BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

TÜRKÇE ÖFKE METAFORLARI

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 1, 302 - 326, 01.01.2017

Öz

Bilişsel dilbilim alanındaki çalışmalar metaforların duyguların kavramlaştırılmasında önemli bir rolü olduğunu, söz konusu kavramlaştırmaların dillerin doğasına özgü özelliklere yönelik ipuçları sunduğunu ortaya koymuştur Lakoff 405; Kövecses, Metaphor and Emotion 15; Kövecses, Metaphor in Culture 34 . Bilişsel bakış açısıyla en sık çalışılan duygu kavramlarından birisi olan öfke kavramı, dillere özgü kültürel farklılıkları belirlemede oldukça önemli bir role sahiptir Lakoff ve Kövecses 200; Yu 60; Soriano 110; Kövecses, Handbook of Anger, 164; Kövecses ve diğerleri 350 . Türkçe'de de öfke metaforlarının genel ve kültüre özgü kavramlaştırmalarını ortaya koymayı amaçlayan öncü çalışmalar bulunmaktadır Aksan, Metaphors of Anger 31; Aksan, The Container Metaphor 103 . Bu çalışmanın temel amacı Türkçe öfke metaforlarını bilişsel dilbilim bakış açısıyla ele almak ve kültüre özgü görünümlerini betimlemektir. Söz konusu amaca ulaşmak için gazete haber metinlerinden ve köşe yazılarından oluşturulan bir veri tabanında yer alan öfke metaforlarının dağılımları ve metaforik eşlemeleri belirlenmiştir. Çalışmanın bulguları Türkçeye özgü bilişsel modelde kap, doğal güç ve rakip metaforlarının belirgin rolü olduğunu; Türkçeye özgü modelin Lakoff ve Kövecses 200 tarafından Amerikan İngilizcesi için geliştirilen bilişsel modelle ortak özellikler sergilediğini, ancak kültüre özgü kimi farklılıklar gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur.

Kaynakça

  • Aksan, Mustafa, "‘Metaphors of Anger: An Outline of a Cultural Model’." Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi/Journal of Linguistics and Literature 3.1 (2006): 31-59.
  • ---. "The Container Metaphor in Turkish Expressions of Anger’." Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi/Journal of Linguistics and Literature 3.2 (2006): 103-24.
  • Foolen, Ad. "The Expressive Function of Language: Towards a Cognitive Semantic Approach." The Language of Emotions: Conceptualization, Expressions, and the Theoretical Foundation. By René Dirven and Susanne Niemeier.
  • Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publ, 1997. 15-33.
  • Kövecses, Zoltan. Metaphor and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge U Press, 2000.
  • ---. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: U Press, 2005.
  • ---. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • ---. "Cross-Cultural Experience of Anger: A Psycholinguistic Analysis." International Handbook of Anger: Constituent and Concomitant Biological, Psychological, and Social Processes. By Michael Potegal, Gerhard Stemmler, and Charles Donald Spielberger. New York: Springer, 2010. 157-174.
  • Kövecses, Zoltan, et al. “Anger Metaphors across Languages: A Cognitive Linguistic Perspective”, Bilingual Figurative Language Processing. By Roberto Heredia and Anna Cieslicka, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. 341-367.
  • Lakoff, George. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By:. Chicago, I.: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • Lakoff, George, and Zoltán Kövecses. "The Cognitive Model of Anger Inherent in
  • American English." Cultural Models in Language and Thought. By Dorothy C. Holland and Naomi Quinn. Cambridge: Cambridge U Press, 1987. 195-221.
  • Maalej, Zouhair. "Figurative Language in Anger Expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An Extended View of Embodiment." Metaphor and Symbol 19.1 (2004): 51-75.
  • Web. 17 February 2015.
  • Mikolajczuk, Agnieszka. "The metonymic and metaphorical conceptualisation of anger in Polish." Speaking of Emotions: Conceptualisation and Expression. By Angeliki Athanasiadou and Elżbieta Tabakowska. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2010. 153-191.
  • Rosch, Elanor. "Principles of Categorization." Cognition and Categorization. By Eleanor Rosch and Barbara B. Lloyd. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1978. 27-48.
  • Soriano, Cristina. "Some Anger Metaphors In Spanish And English. A Contrastive Review." International Journal of English Studies 3.2 (2003): 107-22. Web. 05 June 2016.
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. "Defining Emotion Concepts." Cognitive Science 16.4 (1992): 539- 81. Web. 22 February 2017.
  • ---. Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. New York: Oxford U Press, 1992.
  • ---. Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge U Press, 2005.
  • Yu, Ning. "Metaphorical Expressions of Anger and Happiness in English and Chinese." Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10.2 (1995): 59-92. Web. 12 January 2017.

TURKISH METAPHORS OF ANGER

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 1, 302 - 326, 01.01.2017

Öz

Studies in Cognitive Linguistics have established that metaphors have an important role in the conceptualization of feelings, and that these conceptualizations present clues about the properties unique to the nature of languages. Lakoff, 405; Kövecses, Metaphor and Emotion 15; Kövecses, Metaphor in Culture 34 . The concept of anger, which is one of the most frequently studied feeling concepts examined with a cognitive view, has a signicantly important role in determining the cultural differences of the languages Lakoff and Kövecses 200; Yu 60; Soriano 110; Kövecses, Handbook of Anger 164; Kövecses et al. 350 . There have been prominent studies in Turkish as well which aim to put forward the general and culture specic conceptualizations of anger metaphors Aksan, Metaphors of Anger 31; Aksan, The Container Metaphor 103 . The aim of this study is to analyze Turkish anger metaphors and to describe their culture specic views. To reach this aim, the distribution and metaphorical mappings of anger metaphors in a database, which has been built from news articles and newspaper columns, have been determined. The ndings of the study show that the metaphors of container, natural force and opponent have signicant role in the cognitive model specic to Turkish; and that the Turkish specic model displays common properties with the model developed by Lakoff and Kövecses 200 for American English, aside from having some culture specic differences.

Kaynakça

  • Aksan, Mustafa, "‘Metaphors of Anger: An Outline of a Cultural Model’." Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi/Journal of Linguistics and Literature 3.1 (2006): 31-59.
  • ---. "The Container Metaphor in Turkish Expressions of Anger’." Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi/Journal of Linguistics and Literature 3.2 (2006): 103-24.
  • Foolen, Ad. "The Expressive Function of Language: Towards a Cognitive Semantic Approach." The Language of Emotions: Conceptualization, Expressions, and the Theoretical Foundation. By René Dirven and Susanne Niemeier.
  • Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publ, 1997. 15-33.
  • Kövecses, Zoltan. Metaphor and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge U Press, 2000.
  • ---. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: U Press, 2005.
  • ---. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • ---. "Cross-Cultural Experience of Anger: A Psycholinguistic Analysis." International Handbook of Anger: Constituent and Concomitant Biological, Psychological, and Social Processes. By Michael Potegal, Gerhard Stemmler, and Charles Donald Spielberger. New York: Springer, 2010. 157-174.
  • Kövecses, Zoltan, et al. “Anger Metaphors across Languages: A Cognitive Linguistic Perspective”, Bilingual Figurative Language Processing. By Roberto Heredia and Anna Cieslicka, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. 341-367.
  • Lakoff, George. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By:. Chicago, I.: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • Lakoff, George, and Zoltán Kövecses. "The Cognitive Model of Anger Inherent in
  • American English." Cultural Models in Language and Thought. By Dorothy C. Holland and Naomi Quinn. Cambridge: Cambridge U Press, 1987. 195-221.
  • Maalej, Zouhair. "Figurative Language in Anger Expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An Extended View of Embodiment." Metaphor and Symbol 19.1 (2004): 51-75.
  • Web. 17 February 2015.
  • Mikolajczuk, Agnieszka. "The metonymic and metaphorical conceptualisation of anger in Polish." Speaking of Emotions: Conceptualisation and Expression. By Angeliki Athanasiadou and Elżbieta Tabakowska. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2010. 153-191.
  • Rosch, Elanor. "Principles of Categorization." Cognition and Categorization. By Eleanor Rosch and Barbara B. Lloyd. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1978. 27-48.
  • Soriano, Cristina. "Some Anger Metaphors In Spanish And English. A Contrastive Review." International Journal of English Studies 3.2 (2003): 107-22. Web. 05 June 2016.
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. "Defining Emotion Concepts." Cognitive Science 16.4 (1992): 539- 81. Web. 22 February 2017.
  • ---. Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. New York: Oxford U Press, 1992.
  • ---. Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge U Press, 2005.
  • Yu, Ning. "Metaphorical Expressions of Anger and Happiness in English and Chinese." Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10.2 (1995): 59-92. Web. 12 January 2017.
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Elif Arıca Akkök Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 57 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Arıca Akkök, E. (2017). TURKISH METAPHORS OF ANGER. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 57(1), 302-326.

Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.   22455