BUKHARI, S. M. H. (2013). “Institutional Analysis of Ombudsman: (A Comparative Study of Pakistan, India, UK and USA)”,
7. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(2): 709-713. BROWN, B. E. (2006). “The Government of India”, in Michael Curtis (Ed.), Introduction to Comparative Government, the United States: Pearson Educations, Inc.: 537-593.
8. BÜYÜKAVCI, M. (2008). “Ombudsmanlık Kurumu”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 4: 10-13.

9. CHAKRABARTY, B. (2008). Indian Politics and Society since Independence: Events, Processes and Ideology, USA: Routledge.
10. CHAKRABARTY, B. and PRAKASH C. (2012). Public Administration in a Globalizing World: Theories and Practices, India: SAGE Publications.
11. COORAY, M. J. A. (2000). “Ombudsman in Asia: A Case-study of Hong Kong and Sri Lanka”, in ed. Roy Gregory-Philip
12. Giddings (Ed.), Righting Wrongs: The Ombudsman in Six Continents, Amsterdam: International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS), IOS Press, ss.75-91. CARMONA, G. V. (2011), “Strengthening the Asian Ombudsman Association and the Ombudsman Institutions of Asia”, in
13. Strengthening the Ombudsman Institution in Asia: Improving Accountability in Public Service Delivery through the Ombudsman, Public Management, Financial Sector, and Trade / 2011, the Philippines: Asian Development Bank, ss.1-57.
14. DOĞAN, K. C. (2014). “Karşılaştırmalı Ülke İncelemeleri Bağlamında Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Ombudsmanın Uygulanabilirlik
15. Analizi”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. EREN, H. (2000). “Ombudsman Kurumu”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Erzincan Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, IV(1): 79-96.
16. ERHÜRMAN, T. (1998), “Ombudsman”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 31(3): 87-102.
17. FOWLIE, F. (2008). “A Blueprint for the Evaluation of an Ombudsman’s Office: A Case Study of the ICANN Office of the Ombudsman”, A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Conflict Resolution,
18. School of Law Faculty of Law and Management, La Trobe University Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia, November.
19. GELLHORN, W. (1966). “The Norwegian Ombudsman”, Stanford Law Review, 18(3): 293-321.
20. GOTTEHRER, M. (1998). Ombudsman Legislative Resource Document, Occasional Paper #65 March 1998, http://www.theioi.org/downloads/e1o60/IOI%20Canada_Occasional%20paper%2065_Dean%20Gottehrer_Ombudsman%20Legi slative%20Resource%20Document_1998.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.09.2014).
21. GÜNEY, Z. (2014). “Hindistan’da Mahalli İdareler”, http://www.ziyaguney.com/dosyalar/word/hindistan.doc, (Erişim Tarihi: 02014).
22. HILL, L. B. (1976). The Model Ombudsman: Institutionaling New Zealand’s Democratic Experiment, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23. JAIN, S. N. (1983). “India”, in Gerald E. Caiden (Ed.), International Handbook of the Ombudsman: Country Surveys, Vol. II,
24. United State of America: Greenwood Press, ss.317-320. JHA, R. R. (2000). “The Ombudsman Scene in India”, in ed. Roy Gregory-Philip Giddings (Ed.), Righting Wrongs: The Ombudsman in Six Continents, Amsterdam: International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS), IOS Press, ss.247-262.
25. JHA, R. R. (2013). “Concept and Role of the Ombudsman Institution in Asia in Improving and Maintaining Public Service
26. Delivery”, pp.1-48, http://asianombudsman.com/ORC/RETAstudies/Prof.%20Jha%20Final%20Draft%20_For%20Printing_.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 23.05.2013).
27. JIAYING, P. and CHEONG, L. I. (2008). “Comparative Study of Ombudsman Systems of Asia - Review of Systems in Macao,
28. Korea and India”, Research Awards on Comparative Studies of Ombudsman Systems in Asia jointly sponsored by Commission Against www.acrc.go.kr/eng/file/file.do?command=downFile&encodedKey..., (Erişim Tarihi: 10.10.2013).
29. JOSHI, P. (2003). “Accountability, Indian Administrative Culture and Trust, International Association of Schools and Institutes of Administration, Public Administration: Challenges of Inequality and Exclusion Miami (USA), 14-18 September 2003, http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/iias/unpan011171.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.05.2014).
30. KESTANE, D. (2006). “Çağdaş Bir Denetim Organizasyonu Olarak Ombudsmanlık (Kamu Denetçiliği)”, Maliye Dergisi, 151: 128
31. KTO, (2008). Hindistan Cumhuriyeti Ülke Raporu, Konya: Konya Ticaret Odası Etüd-Araştırma Servisi.
32. LO, C.W.; YEE, H. W. H.; LIU, N. N. and LI H. (2011). “Ombudsman and Stakeholder Engagement for Improved Service
33. Delivery”, in Strengthening the Ombudsman Institution in Asia: Improving Accountability in Public Service Delivery through the Ombudsman, Public Management, Financial Sector, and Trade / 2011, the Philippines: Asian Development Bank, ss.117-191.
34. Lokayukt Organization Madhya Pradesh, http://mplokayukt.nic.in/StatisticalReport1.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.11.2014).
35. Lokayukta-Uttarakhand, 2014).
36. MALIK, M. S. (2007). A Comprehensive Analysis of the Law of the Ombudsman, the United State of America: Aberdeen University Press.
37. MATHUR, R. N. (1963). “Need for an Indian Ombudsman for Successful Planning”, The Indian Journal of Political Science, 24(4): 347-354.
38. MAULION, M. R. (2006-2007), Power and Paradox: Deconstructing Ombudsman Independence Amidst the Thicket of the Constitution, http://ustlawreview.com/pdf/vol.LI/Power_and_Paradox.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.08.2014).
39. MITCHELL, J. and DOANE, D. (1999). “An Ombudsman for Humanitarian Assistance?”, Disasters, 23(2): 115-124.
40. MOHANTY, M. (2014). “Establishment of the Lokpal: Progress towards a New Horizon”, Odisha Review, LXX(6): 49-53.
41. MOHANTY, P. C. (2014). “Indian Constitution: The Charter of Sovereignty”, Odisha Review, LXX(6): 72-75.
42. MOHAPATRA, A. (2013). “Lokpal and the Role of Media in Propping Up Anti Corruption Movement in India”, International
43. Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research IJSSIR, 2(3): 42-53. MUTTA, S. (2005), İdarenin Denetlenmesi ve Ombudsman Sistemi, İstanbul: Kazancı Kitap.
44. PARDHASARADHI, Y. and REDDY, V. R. (2014), “Fostering e-Governance to fight Corruption: The Indian Experience”, pp.1-13, http://www.kapa21.or.kr/data/data_download.php?did=6250, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.09.2014).
45. PARLAK, B. ve CANRÜRK, C. (2009). Karşılaştırmalı Siyasal ve Yönetsel Yapılar, Bursa: Alfa Aktüel.
46. POHEKAR, P. D. (2010), A Study of Ombudsman System in India with Special Reference to Lokayukta in Maharashtra, India:
47. Gyan Publishing House. RAI, H. and SINGH, S. (1976). “Ombudsman in India: A Need For Administrative Integrity and Responsiveness”, The Indian
48. Journal of Political Science, 37(3): 43-63. and Macao Foundation, 28th February 2008, Achievements, http://lokayukta.uk.gov.in/contents/listing/1/53-achievements, (Erişim Tarihi: Law and Jurisprudence, UST LAW REVIEW, Vol. LI, AY 2006-2007, pp.109-154,
49. ROWAT, D. C. (1962). “An Ombudsman Scheme for Canada”, The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science /
50. Revue canadienned'Economique et de Science politique, 28(4): 543-556. ROWAT, D. C. (1973). The Ombudsman Plan: Essays on the Worldwide Spread of an Idea, The Carleton Library No. 67,
51. Canada: McClelland and Stewart Limited, The Canadian Publishers. RUPPEL-SCHLICHTING, Nambia”,http://www.kas.de/upload/auslandshomepages/namibia/Independence_Judiciary/ruppel-schlichting.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 2013).
52. SANCHEZ, A. (2012). “India: the next superpower?: corruption in India”, in IDEAS reports-special reports, Nicholas Kitchen
53. (Ed.), SR010. LSE IDEAS, UK: London School of Economics and Political Science. SAPERS, H. and ZINGER, I. (2010). “The Ombudsman as a Monitor of Human Rights in Canadian Federal Corrections”, Pace Law Review, 30(5): 1512-1529. SAXENA, http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/eropa/unpan021217.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 23.04.2013).
54. SATYANAND, J. A. (2014). “The Role of Ombudsman and Its Connection With the Control of Corruption”, Resource Material
55. Series No. 65, http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No65/No65_18VE_Satyanand.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.09.2014).
56. SHARAN, S. (1971). “Ombudsman in India”, The Indian Journal of Political Science, 32(2): 158-174.
57. STARK, J. J. M. (2010). “The Kerala Ombudsman”, Research Foundation of Governance: in India, 2-4 May 2010, http://www.rfgindia.org/publications/RFGI%20-%20the_kerala_ombudsman.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.07.2014).
58. The Twenty Seventh Consolidated Report of the Institution of Lokayukta of Andhra Pradesh, Annual Report-2011, http://lokayukta.ap.nic.in/annualreports/ANNUAL%20REPORT-2011.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2014).
59. TRIKHA, R. (2009). Bureaucracy and Public Administration, Delhi: ABD Publishers, Mehra Offset Press.
60. OYTAN, M. (1975). “Ombudsman Eli İle İdarenin Denetimi Konusunda Kıyaslamalı Bir İnceleme”, Danıştay Dergisi, 18-19, 1975: 195-196. ÖZGÜL, http://www.ombudsman.gen.tr/makale/detay.asp?id=35, (Erişim Tarihi: 09.10.2013).
61. UĞURLU, M. F. (1997). “Kamu Yönetimini Denetleyen Kurum: OMBUDSMAN”, Yeni Şafak Gazetesi, Düşünce Günlüğü
62. Sayfası, 10. 06. 1997, http://www.mehmetfatihugurlu.com/index.php/calmalarm/kamu-yoenetimi/kamu-yoenetimi yazlar, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.08.2013).
63. WASSEM, M. (2011), “Independence of Ombudsmen”, in Strengthening the Ombudsman Institution in Asia: Improving
64. Accountability in Public Service Delivery through the Ombudsman, Public Management, Financial Sector, and Trade / 2011, the Philippines: Asian Development Bank, ss.57-89.
65. WEEKS, K. M. (1978), Ombudsmen Around the World: A Comparative Chart, California: Institute of Governmental Studies.
66. YILDIRIM, A. (2014). “Yerel Yönetim Ombudsmanının Türkiye’de Uygulanabilirliği Üzerine Genel Bir Değerlendirme”,
67. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2/2: 197-217. http://lokayukta.bih.nic.in/, Lokayukta Bihar, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.09.2014). Devletine Bir Katkı: Ombudsman”,