Çok Sesliliğin Ağında: Iris Murdoch’un Ağ Adlı Romanının Bakhtinsel İncelemesi

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 50 Sayı: 1, 67 - 82, 01.01.2010

Zeynep Z. Atayurt

Öz

Iris Murdoch’un Ağ adlı romanı s ıklıkla romanın ele aldığı ahlaki ve felsefi konularla bağlantılı olarak incelenmiştir. Bu konuların kurmaca bir metinde ortaya konması kuşkusuz tartışmaya değer bir husustur, ancak bu konuların romanda nasıl, diğer bir deyişle hangi yollarla ifade edildiği aynı derecede önemlidir. Bu sebeple, bu çalışmada Murdoch’un romanında ele aldığı güçlü felsefi fikirleri nasıl ustalıkla harmanlayıp; dil, kuram ve gerçeklik üzerine çok yönlü bir tartışmaya olanak sağladığını incelenmektedir. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmanın amacı, romandaki kişiler tarafından aktarılan felsefi görüş ve düşüncelerin ne şekilde çok sesli bir anlatım içinde işlendiğini irdelemek ve Bakhtin’in kuramsallaştırdığı söylesimsel diyalojik ilişkinin, romanda oluşan çoğulluğu incelemeye elverişli diyalektik bir çerçeve sunduğunu vurgulamaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Iris Murdoch, Ağ, Rastlantısallık, Solipsizm, Dil, Kuram, Bakhtin, Söylesimsel (Diyalojik) İlişki, Çok Sesli Roman

Under the Polyphony of Voices: A Bakhtinian Reading of Iris Murdoch’s under the Net

Öz

Iris Murdoch’s highly-acclaimed novel Under the Net has often been studied in relation to the moral and philosophical issues that the novel raises. While the novel’s playful representation of these issues in the form of fiction is certainly significant, the question of how these issues are presented and voiced in the novel is equally noteworthy. Therefore, this study explores how Murdoch’s novel masterfully blends a multitude of philosophically compelling voices through which a multifaceted debate on the notions of language, theory and truth is rendered possible. Thus, the aim of this essay is to look into the various ways in which these voices, conveyed by the characters, are weaved together in a polyphonic narrative, and to argue that Bakhtin’s dialogic interrelation provides a dialectic frame to engage with the prevalent plurality constructed in the novel.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Iris Murdoch, Under the Net, Contingency, Solipsism, Language, Theory, Bakhtin, Dialogic Interrelation, Polyphonic Novel

Kaynakça

• BAKHTIN, Mikhail. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. (Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.
• BAKHTIN, Mikhail. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. (Ed. and Trans. Caryl Emerson). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
• BILES, Jack I. (1978). “An Interview with Iris Murdoch”. Studies in Literary Imagination. 11(2): 115-125.
• BOOTH, Wayne C. (1984). “Introduction”. In Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. (Ed. and Trans. Caryl Emerson). (xiii-xviii). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
• BOVE, Cheryl K. (1986). Understanding Iris Murdoch. New York: Chelsea House Publishers.
• BRADBURY, Malcolm. (1962). “Iris Murdoch’s Under the Net”. Critical Quarterly. 1(1): 47-54.
• BYATT, A.S. (1976). Iris Murdoch. London: Longman.
• BYATT, A.S. (1992). Passions of the Mind: Selected Writings. New York: Turtle.
• CONRADI, Peter J. (1987). Iris Murdoch: The Saint and the Artist. Houndmills and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• CONRADI, Peter J. (1994). “Platonism in Iris Murdoch”. In Platonism and the English Imagination. (Ed. Anna Baldwin and Sarah Hutton). (330-342). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• CONRADI, Peter J. (2001). Iris Murdoch: A Life. London: Harper Collins.
• GARDINER, Michael. (1992). The Dialogics of Critique: M. M. Bakhtin and the Theory of Ideology. London and New York: Routledge.
• HAGUE, Angela. (1984). Iris Murdoch’s Comic Vision. London and Toronto: Associated University Presses.
• JOHNSON, Deborah. (1987). Iris Murdoch. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
• KENYON, Olga. (1988). Women Novelists Today. Sussex: The Harvester Press.
• KERMODE, Frank. (1977). “The House of Fiction: Interviews with Seven Novelists”. In The Novel Today: Contemporary Writers on Modern Fiction. (Ed. Malcolm Bradbury). (111-135). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• LEAVIS, L.R. (1988). “The Anti-Artist; The Case of Iris Murdoch”. Neophilologus. 72: 136-154.
• LODGE, David. (1990a). After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism. London and New York: Routledge.
• LODGE, David. (1990b). “The Novel Now: Theories and Practices”. In Why the Novel Matters: A Postmodern Perplex. (Ed. Mark Spilka and Caroline McCracken-Flesher). (136-154). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
• MURDOCH, Iris. (1959). “The Sublime and the Beautiful Revisited”. The Yale Review. 49: 247-271.
• MURDOCH, Iris. (1977a). “Against Dryness: A Polemical Sketch”. In The Novel Today: Contemporary Writers on Modern Fiction. (Ed. Malcolm Bradbury). (23-47). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• MURDOCH, Iris. (1977b). Sartre: Romantic Rationalist. London: Fontana.
• O’BELLAMY, Michael. (1977). “An Interview with Iris Murdoch”. Contemporary Literature. 18(2): 129-140.
• SPEAR, Hilda D. (1995). Iris Murdoch. London: Macmillan.
• TODD, Richard. (1987). Contemporary Writers: Iris Murdoch. London: Methuen & Co.
• TURNER, Jack. (1993). Murdoch vs. Freud: A Freudian Look at Anti-Freudian. New York: Peter Lang.