Developmental Foreign Policy

Abstract

Considering the changing economic and social parameters as of the 1980s, the concept of "Developmental State" has become an interdisciplinary not only focusing on economic layout as in previous years but also including different dimensions (economic, social, diplomatic and security). Especially after the 2008 financial crisis, when Western hegemonic international political economic system has evolved into a hybrid structure consisting of "Developmental States" whose applications can vary from country to country, foreign policy has been given greater importance by developing countries than in the past. In this study, a literature study will be conducted on "Developmental Foreign Policy" by examining the conceptual dimensions of the "Developmental State" approach introduced in the Washington Consensus, Post-Washington Consensus periods and today, and the concept of Developmental Foreign Policy will be opened to discussion under the main dimensions of economic, social, diplomatic and security.

Keywords

• Developmental Foreign Policy
• Developmental State
• Development and Foreign Policy
• International Political Economy
• State Capitalism

Kalkınmacı Dış Politika

Öz

1980’li yıllar itibarıyla değişen ekonomik ve sosyal parametreler birlikte değerlendirildiğinde “Kalkınmacı Devlet” kavramı, geçmiş yıllarda olduğu gibi sadece ekonomik büyüklüğe odaklanmayan ve farklı boyutları (ekonomik, sosyal, diplomatik ve güvenlik) aynı anda içeren interdisipliner bir hale gelmiştir. 2008 mali krizinin ardından Batı hegomonyasındaki küresel politik ekonomi düzeninin yerini alan ve uygulamaları ülkeden ülkeye değişiklik gösterebilen “Kalkınmacı Devlet”’lerden oluşan karma ve hibrit bir yapıya evrilen uluslararası sistem içinde dış politikaya gelişmekte olan ülkeler tarafından geçmişte olduğundan daha büyük önem verilmeye başlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada, “Kalkınmacı Devlet” yaklaşımının Washington Konsensüsü, Post-Washington Konsensüsü dönemlerinde ve günümüzde ortaya konulan kavramsal boyutları irdelenerek bu çerçevede “Kalkınmacı Dış Politika” üzerinden bir literatür çalışması yapılacak ve bu kavram ekonomik, sosyal, diplomatik ve güvenlik ana boyutları altında belirlenen alt parametreler çerçevesinde tartışmaya açılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kalkınmacı Dış Politika
• Kalkınmacı Devlet
• Kalkınma ve Dış Politika
• Uluslararası Politik Ekonomi
• Devlet Kapitalizmi
• Developmental Foreign Policy
• Developmental State
• Development and Foreign Policy
• International Political Economy
• State Capitalism

Kaynakça

1. Amsden, Alice H. 1989. “Asian Next Giant, South Korea and Late Industrialization,” 394.
2. Barrett, Riley. 2018. “ The Development-Security Nexus: An Exploitative Past and Present”, Erişim : 23/10/2020, https://www.e-ir.info/2018/07/24/the-development-security-nexus-anexploitative- past-and-present/
3. Beeson, Mark. 2017. “What Does China’s Rise Mean for the Developmental State Paradigm?” In Asia after the Developmental State, edited by Toby Carroll and Darryl S. L. Jarvis, 1st ed., 174–98. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480502.008.
4. Bishop, Matt, 2013. “The state, capitalism and development”, Erişim: 14/03/2019 http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/2013/03/21/state-capitalism-development/
5. Bremmer, Ian, 2010. “The end of Free Market”, Erişim: 30/10/2020 https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/05/11/the-end-of-the-free-market-2/
6. Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. 2010. "Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways" Global networks 10 (2): 182-222.
7. Caldentey, Esteban Pérez. 2008. “The Concept and Evolution of the Developmental State.” International Journal of Political Economy 37 (3): 27–53. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJP0891- 1916370302.
8. Cambridge sözlük, "kalkınma", Erişim: 30/09/2019 https://dictionary.cambridge.org/tr/s%C3%B6zl%C3%BCk/ingilizce/economicdevelopment

9. Carroll, Toby. 2017. “Late Capitalism and the Shift from the ‘Developmental State’ to the Variegated Market State.” In Asia after the Developmental State, edited by Toby Carroll and Darryl S. L. Jarvis, 1st ed., 93–123. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480502.005.
10. Chang, Ha-Joon. 1996. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. Repr. (with alterations). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
11. Chang, H. J. 2002. Kicking away the ladder: development strategy in historical perspective. Anthem Press.
12. Cı̇velekoğlu, İlke. n.d. “Washington Uzlaşısı Sonrası Dönemde Devletin Değişen Rolü ve Bir Türkiye Değerlendirmesi,” 21.
13. Debanes, Pauline. 2018. “Layering the Developmental State Away?,” 27.
14. Debanes, P., S. Lechevalier, ve E. Rundell, 2014. "Resurgence of the Concept of the Developmental State: Which Empirical Reality for Which Theoretical Revival?" Critique internationale (2): 9-18.
15. Evans, Peter B. 1989. “Predatory, Developmental, and Other Apparatuses: A Comparative Political Economy Perspective on the Third World State.” Sociological Forum 4 (4): 561– 87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115064.
16. Evans, Peter B. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton Paperbacks. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
17. Evans, P.B., ve P. Heller. 2015. "Human development, state transformation and the politics of the developmental state (draft)." In The Oxford handbook of transformations of the state, edited by S. Leibfried, F. Nullmeier, E. Huber, & M. Lange, 691-713. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Gill, Indermit Singh, Homi J. Kharas, and Deepak Bhattasali. 2007. An East Asian Renaissance: Ideas for Economic Growth. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank.
19. Jacobs, M., & Mazzucato, M. ed. 2016. Rethinking Capitalism: Economics and Policy for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth
20. Jayasuriya, K. 1999. "Globalization, law, and the transformation of sovereignty: The emergence of global regulatory governance." Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 6 (2): 425-55.
21. Haggard, Stephan. 2015. “The Developmental State Is Dead: Long Live the Developmental State!” In Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, edited by James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen, 39–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316273104.003.
22. Hayashi, Shigeko. 2010. “The Developmental State in the Era of Globalization: Beyond the Northeast Asian Model of Political Economy.” The Pacific Review 23 (1): 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740903398330.
23. Heper, Metin. 1985. The State Tradition in Turkey. Walkington North Humberside: The Eothen Press.
24. Hyman, Gerald. 2010, “Foreign Policy and Development”, Erişim: 30.10.2020 https://www.csis.org/analysis/foreign-policy-and-development
25. Isike, Christopher, and Olusola Ogunnubi. 2017. “South Africa’s Foreign Policy Aspirations and the National Development Plan (NDP 2030): The Role of Soft Power.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 35 (3): 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2017.1326698.
26. İpek, Özlem. 2018. "Dış Politikada Medyanın Rolü, Lectio Socialis 2, no. 2 (July): 153-161, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/516065.
27. Landsberg, Chris. 2005. “Toward a Developmental Foreign Policy? Challenges for South Africa’s Diplomacy in the Second Decade of Liberation.” Social Research 72 (3,): 723–56.
28. Landsberg, Chris, and Costa Georghiou. 2015. “The Foreign Policy and Diplomatic Attributes of a Developmental State: South Africa as Case Study.” South African Journal of International Affairs 22 (4): 479–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2015.1124805.
29. Leftwich, Adrian. 1995. “Bringing Politics Back in: Towards a Model of the Developmental State.” Journal of Development Studies 31 (3): 400–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389508422370.
30. Lloyd, Peter, and Cassey Lee. 2018. “A Review of The Recent Literature on the Institutional Economics Analysis of the Long-Run Performance of Nations: Institutional Economics Analysis of Long-Run Performance.” Journal of Economic Surveys 32 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12186.
31. Lopes, Carlos. 2012. “Economic Growth and Inequality: The New Post-Washington Consensus*.” RCCS Annual Review, no. 4 (October). https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.426.
32. Mann, Micheal. 1984. "Tending the roots : nationalism and populism" European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie / Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie 25, (2): 185-213
33. Maxwell, Simon. 2007. “How Do Development and Foreign Policy Connect?”. Erişim : 30.10.2020. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinionfiles/ 794.pdf
34. Modelski, George. 1962. A Theory of Foreign Policy. New York: Praeger.
35. Mollaer, Ömer. 2016. “Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique,” Ekonomik Teori ve Analiz Dergisi 1, (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.265156.
36. Önis, Ziya, Alice H. Amsden, Frederic C. Deyo, Chalmers Johnson, and Robert Wade. 1991. “The Logic of the Developmental State.” Comparative Politics 24 (1): 109. https://doi.org/10.2307/422204.
37. Öniş, Ziya, and Mustafa Kutlay. 2020. “The New Age of Hybridity and Clash of Norms: China, BRICS, and Challenges of Global Governance in a Postliberal International Order.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 45 no.3 (May): 123-142. 030437542092108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375420921086.
38. Öniş, Ziya ve Fikret Şenses. 2009. “Küresel Dinamikler, Ülkeiçi Koalisyonlar ve Reak-tif Devlet: Türkiye‟nin Savaş Sonrası Kalkınmasında Önemli Politika Dönüşümleri.” İçinde Neoliberal Küreselleşme ve Kalkınma: Seçme Yazılar, derleyen Fikret Şenses, 705-43. Çeviri, Tevfik Koldaş. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
39. Peter, Nunnenkamp. 2004. “How to Improve the Developmental Impact of Foreign Direct Investment: A Review.” Review of World Economics 140 (3): 525–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665988.
40. Rodrik, Dani. 2006. “Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s.” Journal of Economic Literature, 15.
41. Rodrik, Dani. 2007. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
42. Rodrik, Dani. 2011. The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy Can’t Coexist. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Rowden R., 2019, “Despite many changes in today’s modern global economy developmental states are needed more than ever.” Development Economics, Erişim : 15/03/2019, https://developingeconomics.org/author/zoya2009/
44. Sayarı, Sabri.1977. Patrons and Clients in Mediterranean Societies, London: Duckworth.
45. Schmidt, Lianne. n.d. “Putting the Developmental State on the SDG Agenda,” 37.
46. Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. 1st. ed. New York: Knopf.
47. Serra, Narcís, and Joseph E. Stiglitz, eds. 2008. The Washington Consensus Reconsidered: Towards a New Global Governance. The Initiative for Policy Dialogue Series. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute’s (SPERI) Final Report of the Industrial Strategy Commission (2017) Raporu. Erişim: 15.03.2019, http://industrialstrategycommission.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/The-Final-Reportof- the-Industrial-Strategy-Commission.pdf
49. Spohr, Alexandre Piffero, André Luiz Reis da Silva, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. 2017. “Foreign Policy’s Role in Promoting Development: The Brazilian and Turkish Cases.” Contexto Internacional 39 (1): 157–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390100008.
50. Stubbs, Richard. 2017. “The Origins of East Asia’s Developmental States and the Pressures for Change*.” In Asia after the Developmental State, edited by Toby Carroll and Darryl S. L. Jarvis, 1st ed., 51–71. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480502.003.
51. The Economist, 2012, “The Rise of State Capitalism”, Erişim: 14/03/2019 https://www.economist.com/leaders/2012/01/21/the-rise-of-state-capitalism.
52. Türk Dil Kurumu, Kalkınma, Erişim : 30.09.2019 http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_bts&arama=kelime&guid=TDK.GTS.5d89b 7c88cd337.13184767.
53. Wade, Robert. 2010. “After the Crisis: Industrial Policy and the Developmental State in Low-Income Countries: Industrial Policy and the Developmental State.” Global Policy 1 (2): 150–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2010.00036.x.
54. Wade, Robert. 1990. “Economic Theory and The Role of Government In East Asian Industrialization,” 450.
55. World Bank. 1997. World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World. New York:Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
56. Woo-Cumings, Meredith. 2007. “Neoliberalism and Institutional Reform in East Asia: A Comparative Study,” 305.
57. Wright, Erik Olin. 1996. Review of Peter Evans, Embedded Autonomy. Contemporary Sociology, 25 (2): 176-179.
58. Yaşgül, Yaşar Serhat. 2013. “Yeni Kalkınmacı Devlet Modeli Bağlamında Ulusal İlaç Politikası: Brezilya Deneyimi.” Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B. Dergisi 35 (2): 123-152. Doi No: 10.14780/iibdergi.201324462.