BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2003, Cilt: 43 Sayı: 1, 11 - 24, 01.01.2003

Öz

Bu makalede Türkçe, Rusça ve ingilizce'de Özişlevsel ve Şahıssız Genel yapıların, Keyser ve Raeper'in savundukları gibi, sözcüksel değil, sözdizimsel olduğu tezi öne sürülmektedir. Tezi desteklemek amacıyla her üç dilde Özne Yükselten Edilgen, Uyumsuz Çift Edilgen ve Mastar sal Çift Edilgen yapılar incelenmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Ailen, M.A. (1978) Morphological Investigations. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  • Chomsky, N.(1984) Lectures on Government & Binding. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.
  • Dietrich, A.P. (1987) Toward a Syntactic Characterization of Passives, Ergatives and Middles in Russian and Turkish. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
  • Fagan, Sarah. (1988) "The English Middle," Linguistic bıcjuiry 19, no. 2, 181-203.
  • George, L. & J. Kornfilt, (1977) "Infinitival Double Passives in Turkish," in K. Leffel and D. Bouchard (eds.) North Eastern Linguistic Society, vol. 7, 65-79.
  • Haegeman, L. Introdııction to Government & Binding Theory. Cambridge: Blackweü, Ltd., 1991.
  • Keyser, S.& T.Roeper (1984) "On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English, "Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 15. no. 3, 381-416.
  • Kornfilt, Jacklin.(1998)"NP-Deletion and Case Marking in Turkish", Studies on Turkish Lingıtistics, METU, Ankara.
  • Roeper, T. and M.E.A. Siegel. "A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds," Linguistic Inguiry 9 (1978) 199-260.

Lexical and Syntactical Analysis of Passives Ergatives and Middles in Türkish, Russian and English

Yıl 2003, Cilt: 43 Sayı: 1, 11 - 24, 01.01.2003

Öz

This article demonstrates that Passives, Ergatives and Middles in Tiırkish and Russian are syntactical rather than lexical as Keyser and Roeper claim. To support our clainı we enıploy Subject-Raising Passive, Non-Finite Doııble Passive and Infinitival Doııble Passive construetions in all three languages.

Kaynakça

  • Ailen, M.A. (1978) Morphological Investigations. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  • Chomsky, N.(1984) Lectures on Government & Binding. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.
  • Dietrich, A.P. (1987) Toward a Syntactic Characterization of Passives, Ergatives and Middles in Russian and Turkish. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
  • Fagan, Sarah. (1988) "The English Middle," Linguistic bıcjuiry 19, no. 2, 181-203.
  • George, L. & J. Kornfilt, (1977) "Infinitival Double Passives in Turkish," in K. Leffel and D. Bouchard (eds.) North Eastern Linguistic Society, vol. 7, 65-79.
  • Haegeman, L. Introdııction to Government & Binding Theory. Cambridge: Blackweü, Ltd., 1991.
  • Keyser, S.& T.Roeper (1984) "On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English, "Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 15. no. 3, 381-416.
  • Kornfilt, Jacklin.(1998)"NP-Deletion and Case Marking in Turkish", Studies on Turkish Lingıtistics, METU, Ankara.
  • Roeper, T. and M.E.A. Siegel. "A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds," Linguistic Inguiry 9 (1978) 199-260.
Toplam 9 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Ayşe Pamir Dıetrıch Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2003
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2003 Cilt: 43 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Pamir Dıetrıch, A. (2003). Lexical and Syntactical Analysis of Passives Ergatives and Middles in Türkish, Russian and English. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(1), 11-24.

Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi - dtcfdergisi@ankara.edu.tr

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.   22455