Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 1310 - 1328, 31.07.2021

Ali Ateş Semiha Poyraz Ömer Çoban

https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.846885

Öz

Earthquake is a natural phenomenon that cannot be ignored in Turkey as in the world. Since Turkey is located in the earthquake zone, research on these issues has increased in recent years in Turkey. In this study, the effects of the earthquake on the reinforced concrete and masonry/mixed buildings in the central neighborhoods of Bilecik province were examined by the Street Survey Method. In this context, a total of 1391 buildings including 1021 reinforced concrete and 370 masonry/mixed buildings on the central districts of Bilecik were examined. The average building earthquake scores for the reinforced concrete and masonry/mixed buildings of each neighborhood were calculated. In terms of reinforced concrete buildings, Bahçelievler, Cumhuriyet, Gazipaşa, Ismetpaşa and Istiklal neighborhoods were found to be at Low Risk in terms of Building Earthquake Safety, while Beşiktaş, Ertuğrulgazi and Hürriyet neighborhoods were found to be Safe in terms of Building Earthquake Safety. All masonry/mixed buildings were found to be Safe in terms of Building Earthquake Safety.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Earthquake, Reinforced concrete buildings, Masonry/Mixed buildings, Street survey method, Bilecik province

Sokaktan Tarama Yöntemiyle Binaların Bölgesel Deprem Risk Dağılımının Belirlenmesi: Bilecik İli Örneği

Öz

Depremler dünyada olduğu gibi ülkemizde de göz ardı edilemeyecek bir doğa olayıdır. Ülkemizin deprem kuşağında yer alması sebebiyle bu hususlardaki araştırmalar son yıllarda artış göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada Bilecik ilinin merkez mahallelerinde, depremin betonarme ve yığma/karma binalar üzerinde oluşturabileceği etkiler Sokaktan Tarama Yöntemiyle ele alınmıştır. Bu kapsamda Bilecik ili merkez mahalleleri (Bahçelievler, Beşiktaş, Cumhuriyet, Ertuğrulgazi, Gazipaşa, Hürriyet, İsmetpaşa, İstiklal) üzerinde bulunan 1021 betonarme ve 370 yığma/karma olmak üzere toplam 1391 adet bina incelenmiştir. Her bir mahallenin betonarme ve yığma/karma binalar için ayrı ayrı ortalama Bina Deprem Puanları hesaplanmıştır. Betonarme binalar açısından Bahçelievler, Cumhuriyet, Gazipaşa, İsmetpaşa ve İstiklal mahalleleri Bina Deprem Güvenirliği açısından Düşük Riskli iken Beşiktaş, Ertuğrulgazi ve Hürriyet mahallelerinin Bina Deprem Güvenirliği açısından Güvenli olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Yığma/karma binalar açısından tüm mahalleler Bina Deprem Güvenirliği açısından Güvenli bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Deprem, Betonarme binalar, Yığma/Karma binalar, Sokaktan tarama yöntemi, Bilecik ili

Kaynakça

• [1] M.Mohammadı,“Investigation of earthquake performance of reinforced concrete-masonry mixed structures,” M.S. thesis,Graduate Education Institute, Konya Technical University, Konya, Turkey, 2019.
• [2] A. Akgönen, “Investigation of earthquake resistant building design and repair reinforcement techniques,” M.S.thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, 05.
• [3] A. GürbüzandM. Tekin, “Determination of regional earthquake risk distribution of existing buildings by performance ranking method,”Celal Bayar University Journal of Science.,vol. 11, no 1, pp. 37-48, 2015.
• [4] M. Özkaratay, “Evaluation of a 6-storey Reinforced Concrete Building Demolished İn Düzce Earthquake With Different Methods,” M.S. thesis, Institute of Science, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey, 2014.
• [5] Z. Tozlu, Ö. Anıl and M. Şahmaran,“Comprehensive Field Application of The Rapid Assessment Technique Within The Scope of The Urban Transformation Law No. 6306: The Example of Niğde,”3. Turkey Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Conference.,İzmir, Turkey, 2015.
• [6] R. Temür,“Rapid Due Diligence (DURTES) Method and development of a computer program,” M.S.thesis, Institute of Science, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey, 2006.
• [7] E. Işık andZ. Tozlu, “Calculation of structure performance score using different variables,”BEÜ Journal of Science, BEU Journal of Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 161-172, 2015.
• [8] D. Okuyucu, G. Savaş, B. Gedik, M. Şuşarlıoğlu and T. Kara, “Determination of regional earthquake risk distribution of buildings by street scanning method: Erzurum - Yenişehir example,”Fırat University Journal of Engineering Sciences,vol.30,no. 1, pp. 219-231, 2018.
• [9] H. Tokgöz, and H. Bayraktar, “Application of Street Scanning Method in The İdentification of Risky Buildings in Düzce Province Kaynaşlı District,”Düzce University Journal of Science and Technology, vol.3, no.1, pp. 107–116, 2015.
• [10] A. Yakut, “Examınatıon of Seısmıc Performance Assessment Procedures For Rc Buıldıngs ın Turkey,”Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, Alaska, July 21-25, 2014.
• [11] İ. B. Karaşin andE. Işık, “Evaluation of an existing masonry structure with different rapid evaluation methods,”Journal of Dicle University Institute of Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 70-76, 2016.
• [12] Bilecik Province Environmental Status Report for 2017. (2019, Jan 1). ÇED, Permission and Inspection General Directorate Environmental Inventory and Information Management Department, Ankara, [Online]. Available:https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/icerikler/b-lec-k_-cdr2017-20180611172347.pdf.
• [13] Bilecik ili haritası. (2018, Jan 1). [Online]. Available:http://cografyaharita.com/haritalarim/4l_bilecik_ili_haritasi.png.
• [14] Inspection of Existing Structures and Building Inspection Commission Report,Earthquake Council, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, 2004.
• [15] B. Özdemir,“A field study on the determination of earthquake risks of buildings using the first level assessment method: an example of Giresun Province Şebinkarahisar District,” M.S.thesis, Institute of Science, Karadeniz Technical University,Trabzon, Turkey,2015.
• [16] H. Sucuoğlu, “Determination of earthquake risks in urban building stocks by street scanning method,”Sixth National Earthquake Engineering Conference,İstanbul, Turkey, 2007.
• [17] B. Görgün and N. Ural, “Determination of Seismicity of Bilecik City Center,”El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 394-402, 2018.
• [18] AFAD (2019, Jan 1). T.C. Ministry of Interior, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Earthquake Department. [Online]. Available: https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/