Avrupa Yolculuğu: Türkiye – Hırvatistan

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 61, 84 - 97, 23.07.2019

Mehmet Yunus Çelik

Öz

Bu çalışma ile Avrupa
Birliği’ne tam üye olarak en son kabul edilen Hırvatistan ile Tam üyelik
müzakere süreci devam eden Türkiye’nin bu süreç içerisinde uygulamış olduğu
kamusal politikalar, kanuni yükümlülükler ve düzenlemeler, üyelik sürecinde
izlediği para ve maliye politikaları karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz edilmiştir.
Çalışmada öncelikle Avrupa Birliği ve birliğe tam üyelik için gerekli uyum
süreçleri ve politikaları hakkında bilgi verilmiştir. Bu kapsamda Avrupa
Birliği’nin amaçları ve gelecekle ilgili dünyaya ne gibi katkılar yapabileceği
incelenmiştir. Sonrasında üyelik sürecinde Hırvatistan ile Türkiye arasında ne
gibi farkların olduğu ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır. Özellikle iki ülke için
sürecin işleyiş farkların net bir şekilde ortaya konması, Türkiye’nin tam üyelik
sürecinde daha etkili bir yolun nasıl izlemesi gerektiğini ortaya koyması
açısından önem arz etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türkiye, Hırvatistan, Avrupa Birliği

Europe Journey: Turkey-Croatia

Öz

In this study,
public policies, legal obligations and regulations, and monetary and fiscal
policies implemented by Croatia, the newest member state of the EU, and Turkey,
which is negotiating its accession to the EU as a member state, during the EU
membership process were analyzed comparatively. First of all, the study
contains information about the European Union and the harmonization processes
and policies necessary for full membership to the Union. In this regard, a
focus was placed on the goals of the Union and how it can contribute to the
world in the future. Afterward, the differences between Croatia and Turkey
during the negotiation process were tried to be demonstrated. We believe that
demonstrating the differences between the negotiation processes of the two
countries will be important for Turkey to follow a more effective path in its
process of full membership to the Union.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turkey, Croatia, European Union

Kaynakça

• Altun, O. (2013). Croatia’s membership in the context of the European Union enlargement policy. Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Finance European Union and Foreign Relations Department Special Agenda.
• Aytug, H. K. (2016). Europeanization of the Turkish Public administration in the negotiation process of European Union. The Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 46, 129-145.
• Çelik, M. Y., Usta, H., & Şen, A. T. (2017). Crisis in Europe. University Journal of faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 18(1), 101-113.
• Çelik, M. Y., Şen, A. T., Usta, H., & Usta, S. E. (2018). European Union's migration/refugee policy and economic, social and public communication issues: Kastamonu example. Dumlupinar University Journal of Social Science, 57, 296-315.
• Dagdemir, O. (2015). Economic approaches to environmental problems and optimal policy. Ankara: Gazi Bookstore.
• European Commission, (2018). 2018 information on EU Enlargement Policy, Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/20180417-turkey-report.pdf
• Eurostat, (2018). Inflation Rates 2006-2017, Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tec00118. Accessed on 13.09.2018
• Eurostat, (2018). Ratio of Budget Deficits to GDP, Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=gov_10dd_edpt1&lang=en. Accessed on 13.09.2018
• Eurostat, (2018). Ratio of Government Debts to GDP, Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=sdg_17_40&plugin=1. Accessed on 13.09.2018
• Eurostat, (2018). Long Term Interest Rates, Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=irt_lt_mcby_a&lang=en. Accessed on 13.09.2018
• Kaya, E. (2016). The last enlargement of the European Union and the Balkan members. Trakya University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(2), 213-233.
• Inac, H. (2016). Turkey-EU relations: causes making it hard for Turkey to integrate. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, 3(25), 229-246.
• Ozpence, O., & Idikut Ozpence, A. (2008). The last two candidates in the process of accession to the European Union: Turkey and Croatia. International Republic of Turkey Symposium Reports, Isparta, 533-540.
• Sandikli, A., & Akcadag, E. (2011). Turkey-EU relations in the context of the Cyprus Dispute. Bilge Strateji Journal, 2(4), 1-14.
• Sayin, Y. (2016). Accession negotiations and negotiation chapters of Turkey. Selcuk University Journal of Vocational School of Social Sciences, 19(2), 41-62.
• Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası, (2018). Long-Term Interest Rates, Retrieved from http://evds.tcmb.gov.tr/index.php?/evds/serieMarket/#collapse-3. Accessed on 13.09.2018
• Toygur, I., & Atak, K. (2009). Croatia’s EU negotiation process (Report no. IKV 2009-7). Retrieved from Economic Development Foundation Assessment Note: https://www.ikv.org.tr/images/upload/data/files/hirvatistanin_ab_muzakere_sureci.pdf
• https://www.ab.gov.tr. Accessed on 13-17.09.2018
• https://www.avrupa.info.tr/tr/ab-ve-turkiye-iliskileri-tarihi-711. Accessed on 19.07.2018
• https://www.artigercek.com/haberler/turkiye-nin-ab-katilim-surecinin-onundeki-engeller-neler. Accessed on 13.09.2018
• http://akademikperspektif.com/2012/08/24/avrupa-birliginin-tarihsel-gelisimi/. Accessed on 15.08.2018
• https://bilgibirikimi.net/2012/06/06/kopenhag-kriterleri-nelerdir-abye-uyum-kriterleri/ Accessed on 13.07.2018
• https://www.ombudsman.gov.tr/contents/files/752d1--Kopenhag-Kriterleri.pdf. Accessed on 13.07.2018
• https://www.ab.gov.tr/katilim-muzakerelerinde-mevcut-durum_65.html. Accessed on 11.07.2018
• https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/5%20Ekim/yatay_muzakere_tablosu_30_06_2016_tr.pdf. Accessed on 15.08.2018
• http://www.gazetebilkent.com/2013/07/16/hirvatistan-abye-28-uye-ulke-oldu/. 20.08.2018
• https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/rehber/07_rehber.pdf, Accessed on 11.07.2018