Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Industry 4.0 in Social Sciences

Yıl 2021, , 159 - 175, 28.01.2021

Gencay Tepe , Burcu Mucan Özcan

https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.789178

Cited By: 2

Öz

The increased rate of technological advancements with Globalization changed, and still changing the industry structures, corporates, the way of working. In recent years Industry 4.0 became one of the prominent subjects. Therefore various corporations and research companies have contributed greatly to the literature of Industry 4.0. In order to find out the fields, countries and authors’ contribution to the subject in terms of conducting studies and their influence on other studies, published studies for the last two decades are reviewed with the bibliometric analysis method. The types, key research subjects, the cross-subject relations and collaborations for 1084 document reviewed by the analysis are revealed. With a systematic map that will be created for Industry 4.0, the aim is to indicate the progress of published papers in graphics, to determine the current fields of interest regarding the subject and in turn to guide the potential future researches. Among these results, it is seen that Business and Management fields, and Engineering are the most prominent disciplines in terms of working on Industry 4.0. Germany has most publications and BRIC countries, such as China at the forefront, Brazil and Russia follow Germany closely.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social sciences, Scopus, Bibliometric analysis, Industry 4.0

Sosyal Bilimlerde Endüstri 4.0’ın İncelenmesi ve Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Küreselleşmeyle birlikte teknolojik gelişmelerde yaşanan hızlı değişim, endüstri yapılarını, şirketleri, iş yapış biçimlerini etkilemiş ve halen de etkilemeye devam etmektedir. Son yıllarda Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi diğer bir adıyla ise Endüstri 4.0 oldukça dikkat çeken konulardan biri olmuştur. Bu nedenle son yıllarda çeşitli kurumların ve araştırma şirketlerinin Endüstri 4.0 literatürüne olan katkıları giderek büyümektedir. Konuyla ilgili yapılan çalışmalara hangi alanların, ülkelerin ve yazarların daha çok katkı sağladığı ve bu çalışmaların diğer araştırmaları nasıl etkilediği sorusunun araştırılması amacıyla, çalışmada bibliyometrik analiz teknikleri kullanılarak son yirmi yılda yayınlanan çalışmalar incelenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda incelenen 1084 dokümanın türleri, anahtar araştırma konuları, konular arası karşılıklı ilişkiler ve iş birlikleri ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Endüstri 4.0 alanında yapılacacak olan bu sistematik haritalama ile yayınların zaman içindeki gelişimi grafiksel olarak gösterilerek, konuya dair mevcut ilgi alanlarının belirlenmesi ve gelecekteki potansiyel araştırmalara yön göstermesi amaçlanmaktadır. Sonuçlar incelendiğinde İşletme ve Yönetim ile Mühendislik alanlarının Endüstri 4.0 çalışmalarına en fazla katkı sağlayan disiplinler olduğu görülmektedir. En çok çalışmanın Almanya ve BRIC ülkeleri tarafından yapıldığı, Çin, Brezilya ve Rusya’nın literatüre katkı bakımından Almanya’yı yakından takip ettiği belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal bilimler, Scopus, Bibliyometrik analiz, Endüstri 4.0

Kaynakça

• Alçin, S. (2016). Üretim için yeni bir izlek: Sanayi 4.0. Journal of Life Economics, 3(2), 19-30.
• Ashton, T. S. (1997). The industrial revolution 1760-1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Banger, G. (2018). Endüstri 4.0 ve akıllı işletme. Eskişehir: Dorlion Press
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review Of General Psychology, 1(3), 311-320.
• Belvedere, V., Grando, A., & Bielli, P. (2013). A quantitative investigation of the role of information and communication technologies in the implementation of a product-service system. International Journal of Production Research, 51(2), 410-426.
• Bogers, M., Hadar, R., & Bilberg, A. (2016). Additive manufacturing for consumer-centric business models: Implications for supply chains in consumer goods manufacturing. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 102, 225-239.
• Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2215-2222.
• Bozkurt, Ç.Ö., & Çetin, A. (2016). Girişimcilik ve kalkınma dergisi’nin bibliyometrik analizi. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 11(2), 229-263.
• Drath, R., & Horch, A. (2014). Industrie 4.0: hit or hype?. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 8(2), 56-58.
• Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101-114.
• Fırat, S. Ü., & Fırat, O. Z. (2017). Sanayi 4.0 devrimi üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme: kavramlar, küresel gelişmeler ve Türkiye. Toprak İşveren Dergisi, 114(2017), 10-23.
• Frank, A. G., Mendes, G. H., Ayala, N. F., & Ghezzi, A. (2019). Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 341-351.
• Gülseren, A., & Sağbaş, A. (2019). Endüstri 4.0 perspektifinde sanayide dijital dönüşüm ve dijital olgunluk seviyesinin değerlendirilmesi. European Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2(2), 1-6.
• Günay, D. (2002). Sanayi ve sanayi tarihi. Mimar ve Mühendis Dergisi, 31(2002), 8-14.
• Günaydın, D. (2018). Türkiye'de dördüncü sanayi devrimini beklerken: çerkezköy organize sanayi bölgesi'nde bir araştırma. Institute of Business Administration-Management Journal, 29(85), 73-106.
• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.
• Hoffman, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Computers in Industry, 89, 23–34.
• Hotamışlı, M., & Erem, I. (2014). Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi’nde yayınlanan makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 63, 1-20.
• Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., Werner, F., & Ivanova, M. (2016). A dynamic model and an algorithm for short-term supply chain scheduling in the smart factory industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 54(2), 386-402.
• Jazdi, N. (2014, May). Cyber physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0. Paper presented at Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, 2014 IEEE International Conference, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6857843
• Kagermann, H. (2015). Change through digitization—Value creation in the age of Industry 4.0. In Management of permanent change (pp. 23-45). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler
• Kang, H. S., Lee, J. Y., Choi, S., Kim, H., Park, J. H., Son, J. Y., & Do Noh, S. (2016). Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions. International Journal Of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 3(1), 111-128.
• Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239-242.
• Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. D. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0-a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609-3629.
• Lobo-Almada, F. (2015). Industry 4.0 revolution and the future of the manufacturing execution systems (MES). Journal of Innovation Management, JIM 3, 4 (2015), 16-21.
• Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1–10.
• Lukaˇc, D. (2015, November). The fourth ICT-based industrial revolution Industry 4.0? HMI and the case of CAE/CAD innovation with EPLAN P8. Paper presented at 23rd Telecomunications Forum (TELFOR), Belgrade, Serbia. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7377595
• Mrugalska, B., & Wyrwicka, K.M. (2017). Towards lean production in industry 4.0. Procedia Engineering, 182, 466 – 473.
• Muhuri, K.P., Shukla, K.A., & Abraham, A.(2019). Industry 4.0: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 78(2019), 218–235.
• Nolin, J. & Olson, N. (2016). The internet of things and convenience. Internet Research, 26(2), 360-376.
• Oesterreich, D.T., & Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in Industry, 83(2016), 121–139.
• Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64-88.
• Roblek, V., Meško, M., & Krapež, A. (2016). A complex view of industry 4.0. Sage Open, 6(2), 1-11.
• Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9(1), 54-89.
• Sanders, A., Elangeswaran, C., & Wulfsberg, J. P. (2016). Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: Research activities in industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 9(3), 811-833.
• Schmidt, R., Möhring, M., Härting, R. C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, P., & Jozinović, P. (2015). Industry 4.0-potentials for creating smart products: empirical research results. In Abramowicz W. (Ed.), Business Information Systems BIS 2015 Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (pp. 16–27). Cham:Springer.
• Shrouf, F., Ordieres, J., & Miragliotta, G. (2014, December). Smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of Things paradigm. Paper presented at 2014 IEEE International Conference On Industrial Engineering And Engineering Management, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7058728
• Sivathanu, B. & Pillai, R. (2018), Smart HR 4.0 – how industry 4.0 is disrupting HR. Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(4), 7-11.
• Stange,R. & Zucchella, A. (2017). Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business, Multinational Business Review, 25(3), 174-184.
• Tayfun, A., Küçükergin, G.F., Aysen, E., Eren, A., & Özekici, K.Y. (2016). Turizm alanında yazılan lisansüstü tezlere yönelik bibliyometrik bir analiz. Gazi Üniversitesi Turizm Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2016), 50-69.
• Tayfun, A., Ülker, A., Gökçe, Y., Tengilimoğlu, E., Sürücü, Ç., & Durmaz, M. (2018). Turizm alanında yiyecek ve içecek ile ilgili lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 6/2(2018), 523-547.
• Theorin, A., Bengtsson, K., Provost, J., Lieder, M., Johnsson, C., Lundholm, T., Lennartson, B. (2017). An event-driven manufacturing information system architecture for Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 55(5), 1297-1311.
• Trotta, D., & Garengo, P. (2018, March). Industry 4.0 key research topics: A bibliometric review. Paper presented at 7th International Conference On Industrial Technology And Management (ICITM), Oxford, United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8333930
• Vaidya, S., Ambad, P. & Bhosle, S. (2018). Industry 4.0: A glimpse. Procedia Manufacturing, 20(2018), 233–238.
• Wahlster, W. (2012, May). From industry 1.0 to industry 4.0: Towards the 4th industrial revolution. Paper presented at Forum Business Meets Research, Luxembourg.
• Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941-2962.
• Zhou, K., Liu, T., & Zhou, L. (2015, August). Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. Paper presented at 2015 12th International conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD), Zhangjiajie, China. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7382284
• https://gephi.org/features/, Access Date 11.09.2019.
• https://www.vosviewer.com/, Access Date 11.09.2019.