II. Dünya Savaşı Öncesi Dönemde Devletlerin Tanınmasında Etkili Olan Faktörler

Öz

Bu makale uluslararası topluma üyeliği düzenleyen devletlerin tanınması konusunu tarihsel örneklerle incelemektedir. Son yirmi yılda dünyanın birçok bölgesinde yeni devlet olma veya yeniden devlet olma iddialarına tanık olunmaktadır. Bu iddia edenlerden Eritre, Slovenya, Hırvatistan Bosna-Hersek ve Kosova gibileri başarıya ulaştılar, Bouganville, Güney Osetya ve Çeçenistan da ise başarılı olmadılar. Bununla birlikte, bu iddiaların çoğunun ileri sürüldüğü ülkelerde şiddetli çatışmalar ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çalışma devletlerin tanınması konusunu kapsamlı bir şekilde araştırmaktadır. Bu çalışma tarihsel örneklerinden kolayca çıkartılabilecek derslerin günümüzdeki sorunlara çözüm sağlayacağını ümit etmemekle birlikte, geçmişte benzer sorunlara bulunan çözümlerin günümüzdeki benzer sorunlarla bazı ortak özelikler taşıdığını görmek mümkündür

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tanıma,Uluslararası Güvenlik, Belçika,Yunanistan, Polonya, Yugoslavya

Effective Factors on Recognition of State Before World War II Period

Öz

This article examines recognition of new states, the pratice historically employed to regulate membership in international society. The Last twenty years have witnessed novel or reinvigorated demands for statehood in many areas of the world. The claims of some, like those Eritrea, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia Herzegovina, Kosovo, achieved recognition, those of others, like Bouganville, South Osetia and Chechnya, did not. However, even as most of these claims gave rise to serious conflicts. This study seeks a comprehensive grasp of the pratice of state recognition. It does so not out of hope that history store readily discernible solutions to current problems, but rather out of expectation that We may learn from past responses that shared at least some common features with the present ones.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Recognition, International Security, Belgium, Greece, Poland, Yugoslavia

Kaynakça

1. AGNEW, Hugh Lecaine, ”New States, Old Identities? The Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Historical Understandings of Statehood”, Nationalities Papers, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2000,s.619-650.
2. BISKUPSKI, M.B., The History of Poland, Greenwood Press, London, 2000.
3. CLOGG, Richard, Modern Yunanistan Tarihi, çev. Dilek Şendil, İletişim Yayınevi, İstanbul,1997.
4. CRAWLEY, C.W. , The Question of Greek Independence: A Study of British Policy in the Near East, 1821–1833, Cambridge,1930, http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=4912048# (11.02.2009).
5. FISHMAN, J.S., Diplomacy and Revolation: The London Conference of 1830 and the Belgian Revolt,CHEV,Amesterdam,1988.
6. HALECKI, O., History of Poland, J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.,London,1955.
7. HEATER, Derek, National Self-Determination, Macmillan, London,1994.
8. HOUSE, Edward Mandell, SEYMOUR, Charles, What Really Happened at Paris: The Story of the Peace Conference, 1918–1919, Charles Sribner’s Sons, New York, 1921. http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=809920# (19.04.2009).

9. KELLY, Michael J., “ Political Downsizing: The Re- Emergence of SelfDetermination, And The Movement Toward Smaller, Ethnically Homoceneous States”, Drake Law Review, Vol.47,No.2,1999,s.211-276.
10. LAL, Shiv, Politico-Legal History of Nations, Poland, New Delhi, 1996.
11. LOWE, Jhon, Britain and Foreign Affairs, 1815–1885: Europe and Overseas, Routledge, London and New York,1998.
12. MAMATEY, Victor S. – LUZA, Radomir, The History of Czechoslovakia Republic 1918–1948, Princeton University Press, New Jersey,1973.
13. MANSEL, Philip , “The Foundation Of Belgium”, History Today, Vol.56,No.5,2006, ss.21-27.
14. POLISENKY, J.V., History of Czechoslovakia in Outline, London,1991.
15. bridge History of Poland, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,1941. STACHURA, Peter D., Poland in the Twentieth Century, St. Martin's Press, London, New York,1999 . Belgeler
16. Annex B to Protokol No.10., House of Commons Parliamentary Papers ,Vol.42,1833,s.300-305. Belgian Events, Publication of the Belgian Embassy in London, London, 2005,s.13. http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUSidx?type=goto&id=FRUS.FRUS1914- 1920v2&isize=M&submit=Go+to+page&page=139 (Erişim tarihi 25.03.2009). http://www.diplomatie.be/london/media/london/SpecialBE0512.pdf (Erişim tarihi 24.08.2009).
17. Protocol no.19, 19 Februrary 1833, House of Commons Parliamentary Papers, Vol.42,1833,s.315-318.
18. Protocol of December 12, House of Commons Parliamentary Papers , Vol.32,1828,s.661–681.
19. Protokol no. 11,January 20,1831 and Protokol no.12, January 27,1831, House of Commons Parliamentary Papers, Vol.32,1833,s.306–308. Protokol no.7, December20 ,1830, House of Commons Parliamentary
20. Papers, Vol.42,1833,s.298-301.
21. United States Department of State / Papers relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States. The Lansing papers, 1914-1920 (in two volumes),Volume II (1914-1920),s.139-140.