Frankenstein: Ego, Body, Creation and Monstrosity

Yıl 2003, Cilt: 43 Sayı: 1, 127 - 155, 01.01.2003

Erinç Özdemir

Öz

This study aims to explore the themes and concepts of self, body, creation and monstrosity inscribed in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. it will approach these issues from a mainly posmodern point of view that takes gender as its central focus. Although gender is not an explicit theme in the novel, it plays an enormous part in ehıcidating the deeper meanings embedded at its heart, and is woven into its fabric in a multi-layered manner that can be roughly summarized as follows: 1 as a rewriting of Paradise Lost as a masculinist text and as a Romantic version of culturally central mytlıs such as the creation myth and the Promethean myth in ways that covertly question Romantic notions of şelf and creativity; 2 in connection with some of the most influential cultural and philosophical discourses of Shelley's time such as Godwinian rationalism, the Enlightenment belief in the beneficience of selence and human progress and Rousseau 's Romanticism, ali of which deal with "civilized" man's relationship to nature, to society and to himself; 3 in relation to the domestic ideology that constituted a major cultural basis of the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century middle-class domination; 4 as an inseription of crucial aspects of Shelley's own life such as parental loss and ambivalence about her gender role in relation to her artistle self; 5 through the narrative marginalization of the female characters refleeting the sodalı'cultural marginalization of woman.

Kaynakça

• Baldick, Chris. (1987). In Frankenstein's Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and 19th-century Writing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Behrendt, Stephen. (1998). "Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, and the Woman Writer's Fate." Critical Essays on M. Wollstonecraft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
• Botting, Fred, (1991). Making Monstrous: Frankenstein, criticism, theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Bronfen, Elisabeth. (1994). "Rewriting the Family: Mary Shelley's 'Frankenstein' in its Biographical/Textual Context." Frankenstein, Creation and Monstrosity. Ed. Stephen Bann. London: Reaktion.
• Gilbert, Sandra M. & Gubar, Susan. (1979). The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-century Literary Imagination. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
• Godwin, William. (1993). An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. Ed. Mark Philp. London: William Pickering. Vol. 3 of Political and Philosophical Writings of William Godwin.
• Homans, Margaret. (1986). "Bearing Demons: Frankenstein's Circumvention of the Maternal." Bearing the Word: Language and Female Experience in Nineteenth-Century Women's Writing. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Jackson, Rosemary. (1981). Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London: Routledge.
• James, Louis. (1994). "Frankenstein's Monster in Two Traditions." Frankenstein, Creation and Monstrosity. Ed. Stephen Bann. London: Reaktion.
• Johnson, Barbara. (1987). "My Monster / My Self." Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
• Jordanova, Ludmilla. (1994). "Melancholy Reflection: Constructing an Identity for Unveilers of Nature." Frankenstein, Creation and Monstrosity. Ed. Stephen Bann. London: Reaktion.
• Levine, George. (1981). "The Pattern: Frankenstein and Austen to Conrad." The Realistic Imagination: English Fiction from Frankenstein to Lady Chatterley. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• -. (1998). "The Ambiguous Heritage of Frankenstein" Critical Essays on Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
• McLane, Maureen Noelle. (1996). "Literate Species: Populations, 'Humanities,' and Frankenstein' English Literary History, vol. 63, 959-988.
• Mellor, Anne K. (1998). "A Feminist Critique of Science." Critical Essays on Mary Woilstone craft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
• Moi, Toril. (1985). Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. London & New York: Routledge.
• Oates, Joyce Carol. (1987). "Frankenstein's Fallen Angel." Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
• O'Rourke, James. (1989). " 'Nothing More Unnatural': Mary Shelley's Revision of Rousseau." English Literary History, vol. 56, 543-569.
• Poovey, Mary. (1987). '"My Hedious Progeny': The Lady and the Monster."
• Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
• Shelley, Mary. (1994). Frankenstein. Republication of the text of the third edition of 1831. New York: Dover.
• Sherwin, Paul. (1987). "Frankenstein: Creation as Catastrophe." Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
• Thornburg, Mary K. (1987). The Monster in the Mirror: Gender and the Sentimental/Gothic myth in Frankenstein. Ann Arbor, Michigan: U.M.I Research Press.
• Wittman, Ellen H. (1998). "Mary Shelley's Daemon." Critical Essays on Mary Woilstone craft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
• Wordsworth, William. (1971). Poetical Works. Ed. Thomas Hutchinson, revised Ernest de Selincourt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.