POSTMODERN ROMANDA KARAKTER: JOHN FOWLES'IN MANTISSA ROMANININ POSTMODERN KARAKTER BAĞLAMINDA İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 2, 1000 - 1019, 01.01.2017

Mürüvvet Mira Pınar Dolaykaya

Öz

The concept of character is quite a problematic term in postmodern ction since postmodern texts overtly subvert and transgress the conventions of characterization in the novels of previous ages. In relation to the paradoxical and ambiguous nature of postmodernism, character undergoes a radical transformation in postmodern ction, and it cannot be pinned down with regards to the conventions of characterization. The character in postmodern ction becomes a site where the ontological concerns of postmodernism that the text rests upon are reverberated. Thus, postmodern problematization of such contentious concepts as self, identity, essence, history writing, ction, and fact is carried out and presented through postmodern characterization in the novel genre. Deprived of characters in the conventional sense, postmodern ction can thus be claimed to establish its own conventions of characterization. Hence, this paper analyses John Fowles' Mantissa 1982 so as to discuss how postmodern ction utilizes characterization to reverberate certain issues problematized in postmodern context and hence puts forth its own character conventions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Postmodernism, Postmodern Novel, Postmodern Character, John Fowles, Mantissa

CHARACTERIZATION IN POSTMODERN NOVEL: ANALYSIS OF JOHN FOWLES' MANTISSA IN THE CONTEXT OF POSTMODERN CHARACTER

Öz

Postmodern romanın önceki dönemlerde yazılan romanlardaki karakter geleneklerine karşı gelmesi ve bu gelenekleri yıkması nedeniyle postmodern edebiyatta karakter kavramı bir sorunsal teşkil etmektedir. Postmodernizmin çelişkili ve belirsiz doğasıyla ilişkili olarak, postmodern romanda karakter önemli ölçüde dönüşüme uğramakta ve alışılagelmiş karakter özellikleri dâhilinde tanımlanamamaktadır. Postmodern karakter, metnin postmodernizmin ortaya koyduğu ontolojik sorunları yansıttığı bir alan olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu sebeple, postmodernizmin sorunsallaştırdığı özbenlik, kimlik, öz, tarih yazını, kurmaca ve gerçek gibi kavramlar postmodern romanda karakterler üzerinden tartışılmaktadır. Sonuç olarak geleneksel anlamda karakterden yoksun olan postmodern romanın kendi karakter geleneklerini ortaya koyduğu söylenebilir. Bu bağlamda bu makale John Fowles'ın Mantissa 1982 isimli romanını postmodern edebiyatın karakteri postmodernizmin sorunsallaştırdığı belli başlı meseleleri yansıtmak için nasıl kullandığı ve böylelikle kendi karakter geleneklerini nasıl ortaya koyduğunu tartışmak üzere inceleyecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Postmodernizm, Postmodern Roman, Postmodern Karakter, John Fowles, Mantissa

Kaynakça

• Amerika, Mark. “The Word-Being Talks: An Interview with Ray Federman.” N.d. Web. 18 July 2014.
• Barthes, Roland. “Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives.” ImageMusic-Text. Trans. Stephen Heath. London: Fontana, 1977. 79-124.
• ---. “The Death of the Author.” Image-Music-Text. Trans. Stephen Heath. London: Fontana, 1977. 142-48.
• Bertens, Hans. “The Debate on Postmodernism.” International Postmodernism: Theory and Literary Practice. Eds. Hans Bertens and Douwe Fokkema. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997. 3-14.
• Cazzato, Luigi. “Hard Metafiction and the Return of the Author Subject: The Decline of Postmodernism?” Postmodern Subjects/ Postmodern Texts. Eds. Jane Dowson and Steven Earnshaw. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1995. 25-41.
• Cixous, Helene. “The Character of Character.” Volleys of Humanity: Essays 1972- 2009. Ed. Eric Prenowitz. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2011. 41-60.
• Docherty, Thomas. “A Constant Reality: The Presentation of Character in the Fiction of John Fowles.” NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction 14.2 (Winter, 1981): 118- 134. JSTOR. Web. 24 August 2012.
• Eco, Umberto. “Lector in Fabula: Pragmatic Strategy in a Metanarrative Text.” The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984. 200-260.
• Eddins, Dwight. “John Fowles: Existence as Autorship.” Contemporary Literature 17.2 (1976): 204-22. JSTOR. Web. 11 December 2013.
• Elias, Amy J. “Meta-mimesis? The Problem of Postmodern British Postmodern Realism.” British Postmodern Fiction. Eds. Theo D’haen and Hans Bertens. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1993. 9-31.
• Eliot, George. Adam Bede. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth, 1997.
• Federman, Raymond. “Surfiction: A Postmodern Position.” Critifiction: Postmodern Essays. New York: State University of New York Press, 1993. 35-47.
• Fokkema, Aleid. Postmodern Characters: A Study of Characterization in British and American Postmodern Fiction. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1991.
• Fokkema, Douwe. “The Semiotics of Literary Postmodernism.” International Postmodernism: Theory and Literary Practice. Eds. Hans Bertens and Douwe Fokkema Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997. 15-42.
• Foucault, Michel. “What is an Author?” Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. Ed. James D. Faubion. Trans. Robert Hurley et al. New York: The New Press, 1998. 205- 222.
• Fowles, John. Mantissa. London: Vintage, 2009.
• Gubrium, Jaber F., and James A. Holstein. “Grounding the Postmodern Self.” The Sociological Quarterly 35. 4 (1994): 685-703. JSTOR. Web. 25 December 2015.
• Haegert, John. “Memoirs of a Deconstructive Angel: The Heroine as Mantissa in the Fiction of John Fowles.” Contemporary Literature 27. 2 (1986): 160-181.
• Hassan, Ihab. “Quest for the Subject: The Self in Literature.” Contemporary Literature 29. 3 (1988): 420-37. JSTOR. Web. 19 June 2012.
• Hill, Roy Mack. “Power and Hazard: John Fowles‟s Theory of Play.” Journal of Modern Literature 8.2 (1980-1981): 211-218. JSTOR. Web. 28 February 2014.
• James, Henry. “The Art of Fiction.” The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch. New York: Norton, 2001. 855-869.
• Jouve, Nicole Ward. “Virginia Woolf and Psychoanalysis.” The Cambridge Companion to Virginia Woolf. Eds. Sue Rose and Susan Sellers. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. 245- 272.
• Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report On Knowledge. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
• McHale, Brian. Postmodernist Fiction. London and New York: Routledge, 2004. Taylor & Francis. Web. 2 May 2012.
• Meinert, Roland G., John T. Pardeck, and John W. Murphy eds. Postmodernism, Religion and the Future of Social Work. New York: Haworth, 2007.
• Onega, Susana. “Self, World, and Art in the Fiction of John Fowles.” Twentieth Century Literature 42.1 (Spring, 1996): 29-57. JSTOR. Web. 11 December 2013.
• Phillips, Brian. “Character in Contemporary Fiction.” The Hudson Review 56. 4 (2004): 629-42. JSTOR. Web. 21 June 2014.
• Salami, Mahmoud. John Fowles’s Fiction and the Poetics of Postmodernism. London: Associated UP, 1992.
• Watt, Ian. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1959.
• Woolf, Virginia. Mr. Bennett and Mrs. Brown. London: The Hogarth, 1924.
• ---. “The Modern Fiction.” The Essays of Virginia Woolf: Volume 4: 1925 to 1928. Ed. Andrew McNeille. London: The Hogarth, 1984. 157-165.